Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것

Channel

매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것

@waitstudy

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,396subscribers

+34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001580798536
TypeChannel
Username@waitstudy
Description돈벌러왔으면 돈을 벌자 투자자 매실남입니다. #AD = Paid promotion / #KOL = Requested KOL post 📌 면책조항 - 본 채널의 모든 내용은 정보 공유 목적이며, 투자 권유나 자문이 아닙니다. - 투자 판단과 그에 따른 손익의 책임은 이용자 본인에게 있습니다. - 국내 이용자는 특정금융정보법 등 관련 법령을 준수하고 신고된 거래소 이용을 권장합니다. - 미신고 해외 거래소 이용 시 법적 보호가 제한될 수 있습니다.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/waitstudy

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

No sample pairs were kept for this entry. The counts below were measured, but without the pairs there is nothing here for you to open and check, so treat the relationship as recorded rather than demonstrated.

Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@leedogin216 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0038 minutesthis entry (13–3)
@Honeyofwhitesocks_28 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.8 hourseven

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 1 of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 162 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

19,31619,87019,59319,3966 August 202610 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 96 days, net +34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,233–19,953 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 02:2719,396-14
8 Nov 2026, 14:5619,410-17
7 Nov 2026, 08:3619,427-14
6 Nov 2026, 09:4919,441-23
4 Nov 2026, 11:0819,464-7
3 Nov 2026, 09:1919,471-3
2 Nov 2026, 08:1819,474-8
1 Nov 2026, 11:0019,482+2
31 Oct 2026, 13:4619,480-9
30 Oct 2026, 11:3519,489-5
29 Oct 2026, 11:2919,494-7
28 Oct 2026, 11:5719,501-5
27 Oct 2026, 15:2119,506-5
26 Oct 2026, 16:0919,511-3
25 Oct 2026, 14:2619,514+3
24 Oct 2026, 17:2719,511-7
23 Oct 2026, 20:2819,518-5
22 Oct 2026, 23:4619,523-24
21 Oct 2026, 19:0719,547-21
20 Oct 2026, 15:3919,568first reading

Engagement

858 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.13%
avg views ÷ 19,396 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,190
235 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.222%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
235
of 858 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 100 of 235 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held858 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total279,547
Reactions total288
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 03:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈15,000
Videos
≈207
Links
≈7,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 31s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,153 reactions across 490 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,11551.8%
🔥28413.2%
❤‍🔥1838.50%
👀1667.71%
💊1406.50%
🤮1175.43%
🍌843.90%
🤯642.97%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 506 of the 858 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,178 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 858 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 235 posts held from the last 30 days (7.23%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 03:24 UTC206 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

바이빗 해킹 이후의 비트코인 차트와 바이낸스 해킹 사태(10/29) 이후로도 유사한 흐름을 보이는 것 같아 뽑아봤습니다. 우하향 하는 흐름은 비슷하네요. 현재 10일 밖에 되지 않은 상황, 더욱 지켜볼 필요가 있을 것 같음. 바이빗 때는 해킹 이후 45일 쯤 반등이 나왔으니 앞으로 한달 정도 비슷한 우하향 흐름이 보일지도.

👍1

11 Nov 2026, 02:49 UTC852 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Variational 한국방 봤는데 TGE는 4분기니까 걱정말라는 글을 남기셨네요. 그나저나 이제 12월까지 최대로 잡아도 50일...? 남았네요. 시간 참 빠르네..

10 Nov 2026, 23:21 UTC677 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

시장은 12월 25bp 인상, 그리고 내년 2회 추가 인상을 반영중

👍2

10 Nov 2026, 22:38 UTC511 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Arcus, 잔액 부풀리기 버그로 223만 USDG 유출 공식 사고보고서에 따르면 한국시간 11월 10일, 공격자가 자기 서브계정끼리 자금을 옮기는 과정의 버그를 악용해 실제보다 잔액을 크게 부풀린 뒤 출금함. 실제 유출액은 2,234,391 USDG 추가 300만 달러 출금은 브리지 출금 한도에 막혔고 이후 취소 팀은 전체 출금을 중단하고 패치한 뒤 약 5시간 만에 출금 재개 부족분은 회사 재원으로 전액 보전했으며, 다른 이용자의 잔액·포지션·주문에는 영향이 없었다는 설명 유저 자금에 손실은 없다고 하지만 돈이 빠져나갔고 그 구멍을 회사가 메운 사건임. 유출 자금은 회수 완료가 아니라 추적 중이라고 함 대충 팀 자금에서 30억정도 빵꾸난듯. 서브계정 복사버그 뭐냐... https://arcus.xyz/blog/arcus-inc…

