Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

키움증권 리서치센터

@KiwoomResearch

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

19,533subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001127984656
TypeChannel
Username@KiwoomResearch
Description키움증권 리서치센터
Created18 September 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/KiwoomResearch

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@KiwoomResearch/23692 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:26 UTC@kwusa/600555 Aug 2026, 22:27 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/600565 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC@KiwoomResearch/23696 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/600595 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC@KiwoomResearch/23700 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/601197 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC@KiwoomResearch/23719 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC1.00under a minute
@kwusa/601227 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC@KiwoomResearch/23721 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC1.00under a minute
@sjpark_sobi/15595 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC@KiwoomResearch/23693 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@kwusa5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@kwusa (41)
@sjpark_sobi5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@sjpark_sobi (50)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 38 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @KiwoomResearch — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

19,49419,53319,513.56 August 2026 — 19,494 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,496 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,498 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,499 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,503 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,518 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,533 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 6 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,488–19,539 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 14:1619,533+15
11 Aug 2026, 11:1719,518+15
10 Aug 2026, 09:2819,503+4
9 Aug 2026, 11:5219,499+1
8 Aug 2026, 10:5719,498+2
6 Aug 2026, 13:3719,496+2
6 Aug 2026, 02:4719,494first reading

Engagement

96 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.09%
avg views ÷ 19,533 subscribers
Avg views / post
800
96 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
96
of 96 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held96 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total76,768
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 23:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,340
Links
18,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 23:19 UTC329 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @kiwoom_semibat

키움 반도체 박유악입니다. ☀️채널: https://t.me/kiwoom_semibat ♠ SK하이닉스 [TP 210만원] : HBM 성장에 기대어 ♠ 투자 포인트 1) 2027년 HBM 영업이익 70조원(+138%YoY) 전망 2) SK하이닉스 HBM 출하량 +46%YoY HBM Blended ASP +48%YoY 3) HBM 실적 성장 기대감이 주가의 단기 반등 모멘텀으로 작용할 것으로 판단함. ♠ 리포트: https://buly.kr/8TtHMrm [박유악, 키움 반도체] *컴플라이언스 검필

12 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC528 viewsread 12 August 2026

[키움 채권 안예하] ★Kiwoom Fixed Income Issue 연준 인상 우려 완화 , 커브는 스티프닝 예상 -미국 물가는 중동발 에너지 충격에 따른 재가속 국면의 정점을 통과한 것으로 판단 - 에너지 가격 상승이 근원 물가로 광범위하게 전이되지 않았다는 점은 물가 피크아웃 판단을 더욱 뒷받침 - 다만 물가가 곧바로 연준의 2% 목표 수준으로 수렴할 것으로 판단하기에는 아직 이른만큼 동결 구간 장기화 예상 -이에 따라 이번 CPI는 미 연준의 금리 인상 필요성을 낮추는 방향으로 작용할 전망 -물가 피크아웃은 미국채 단기 금리의 상방 위험을 낮추겠지만 장기금리의 하락폭까지 크게 확대시키지는 않을 전망 ★보고서 원문 링크: https://bbn.kiwoom.com/rfIA889.pdf

12 Aug 2026, 22:53 UTC416 viewsread 12 August 2026

[키움 글로벌 ETF 김진영] 🌏글로벌 ETF Daily (8/13) (8/12 종가기준) (Daily Return) 📈 주요 ETF 수익률 (전일대비) *시장 대표 ETF QQQ 0.73% SPY 0.25% DIA -0.02% IWM 0.57% *미국 상승 업종 XLK (기술) 1.49% XLRE (부동산) 0.93% XLU (유틸리티) 0.48% XLP (필수 소비재) 0.46% *미국 하락 업종 XLB (원자재) -1.24% XLY (경기 소비재) -1.13% XLC (통신서비스) -0.90% 🔥 주목할 만한 ETF 움직임 *1M Highs SMCY 13.54% (SMCI 커버드콜) MEME 9.76% (밈 주식) LAZR 7.20% (AI 광통신·포토닉스) QTUP 6.41% (양자컴퓨팅) *1M Lows STLU -3

12 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC341 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sms_archive

