미시간에서 당선된 민주사회계열 압둘 알세이드는 진보 성향인 밴 홀렌을 상원 대표로 지지합니다 내년 초까지 치열한 상하원 대표 선거전이 있을 것입니다. 미국은 다수당이 상임위원장을 독식합니다 밴 홀렌은 메릴랜드 상원의원이고, IRA를 만드는데 실무반 역할을 한 재생에너지 적극 지지자입니다 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hDtFbhG7zBY&pp=ygUSYWxzYXllZCB2YW4gaG9sbGVu
Signed 병화 한

Channel
@SmallCap
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,994subscribers
-311 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001111987116 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SmallCap |
| Created | 19 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SmallCap |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 57% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Ten_level/9091626 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC | @SmallCap/8989 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Ten_level | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (7–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 220 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @greenlightBH. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 10:11 | 22,994 | -6 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:09 | 23,000 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:26 | 23,008 | -12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:07 | 23,020 | +3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 04:27 | 23,017 | +1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:41 | 23,016 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:44 | 23,020 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 02:55 | 23,022 | -7 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 23:16 | 23,029 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 23,033 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 23,043 | -11 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 23,054 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 02:27 | 23,057 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:45 | 23,064 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 23,069 | -9 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:21 | 23,078 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:51 | 23,092 | -1 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:10 | 23,093 | -7 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 23,100 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 23,108 | first reading |
272 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 113 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 272 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 175,810 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 14:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 80 posts held from the last 30 days (5.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
미시간에서 당선된 민주사회계열 압둘 알세이드는 진보 성향인 밴 홀렌을 상원 대표로 지지합니다 내년 초까지 치열한 상하원 대표 선거전이 있을 것입니다. 미국은 다수당이 상임위원장을 독식합니다 밴 홀렌은 메릴랜드 상원의원이고, IRA를 만드는데 실무반 역할을 한 재생에너지 적극 지지자입니다 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hDtFbhG7zBY&pp=ygUSYWxzYXllZCB2YW4gaG9sbGVu
Signed 병화 한
버니 샌더스, 척 슈머 차기 상원 대표 반대 무소속이지만 민주당과 같이 정책을 만드는 샌더스는 사회민주주의자입니다 척 슈머는 중도 진보입니다 민주당 일각에서 척 슈머에 대한 문제 제기가 트럼프 2기 시작할 때부터 있었습니다 너무 소극적인 대응을 한다구요 만약 척 슈머가 물러나고 좀 더 진보적인 대표가 선임되면 트럼프의 남은 2년이 좀 더 힘들어질겁니다. 미국의 비정상의 정상화가 이루어지길 바랍니다 https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2026/11/10/congress/sanders-dings-schumer-01159546
Signed 병화 한