10 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,080 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

ZEC, 24시간 11% 넘게 하락… 장중 1,000달러선 붕괴

👍2

10 Nov 2026, 17:17 UTC≈1,180 viewsread 11 November 2026

다음 매물대 70불에 있어서. 그 라인까지 찍으면 "여기서부터" 40% 추가 하락임

10 Nov 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

코베는 얼핏봐도 상당히 중요해보이는 지지선 이탈

Showing the 12 most recent of 858 posts we hold for @waitstudy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Nov 2026, 08:29 UTCAnonymous Poll283 voters

본인 포지션

  1. 다 물렸음. 코인 주식 등등 싹다요58%
  2. 현금임...19%
  3. 적당히만 물려있음... 적당히..25%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Nov 2026, 10:01 UTCAnonymous Poll295 voters

내가 5천으로 5억 만들었다면

  1. 10억까지 존버. 복리의 투자 간다56%
  2. 익절 익절 무조건 익저ㅓㄹㄹㄹㄹㄹㄹ47%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTCAnonymous Poll340 voters

비트코코 도넘는 상승.

  1. 무조건 찐반 찐반. 절대 숏치지마.55%
  2. 역대급 불트랩 각. 절대 롱치지마.47%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTCAnonymous Poll554 voters

도넘는 크립토 반등... 정말로 찐반인가?

  1. 이게 찐반이 아니라면 코접한다. 찐반임.47%
  2. 불트랩에 속지마라. 절대 찐반 아님.53%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

10 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTCAnonymous Poll392 voters

