평일 잠실 잉어킹 현황 11시 예약 11시 10분에 대기줄로 가면 대기없이 입장 카드수령까지 3분 11시 3분에 카드수령완료

Channel
PASA 공지방
@PASACREW
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,374subscribers
-613 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001680904256 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PASACREW |
| Created | 29 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PASACREW |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 6,374 | -124 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:00 | 6,498 | -116 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:01 | 6,614 | -170 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:28 | 6,784 | -138 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 6,922 | -82 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:34 | 7,004 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 7,003 | +20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:29 | 6,983 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 6,978 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 6,980 | -15 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 6,995 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 7,011 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 7,012 | +25 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 6,987 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 6,987 | first reading |
Engagement
128 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 128 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,246 reactions across 99 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 960 | 77.0% | |
| 👍 | 223 | 17.9% | |
| ⚡ | 30 | 2.41% | |
| 😢 | 15 | 1.20% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 0.883% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 0.562% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 128 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,394 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 128 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭐⭐⭐⭐ Daily News 2026.08.20 1️⃣ 트럼프, 백악관 행사서 CLARITY Act 처리 촉구 트럼프 대통령이 백악관 크립토 행사에서 미 상원과 의회에 시장구조 법안인 CLARITY Act를 신속히 진전시키라고 압박했다. 업계는 미국이 규제 명확성을 앞세워 중국보다 앞서야 한다는 메시지에 주목했다. CoinDesk 2️⃣ OCC, 스테이블코인 GENIUS 규칙 11월 마무리 예고 미 통화감독청(OCC) 수장이 스테이블코인 법 이행 규칙을 11월까지 확정하겠다고 밝혔다. 지난 2월 376페이지 분량의 제안서를 내놓은 뒤, 2027년 1월 시행 전까지 감독 틀을 서두르겠다는 신호다. Cointelegraph 3️⃣ 비트코인 6만9천달러 돌파… 숏 청산·국채 바이백이 랠리 견인 미 재무부가 국채 바이백 규모를 키우자 위험자산 …
지난 6월 이후 첫 70k 터치한 듯
❤2
ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ ???
자고 일어나니 세상이 변해있네... 이 적응 안되는 세상 뭐지요...? TGE 안누르고 있던 플젝들 이제 버튼 막 누르려나
븐브 밈코쪽은... 다시 또 한국어 밈코들이 대 혼돈의 도가니탕을 만드는 중
❤2
그리고 스토리텔러 대뽀스도 전송되는 듯. 그래도 아침보다는 조금 오른 가격
❤12
플래박스는 놓치고 실버박스 10개 골드박스 100개 대충 수수료랑 포차띠고 치킨한마리 득인듯. ‼️ 거래 완료하고 이벤트 페이지 보상받기 버튼으로 바뀌기 까지 한 3분넘게 기다린 듯
👍5
와... 플래티넘 바로 종료되어 버렸네.. 업비트에 돈이 없어서 보내는 사이에...
