#환율(달러인덱스) 및 #미국 테너 별 #국채 #금리 - 2년물 +15.2bp, 5년물 +16.5bp, 30년물도 +10bp 넘게 상승하며 마감 - 5년물 금리, 5% 선 탈환까지 단 3bp 단기적으로는 국채시장으로부터 도주한 자금이 #주식 시장을 부양하겠지만, 결국 #크레딧 문제를 무시할 수 없게 됩니다.

Channel
Polaristimes
@The_MariTimes
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,586subscribers
+319 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001393291031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @The_MariTimes |
| Description | ENGAGEMENT CONTACT: [email protected] ※ 공지 본인이 본 채널에서 밝혔던 / 밝히는 견해는 업데이트된 분석, 뉴스 및 향후 전개에 의해 변경될 수 있으며, 이 때 별도의 공지 의무를 지지 않습니다. 투자는 전적으로 투자자 본인의 판단이며 그 책임은 투자자 본인에게 귀속됩니다. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/The_MariTimes |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:55 | 7,586 | +25 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:57 | 7,561 | +90 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 18:57 | 7,471 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:50 | 7,474 | +2 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 7,472 | -2 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 7,474 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 7,476 | +13 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 7,463 | +2 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 7,461 | -3 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 17:39 | 7,464 | -7 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 16:42 | 7,471 | +91 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 05:59 | 7,380 | +5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 7,375 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:01 | 7,367 | +18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:46 | 7,349 | +28 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 7,321 | +13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 7,308 | -6 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 7,314 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:42 | 7,313 | +45 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 7,268 | first reading |
Engagement
423 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.4%
- avg views ÷ 7,586 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 790
- 295 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 295
- of 423 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 423 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 232,965 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 03:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈37,800
- Videos
- ≈24
- Links
- ≈22,500
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 76 of 295 posts held from the last 30 days (25.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#중국, 세계 해운 시장에서 중국 판 해상 보험 마련을 위해 움직이고 있어 사실 #브릭스 차원의 공동 보험사 등 이야기는 #탈달러 의 일환으로서 몇 년 전부터 나왔음에도 그 진척은 상당히 미진한 상황이었습니다만... 이제 슬슬 속도를 붙이려는 모양. #지정학 https://www.wsj.com/business/logistics/beijing-is-trying-to-build-a-chinese-rival-for-insuring-world-shipping-eaf8ccdb?reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink
샌프란시스코 연은 데일리 총재: - 추가적 #금리 인상이 필요할 것 - 하지만 #채권 금리 상승과 긴축적 금융 환경이 #연준 에게 시간을 더 벌어준다 - 당장 조치를 취할 필요는 없어 다른 연준 동료들과 대조할 때, 유독 완화적이죠? 그럴 수 밖에요. 메리 데일리 총재는 샌프란시스코 연은 총재이며, 샌프란 연은은 그 '실리콘밸리'를 관할 구역으로 두고 있는 지역 연은입니다. https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/fed-daly-says-more-rate-192423659.html
#미국 민주당 잭 리드 상원의원, NVDA가 소위 '대마불사' 기업인지, 그리고 #은행 시스템에 미칠 수 있는 영향을 평가해야 한다고 밝혀 1) 대마불사를 논한다는 것은, 엔비디아의 파산도 고려 대상이라는 뜻입니까? 2) 엔비디아 그 자체가 대마불사인지는 몰라도, 아까 전 이야기했듯, 이렇게 폭락한 주가가 그 자체로 NVDA #주식 을 담보로 한 레버리지에 대한 디레버리징 이벤트로 작용할 수는 있습니다. #정치 https://www.roic.ai/news/senator-reed-calls-for-assessment-of-whether-nvidia-is-too-big-to-fail-as-ceo-resigns-and-shares-tumble-11-12-2026
NVDA 젠슨 황, 세 번째 불륜 사실 드러나 - 또 다른 사내 직원과 불륜 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 진짜 인생 늘그막에 이게 무슨 꼴인지 https://www.reuters.com/technology/former-nvidia-ceo-huang-had-relationship-with-second-employee-sources-say-2026-11-12/
#미국 30년물 #국채 경매 - 낙찰 #금리, WI 대비 +0.4bp Tailing - 낙찰 경쟁률, 2.36:1로 급감 - 간접 수요 하락, PD 부담 증가 초장기채 경매는 여전히 좋지 못한 상황
하킴 제프리스 #미국 민주당 하원 원내대표, 연방 최저 #임금 인상 아이디어 띄워 #정치 https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/hakeem-jeffries-jb-pritzker-urge-120009258.html
remind. 만약 양 시장이 결론을 못 낸다면, 양 시장 모두가 약세를 띄게 됩니다.