과세 유예 찐막차 가능할까

  1. 코인 과세 유예 마지막으로 될듯31%
  2. 상대는 대재명이다. 되겠냐....71%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 858 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 60 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,361
7 posts
크립토광부 게시판
@cryptokwangbu · 2,333
4 posts
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,756
4 posts
아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,817
3 posts
코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,370
3 posts
큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,342
3 posts
싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 11,018
3 posts
희단이의 Web3 꿀정보 공지방
@heedan22 · 8,028
3 posts
원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 17,003
3 posts
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,805
2 posts
젬하 크립토(GemHive)🦄 경제적 자유 이루기
@GemHive · 21,259
2 posts
돈벼락 맞을 에이스비(와 호미)의 채널
@aceb10b · 366
2 posts
ST Asian Parser
@asian_parser · 1,605
2 posts
차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,088
2 posts
크립토파즈(Cryptopaz)
@cryptopaz0 · 10,386
2 posts
디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 13,013
2 posts
성장 다오ㅣ에드작 맛집 전문
@grow_airdrop · 3,482
2 posts
크립토 꿀쥐🐭
@honeymouse1003 · 11,559
2 posts
0.094톤 일기장
@koreapigdiary · 4,136
2 posts
Web3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 23,025
2 posts
리버모어의 트레이딩 노트
@lmtradingnote · 1,209
2 posts
인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 7,940
2 posts
웹3 & AI 에이전트 광기 연구실
@ryotmadness · 1,902
2 posts
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,000
2 posts
빌더가 되고싶은 참김방
@tunakimbab · 154
2 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,325
1 post
BMT 파라다이스
@BMTube · 13,428
1 post
바밀이야 bamilirya
@Bananamilkrich · 8,640
1 post
부업연구소 🦅
@CRYPTOSCH00L · 12,544
1 post
꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,065
1 post
캬오의 공부방
@Kyaooo · 17,481
1 post
코스모스 생태계 에어드랍 소개
@airdropcosm · 6,383
1 post
브라이언홍
@apac · 3,788
1 post
바나의 꺾여도 그냥 하는 방
@bana_list · 336
1 post
코백남 공지방
@cobacknamannounce · 17,020
1 post
코인포
@coinpo2 · 6,754
1 post
코인웃짤 시즌2
@coinsmileV2 · 49
1 post
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,104
1 post
크립토플로우 에어드랍
@cryptoflow_airdrop · 15
1 post
FOMO 4가투
@fourgachi · 9,361
1 post
재야의 고수들
@gaoshoukorea · 41,200
1 post
고따 일기장
@goraetrackerKR · 7,557
1 post
암호화폐 연구소
@ishowcrypto7 · 64
1 post
자돈의 대모험 (구 리버스시그널)
@jadonadventure · 64
1 post
경기도웨일
@korea_whale · 6,500
1 post
레오마스터‘s 코인 공지채널
@leomasternotice · 555
1 post
리암의 코인공방
@liambitcoin · 4,517
1 post
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,189
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Republishes 105 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,325
11 posts
㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,408
9 posts
📰 실시간 속보 단독 뉴스
@news_kor · 15,618
7 posts
라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,878
6 posts
돈타쿠
@dontak00 · 14,773
5 posts
Binance Futures Liquidations
@BinanceLiquidations · 176,061
4 posts
끄적이는 펭귄의 일기장
@SongPenguin0 · 31
4 posts
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,511
4 posts
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,703
4 posts
Followin 속보
@followin_ko · 3,652
4 posts
🌸Crypto Judy🐰🌸
@lovejudylee · 37,063
4 posts
StockHub (스톡허브) 뉴스
@stockhubkr · 3,152
4 posts
Valletta's 투자 이야기
@vallettaidea · 3,479
4 posts
New Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,178
3 posts
싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 11,018
3 posts
돌곰배와 매직 코인일기
@dolgommagic · 12,110
3 posts
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,370
3 posts
WEDOM BITCOIN
@wedomnbro · 16,678
3 posts
조선코인
@ChosunCrypto1 · 3,957
2 posts
그냥 꼬맹
@Dove262 · 3,397
2 posts
ELLIOT_TRACE
@ELLIOTTRACE · 298
2 posts
생각 정리하는 방
@Thoughts_BFox · 15,086
2 posts
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,170
2 posts
글반장
@banjang9 · 7,485
2 posts
.dms
@channel_dms · 2,086
2 posts
CRYPTO Sea
@crypt0_sea · 15,608
2 posts
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,104
2 posts
큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,342
2 posts
나혼자매매-차트&온체인
@easychartgo · 6,052
2 posts
ETH Price
@ethprices · 13,512
2 posts
숙제를 합시다
@homeworkgogo · 6,420
2 posts
Zi존파워잼민
@jammin0720 · 5,703
2 posts
해랑달‘s Takes & Notes
@newmoneymovesio · 5,117
2 posts
머리나빠도 돈버는법
@nojobnoplan · 5,434
2 posts
미국코인
@rolypopa · 10,617
2 posts
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,000
2 posts
CTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,436
2 posts
알랑이 정보교류소
@AlanInfoExchange · 3,283
1 post
Big Liquidations
@BigLiquid · 6,707
1 post
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,455
1 post
Min.Alpha🏆Premium Airdrop Global
@airdropAScenter · 2,549
1 post
알파를 듀오 공지방
@alpha_duo · 2,566
1 post
Arcane Gems
@arcanegems · 46,663
1 post
백호의 투자갤러리
@baekobaeko · 8,017
1 post
BARO | 한국 크립토 인텔리전스
@baro_quest · 550
1 post
bite the bullet
@bitethebulletkr · 9,588
1 post
비트웨일
@bitwhalelv1 · 1,298
1 post
블루의 일기장
@bluezeroneV · 2,294
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,805
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,756
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,189
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,170
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,236
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,675
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,325
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,355
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,840
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,511
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,370
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,000
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,330
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
우리는 트윗충
@twitchoong · 79,274
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
크립토퀀트 알람
@cq_alert_kr · 21,587
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
Baby Doge 공지사항
@BabyDogeAnnKO · 74,089
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
Slinky Announcements
@slinkylayer_ann · 38,612
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 29 August 2026
갓물주 (코인정보, 돈되는거)
@godmulzoo · 22,609
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Layergg exchange & project alert
@layergg · 19,298
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
JackToken Announcements
@jacktokencom · 381,368
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,389
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
New Listings Feed
@NewListingsFeed · 59,178
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지)
@coinkcgchannel · 15,387
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
블록미디어
@blockmedia · 32,929
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“매실남과 당신은 반드시 승리할것” (@waitstudy), 19,396 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/waitstudy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.