★ 클래시스(214150): 가이던스 하향 조정과 함께 먼 길 가는 중 [키움 의료기기 / 신민수] ◆ 애널리스트 코멘트 2Q26 매출액 1,055억, 영업이익 439억으로 시장 기대치를 각각 -5.1%, -13.4% 하회했습니다. 국내 장비 및 소모품 판매세가 빠르게 회복되지 못했고, 브라질 연결 법인 반영으로 미실현이익 17억이 매출총이익에서 제거되어 기대치를 밑돌았습니다. ‘26년 연간 가이던스도 기존 대비 -9.2% 하향 조정하였고, 일본 직판 전환에 따른 추가 영업이익률 하향 가능성이 있습니다. 목표주가는 -6.9% 하향한 54,000원을 제시합니다. 보고서 링크 → 키움증권 신민수 의료기기 기록보관소 → https://t.me/sms_archive ★ 보고서 링크: https://bbn.kiwoom.com/rfCR123

12 Aug 2026, 22:51 UTC315 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sms_archive

★ 스카이랩스(386380): 씨어스가 겹쳐보인다 [키움 의료기기 / 신민수] ◆ 애널리스트 코멘트 동사는 전 세계 최초로 cuffless 반지형 혈압계를 개발하고 상용화까지 성공시킨 업체입니다. 씨어스처럼 국내 보험 급여 시장을 주도하며 빠른 처방 건수 성장세를 보여주고 있습니다. 향후 해외 진출 시 최대 12배 더 높은 해외 수가를 통해 ASP 상승을 노려볼 수 있습니다. 다만 동사와 BM이 비슷하고 같은 국내 파트너사를 두고 있으며 이미 스스로를 증명한 바 있는 씨어스가 밸류에이션 조정을 받고 있는 상황에서 동사의 PER 프리미엄에 대해서는 점검해볼 필요가 있습니다. 키움증권 신민수 의료기기 기록보관소 → https://t.me/sms_archive ★ 보고서 링크: https://bbn.kiwoom.com/rfCI5671

12 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC373 viewsread 12 August 2026

[키움 유틸리티/스몰캡 조재원] ▶️ 한국전력(047050) : 원전의 빈자리가 느껴진 2Q26 ◎ 2Q26 영업이익 시장 기대치 하회 - 2Q26 연결 영업이익 1조 1,285억원(-47%YoY)으로, 시장 기대치 하회 - 원전 이용률 하락에 따른 발전 Mix 악화로, 영업이익 부진 ◎ 3Q26 영업이익 3조 832억원(-45%YoY, OPM 10.9%) 전망 - 3분기부터 본격적인 연료비, 구입전력비 증가 예상 - 원전 이용률 회복에도 불구하고, 연료 및 SMP 상승이 Mix 개선 효과를 압도할 전망 - 2Q26 SMP는 118원/KWh(+10%QoQ). 7월 133원/KWh, 8월 현재 약 150원/KWh까지 상승 ◎ 영업 환경 개선 확인 후, 움직여도 늦지 않다 - 2026년 영업이익 7조 639억원(-48%YoY) 예상. 기존

12 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC238 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @hedgecat0301

[8/13, 장 시작 전 생각: 외국인 플레이, 키움 한지영] - 다우 -0.04%, S&P500 +0.26%, 나스닥 +0.54% - 마이크론 +4.9%, 엔비디아 +3.0%, 코어위브 +19.3% - WTI 82.7달러, 미 10년물 금리 4.69%, 달러/원 1,417.1원 1. 미국 증시는 혼조세를 보였지만, 내용은 괜찮았습니다. 다우지수 신고가 경신에 따른 가치주 차익실현 물량 출회에도, 7월 CPI 컨센 부합에 따른 인플레이션 안도감, 코어위브(+19.3%), 슈퍼마이크로(+19.0%) 호실적발 AI 인프라 수요 호조 전망 등에 힘입어, 엔비디아(+3.0%), 마이크론(+4.9%), 샌디스크(+5.8%) 등 반도체 중심의 강세를 연출했습니다. 2. 미국의 7월 CPI는 헤드라인(YoY 3.4% vs 6월 3.5%과 코

12 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC302 viewsread 12 August 2026

[키움 미국전략/주식 김승혁] 🌏US Daily (8/13) (8/12 종가기준) - 주요 지수 수익률 S&P500 7,748.50 / 0.26% NASDAQ 종합 26,588.49 / 0.54% 다우산업 53,770.27 / -0.04% 러셀2000 3,045.48 / 0.61% 필라델피아 반도체 12,399.38 / 2.49% - 섹터별 수익률 High 3: 반도체 및 장비 (2.46%), 식료품 (1.37%), 부동산 (1.15%) Low 3: 내구소비재/의류 (-2.18%), 유통 (-1.87%), 자동차 및 부품 (-1.67%) - 세부 업종별 수익률 반도체 및 장비 2.46% 식료품 1.37% 부동산 1.15% 하드웨어 1.07% 은행 1.05% 호텔/레저 0.69% 유틸리티 0.53% 헬스케어 0.27% 자본재 0.26% 에

