맨날 스캠링크 올리던 악질 쓰레기를 AI로 찾아서 제거했습니다 하는 김에 채팅방 입장걸어주셨던 분들 중에 확실히 사람인 분들도 한번에 다 넣었어요 입장 요청이 천개가 넘게 쌓여서 손을 못대고 있다가 이번에 ai로 확실히 사람인 분들 잘 추려봤습니다
❤8💩1

Channel
@murphybus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
19,909subscribers
-556 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001829994590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @murphybus |
| Description | 최근 트위터를 시작했습니다 https://x.com/murphys1d 결혼이슈로 은퇴 번복했습니다. @murphysid *모든 광고에는 광고표기가 됩니다. 거래소는 바이낸스 OKX, 혹은 한국 거래소 외에 협업 안하니 문의 보내지 마세요. 문의 보낼시 무조건 차단 + 채널에 고로시 예정 머피블로그 : https://blog.naver.com/murphysid 주식채널 : https://t.me/murphybus2 |
| Created | 19 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/murphybus |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 02:54 | 19,909 | -12 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 19:47 | 19,921 | -11 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:54 | 19,932 | +2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 11:14 | 19,930 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:46 | 19,935 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 07:11 | 19,938 | +1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:40 | 19,937 | +1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 08:59 | 19,936 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:28 | 19,946 | +3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:48 | 19,943 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 11:09 | 19,949 | -3 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 08:20 | 19,952 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 19,957 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:15 | 19,959 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 07:20 | 19,961 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 09:38 | 19,960 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 19,965 | -6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 09:36 | 19,971 | -6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:30 | 19,977 | -26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 20,003 | first reading |
92 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 74 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 92 (19 July 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 104,260 |
| Reactions total | 256 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 03:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
804 reactions across 90 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 339 | 42.2% | |
| 💩 | 292 | 36.3% | |
| 👍 | 69 | 8.58% | |
| 🔥 | 38 | 4.73% | |
| 😢 | 20 | 2.49% | |
| 😱 | 19 | 2.36% | |
| 🤷 | 7 | 0.871% | |
| 😡 | 6 | 0.746% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 0.746% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 0.622% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.373% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 804 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (2.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
맨날 스캠링크 올리던 악질 쓰레기를 AI로 찾아서 제거했습니다 하는 김에 채팅방 입장걸어주셨던 분들 중에 확실히 사람인 분들도 한번에 다 넣었어요 입장 요청이 천개가 넘게 쌓여서 손을 못대고 있다가 이번에 ai로 확실히 사람인 분들 잘 추려봤습니다
❤8💩1
AI로 인해 편해진 게임 궁금한거 물어보면 그냥 다 알려준다 옛날처럼 인벤 뒤지던 시대는 끝났구나
❤5💩1
‘마감알림’ 스캠 댓글 101개를 삭제했고, 계정도 차단 완료했습니다.
❤1💩1
개스캠링크랑 다를게 없는 거래소들이 많음... 제발 당하지좀말자
💩1
개스캠링크 다는 십새기 네이버 블로그도 테러 중... 네이버 블로그 운영하시던 분 아이디 하나가 해킹당한 것 같은데, 그분 아이디로 저인거처럼 꾸며서는 이상한 링크 달고다닙니다 삭제 중이니 눌르지마세요
💩2
GenLayer 스테이킹 오픈 Genlayer가 메인넷 전에 노드를 돌린다고하네요 👉 Pre-Mainnet Staking - TGE부터 GEN 1개당 하루 1포인트, 모두 같은 비율 - 에어드롭 대상자는 클레임 안 해도 자동 적립 - 리더보드 순위대로 메인넷 노드 자리 배정 - 노드 운영 몰라도 대행 서비스(NaaS)로 참여 가능하다고 함 👀 개인적으로는 보통 포인트 프로그램은 포인트 = 토큰 개수인데, 여기는 포인트 = 노드 자리라는 게 좀 다르네요. 다만 많이, 오래 들고 있을수록 유리한 구조라서 소액이면 노드 자리보다는 내 순위 구경하는 정도로 생각하는 게 맞을 것 같아요. 원문 젠레이어포탈 (내 순위 확인) | 공지방 | 채팅방
💩3❤1😡1
달러 역프입갤 선물로 잡은거 풀고 테더로 넘어갑시다
❤4💩1
존나무섭다;;
❤2💩1
Theo가 골드를 토큰화하자 20% 하락했다 Theo가 실버를 토큰화하자 50% 하락했다 Theo가 지금 GPU를 토큰화 하려고 한다
💩1
https://www.hankyung.com/article/2026110591621 나라에서 달러사라고 시그널주는건가...
❤2🔥2💩1
AI를 2.5배 성능으로 쓰는 법, 미라 네트워크 Sterling 🎆🎇 같은 AI 모델이라도 어느 업체를 통해 쓰느냐에 따라 성능이 꽤 달라질 수 있대요 👉 같은 모델, 다른 성능 - gpt-oss-120b로 업체별 수학 테스트(AIME 2025)를 돌려봤더니 - 점수가 93.3%에서 36.7%까지 벌어짐 문제는 쓰는 입장에서는 이 차이를 알아챌 방법이 거의 없다는 것 🔥 그래서 나온 Sterling - 미라 네트워크가 새로 내놓은 AI 추론 서비스 - 모델 제공업체를 먼저 검증하고, 통과한 곳을 통해서만 AI를 돌려주는 구조라고 해요 미라는 원래 AI 답변을 교차 검증해서 환각을 걸러내던 프로젝트인데, 이번엔 답변을 내는 업체 자체를 검증하겠다는 거라 방향이 자연스럽게 이어지는 느낌이네요. 앞으로는 무슨 모델을 쓰느냐만큼 어디서 …
💩3
대 상 혁
🔥2💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @murphybus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“30대에 은퇴번복한 머피” (@murphybus), 19,909 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/murphybus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.