Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 키움증권 전략/시황 한지영

Channel

키움증권 전략/시황 한지영

@hedgecat0301

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32,971subscribers

+132 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001304649917
TypeChannel
Username@hedgecat0301
Description국내외 시황, ETF, 금융, 경제, 투자 등
Created26 December 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hedgecat0301

Growth

32,83932,97132,9056 August 2026 — 32,839 subscribers6 August 2026 — 32,847 subscribers7 August 2026 — 32,876 subscribers8 August 2026 — 32,882 subscribers9 August 2026 — 32,898 subscribers10 August 2026 — 32,924 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32,927 subscribers12 August 2026 — 32,936 subscribers13 August 2026 — 32,950 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,971 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +132. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,819–32,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:5832,971+21
13 Aug 2026, 11:2632,950+14
12 Aug 2026, 13:4732,936+9
11 Aug 2026, 14:5332,927+3
10 Aug 2026, 11:2832,924+26
9 Aug 2026, 08:2132,898+16
8 Aug 2026, 11:2532,882+6
7 Aug 2026, 14:5632,876+29
6 Aug 2026, 13:4232,847+8
6 Aug 2026, 02:4832,839first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.0%
avg views ÷ 32,971 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,400
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.741%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held29 (21 July 202613 August 2026)
Views total592,440
Reactions total4,392
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
367
Videos
1
Links
1,630

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4,203 reactions across 28 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,29278.3%
🔥54112.9%
🥰3708.80%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,392reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈11,200 views130 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/14, 장 시작 전 생각: 수급의 퀄리티, 키움 한지영] - 다우 +0.1%, S&P500 +0.7%, 나스닥 +0.8% - 샌디스크 +13.8%, 마이크론 +4.2%, 시스코 -8.4% - WTI 81.0달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.63%, 달러/원 1,418.5원 1. 미국 증시는 강세를 보였습니다. 시스코(-8.4%)의 마진 둔화, 후티 반군의 사우디 정유시설 공격 등 불안 요인이 상존했지만, 7월 PPI 컨센 하회, 원유 재고 증가에 따른 유가 약세, 샌디스크(+13.8%)의 중장기 긍정적인 전망 제시 효과 등이 증시 상승을 견인했네요. 2. 직전일 7월 CPI의 컨센 부합 소식에 이어, 7월 PPI도 헤드라인과 코어 모두 각각 4.7%(YoY vs 컨센 4.9%), 4.2%(YoY, 컨센 4.2%)로 둔화됐습니다.

👍110🥰13🔥7

13 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈6,570 views49 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

(신용잔고, 예탁금, 외국인 수급) - 여전히 신용 부담은 가벼운 상태 - 예탁금 100조원 하회는 신경쓰이지만, 외국인 수급이 개인의 신규 실탄 보급 제한을 상쇄시켜줄 가능성

👍48🔥1

13 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈6,770 views55 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

(7월 30일 이후 코스피 26개 업종의 수익률) - 현재의 반등장은 소수업종 쏠림이 아닌 다수 업종으로 수익률 온기가 분산되는 등 증시 회복 탄력성이 개선되고 있는 환경

👍46🥰8🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC≈17,300 views159 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/13, 장 시작 전 생각: 외국인 플레이, 키움 한지영] - 다우 -0.04%, S&P500 +0.26%, 나스닥 +0.54% - 마이크론 +4.9%, 엔비디아 +3.0%, 코어위브 +19.3% - WTI 82.7달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.69%, 달러/원 1,417.1원 1. 미국 증시는 혼조세를 보였지만, 내용은 괜찮았습니다. 다우지수 신고가 경신에 따른 가치주 차익실현 물량 출회에도, 7월 CPI 컨센 부합에 따른 인플레이션 안도감, 코어위브(+19.3%), 슈퍼마이크로(+19.0%) 호실적발 AI 인프라 수요 호조 전망 등에 힘입어, 엔비디아(+3.0%), 마이크론(+4.9%), 샌디스크(+5.8%) 등 반도체 중심의 강세를 연출했습니다. 2. 미국의 7월 CPI는 헤드라인(YoY 3.4% vs 6월 3.5%과 코

👍127🥰21🔥11

11 Aug 2026, 22:41 UTC≈19,700 views159 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/12, 장 시작 전 생각: 변동성 스트레스 완화, 키움 한지영] - 다우 -0.3%, S&P500 -0.3%, 나스닥 -0.6% - 마이크론 +0.84%, 엔비디아 -0.03%, 코어위브 +2.4%(시간외 +13%대) - WTI 83.5달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.69%, 달러/원 1,412.7원 1. 미국 증시는 어제도 소폭 약세를 보였네요. 파키스탄 등 주변국의 미-이란 협상 중재 시도 소식에도, 호르무즈 해협 불확실성 지속, 7월 CPI 대기심리 등 매크로 경계감이 상존한 가운데, 엔비디아(-0.02%)의 5,000억달러 AI 인프라 금융 구축을 둘러싼 기대(투자 여력 확대)와 불안(부채 의존도, 수익성)도 공존했던 하루였습니다. 이제 시장은 미국의 7월 CPI 결과에 집중할 예정입니다. 7월 고용 부진 이후 재차 우

