24년 연말 중국공장 증설 발표가 주가 트리거였으며, 기점일 대비 주가 +124% 상승 +밀양 2공장 가동 기대감 현재도 패턴 유사. 27년 1월 중국공장 가동이 예정되어있는 상황에서 베트남 공장 증설 발표
❤6👍2

Channel
@jeilstock
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,239subscribers
-227 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001441903995 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jeilstock |
| Description | 매일 아침 국내외 시황 브리핑, 종목분석, 증권사 리포트 요약, 투자 방법 공부까지 - 주식 초보자부터 숙련자까지 모두 쉽고 재밌게 보는 대표 주식 정보 채널입니다. |
| Created | 22 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jeilstock |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 8 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @HanaResearch/2022413 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC | @jeilstock/46098 · this entry13 Aug 2026, 23:01 UTC | 1.00 | 8.4 hours |
| @HanaResearch/2027219 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC | @jeilstock/46168 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC | 1.00 | 3.3 hours |
| @HanaResearch/2049822 Sept 2026, 22:23 UTC | @jeilstock/46638 · this entry22 Sept 2026, 23:40 UTC | 1.00 | 76 minutes |
| @jeilstock/46130 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 23:07 UTC | @YeouidoStory2/11620017 Aug 2026, 23:08 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @jeilstock/46156 · this entry18 Aug 2026, 23:33 UTC | @YeouidoStory2/11626418 Aug 2026, 23:34 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @jeilstock/46297 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 23:37 UTC | @YeouidoStory2/11667827 Aug 2026, 23:41 UTC | 1.00 | 4 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @HanaResearch | 13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 73 minutes | @HanaResearch (13–0) |
| @YeouidoStory2 | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.99 | 3 minutes | this entry (6–2) |
| @corevalue | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 10 minutes | @corevalue (4–2) |
| @Yeouido_Lab | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 13 minutes | @Yeouido_Lab (8–2) |
| @pharmbiohana | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 23 minutes | this entry (5–1) |
| @bornlupin | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 26 minutes | @bornlupin (4–2) |
| @umbrellaresearch | 9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 7 minutes | this entry (5–4) |
| @Ten_level | 6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 16 minutes | @Ten_level (4–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 17 of the 17 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 373 comparable posts for this entry, running 6 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 16:51 | 26,239 | -5 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 20:55 | 26,244 | -8 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 12:11 | 26,252 | -7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:11 | 26,259 | -6 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 00:45 | 26,265 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 01:41 | 26,273 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:37 | 26,272 | +9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 02:46 | 26,263 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:28 | 26,270 | -5 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:55 | 26,275 | -2 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 22:54 | 26,277 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 26,283 | -1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 04:09 | 26,284 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:45 | 26,286 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 26,289 | +2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 26,287 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 26,297 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 26,304 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:15 | 26,305 | -9 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 05:59 | 26,314 | first reading |
966 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 327 of 368 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 966 (6 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 857,571 |
| Reactions total | 2,194 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 18:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
5,503 reactions across 837 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2,913 | 52.9% | |
| ❤ | 1,745 | 31.7% | |
| 🙏 | 340 | 6.18% | |
| 👏 | 285 | 5.18% | |
| 🔥 | 220 | 4.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 851 of the 966 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,503 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 966 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 368 posts held from the last 30 days (2.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
24년 연말 중국공장 증설 발표가 주가 트리거였으며, 기점일 대비 주가 +124% 상승 +밀양 2공장 가동 기대감 현재도 패턴 유사. 27년 1월 중국공장 가동이 예정되어있는 상황에서 베트남 공장 증설 발표
❤6👍2
[11.11] 증시 마감시황 및 오늘의 특징주 https://hibulls.com/?p=89468 https://naver.me/xEXeh4eN
👍6❤1
[삼양식품, 베트남 신공장 투자 관련 코멘트_유안타 손현정] -베트남 신공장 건설에 2,186억원 투자 결정. 2029년 1월 준공 목표. 초기 1개 생산라인을 설치하되, 향후 총 8개 라인까지 확장 가능한 공장을 선제적으로 건설 -생산CAPA 전망 2026년 25억식 → 2027년 38억식 → 2029년 39억식 → 중장기 최대 49억식 -베트남 최종 8개 라인 구축 시 연간 약 10~11억식 추가, 2027년 대비 생산능력 약 30% 확대 가능 1. 2029년부터 추가 매출 기여 시작 -2027년 중국 자싱공장(11.3억식) 가동으로 글로벌 CAPA 약 37.8억식 확보 -2029년 베트남 초기 1개 라인 가동 시 CAPA 약 1.2~1.4억식 추가 예상. 글로벌 CAPA 약 39억식으로 확대 -초기 1개 라인 기준 연간 매출 잠재력…
👍4❤3
코스닥 살리기 나서는 정부…13일 거래소서 대책 논의 -금융위 주재…이재명 대통령 참석 가능성도 -코스닥 활성화 포함 3가지 안건 논의할 예정…구체적 내용은 아직 미공개 -"증시 저평가" 언급, 이 대통령 메시지 주목 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/648/0000052522?sid=101
🙏5👍1
중국 자싱 공장에 이어 두 번째 해외 생산거점이네요. 의미가 큰 것 같습니다!
👍7
삼양식품 타법인 주식 및 출자증권 취득결정 https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20261111800496
셀트리온 분기별 실적 추이
👍6❤4
셀트리온 스테키마, 유럽서 소아 치료 범위 넓힌다 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/016/0002721340?sid=101
지엔씨에너지 분기별 수주잔고 추이 국내 데이터센터 비상발전기 시장 점유율 약 70% 발전기 전체 매출의 99.9% 이상이 국내 고객사라 해외 데이터센터 규제 이슈에서 자유로움 3Q26 공시된 신규 수주만 2,541억원
👏6❤3
나노신소재 분기별 실적 추이 지난해 개정된 미국 세법은 배터리 부품 생산 세액공제(45X)에 중국 등 우려 기업 관련 제한이 붙음 나노신소재는 미국 켄터키에서 배터리 소재(CNT 도전재)를 만드는 미국 안의 비중국 공급처 대표 경쟁사인 씨나노(Cnano)는 중국 기업
👏5❤1
뉴파워프라즈마 분기별 실적 추이
👏2👍1
해킹을 당한 회사가 가장 먼저 묻는 질문은 두 가지 ①누가 들어왔는가. ②들어와서 무엇을 했는가. 첫 번째 질문에 답하는 게 NAC(사내망에 들어오는 기기를 하나하나 확인해서, 등록된 기기만 들여보내는 출입 관리 시스템) 두 번째 질문에 답하는 게 EDR(PC 안에서 벌어지는 수상한 움직임을 잡아내 격리하는 감시 카메라) 지니언스는 이 두 가지를 다 만드는 보안 회사 공공조달 점유율 NAC 71%, EDR 46% 둘 다 국내 1위
👍6❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 966 posts we hold for @jeilstock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“이지스스트레티지 리서치” (@jeilstock), 26,239 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jeilstock.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.