Channel
@yongtaecenter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001855595353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yongtaecenter |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yongtaecenter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:40 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (3 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 20 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
✅ [단독] "휴머노이드 사업계획서 제출하라"...현대차, 200여개 협력사에 '특명' - "휴머노이드 속도전 혼자선 역부족" - 각 부품사 독자기술 담은 사업계획서 요구 투자 지지부진하던 부품사들 로봇 사업 전환 움직임 - "10만달러 로봇을 2만달러로…부품회사들 단가 5분의 1로 깎아야" https://www.hankyung.com/article/202608139607i
✅ 아마존 텍사스 데이터센터, 원전 7기급 자체 가스발전 규모 확보 https://www.esgeconomy.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=16386
💻 2028년 DRAM·NAND 수급 균형에 필요한 Capex 📌 J.P. Morgan 추정 2028년 DRAM과 NAND의 공급 부족을 해소하려면 추가 Capacity 및 대규모 Capex가 필요 특히 DRAM의 투자 부담이 NAND 대비 훨씬 큰 상황 📌 DRAM 2028E 공급 부족: 5.0 EB 수급 균형을 위해 필요한 추가 공급: 5.5 EB 필요 Capex: $58bn (약 580억달러) FY27E 대비 추가 Capex: +41% 필요 Capacity: 299K WSPM 월 웨이퍼 투입 기준 약 29.9만장 📌 NAND 2028E 공급 부족: 63 EB 수급 균형을 위해 필요한 추가 공급: 76 EB 필요 Capex: $7bn (약 70억달러) FY27E 대비 추가 Capex: +27% 필요 Capacity: …
https://youtube.com/shorts/9hbE8fg-Noo?si=3QxFww6rkfK5KcmT
https://youtube.com/shorts/4ASv6KPbse4?si=BVo4SMEbzvlPrYFF
https://youtube.com/shorts/ERDGcH5dw8k?si=wA_IQVkZtvfrsg-U
🛞 Tesla·SpaceX, 168억 달러 규모 ‘Terafab’으로 AI 반도체 수직계열화 1. 텍사스에 초대형 AI 반도체 단지 건설 ① Tesla와 SpaceX가 텍사스 Grimes County에 초기 투자금 168억 달러 규모의 Terafab 반도체 단지를 공동 건설할 계획 ② 전체 부지는 약 1억 제곱피트 규모로, 장기적으로 완전 확장 시 총 투자액이 약 1,190억 달러까지 늘어날 가능성 ③ 최소 3,000개의 고임금 일자리를 창출하며 텍사스를 Musk 생태계의 핵심 제조 거점으로 확대하는 계획 (Reuters) 2. Tesla·SpaceX가 필요한 1TW 이상 AI 연산능력 자체 확보 ① Terafab은 Tesla의 Cybercab·Optimus와 SpaceX의 우주 기반 데이터센터에 필요한 AI 반도체 공급을 목표로 하는 시…
https://youtu.be/0YcM-GDm-kE?si=0LIDMCX_MPnrgQAi
여의도 찌라시) 1. 지금 HBM3E는 닉스가 헐값에 엔비디아에 주고 있음. 연간 고정가라 전자는 범용 가격인상 팍팍해서 실적 좋은데 닉스는 분기별 이익 증가폭이 상대적으로 낮은 이유임. 2. HBM4는 닉스 불량 때문에 엔비디아에서 베라루빈 출시 지연된게 맞음 3. 엔비디아향 HBM4 스크닉스 내년 가격 인상폭 타 업체대비 낮을 듯(타업체 80% 이상 인상, 닉스는 50% 인상) 4. 대신 SK그룹에서 진행하는 데이터센터사업은 엔비디아칩 우선공급권 얻음 5. 이 얘기를 SK하이닉스 영업직원이 술자리에서 푸념함 6. SK하이닉스 출신 애널리스트 채민숙이 이 얘기를 듣고 여의도에 던짐 7. 7월 닉스 떡락 & SK 및 이터닉스 상한가 8. SK하이닉스에서 전말확인 후 채민숙 출입 밴함. 9. 매니저들이 다른 애널들 시켜서 사실…
File, posted without a caption
Winbond, 2027년에 메모리 공급이 더욱 부족해질 것으로 예상됨에 따라 가오슝 공장 확장 계획을 발표. 3분기에는 제품 평균 판매 가격이 다시 상승할 것으로 밝힘. 가오슝 공장은 내년 1월 착공하여 2029년 양산에 들어갈 예정 뉴스: https://money.udn.com/money/story/5612/9675146?from=edn_subcatelist_cate ☀️채널: https://t.me/kiwoom_semibat .
2026.08.06 15:40:24 기업명: 원익IPS(시가총액: 4조 5,452억) A240810 보고서명: 연결재무제표기준영업(잠정)실적(공정공시) 매출액 : 2,165억(예상치 : 2,361억/ -8%) 영업익 : 184억(예상치 : 236억/ -22%) 순이익 : 899억(예상치 : 226억+/ 298%) **최근 실적 추이** 2026.2Q 2,165억/ 184억/ 899억 2026.1Q 1,649억/ 107억/ 221억 2025.4Q 2,750억/ 172억/ 328억 2025.3Q 2,684억/ 275억/ 283억 2025.2Q 2,422억/ 365억/ 277억 공시링크: https://dart.fss.or.kr/dsaf001/main.do?rcpNo=20260806900323 회사정보: https://finance.naver…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @yongtaecenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“기록 하기 위한” (@yongtaecenter), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yongtaecenter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.