Channel
@seaotterbtc
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,151subscribers
+68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001313067241 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seaotterbtc |
| Created | 27 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seaotterbtc |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 30,151 | -4 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 17:59 | 30,155 | +35 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 30,120 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 30,136 | -13 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 30,149 | +36 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:39 | 30,113 | -4 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 30,117 | +2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:24 | 30,115 | -7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:52 | 30,122 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 30,125 | -18 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 30,143 | +3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:14 | 30,140 | +4 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 30,136 | +13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 30,123 | +20 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 30,103 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 30,108 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:46 | 30,105 | +4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 30,101 | +23 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 30,078 | +5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 30,073 | first reading |
262 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 262 (3 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 405,350 |
| Reactions total | 1,852 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 09:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5,540 reactions across 247 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,724 | 31.1% | |
| 👍 | 1,690 | 30.5% | |
| 👀 | 1,125 | 20.3% | |
| 🔥 | 589 | 10.6% | |
| 👏 | 216 | 3.90% | |
| 🐳 | 196 | 3.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 262 of the 262 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,766 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seaotterbtc. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 262 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
비트코인, 이더리움 ETF 프리미엄은 여전히 중립권 미국 현물 ETF 프리미엄이 높다는건 해당 종목에 미국 투자자들이 프리미엄을 지불하면서까지 매수하려는 수요가 높다는 것 (반대로 음수라면 매도 수요가 강한 것) 시원하게 프리미엄 붙기 시작하면 단기 매수 자리 보려고 하는데... 계속해서 중립권이네요 #비트코인 #이더리움 #차트
👀8❤4👍4🔥3
변곡을 잘 맞췄던 고래는 여전히 비트코인 기준 $82.2K~$78.8K에 매수 오더를 설정해놓고 기다리는 중 매수 기회주나...? #비트코인
👀21🐳8❤4🔥2👍1
비트코인은 9월 양봉 마감 역사적 평균과 다르게 지난 9월을 양봉으로 마감 지난 통계상 10월은 평균 약 19% 상승하는 강세를 보인 시기가 되었는데 과연 이번달은..? #비트코인 #차트
👏8👀6👍6
Avantis가 Veranta로 리브랜딩된 이후 신규 주식 39종을 추가 Veranta에 새로운 주식 39종이 추가, 이 중 26개 페어는 현재 다른 크립토 플랫폼에서는 거래할 수 없는 종목 - Base에서 최대 25배 Perp 거래 지원 - 신규 TradFi RFQ 엔진 적용 - OI는 최근 한 달간 $10M -> $60M으로 약 6배 증가 - 연말까지 500개+ RWA 시장 지원 목표 - 특히 $SNPS, $CDNS 같은 반도체 설계주부터 $PANW, $FTNT 사이버보안, $AMGN, $REGN, $VRTX 등 바이오 종목까지 다양한 섹터를 지원하는 모습 Veranta는 단순 크립토 Perp DEX가 아니라 주식, 원자재, FX까지 온체인으로 가져오는 RWA 파생상품 플랫폼을 지향하는 느낌 ➡트윗 원문 #KOL
👀2👍2👏2
지난 새벽 급변한 미국의 기준금리 베팅 어제까지 올해 추가 50bp 인상베팅이 정배였지만 뉴욕 연은 총재 존 윌리엄스가 9월 인상 이후 “서두를 필요가 없다(no need for urgency)”고 했고, “더 많은 정보를 모을 시간이 있다”고 발언하면서 10월 FOMC +25bp 인상 베팅이 약 70% -> 50% + 12월 FOMC 인상 베팅은 추가 인상 없이 동결된다로 전환 = 올해 총 25bp 인상 예상 아직 위험자산 시장은 크게 반응하지 않는데.. 오늘 PCE 잘나오면 좋은 흐름 보여줄수도? #경제
👍14👀5🔥4❤3
라이터 로빈후드가 인앱에서 선물거래 비트스탬프 쓴다고 해서 조정 씨게 받는중 근데 채권관련 선물한정 같은데 아닌가? 전체 다 쓴다네요. 비트스탬프는 로빈후드에 인수되었으니 그냥 자체 엔진 쓴다 느낌인듯.
👍12👀4🐳3❤1
미국 지표 발표 고용 관련 지표인 JOLTs 보고서 발표 후 시장에 큰 변동은 없네요 일단 내일 연준이 참고하는 물가 지표인 PCE 발표가 변동성을 불러올 수 있어보입니다 + 미국 GDP, 기업 실적 등도 공개 * 30일 21:30분 발표 현재 페드 워치 기준으로는 올해 +25bp씩 2번의 추가 인상, 내년 6월까지 +100bp 인상이 정배 PCE 발표 후 어떻게 변화는지 체크 #경제
👀9👍6❤2👏1
9/30 롯데월드 입장권 100장 내일 롯데월드 통대관 예정인 밈코어에서 해달 채널 구독자에게 티켓 100장을 추가로 지원해주셨습니다..! VIP 티켓은 아니라 패스트트랙은 아니고 일반 입장권 ($M 홀딩 조건 면제) 선착순 50분에게 2장씩 에드해드릴게요! 댓글에 가고싶은 이유 남겨주신 분들에게 선착순으로 일괄 발송 (시간이 없어서 30일 오전 01시 발송) 시간 되시는 분들은 좋은 추억 만들고오시길 일단 연예인 라인업은 츄, 티파니, 스테이시 등등 계속 공개됨
👍19👏6🔥6❤3
비트코인, 이더리움 ETF 프리미엄은 거의 중립권 미국 현물 ETF 프리미엄이 높다는건 해당 종목에 미국 투자자들이 프리미엄을 지불하면서까지 매수하려는 수요가 높다는 것 (반대로 음수라면 매도 수요가 강한 것) 비트코인은 살짝 음수, 이더리움은 살짝 양수 곧 JOLTs 보고서 발표되는데 과연...? #비트코인 #이더리움 #차트
👍5👀4🔥3❤2🐳1👏1
FOMC 변곡을 맞췄던 고래가 입 벌리고 있는 매수 대기 라인은 현재 약 $82.2K~$78.8K 반등 전 저점을 만들러 가기 전 숏 포지션도 진입하고.. 지난 FOMC 전, 후 하락세에 롱 포지션으로 스위칭하고 익절했던 고래 며칠간 조정이 좀 나오고 있는데 이번에도 변곡을 맞춰주길 #비트코인
🔥16❤10👀7
거래소로 입금되는 알트코인 트젝 증가 중 작년 10월 이후 최고치를 기록 중 2024년 2번의 고점권이 되었던 시기만큼 급증하지는 않았지만.. 일단 좋은 데이터는 아니니 참고 입금 트젝이 더 증가하면 조심할 필요가 있을듯 #알트코인 #온체인데이터
👍13👀7🐳3
도플러 파이낸스 TGE 완 - 현재 약 $200M 근처 유지 중 - 상장 거래소는 바낸 알파, OKX, 크라켄 등 강성 홀더들이 많은 리플과 깊게 얽혀있는만큼 당분간 주의깊게 살펴보면 좋을듯 #KOL
👀8❤5👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 262 posts we hold for @seaotterbtc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@seaotterbtc edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 85 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“해달의 투자 정보 공유” (@seaotterbtc), 30,151 subscribers as measured 2 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seaotterbtc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.