$BTC $useless 매수완!
❤44🔥5🎉2😱2

Channel
@mongtanodance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,536subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002100804940 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mongtanodance |
| Description | 인스타 목적으로 만든 채널 절대 먼저 DM보내지 않습니다. 문의: @mongmongtata |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mongtanodance |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:56 | 4,536 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 4,544 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 4,544 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 21 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
430 reactions across 17 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 255 | 59.3% | |
| 👍 | 113 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 6.51% | |
| 😢 | 13 | 3.02% | |
| 🐳 | 7 | 1.63% | |
| 🎃 | 6 | 1.40% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.465% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.465% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.465% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.465% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 430reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 21 June 2025 to 17 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
$BTC $useless 매수완!
❤44🔥5🎉2😱2
🧑🍳몽타는 살아 있었내..
❤32
몽타를 찾아서... 살아계셨다😱 혹시 코주부 안경의 전설, 레전드 트레이더 몽타님을 아시나요? 초심으로 돌아가겠다며 빗썸 출연을 끝으로 다시 사라지신 레전드 행보를 보이신... 분이죠.. 😱 문득 살아계신지 걱정이 되어 기거지에 찾아뵈었습니다.. 다행히 무사히 살아계셨고, 무사히 트레이딩을 잘 하고 계시며, 다른 필드를 찾아 항해중이라는 소식이 업데이트되었습니다.. 몽타님의 근황이 궁금하신 몽조쿠들을 위해 소식 올립니다..
👍24❤16
오랜만이다 게이들아 나 잊은거 아니지?
👍67😢13❤9🐳7🎃6
https://youtu.be/hMdWQqivYHE 휴 취재는 처음이라 떨렷네요 다시 초심으로 돌아가겠습니다 빗썸 화이팅!!
❤38
부처님을 믿어볼까 음
🔥6❤4👏2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8👍3
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 뉴턴프로토콜(NEWT) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2025-06-24 16:25:53
Hifi는 좀 많이 쌓여았긴 했어...(oi가)
❤8👍3🫡2
네시간봉 꼬라지보니 더 빠지겟네ㄷㄷ매수세가 없구나
❤3
남자니까 롱 칠수도 있지 뭐~
🔥12❤1
간단하게 요약하면 새로운 L1의 등장조건은 • 기존 L1의 철학(dogma)을 논리적으로 비판하고 새로운 명제를 제시하는가? • 속도, 비용, 채택성, 보안 등에서 실제 측정 가능한 우위를 가지는가? 이렇게 두가지로 새로운 L1의 등장을 설명함 어렴풋하게 비트코인 > 이더리움 > 솔라나 > 수이? 로 이어지는 L1 네러티브를 다시 생각하게 되었음 Bitcoin “화폐만이 목적이다. 스마트 계약은 불필요하다.” → “코드는 돈이다. 블록체인은 프로그래머블해야 한다.” (Ethereum) Ethereum “탈중앙성과 무허가성이 모든 것보다 우선한다.” → “탈중앙만으론 부족하다. 현실적 UX와 성능이 먼저다.” (Solana) Solana “초고속 단일 상태기계가 최고의 확장 해법이다.” → “확장은 구조다. 병렬성과 객체 중심 …
❤30👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @mongtanodance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 540,703 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“몽타의 보통펀치” (@mongtanodance), 4,536 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mongtanodance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.