Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

치코의 택배상자

@chikointhebox

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

15,086subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001779453749
TypeChannel
Username@chikointhebox
Created5 July 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/chikointhebox

Growth

15,08615,13215,1096 August 2026 — 15,132 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,128 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,126 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,119 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,118 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,113 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,105 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,093 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,086 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,079–15,139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:4615,086-7
12 Aug 2026, 04:1715,093-12
11 Aug 2026, 07:0115,105-8
10 Aug 2026, 08:1515,113-5
9 Aug 2026, 10:5115,118-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:4215,119-7
7 Aug 2026, 15:1015,126-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:1315,128-4
6 Aug 2026, 02:3715,132first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 15,086 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,560
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.102%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 17 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total43,500
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

42 reactions across 17 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3992.9%
🐳24.76%
🤡12.38%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC≈1,090 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

[ 업비트 CAP 상장 ] 원상따리 계속 해보고있는데 원상따리하면 저점매수자들에게 털려서 돈 잃습니다 우리가 할 수 있는건 상장 예측으로 돈 버는게 최고같아요... 요즘 매일매일 상장하네 38커뮤니케이션 보는거같아

👍5🤡1

4 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,330 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

[ 업비트 빗썸 QUID 상장 ] 오랜만의 TGE 상장. TGE가 10시였는데 요새 기조로 보아 정규 상장시간인 11시에 상장은 못할 것 같음.

👍3

31 Jul 2026, 00:46 UTC≈2,250 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

이유는 모르겠지만 SK하이닉스랑 달러랑 커플링되어있음 SK하이닉스 상승 = 달러 상승

👍3

31 Jul 2026, 00:27 UTC≈4,810 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

아침 9시 3분, 하이닉스 레버리지 괴리율이 -20%까지 찍었습니다. 본주의 상승을 레버리지가 못따라간건데요. 이 때 줍기만해도 괴리율 사냥으로 돈을 벌 수 있었음

31 Jul 2026, 00:12 UTC≈1,960 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

누가 내 구글 메일로 KFC랑 맥도날드에 알바지원 제출한거냐 자수해라

🐳1

30 Jul 2026, 23:56 UTC≈1,850 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

상한가를 이렇게 구경하네 뻥호가겠지만요

29 Jul 2026, 00:36 UTC≈2,100 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

[ 하이퍼리퀴드 롱 청산 사태 : 손실 보상하기로..] Trade.xyz : 우리는 이 이상 현상에 기인한 청산 손실을 보상하기로 결정했습니다. 자격 요건은 곧 전달될 것이며, 분배는 며칠 내에 완료될 것으로 예상됩니다. 이는 일회성 재량 결정이며, 유사한 미래 조치에 대한 보증이 아닙니다.

👍1

27 Jul 2026, 23:48 UTC≈2,160 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

[ 하이퍼리퀴드 하이닉스 920$ 찍고옴 ] 넥장에서 하한가 잠시 터져서 이 가격을 받는 바람에 난리났던듯. 펀비작하던 사람들은 좋지만 롱 잡고있던 분들은 괴로워졌습니다. ㅜㅜ...

🐳1👍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:41 UTC≈1,850 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

[ 빗썸 BANK 상장 ] 빗썸은 로렌조 BANK를 오늘 상장했는데요, 초반에 상장 펌핑이 많이 나왔더라고요. 이런 비슷한 결과를 오늘 바라면.... 바라면... 안되나?

👍3

27 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

[ 업비트 빗썸 GEOD 상장 ] 간만에 앞선 매집각도 아닌 것 같은 코인이 나란히 상장하네요. 업비트는 원래 3시 상장이였다가 연장에 연장을 했는데 자강두천의 싸움이 시작됩니다 과연 결과는..?

26 Jul 2026, 13:05 UTC≈1,370 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @c0wfarmPhoto

한국 M2 통화량은 2019년 대비 2.55M → 4.16M, +63.1% 아리팍 34평 동일 동·비슷한 층은 34억 → 63억, +85.3% 홍콩반점 짜장면도 4,500원 → 7,000원, +55.6% 그렇다면 정상과 비정상을 나누는 기준은 뭘까요? 통화량은 63% 늘고, 짜장면은 56% 올랐는데, 아파트가 85% 오르면 무조건 비정상인가요? 같은 기간 금은 조정 후에도 약 +200%, 나스닥은 약 +285%, 원·달러 환율도 약 +28% 올랐습니다. 아리팍을 달러 기준으로 보면 상승률은 약 +45.2%입니다. 자산 가격만 볼 게 아니라 통화량, 물가, 환율도 같이 봐야 하지 않을까요? 아파트만 정상화하지 말고 짜장면도 4,500원으로 정상화시켜 주세요!!!!

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @chikointhebox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 489,578 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“치코의 택배상자” (@chikointhebox), 15,086 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chikointhebox.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.