Channel
@jammin0720
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,563subscribers
+55 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002179206614 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jammin0720 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jammin0720 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 3,563 | +43 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 3,520 | +10 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:40 | 3,510 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:50 | 3,508 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 3,508 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (2 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 22,236 |
| Reactions total | 27 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
27 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 70.4% | |
| 😱 | 4 | 14.8% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 7.41% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 7.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2주후부터 단돈 1원도 트래블룰 필요? 8월 11일 가상자산 트래블룰 금액기준을 폐지하는 내용의 개정안이 국무회의에 오를 예정. 이게 의결되면 당장 8월 20일부터 금액과 상관없이 전부 트래블룰 대상이 된다고 하네요.. 😠 https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42351
🤔2
최근 국내 거래소 근황 업비트 전년 동기 대비 -75% 빗썸 전년 동기 대비 -95% 코빗 운영자금을 위해 갖고 있던 암호화폐를 판매 (약 120억) 출처
😱2
최근 투자 유치로 주목받는 체인·인프라 프로젝트들 X 원문 내용을 바탕으로 정리 투자 규모와 주요 투자사를 간단히 정리 • Arc — $222M a16z Crypto, BlackRock, Apollo, ARK Invest 등 참여 • Commonware — $34M Tempo, Dragonfly 등 참여 • Doma Protocol — $30M Paradigm 등 참여 • Ritual — $25M+ Archetype, Polychain, Robot Ventures 등 참여 • Miden — $25M a16z Crypto 등 참여 • Fhenix — $22M Multicoin, Hack VC, Amber 등 참여 • 1Money — $20M+ Galaxy, Hack VC, Kraken Ventures, F-Prime 등 참여 • …
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 진행되지 못하고 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다.
해당 글에 대한 Rabby wallet의 답변 "소스 체인에서의 거래로, ~$10 USDC는 프로토콜 반환분" MEV, 유동성 부족, 또는 지갑 버그가 관련된 바는 없었다.
1 ETH를 스왑했는데 10 USDC만 들어온 사건 Rabby에서 약 $2,000 를 스왑을 진행 지갑에 들어온 금액은 고작 $10 15분이 지나도 나머지 금액이 들어오지 않아 트랜잭션을 확인해보니, 1 ETH가 10 USDC로 스왑된 것처럼 표시돼 있었음. 순간 MEV에 털린 줄 알고 아침부터 정신이 번쩍 들었음. Rabby 내역상으로는 실제로 $10에 스왑된 것처럼 보였지만, LI.FI 익스플로러를 확인해보니 Circle CCTP를 통해 Mayan을 거치는 라우팅이었음. 결론적으로 약 1시간 뒤 정상적으로 전액 도착 다만 진짜 무서운 점은 이런 일이 실제 사고일 수도 있다는 것 유동성이 부족한 DEX나 인앱 오류를 제대로 확인하지 않고 승인하면, $100,000를 $10에 스왑하는 것도 이론상 가능 스왑 전에는 무조건 확인해…
❤4
[Decibel × DOKDO] 포지션 손실 $0, 최대 $220 + $2,000 리워드 이중 파밍 USDC를 일정 기간 락업하면 Decibel에서 2분짜리 무료 BTC 포지션을 제공합니다 방향이 맞으면 수익을 받고, 틀려도 포지션 손실은 $0 추가로 결과 화면과 참여 후기를 인증하면 DOKDO $2,000 리워드풀까지 추가로 노릴 수 있습니다. ✔️ 캠페인 핵심 락업 금액: $250~$5,000 USDC 락업 기간: 1일 / 4일 / 7일 무료 포지션 규모: $50~$1,100 포지션 방향: 클레임 즉시 롱·숏 중 랜덤 배정 적중 시 수익 지급 / 실패 시 손실 $0 락업 원금은 기간 종료 후 전액 출금 가능 락업 중에도 거래 가능하며 출금만 제한 ※ 락업 원금으로 포지션을 잡는 것이 아니라, Decibel이 락업 금액에 비례한 별도…
Perp DEX 포인트 OTC 거래 가격 정리 현재 장외거래에서 형성된 것으로 알려진 Perp DEX별 포인트 가격 • Variational: 포인트당 $25~$30 • Extended: 포인트당 $2~$3 • Perpl: 포인트당 $5~$10 • Ondo Perps: 포인트당 $0.3~$0.5 • Rise: 포인트당 $5~$7.5 • Pacifica: 포인트당 $0.2~$0.3 • Nado: 포인트당 $0.4~$0.6 최근 에어드랍 메타가 Perp DEX로 몰리고 있는 가운데, 우선 Extended가 향후 몇 주 내 TGE를 준비 중이며 다른 프로젝트들도 순차적으로 에어드랍을 진행할 가능성이 있음 다만 OTC 가격은 공식 가격이 아니며 거래 상대방과 시장 상황에 따라 크게 달라질 수 있으니 참고용으로만 보는 게 좋음 출처
😭2
Extended 에어드랍 임박? Extended 팀이 향후 몇 주 내 TGE를 준비 중이며, 최종 포인트 정산 결과도 이번 주 공개할 예정이라고 밝힘 비정상적이거나 조작된 활동으로 적립된 포인트는 삭감되며, 최종 배포 포인트는 기존에 책정된 7,000만 포인트를 넘지 않을 예정 • 전체 공급량의 30%를 에어드랍으로 배정 • TGE를 앞두고 최근 $12.5M 규모의 투자 유치 • 바이백 재원으로 $30M 보유 • GRVT가 약 $250M FDV로 출시된 점을 고려하면, Extended는 $400M~$500M FDV도 기대된다는 전망 • 포인트당 $2~$3 수준의 가치가 나온다면 상당한 규모의 에어드랍도 가능 퍼프 파밍은 계속 출처
😱2
브리지·스왑 애그리게이터로 유명한 Jumper Advanced 기능 정식 출시 정식 출시 기능 ● 트랜잭션 체결 결과 사전 시뮬레이션 ● 거래 페어별 스마트 슬리피지 자동 설정 ● 대규모 주문을 여러 유동성 소스로 분할하는 Jumper Flow ● 목표 가격에 미리 주문을 걸어두는 지정가 주문 특히 큰 금액을 스왑할 때 발생하는 가격 충격과 예상 견적·실제 체결 수량 간 차이를 줄이는 데 초점을 맞춘 기능으로 보임. 기존에는 브릿지 용도로 자주 활용했다면, 이제는 대규모 온체인 스왑이나 지정가 주문에서도 활용도가 높아질 듯 X / Announcements
❤1
Posted without readable text
당첨자 공개 @haoyue26 @jongnym @rika179 @dldlwns @k5877 @cheetaman @soongyeoni @kimyingying @REDLION_137 @japjookki 당첨자분들은 DM 부탁드립니다 @songb2
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @jammin0720. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 4,596 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Zi존파워잼민” (@jammin0720), 3,563 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jammin0720.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.