❤3
업비트 이벤트 참여하자 🟢 실버 랜덤박스 : 🔤 최소 3 GRVT ~ 최대 25 GRVT 랜덤 지급 🟢 골드 랜덤박스 : 🔤 최소 25 GRVT ~ 최대 500 GRVT 랜덤 지급 🟢 플래티넘 랜덤박스 : 🔤 최소 100 GRVT ~ 최대 2,500 GRVT 랜덤 지급 안할 이유가 없는 이벤트임. 거래비용 = 사팔했을 때 1원차이와 0.05% 수수료 까지 계산함. https://upbit.onelink.me/dH32/00g0o9f8?exchangeCode=kr
❤5
이게 뭐냐면.. aaa.bbb.com 이런 도메인이 있다치면 .com 은 최상위 도메인이고 bbb 는 2차 도메인 aaa 는 3차 도메인 혹은 서브도메인이라 불리는데 보통 도메인을 구매하면 2차 도메인을 구매하고 서브도메인은 2차 도메인 구매자가 추가로 여러개 만들어 사용할 수 있죠. ICANN 에 신청하는데 대충 몇억 정도 들어감. 거기에 그냥 되는게 아니라 인프라를 구축하는것도 꽤 많은 돈이 들어가는데 사용자명으로 된 2차 도메인을 그냥 무료로 준다는건 제 기준으로 보면 엄청난거긴 함... 저 도메인을 사이트로 이용할 수 있다는거거든요 dashboard.plm2000.gram nft.plm2000.gram 뭐 이런식으로.. 암튼 그렇습니다. 이러면... 사용자명 괜찮은 걸 구해야하나? ;; 프로젝트명 사용자명 스틸하면 재…
❤3
🟢 Telegram, Gram 도메인 공식 신청 -두로프는 트위터를 통해 텔레그램이 .gram 도메인을 획득하기 위해 ICANN에 신청했다고 밝힘 -.gram 도메인이 승인되면 텔레그램 사용자는 .gram으로 끝나는 네임서비스를 가질 수 있을 것 (예시: cek.gram) -나아가 텔레그램 내에서 AI로 생성하는 서비스에 대해 .gram 도메인을 지원해줄 생각이라고 함 -이를 토대로 추정하면 텔레그램 내에서 웹서버 구축이 가능해질 것으로 보임 https://x.com/durov/status/2089770867576172804
Showing the 12 most recent of 128 posts we hold for @PASACREW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@jaysonchart · 1,1243 posts구름의 NFT연구소
@GroomNFT · 402 postsST Asian Parser
@asian_parser · 1,6092 posts크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,0892 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1192 posts🎒Alpha School🎒
@AlphaSchool77 · 10,8001 post돈독이 바짝 오른 돈독킹
@Dondoking · 2101 postFeri's Book📖
@Ferisbook · 4,6941 post젬하 크립토(GemHive)🦄 경제적 자유 이루기
@GemHive · 24,2271 post라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,9801 postDoggyDuck Crypto
@admoamoa · 211 post바베레토의 코인 ALL-ROUND
@baberetoallround · 1,0681 post수익나는대로 비트코인 DCA 합시다
@bitcoinpiggybank · 91 post부자가 되고싶은 춘식이
@choonsik · 6,1181 post보노의 야수매매
@cryptobonobobo · 7701 post크립토플로우 에어드랍
@cryptoflow_airdrop · 151 post도리의 레전도리탕
@doridorijam · 7271 post동행
@gowithairdrop · 131 post종명이의 딸깍
@jh_6598 · 8,8011 postWeb3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 22,5511 post크립토 원정대
@legoleecm777 · 7,1271 postMYU's Research (AI & WEB3)
@myu_moonyu · 7,2731 post생계형 에어드랍
@sangp_airdrop · 1,4321 postsilverwave 가이드
@silverwaveguide · 8051 post부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news · 7,8251 post석꿀이의 Sucking Honey
@suckggul · 421 post태초마을🍄
@taechovillage · 2121 post돈기부여 숙제방
@wreckcarbluebird · 4681 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@upbit_news · 65,1393 postsBithumb 빗썸 공식 채널
@BithumbExchange · 14,7312 posts폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,5892 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1192 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 24,9731 postNew Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,2091 postCOINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,9581 postXbyus_News
@xbyus_news · 1,7651 post윤로그 공지방
@yunlog_official · 10,7521 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@yobeullyANN · 22,081
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
@airdrop_kor · 21,286
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,959
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@marshallog · 21,798
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,748
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 49,893
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@BChoSN · 24,973
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@tlsrltnf · 22,804
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
@airdr0p_lab · 20,589
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,209
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@Bounty_ATM · 25,514
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,960
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,979
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@emperorcoin · 37,091
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@mujammin123 · 26,052
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 21,207
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@magonia_b · 26,896
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,670
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@twitchoong · 74,854
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,958
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,155
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PASA 공지방” (@PASACREW), 6,374 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PASACREW.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.