👍132🔥15🥰12

10 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTC≈21,000 views166 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/11, 장 시작 전 생각: 단독 등반 vs 단체 등반, 키움 한지영] - 다우 -0.1%, S&P500 -0.1%, 나스닥 -0.3% - 엔비디아 -2.9%, 마이크론 -1.8%, 샌디스크 +2.1% - WTI 82.1달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.70%, 달러/원 1,418.0원 1. 미국 증시는 소폭 조정을 받았습니다. 최근 신고가 경신(다우, S&P500)에 따른 단기 레벨 부담이 누적된 가운데, 미-이란 협상 교착에 따른 WTI 80달러 재돌파, 미 10년물 금리 4.7%대 상회, 7월 CPI 대기심리 등이 차익실현 압력으로 이어졌던 하루였네요. 엔비디아(-2.9%)의 순환금융 논란 재부각, 인텔(-4.0%)의 유상증자(AI투자 목적, 150억달러) 등 AI, 반도체 업종에서 부담스러운 소식들이 전해졌지만, 마이크론(-

👍146🥰12🔥8

10 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC≈11,600 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

연초 이후 코스피 vs 코스피 200 동일가중 vs 코스닥 성과 비교 : 최근 코스닥 강세는 낙폭과대 + 키맞추기 수요가 내재

👍34🥰5🔥1

9 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC≈21,900 views128 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/10, Kiwoom Weekly, 키움 전략 한지영] “주도주 소외 현상의 해소 구간” ------ <Weekly Three Points> a. 지난 금요일 미국 증시는 호르무즈 해협 재개방 지연 소식에도, 미국 7월 고용 둔화에 따른 연준의 9월 인상 전망 약화 등 우호적인 매크로 환경에 힘입어 AI, 테크 등 성장주를 중심으로 상승(다우 +0.3%, S&P500 +0.6%, 나스닥 +1.3%, 필라델피아 반도체 지수 +2.6%). b. 매크로상 주중 대형 이벤트는 미국 7월 CPI로, 인플레이션 불확실성이 잔존하고 있음을 감안 시, 컨센에만 부합하더라도 증시 안도감 확보 가능할 전망 c. 실적 측면에서는 백화점, 증권, 보험 등 여타 업종들의 실적이 예정되어 있지만, TSMC 7월 매출, 시스코, 코어위브, AMAT 등

👍106🔥14🥰8

6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC≈24,000 views139 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/7, 장 시작 전 생각: 유효한 회복력, 키움 한지영] - 다우 -0.9%, S&P500 -0.2%, 나스닥 -0.1% - 마이크론 -1.3%, 샌디스크 -6.7%, 엔비디아 -0.2% - WTI 78.1달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.68%, 달러/원 1,423.2원 1. 미국 증시는 소폭 약세를 보였네요. 호르무즈 해협 불확실성 및 연준의 9월 금리인상 우려 등에 따른 유가 및 시장 금리 상승이 재가된 가운데, 분기 호실적에도 급락한 샌디스크(-6.7%), 웨스턴디지털(-13.0%) 약세 여파 등으로 하락세를 보였습니다. 2. 현재 미국, 한국 등 주요국 2분기 실적 시즌은 순조롭게 진행되고 있습니다. 미국 S&P500의 경우, 지금까지 실적을 발표한 380개 기업 중 약 85%가 컨센서스를 상회하는 실적을 발표하면서,

👍119🥰15🔥5

5 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC≈22,000 views142 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/6, 장 시작 전 생각: 변동성 안정 국면, 키움 한지영] - 다우 +0.5%, S&P500 +0.1%, 나스닥 -0.8% - 마이크론 0.0%, 엔비디아 +3.4%, 샌디스크 -5.3%(시간외 -5%) - WTI 75.0달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.61%, 달러/원 1,422.2원 1. 미국 증시는 혼조세를 보였네요. 호르무즈 해협 정상화 기대감, 서버 수요 개선 전망에 따른 엔비디아(+3.4%) 강세 등 상방 요인이 상존했음에도, AMD(-7.0%, 기대치 하회 실적 등), 스페이스X(-13.6%, 실적 부진, 6일 보호예수물량 해제 등)의 주가 약세 등이 여타 AI, 반도체주 차익실현으로 이어졌던 하루였습니다. 2. 지난주부터 주식시장은 MS, 아마존, 팔란티어 호실적을 통해 AI 수요 호조 및 투자 지속 가능성을 재확

👍128🥰11🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC≈13,900 views53 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

* 단일종목 레버리지 거래대금과 회전율 변화: 거래대금 한자릿수대로 급감, 회전율 대폭 하락, 7월과 같은 비정상적인 수급 변동성 확대 재현 가능성을 낮추는 요인

👍53

4 Aug 2026, 22:32 UTC≈24,100 views142 reactionsread 15 August 2026

[8/5, 장 시작 전 생각: 갈아타기 vs 추가하기, 키움 한지영] - 다우 +1.7%, S&P500 +1.8%, 나스닥 +2.6% - 마이크론 +7.6%, 팔란티어 +29.5%, AMD +7.0%(시간외 -8%) - WTI 75.3달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.61%, 달러/원 1,429.6원 1. 미국 증시는 오늘도 급등했습니다. 호르무즈 해협 재개방 기대감에 따른 WTI 유가 급락(-6.4%), 팔란티어(+29.5%), 캐터필러(+5.6%) 호실적, 대만 IT매체의 2027년 메모리 조기 완판 보도 등에 따른 AI 성장 모멘텀 회복이 증시 강세를 견인했네요. 현재 주식시장은 전반적인 위험선호심리가 개선되는 과정에서 이전처럼 쏠림 현상이 심화되기 보다는, 업종간 온기가 확산되고 있습니다. 이는 한동안 증시에 제약으로 작용했던

👍123🥰10🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @hedgecat0301. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,133 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“키움증권 전략/시황 한지영” (@hedgecat0301), 32,971 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hedgecat0301.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.