Hope님 글 보고 닉네임 많이 남은 것 같아서 심심한김에 telegram 가져감... 일론머스크는 누가 가져갔더라... 슥 하나 가져가세요... 링크
👍1

Channel
@waitstudy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
19,328subscribers
-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001580798536 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @waitstudy |
| Description | 돈벌러왔으면 돈을 벌자 투자자 매실남입니다. * 매실남 채널의 모든 내용은 투자의 선택에서 참고자료 용도로만 사용하시길 바랍니다. * 채널의 어떠한 내용의 글도 매수 및 매도 추천의 글이 아닙니다. #AD = Paid promotion / #KOL = Requested KOL post |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/waitstudy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 19,328 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 19,338 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:42 | 19,341 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:11 | 19,344 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 19,349 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 19,351 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:40 | 19,362 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 19,362 | first reading |
126 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 84 of 126 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 126 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 165,887 |
| Reactions total | 326 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
301 reactions across 72 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 150 | 49.8% | |
| 👀 | 53 | 17.6% | |
| 💊 | 52 | 17.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 29 | 9.63% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 5.65% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 84 of the 126 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 326reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hope님 글 보고 닉네임 많이 남은 것 같아서 심심한김에 telegram 가져감... 일론머스크는 누가 가져갔더라... 슥 하나 가져가세요... 링크
👍1
솔직히 말해서 업비트랑 빗썸이 마지막 한국의 협상력이었음. 근데 업비트랑 빗썸이 할수있는게 한국에서는 너무 제한적임. 할수있는거? 하루에 한번씩 상장하면서 상장거래량 만드는거.... 그니까 미친듯이 상장하는데 역설적으로 모두에게 열린시장은 협상력을 잃게 됨. 한국의 코인시장은 어디로가야하는가? 업비트가 코인베이스처럼 큰형님의 역할을 해줘야 하는데.... 빗썸이 로빈후드처럼 자체 생태계 구축 시도를 할 수 있을까? 1. 우리나라는 이해충돌 어쩌고 법 때문에 투자한 코인을 상장 못함. 2. 투자시장에서 업비트나 두나무, 빗썸의 투자를 받으면 오히려 좋은 거래소에 상장을 못하는 오히려 투자를 받으면 장애물이 되어버림. 3. 그러다보니 생태계 투자 순환도 안됨. 4. 유저들 유동성 플레이말고 할 수 있는게 없음. 5. 근데 유저들 유동성플레이…
전닉 야간 분위기 좋음.
👍1
미친새키
👀1
금일의 큐레이션 위로가 필요한 분들께. https://www.teumjournal.com/post/2bc47514-2103-465b-a8cf-f6abf90f184d
[Walter Bloomberg] 이란, 트럼프 퇴임까지 전쟁 장기화 시사 나그디 IRGC 고문: 이란, 트럼프 퇴임까지 미와 전쟁 지속 가능성…비용 부과·억지력 강화 목적 나그디: 이란 승리 중, 미국은 명확한 전략 부재 나그디: 분쟁 길어질수록 미군과의 전투 학습 늘어 나그디: 이란, 미사일 사용 속도보다 생산 속도 빨라 ㅡ ❓IRGC: 이슬람혁명수비대 (Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps). 이란 최고지도자 직속 군사조직, 미국이 테러단체로 지정 🔗자세히 보기 ⚔️전쟁 상황실 📲앱 다운로드
👀2
🟢 $64,000 @bitcoin_price
👍4
코인도 가능...?
👍6
ISA 개편안 "없던 일로"
2026 크립토 오디세우스는 어디에..
👀4👍2💊1
주식시장에 피가 낭자하고..
이런 부류의. 지금이 기회라는 글들이 트위터에 상당히 자주 보이는중.
Showing the 12 most recent of 126 posts we hold for @waitstudy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
과세 유예 찐막차 가능할까
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 126 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 30,168 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것” (@waitstudy), 19,328 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waitstudy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.