불과 1시간전 바이낸스 4조원 해킹
👍1

Channel
@chikointhebox
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,542subscribers
-590 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001779453749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chikointhebox |
| Description | 방장은 코인 개못하지만 고래들이 많이 보는 텔레그램방 Korea Whales Channel 공지방 : @chikointhebox |
| Created | 5 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chikointhebox |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 14,542 | -18 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:35 | 14,560 | -14 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 11:47 | 14,574 | -12 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:49 | 14,586 | -7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:48 | 14,593 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:49 | 14,598 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:09 | 14,605 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:17 | 14,608 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 00:40 | 14,615 | -13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:37 | 14,628 | -2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:20 | 14,630 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 14,638 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 14,645 | -8 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:59 | 14,653 | -8 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 14,661 | -2 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 03:28 | 14,663 | -4 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 14,667 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:59 | 14,666 | -8 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:18 | 14,674 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 20:46 | 14,676 | first reading |
44 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (11 November 2025 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 11,230 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 19:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
177 reactions across 39 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 124 | 70.1% | |
| 🐳 | 32 | 18.1% | |
| 🤡 | 21 | 11.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
불과 1시간전 바이낸스 4조원 해킹
👍1
빗썸은 쓰지 말아야할 거래소가 되었습니다. 1. 알트 출금수수료 1% 2. 코인 출금을 하루가 지나도 안빼줌 (문제 걸린 것도 없음) 입출금을 막는 은행이 은행이라 할 수 있나? 그래도 정때문에 계속 빗썸을 쓴 제가 잘못된거겠죠. 여러분은 절 교훈삼아 빗썸을 절대 쓰지마...
👍8
솔직히 빗썸이 출금 존나게 해줘서 업비트 원상 망하게하면 되지않나? 카이아 1500억중에 150억만 출금해줬어도 업비트에서 바로 50원갔을듯
👍3