#미국 #국채 투매 심화 - 2년물 금리 +13bp, 5년물 +13.6bp 상승 - 5년물은 어느덧 5% 선 근접 중, 10년물 금리는 5.1% 탈환
#미국 의회 양원 재무위원회, 러트닉 상무장관에게 NVDA #반도체 수출 관련 서한 발송 - 반도체 #관세 부과 및 수출 면허 인허가 관련, 그리고 그 외에 상무부-엔비디아 사이 오간 모든 기록을 보존하라고 요구 이제는 확실히 #정치 문제가 됐습니다. https://www.cnbc.com/video/2026/11/12/senate-and-house-to-launch-investigation-into-trump-whs-approval-of-nvidia-chip-exports-to-china.html
한편 로이터, 이번에는 #미국 이 올해 초 #베네수엘라 침공 및 이후 #석유 판매 관련 의혹에 대해 보도 - 정계 입문 초기부터 JD 밴스 부통령을 후원했던 글로벌 트레이딩 하우스 비톨(Vitol)에게, 밴스 부통령&크리스 라이트 #에너지 장관 등 트럼프 내각 인사들이 접촉 - 트럼프 내각 인사들, 비톨/트라피구라 등에게 베네수엘라 #원유 판매 라이센스를 입찰도 없이 제공 - 이 과정에서 사적 관계 및 이익이 작용했다는 의혹 불거져 #지정학 https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-vitol-traders-ties-jd-111121278.html
NVDA, SMCI, AAPL, #국채 #금리, #환율, #귀금속, #이란 등 #지정학 이벤트에 이르기까지, 오늘 시장의 움직임은 너무나도 어지럽고, 각 자산들이 각자의 이슈를 서로 주장하며 자기들의 움직임을 고집하고 있습니다. #매크로 관점에서 볼 때는 상당히 오랜만에 보는 혼란이라 할 수 있는데, 이러한 혼란이 결국 어느 방향으로 정리되는가가 관건일 것입니다. 결국, 크게 보자면 주식이 더 약세를 보일 것이냐, 국채가 더 약세를 보일 것이냐로 정리됩니다. 주식과 국채는 현재 서로가 서로의 #유동성 을 잡아먹는 형국입니다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 423 posts we hold for @The_MariTimes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@dots999 · 2023 postsFOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 9,3613 posts주식 급등일보🚀급등테마·대장주 탐색기 | Korean Stocks
@FastStockNews · 128,8112 posts캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,4832 posts디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 13,0252 postsPluto Research
@hedgehara · 19,6032 posts뺀지뤼의 SKLab.(스크랩)
@bbanjil · 10,6631 post간절한 투자스터디카페
@desperatestudycafe · 18,5101 post기술적 분석으로 보는 주식시장 (by 소라게아빠)
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,5061 post주식비서 시황/주도주/뉴스
@jusikbiso · 3,0071 post📉껑껑이의 메모장📈
@kkeongsmemo · 10,5331 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@kkkontemp · 21,169
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 30 September 2026
@rafikiresearch · 20,656
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@yieldnspread · 22,083
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 September 2026
@cahier_de_market · 23,110
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 September 2026
@mistergray_11 · 19,794
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 1 October 2026
@globaletfi · 20,610
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 September 2026
@hermitcrab41_1 · 21,506
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
@HANAchina · 35,273
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@athletes_village · 22,145
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
@daegurr · 23,789
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
@easobi · 23,419
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
@habit4117 · 28,295
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,206
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@desperatestudycafe · 18,510
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
@sypark_strategy · 29,245
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
@gaoshoukorea · 41,185
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 16 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Polaristimes” (@The_MariTimes), 7,586 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/The_MariTimes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.