12 Aug 2026, 22:36 UTC312 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @huhpharm

26/08/13 (목) 키움 제약바이오 데일리 💊 [제약/바이오 Analyst 허혜민, RA 김종현] 키움 제약/바이오/의료기기 소식통: t.me/huhpharm <‍📈 주요 지수 등락> * 코스피 +3.68% vs 코스피 제약 -3.53% * 코스닥 +0.12% vs 코스닥 제약 -1.88% * S&P500 +0.26% vs XBI +0.84% * 나스닥 +0.54% vs NBI +0.42% <‍🇰🇷 국내 주요 뉴스 🔥> *괄호 안은 전일 수익률 ★ 올릭스 “CPS 전환 물량, 즉시 시장 출회되는 구조 아냐” (-13.95%) - "8월 31일 즉시 출회 단정 못해…기존 투자자들과 긴밀히 협의” -> https://tinyurl.com/28a6hd7e ▶ [단독] 샤페론 "관리종목 지정, 9월 재상장후 12월초 해제" (+29.8

12 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC437 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @sjpark_sobi

★ 쿠팡 (CPNG.US): 4분기 이후 매출 성장률 정상화에 주목 [키움 음식료/유통 박상준] 1) 2분기, 매출 성장률 반등에 성공 - 쿠팡의 2Q26 매출액과 조정 EBITDA 는 모두 시장 컨센서스를 소폭 하회 - Product Commerce 부문의 매출 성장률은 +8%로 1 분기 대비 반등에 성공(Constant Currency 기준) - Developing Offerings 부문의 조정 EBITDA 적자가 전분기 대비 소폭 축소된 점도 긍정적 2) 4Q26 부터 매출 성장률 정상화 기대 - 동사는 3Q26 실적 가이던스로 YoY 매출 성장률 +8~9%, 조정 EBITDA 마진율 -3~-4%p 하락을 제시. - 3Q26은 추석 시점 차이 영향으로 매출 성장세가 둔화될 것으로 전망했으나, 4Q26부터는 의미 있는 매출 성장세가 가

12 Aug 2026, 22:29 UTC426 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @jkimsw

[키움증권/김진구] 카카오게임즈 기업리포트, Outperform(Upgrade), 목표주가 1만원(하향) ◆ 동사에 대한 목표주가를 기존 1.6만원에서 1만원으로 하향하면서, 투자의견을 Marketperform에서 Outperform으로 상향 조정, 신규 목표주가는 동사 주력 신작들의 성과가 반영될 27E 지배주주지분 589억원에 타겟 PER 20배와 할인율 10%를 적용한 올해 기준 현재가치 ◆ 동사의 중단기 캐시카우로 워킹될 것으로 기대될 오딘 Q는 출시 초기 분기 기준 1Q27E 일평균 매출을 10억원으로 가정해 추정 적용, 신작 전략에 있어 글로벌 IP로 워킹할 수 있는 신작별 무게감과 해당 라인업별 창의적 메타와 기존 장르를 브레이크 할 수 있는 신규 게임성을 유저에게 선사하는 과정이 선결될 필요성이 존재함을 적시 ◆ 보고서: htt

12 Aug 2026, 22:25 UTC462 viewsread 12 August 2026

[키움 채권 안예하] ◆채권 Daily 코멘트(26.08.13.) [미 채권시장 동향] 미국채 금리는 보합권 혼조 마감. 미국 7월 헤드라인과 근원 CPI가 모두 예상치에 부합하고 전년비 상승률도 둔화되면서 9월 금리 인상 가능성은 40% 수준까지 낮아졌음. 다만 연준이 금리 인상 가능성을 완전히 배제하기에는 근원 서비스 물가에 대한 추가 확인이 필요하고, 9월 FOMC 직전 8월 CPI까지 남아 있어 동결 기대가 크게 강화되지는 않았음. 10년물 입찰은 무난한 수요를 확인하며 시장 영향이 제한. [경제지표](발표, 전망, 이전) (미국)7월 소비자물가 MoM: 0.1%, 0.1%, -0.4% (미국)7월 근원 소비자물가 MoM: 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.0% (미국)미국채 10년물 입찰 *발표예정 경제지표(전망, 이전) (미국)신규실업

Showing the 12 most recent of 96 posts we hold for @KiwoomResearch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 457,830 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“키움증권 리서치센터” (@KiwoomResearch), 19,533 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KiwoomResearch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.