방금 전 창신메모리(CXMT)가 급등하면서 순간 9$ 을 돌파했습니다. #CXMT
❤4

Channel
@enjoymyhobby
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
50,582subscribers
-164 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001479376547 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @enjoymyhobby |
| Description | 비트코인 & 경제 & 재테크정보를 공유드리는 방입니다 모든 글은 투자의 참고 자료일 뿐이며, 투자 판단에 대한 책임을 지지 않습니다. https://x.com/CryptoMyhobby * 홍보, 후원, 광고 : @KimYoungTaek 문의 |
| Created | 31 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/enjoymyhobby |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 50,582 | +37 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 50,545 | -32 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 50,577 | -17 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 50,594 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:41 | 50,607 | -20 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 50,627 | -25 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:40 | 50,652 | -24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 50,676 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:05 | 50,700 | -23 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 50,723 | -23 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 50,746 | first reading |
135 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 124 of 135 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 135 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 337,683 |
| Reactions total | 534 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
477 reactions across 108 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 93.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 445 | 93.3% | |
| 😭 | 25 | 5.24% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 124 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 534reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @enjoymyhobby. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 135 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
방금 전 창신메모리(CXMT)가 급등하면서 순간 9$ 을 돌파했습니다. #CXMT
❤4
DATA 토큰 (구 $IP) 를 DAT 로 홀딩하는 회사인 IP 스트래티지 홀딩스가 프리마켓에서 무섭게 상승하고 있네요. #DATA
❤3
쿠팡 사랑으로 유명한 미국의 대가 중 한 명인 드러켄밀러가 최근 공시에서 $PURR 주식(Hyperliquid Strategies)을 매수했다고 밝혔습니다. 액수가 크진 않은 듯 하네요. 트위터 원문 #국제 #Hyperliquid
❤4
📕 바이낸스, AMAT, MSFT 배당금 지급 완료 최근 많이 상승한 Applied Materials 와 마이크로소프트(MSFT)에 대한 배당금을 지급했다고 합니다. bStocks 를 현물 계좌로 바이낸스에 있어야만 받을 수 있습니다. #Biancne #Bstocks
❤3😭1
📕 확산되고 있는 하드웨어 렛저 무용론 최근 한 트위터 인플루언서가 모든 하드웨어 지갑은 쓰레기라며 이번까지 8번에 걸친 하드웨어 렛저가 해킹당한 사례를 모아 공유하고 있습니다. 시장에서는 반응이 뜨거운 것 같네요. CEX 도 해킹의 위협이 있고, 셀프 커스터디도 이렇게 해킹이 심하면 대체 크립토는 어디로 가야할지 모르겠네요. 원문 #국제
❤1
📕 Glassnode, 이번 약세장에 대한 아티클 발간 암호화폐 온체인 데이터 공급 업체인 Glassnode 에서 이번 약세장을 특이한 케이스라고 칭하며 장문의 레포트를 발간했습니다. 요즘 다들 시장을 떠나 좋은 레포트를 볼 기회가 없는데, 한 번 보는 것도 좋아 보입니다. 📁아티클 요약 🟢비트코인, 2019년 이후 최저 거래량 🟢매도세는 지치지만 매수세는 약함 🟢ETF 유입 미미, 거래소 유입 지속 🟢레버리지 증가로 급락 위험 확대 🟢68.7K 회복·58.5K 이탈 주목 😂 요즘 들어 약세장의 끝이 보인다는 글이 많은데 개인적으로도 꼭 그래줬으면 좋겠네요. 아티클 원문 #BTC
❤10
네바다주의 경찰 바디캠에서 용의자의 시드 구문이 유출되면서 자금에 피해가 간 케이스가 있다고 합니다. 진짜인지는 모르지만, 확실한 건 경찰이나 공무집행하는 사람들이 시드 구문에 대해서 모르면 이런 사고가 날 수 있습니다. 이전에 검찰이 보관하던 비트코인이 사라진 것도 이런 무지에서 나왔는데, 공공교육으로 편입할 수도 없고 참 애매한 경우네요. 이 글은 취미생활방 인턴이 작성했습니다. #국제
❤4
테더 CEO 는 공식적으로 자신들이 자체 블록 체인을 구축할 가능성이 없다고 밝혔습니다. 다만 이 바닥은 언제든지 말을 바꾸는 바닥이기는 합니다. #USDT
❤5
옵티미즘($OP)의 최근 프로포절이 꽤나 핫 이슈입니다. 요지는 아직 수령하지 않은 $OP 를 생태계 전략적 기금으로 바꾸자는 의견이네요. 현재 남아있는 $OP 는 약 5억 5천만개 정도로 현재 가치로 약 40M 정도됩니다. 거버넌스는 일반 사람의 영역은 아니라 그런지 현재 YES 가 70% 정도로 더 많습니다. 투표 종료는 8월 20일인데, 이번 계기로 $OP 의 가격 행보가 궁금하네요. 이 글은 취미생활방 인턴이 작성했습니다. 프로포절 게시글 원문 #OP
❤3
Trade.xyz, 하이닉스 이슈 청산 자금 지급 완료 Trade.xyz 하리 사태에서 1만불 이하 청산 금액에 대한 지급은 바로 진행되었고, 이후 1만불을 넘는 금액에 대한 추가 지급건이 오늘 처리되었습니다. 홈페이지 추가 문의를 통해서 KYC를 받았고, 오늘 해당 금액 지급이 완료되었습니다. 생각보다도 더 깔끔하고 빠르게 처리가 되었네요. 그리고 중간에 하닉 가격이 청산가보다도 훠얼씬 낮게 내려갔던걸 생각해보면... 지금은 살려줘서 감사하다는 마음도 드네요. 알랑이 정보교류소 | #Hyperliquid #TradeXYZ #SKHYNIX #SKHX #SKHY #Liquidation
❤2
청산의 귀재인 마치 빅 브라더가 돈을 다 잃어서 그런지 이제 밈 코인에 뛰어드려고 하는 것 같네요. #meme
❤5
하이퍼리퀴드의 총합 Open Interest 가 10/10일 폭락 이후 처음으로 그 이상으로 회복했다고 합니다. #Future
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @enjoymyhobby. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 11,077 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“취미생활방📮” (@enjoymyhobby), 50,582 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/enjoymyhobby.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.