Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

서초동 투자머신

@twomachine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,323subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879453363
TypeChannel
Username@twomachine
Description현 대한민국은 주식만이 살길이다
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/twomachine

Growth

5,3235,3295,3267 August 2026 — 5,327 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,329 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,323 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,322–5,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 01:265,323-6
7 Aug 2026, 16:215,329+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:175,327first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.9%
avg views ÷ 5,323 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,760
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.653%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held25 (31 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total69,031
Reactions total451
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,390
Videos
14
Links
2,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

451 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍15434.1%
🖕13229.3%
🤮7917.5%
💩275.99%
🙏224.88%
😁183.99%
👏122.66%
🤔71.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 451reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC333 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

바이오 뭐 얼마나 올랐다고 이러는건데

🖕3🤮2

11 Aug 2026, 03:56 UTC≈1,180 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026

전닉만 오르면 바이오가 후두둑 쏟아지는거 같네

🤮12🖕6😁1

11 Aug 2026, 00:10 UTC788 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @free_life59

1. 미 SEC가 데이터센터 ABS 발행 시 2008년 금융위기 방어책인 '위험보유' 규제 예외를 인정하며 AI 인프라 자금 조달의 빗장을 완전히 해제함. 2. 데이터센터를 단순 금융 자산이 아닌 실물 자산군으로 분류하여, 발행사의 부채 의무 보유 부담을 없애고 자본 효율성을 극대화함. 3. 금융 시스템 안정보다 AI 산업 경쟁력 강화를 우선시하는 미 규제 당국의 강력한 'AI 하이퍼 사이클' 지원 의지.

💩1🖕1

10 Aug 2026, 00:35 UTC≈1,530 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

3천억대 까지 빠졌다 이제 좀 반등해서 6천억대네.. 수급으로 3천억대까지 조져넣는거 보면서 진짜 국장에 오만정이 다 떨어질뻔

💩4👍2🖕1🤮1

10 Aug 2026, 00:34 UTC≈1,240 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @stoner8740Photo

#앱클론 로얄티가 7천억 기대되는데도 그리고 압도적 데이터인데도 불구하고 시총이 6천억대 그냥 웃음만 나옵니다. 앱클론 주장이 아니라 헨리우스가 데이터가 너무좋으니 적응증을 저리 확대하는데 압도적 데이터로 내년 상반기 글보로벌 3상 데이터 발표입니다.

💩3🖕1

6 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,440 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

이 법안 만든 새끼들 찾아서 김무열 투입해서 참교육 한번 가야될거 같은데

😁7🖕5💩3

6 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC≈1,720 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @knowledge_to_wealth

주가 누르기 방지법을 만들랬더니 주가 누르기 장려법을 가져온 재정경제부 이소영 의원(여당)의 글 공유합니다. ——————————————————————————- <‘주가누르기 방지법 정부안’ 비판> 이 법안을 처음 생각한 이유는, 똑같은 회사인데 비상장일 땐 상속증여세를 100원 내고 상장을 하면 20원-30원을 내는 우리 세법의 불공정을 바로잡고 공정과세를 하자는 것이었고, 동시에 대한민국의 많은 경영자들이 기업을 상장해서 다수 일반인의 투자를 유치해놓고도 자신의 개인세금을 아끼자고 주가를 낮게 유지하는 ‘대한민국 투자자라면 누구나 아는’ 비양심적 경영행태의 유인을 제거하고자 함이었다. 어제 처음 정부안을 보고는 온갖 나쁜 상상이 튀어 나왔으나, 감정을 배제하고 정부안의 문제점을 지적해보려 한다. 사실 문제점을 지적하는 게 무의미할

👍3🖕3🤮2

6 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC≈2,970 views28 reactionsread 12 August 2026

밸류의 정상화가 아니라 수급의 정상화. 국장은 밸류보단 수급이라는걸 깨닫는 올 한해..

🖕20👍6🤮2

6 Aug 2026, 04:57 UTC≈3,000 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

내 입장에선 이제야 좀 정상화가 되어간다. 하지만 한참 멀었다

🖕12👍8🤮7

5 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC≈2,220 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

디앤디 이슈에도 알테 덕분인지 반도체 상승장에서 바이오가 무너지지 않고 잘 버티는게 고무적이네요 레버리지 제어 안할때 같았으면 개별종목 기본 -7,8프로는 하락했을거 같은데

👏9👍5🖕5🤮3

4 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,820 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @eyang92

디앤디파마텍 <오랄링크 상황> - 224, 097 (단일작용제) - 875(이중작용제) 근데 여기서 화이자가 227,097 드랍한 상황 <해석> 875에 집중하려고 하는 것 같다 그 이유 - 1) 애초에 227/097은 안한다고 예고했었다 - 2) 실제로 1상 중간에 드랍했다 (흡수율/PK 체크한듯) - 3) 내 생각에도 단일작용제는 상업성 적다 (위고비필) - 4) 875로 추정되는 용역계약이 있었다(핵심!) - 5) GIP저분자는 드랍했다(핵심!!) 지금 남아있는 저분자 : GLP-1(야오파마에서 들고온거) 지금 남아있는 펩타이드 : 이중작용제(디앤디 875) 정리하면, 이제 경구 남아있는거 야오파마 GLP-1이랑 875 즉 단일은 저분자, 이중/삼중은 펩타이드로 가는 전략인 것임 결론 : 오랄링크 계속 하는거 맞아 보

👍9🤮3💩2🖕2

4 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,020 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

장 시작전에 디앤디에서 멘트가 있기를

🙏11🖕6🤮3🤔1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @twomachine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 811,713 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“서초동 투자머신” (@twomachine), 5,323 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/twomachine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.