[ Abstract 서비스 종료 ] 레전드 플레이네 88주간 XP 채굴 시켜놓고 나오기전에 섭종
👍3
폼좋은 디파이 마에스트로의 글 (원문) 요약: 제품 중심적이면서도 현실적인 창업자를 찾는다. 그들은 성공하고자 하는 의지가 매우 강하다는 것. “이 시장에 프로토콜이 너무 많은데, 한두 곳에 크게 집중할 만큼의 확신은 어떻게 쌓나요?” 제 답은 간단합니다. 창업자, 그리고 제품의 PMF(제품-시장 적합성)입니다. 매 시장 사이클마다 핵심 테마가 있습니다. 시장이 혁신하면서 트렌드도 바뀝니다. 그리고 새로운 트렌드가 나올 때마다, 고래와 VC가 본격적으로 들어오기 전에 해당 섹터의 잠재적 리더를 알아볼 수 있는 짧은 기회가 있습니다. 제가 찾는 건 제품 중심적이면서도 현실적인 창업자입니다. 프로토콜에 큰 베팅을 한다는 것은 결국 그 창업자의 성공에 베팅하는 것과 다름없습니다. Pendle에는 TN이 있고 Ethena에는 Guy가 있으…
👍3
하루 만에 10배 오른 LSK, 숏 진입 주의 현재 LSK는 바이낸스 현물·선물, 업비트 현물 세 시장을 이용해서 주작을 치고있습니다 제가 확인한 시점 기준, 바이낸스 가격은 약 1,400원, 업비트는 약 650원으로 바이낸스가 업비트보다 100% 이상 비싸게 거래되고 있습니다. 바이낸스 현물은 호가가 매우 얇은 반면, 업비트 현물은 상대적으로 촘촘합니다. 이 차이를 이용해 바이낸스 현물을 강하게 매수하면서 가격을 끌어올리고, 가격 차이를 노린 차익거래자들이 업비트에서 현물을 매수해 바이낸스로 보따리 보내도록 유도하는 구조로 보입니다. 이 과정에서 유입되는 매수세를 이용해 물량을 정리하고 선물거래소에서 롱숏 다터트리는 결말로 보입니다 제 관점에서는 지난해 레이브다오와 유사한 패턴입니다. 당시에는 비트겟 현물을 끌어올려 바이낸스 선물에서 물량…
👍2
https://theddari.com/game/coin-syndicate 이전에 gpt 로 임시로 만든 게임을 좀 강화하여 코인충들이 공감할만한 느낌의 내용으로 채워서 넣었어요. 이전에는 해당 브라우저에서밖에 저장이 안되지만, 더따리의 텔레그램 로그인으로 하면 폰에서 하다가 컴퓨터로 넘어가서 하거나, 이런저런 방식이 가능합니다. 심심하실때 하시고, 언제든지 피드백 주시면 추가하겠습니다. 도중에 멈췄다가 진행해도 괜찮아요. 아마? 랭킹 시스템도 있고, 추후에 다음주 신디케이터 랭킹에는 콩이러브님이 내신 구독료 TRX 을 주기적으로 나눠서 상금으로 배포해보려고 해요. 일단 배포를 위한 시스템 구축을 해둬야해서, 담주 정도면 되지 않을까.. 아무튼 테스터 여러분들의 피드백을 많이 받고, 캐릭터에 넣어드렸습니다. 재밌게 하세용 콩이러…
👍2
" 원상하는데 5분후에 상장하기 " 대체 왜 이렇게? 싶기는한데 그래도 코인충에겐 이런 상장이 오히려 더 좋은거 같아요
👍2
LAPTOP, 서브스택 구독인가? 똥글 구독하던 사람은 현재 가격 100$, 기본 요금제로는 8만불, 고급 요금제로는 40만불의 이득을 올림. 내부자가 아니고선 어떻게 이걸 해쳐먹어~ 그래도 오랜만에 '진짜 코인' 보는 것 같네요
👍2
남들 다 아는 헤미 해킹 사건을 거래개시 20분전에 공지해서 상장 취소하는 업비트, 상장 심사에 힘 썼으면 좋겠네요. 그래도 우리 업비트, 응원해볼게요 나아질 수... 있지?
👍3
업비트는 언제쯤 정상적인 코인을 상장할까? 상장이 되고 시간이 지나면 재단과 연관된 지갑은 각종 거래소에 코인을 뿌려서 매도를 해대버린다. 차트만 봐도 따리꾼들 순 유입금액이 50억인데, 이렇게 떨어질 수가 없다. 개똥코인을 자꾸 상장하는 업비트 뭔가 이유가 있지않을까... 사실 이렇게 피해를 주는데 아직도 따리하는 제가 흑우고 등신인거긴합니다
👍10🤡5🐳1
헌터 바이든이 9월 9일 BASE 체인을 통해 밈코인을 출시한다고 한다. 노리는 수요는 $TRUMP 뽕을 근거리에서 느꼈던 사람들이 FOMO로 매수하는걸 노리나봄 그리고, 이 소식이 뜨기 전 3일전에 바이든 관련 코인을 매수한 지갑도 실제로 있다. 딱봐도 밈코인은 손대면 위험한 이유가 느껴진다 1. 돈 된다고 코인하지도 않은 사람이 유입되는 신호 2. 개미들 입장에선 사고 팔고 해봤자 결국 발행자 돈을 챙겨주는 셈 3. 인사이더들이 있을텐데, 그 사람들 주머니도 챙겨주는 셈 4. 실력인지 내부자인지는 모르겠지만 그런 발빠른 사람들마저도 이겨낼 준비가 되어있어야함 결국 밈코는 우리들로선 질 수 밖에 없는 장사다. 그럼 이제 뭘로 돈 벌어야하지... 밈코로 돈 잃고 쓰는 글 맞음
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @chikointhebox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@chikointhebox edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“치코의 코인상자” (@chikointhebox), 14,542 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chikointhebox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.