78? 👀

Channel
Bullbit_korea 한국채널
@BullbitKoreaChannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,776subscribers
-186 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002053763548 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @Bullbit_Korea @BullbitKoreaChannel |
| Description | Bullbit Korea Hub에 오신 것을 환영합니다 🇰🇷 한국의 Bullbit & PerpDEX 이용자들을 위한 독립 커뮤니티입니다. 커뮤니티에 의해 자율적으로 운영되며, Bullbit이 직접 운영하거나 공식적으로 제휴된 채널이 아닙니다. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BullbitKoreaChannel |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 2,776 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 2,776 | +2,774 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:40 | 2 | -2,807 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 2,809 | -29 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 2,838 | -20 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:06 | 2,858 | -13 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:25 | 2,871 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 2,880 | -12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 2,892 | -21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 2,913 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 2,927 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 2,938 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 2,950 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 2,959 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 2,962 | first reading |
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.7%
- avg views ÷ 2,776 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 437
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.044%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 34 (17 July 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 8,304 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 119
- Videos
- 20
- Links
- 102
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 58s
- Average length
- 30s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,406 reactions across 16 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 347 | 24.7% | |
| 👍 | 344 | 24.5% | |
| ❤ | 339 | 24.1% | |
| 🔥 | 334 | 23.8% | |
| 🥰 | 14 | 0.996% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 0.427% | |
| 🫡 | 6 | 0.427% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 0.356% | |
| 😇 | 4 | 0.284% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 0.142% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.071% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.071% | |
| 🤷 | 1 | 0.071% | |
| 🤷♀ | 1 | 0.071% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.071% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,406 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 15
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 12
- of 33 we hold a reading for · 36%
- Most on one post
- 3
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BullbitKoreaChannel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Bullbit_korea 한국채널 pinned «🇰🇷 BlockchainSeoul | KBW 2026 🔥 KBW 2026 기간, 서울에서 주목할 만한 Web3 네트워킹 행사가 열립니다. BlockchainSeoul 보도에 따르면, 오는 10월 1일 그랜드 하얏트 서울에서 ‘My Own Access with WLFI’가 개최됩니다. 🤝 Co-hosted by 🌐 World Liberty Financial (WLFI) × MOA Protocol 🤝 Sponsors 🧪 CATALYST LABS 🏛 KMTPA…»
🇰🇷 BlockchainSeoul | KBW 2026 🔥 KBW 2026 기간, 서울에서 주목할 만한 Web3 네트워킹 행사가 열립니다. BlockchainSeoul 보도에 따르면, 오는 10월 1일 그랜드 하얏트 서울에서 ‘My Own Access with WLFI’가 개최됩니다. 🤝 Co-hosted by 🌐 World Liberty Financial (WLFI) × MOA Protocol 🤝 Sponsors 🧪 CATALYST LABS 🏛 KMTPA 💳 Wasabi Card 🐂 Bullbit 💎 Value X 🚗 GOTCAR ⚡️ ENERGY MIRACLE 🛡 CertiLife 📰 Media Partners 🇰🇷 BlockchainSeoul 🗞 CryptoTimes 📈 Bloomingbit 📰 ME 이번 행사에는 글로벌 Web…
👍1
연준이 금리를 올렸네요 그런데 비트코인은 생각보다 덤덤합니다. 이번 25bp 인상 자체는 시장이 어느 정도 예상하고 있었던 만큼, 충격이 덜 해보입니다. 역시 비트코인은 연준의 결정만 기다렸다가 움직이는 시장은 아닌 것 같습니다. 🐂 이제 중요한 건 75K 부근을 지켜주느냐 여기서 버텨준다면 반등 시도가 이어질 수 있지만, 75K가 확실하게 무너지면 시장의 분위기도 다시 달라질 수 있어 보입니다.
👍1
📅 이번 주 크립토 시장 주요 일정 이번 주는 FOMC를 중심으로 미국 주요 경제지표와 디지털자산 규제 이슈가 같이 나옵니다. 9/15 (화) 🇺🇸 FOMC 회의 시작 🇺🇸 CLARITY Act 상원 절차표결 9/16 (수) 🇺🇸 FOMC 금리 결정 📊 미국 경제전망·점도표 🎙️ 연준 기자회견 🇺🇸 미국 8월 소매판매 9/17 (목) 🇺🇸 신규 실업수당 청구건수 🏠 미국 8월 주택착공·건축허가 🏭 필라델피아 연은 제조업 지수 이번 주는 아무래도 FOMC 결과와 점도표, 기자회견 내용이 시장 방향에 가장 큰 영향을 줄 것으로 보입니다. 변동성 커질 수 있는 구간이라 주요 일정은 체크해두는 게 좋겠습니다.
✅ BullChain 테스트넷이 다시 온라인으로 복구되었습니다. Bullbit과 BullChain 테스트넷 모두 이제 완전히 정상 작동 중입니다. 유지보수 기간 동안 참아주셔서 감사합니다. 여러분의 인내와 지원에 깊이 감사드립니다. 지금 테스트넷으로 가서 시도해보세요 👉 https://app.bullchaintestnet.ai/
버그 바운티 프로그램 업데이트 BullChain 버그 바운티 프로그램은 커뮤니티의 강력한 참여를 계속해서 보고 있습니다. 지금까지 414건의 제출물을 받았으며 26,193건의 범위 검토를 완료했습니다. 지속적인 보고와 피드백은 잠재적인 문제를 식별하고 BullChain의 보안을 지속적으로 강화하는 데 도움이 됩니다. 프로그램이 진행됨에 따라 더 많은 업데이트를 제공하겠습니다.
혹시 놓치셨다면, BullChain 버그 바운티 프로그램에 참여하는 데 필요한 모든 정보를 요약해 드리겠습니다. 네트워크를 과부하 상태로 만드세요. 결함을 보고하세요. 보상을 받으세요. 아래 링크를 북마크하세요📌 Trade | Scan | Faucet | Hacken Proof | First Dollar
Layer 1 네트워크들이 엄청난 유동성을 흡수하며 Bullbit의 24시간 거래량을 장악하고 있습니다. 우리와 함께 이 물결을 타고 가시나요?
Bullbit dou가 잘 생겼어? 👀
❤1
📸 WLFI 스냅샷 WLFI는 약 $0.05666 부근에서 거래되고 있으며, 시장 활동이 활발해지면서 24시간 거래량이 $6.7M에 달합니다. 시장을 주시하세요. 제품을 테스트하세요. 무엇이 고장 나는지 찾아보세요. Bullbit에서 제공하는 더 많은 WLFI 업데이트와 기회를 주의 깊게 지켜보세요. WLFI에 대한 추가 소식이 더 있습니다 - 다가오는 업데이트와 활동에 주목하세요.
불체인 테스트넷이 탄력을 받고 있습니다. 지난 7일 동안 총 거래량은 67억 달러이며, 일일 거래량은 9월 5일에 19억 달러로 최고치를 기록했습니다. 일일 평균 거래량은 약 10억 달러로, 테스트넷 전반에 걸쳐 지속적인 거래 활동을 반영합니다. 숫자가 모든 것을 말해줍니다. 버그 바운티 참여 - Hacken Proof 버그 바운티 참여 - FirstDollar
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @BullbitKoreaChannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@BullbitKoreaChannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bullbit_korea 한국채널” (@BullbitKoreaChannel), 2,776 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BullbitKoreaChannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.