[서울바이오시스(092190,KQ) / 유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 박종선 ☎02)368-6076] ★ 3Q26P Review: 4분기 연속 영업이익 흑자 달성 ☞ 3Q26P Review: 4분기 연속 두 자리 수 매출 성장과 영업이익 흑자 달성 - 3Q26P 매출액 2,297억원(+22.5% YoY), 영업이익 124억원(흑자전환 YoY) - 지난해 4분기 이후 4분기 연속 두 자리 수 매출 성장률 기록, 분기 최고 매출액 달성 - 매출 성장과 수익성 개선으로 지난해 4분기부터 4분기 연속 영업이익 흑자 유지 - 영업이익률도 4~6%대의 양호한 수준을 지속하며 실적 정상화 확인 ☞ WICOP 3 출시 및 AI 데이터센터향 광통신 시장 진출 기대 - 모회사 서울반도체와 희토류가 필요 없는 백색 LED 칩 ‘WICOP 3’ 공동개발 완료 - …
[헥토이노베이션(214180,KQ) / 유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 박종선 ☎02)368-6076] ★ 3Q26P Review: 실적 성장 지속, 시장 기대치 부합 ☞ 3Q26P Review: 3분기 연속 1,000억원대 매출 달성, 시장 기대치 부합 - 3Q26P 매출액 1,088억원(+13.8% YoY), 영업이익 153억원(+4.0% YoY) - 3분기 연속 1,000억원대 매출액 달성, 8분기 연속 두 자리 수 매출 성장률 기록 - 컨센서스(매출액 1,138억원, 영업이익 160억원) 대비 부합한 수준 ☞ IT정보서비스 및 핀테크 중심으로 안정적인 매출 성장 지속 - IT정보서비스 및 핀테크 사업부문 매출액 전년동기 대비 각각 14.9%, 15.5% 증가하며 전체 실적 성장 견인 - IT정보서비스는 신규 서비스 출시 및 고객군 확대 …
[에스에프씨(083030,IPO예정기업) / 유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 박종선 ☎02)368-6076] ★ Blue OLED 소재 강자, 바이오 등 신규사업 확장 중 ☞ 기업 개요 - 1998년 썬정밀화학 설립, 2000년 썬화인켐 법인 전환, 2006년 에스에프씨㈜로 사명 변경 - OLED용 유기발광 소재 연구개발·생산을 주력으로 하며, 유기합성·정제 기술을 기반으로 바이오·분자진단용 형광소재 사업 확대 - 반도체 포토공정용 SOC 등 고순도 반도체 소재와 2차전지 소재로 신규 사업영역 확대 추진 - 주요 매출비중(2025년 연결 기준): OLED 90.8%, BIO 8.9%, 미래사업 0.3% ☞ 투자포인트 ① ① 모바일에서 IT·자동차로 OLED 적용처가 확대되는 가운데 자동차용 OLED 시장은 2025~2035년 연평균 21% 성장…
[KT나스미디어(089600,KQ) / 유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 박종선 ☎02)368-6076] ★ 3Q26P Review: 수익성 회복 성공, 매출 성장 기대 ☞ 3Q26P Review: 매출 부진에도 영업이익 시장 기대치 부합 - 3Q26P 매출액 295억원(-5.4% YoY), 영업이익 57억원(+50.8% YoY) - 매출액은 7분기 만에 전년동기 대비 역성장했으나 영업이익은 큰 폭 증가 - 컨센서스(매출액 339억원, 영업이익 58억원) 대비 매출액 하회, 영업이익 부합 ☞ 매출 감소에도 비용 효율화로 영업이익률 19%대 회복 - 디지털광고 부문은 OTT 광고 성장에도 가전·쇼핑 업종 광고 집행 감소로 매출액 전년동기 대비 3.6% 감소 - 플랫폼광고 부문은 옥외광고 플랫폼 성장에도 커머스 광고주 광고비 축소로 매출액 전년동기 …
[헥토파이낸셜(234340,KQ) / 유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 박종선 ☎02)368-6076] ★ 3Q26P Review: 주력 결제사업 안정적 성장 지속 ☞ 3Q26P Review: 매출액 컨센서스 부합, 영업이익 소폭 하회 - 3Q26P 매출액 526억원(+14.9% YoY), 영업이익 48억원(+6.2% YoY) - 4개 분기 연속 500억원대 매출액 달성, 8분기 연속 두 자리 수 매출 성장률 기록 - 컨센서스(매출액 530억원, 영업이익 55억원) 대비 매출액 유사, 영업이익 12.7% 하회 ☞ 주력 결제사업 기반 안정적 성장 지속 - 신규 가맹점 확대 및 거래량 증가로 간편현금결제 매출 전년동기 대비 12.5% 증가, 매출비중 22.8% - PG 서비스 매출도 전년동기 대비 14.1% 증가, 매출비중 47.5%로 실적 성장 견…
미 국방부, 10개 풍력단지 추가 허가 https://news.bloomberglaw.com/environment-and-energy/pentagon-to-advance-10-more-wind-projects-today-punchbowl-says
Signed 병화 한
Photo, posted without a caption
Signed 병화 한
미 국방부, 9개 풍력단지 추가 허가 법원 판결 집행 속도가 좀 빨라지네요
Signed 병화 한
2026.11.09 / 유진 채권 김지나,디지털자산 김세희 [중간선거 이후, 스테이블코인–미국채의 운명] ▶️ 보고서 링크: https://buly.kr/3YGZoPo 안녕하세요. 유진투자증권 디지털자산 담당 김세희입니다. 이번 자료는 채권 담당 김지나 부장님과 공동으로 작성한 스테이블코인 인뎁스 보고서입니다. 작년부터 트럼프 대통령과 베센트 재무장관은 스테이블코인을 미국 단기국채의 새로운 수요처이자 정부의 자금조달 비용을 낮출 수 있는 수단으로 강조해 왔습니다. 2027년 1월 GENIUS 법안 시행을 앞두고 2030년 2조 달러 시장에 대한 기대도 높지만, 관건은 이러한 기대가 언제, 어떤 조건에서 현실화될 수 있느냐는 점입니다. 실제 스테이블코인 사용량은 빠르게 증가하고 있지만 공급 증가세는 둔화되고 있습니다. 중간선거 이후 …
Signed Say
[교촌에프앤비(339770,KS) / 유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀 박종선 ☎02)368-6076] ★ 3Q26P Review: 최고 매출액, 영업이익 시장 기대치 상회 ☞ 3Q26P Review: 분기 최고 매출액 달성, 영업이익 시장 기대치 상회 - 3Q26P 매출액 1,445억원(+6.9% YoY), 영업이익 123억원(+9.6% YoY) - 분기 최대 매출액 달성, 영업이익률 8.5%로 6분기 만에 높은 수익성 회복 - 컨센서스(매출액 1,425억원, 영업이익 108억원) 대비 매출액 유사, 영업이익 14.2% 상회 ☞ 전 사업부 매출 성장과 계열사 손익 개선으로 수익성 유지 - 여름 성수기 수요 증가 및 원자재 공급 안정화로 국내 프랜차이즈 매출 전년동기 대비 5.9% 증가, 매출비중 93.5% - 중국·미국 등 글로벌 매장 정상화로…
Showing the 12 most recent of 272 posts we hold for @SmallCap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@SmallCap edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 1 post on @SmallCap as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“유진투자증권 코스닥벤처팀” (@SmallCap), 22,994 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SmallCap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.