[ PONS로 돈을 못벌었다면 ] PONS가 오르기전에 손절한 지갑을 보고 위안을 얻자 ... 그래도 이 지갑은 좋은걸 미리 보는 눈이 있으니 나중에 복구할 수 있을거야
👍3

Channel
@chikointhebox
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,872subscribers
-260 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001779453749 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @chikointhebox |
| Created | 5 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/chikointhebox |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 14,872 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 14,875 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 14,877 | -15 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 14,892 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 14,900 | -28 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:39 | 14,928 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 14,934 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:48 | 14,933 | -21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:04 | 14,954 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 14,958 | -11 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 14,969 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 14,974 | -18 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 14,992 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 14,996 | -3 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 21:53 | 14,999 | -17 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 15,016 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 15,021 | -12 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 15,033 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 15,044 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 18:45 | 15,050 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (6 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,080 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
71 reactions across 24 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 77.5% | |
| 🤡 | 14 | 19.7% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 2.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[ PONS로 돈을 못벌었다면 ] PONS가 오르기전에 손절한 지갑을 보고 위안을 얻자 ... 그래도 이 지갑은 좋은걸 미리 보는 눈이 있으니 나중에 복구할 수 있을거야
👍3
[ 기회는 늘 가까이 ] 코인 안하는 사이에 로빈후드 체인 밈이 흥하더니 PONS가 대박 픽이 되었었네요. 대박을 위해 코인을 가까이두자... PONS는 로빈후드체인의 펌프펀같아보이는데 장기적으로 보면 더 갈 것 같기도해
👍5
[ Entropy를 보며 ] 파밍을 시작했어요 같이 함께해요 무조건 성공하지는 모르겠고 그냥 불장이 온다면 수혜를 받는 느낌으로... https://entropy.io/
👍3
[ Umia 세일을 보며 ] 이번 Umia 세일은 다들 하고싶어 돈 두둑히 장전해놨는데, 영문도 모를 유저들이 몇만달러 이상씩 턱턱 넣는 것보고 허탈함에 젖어있는거같음 이미 알고있다면 모르겠지만 다들 모른채로 이야기안하고 있다가 이렇게 차별주면은 슬픈거에요 이런게 국내에 상장하면 진짜 개미들을 설거지로 보는걸로 생각하겠읍니다 - 내용이 틀리면 알려주세요
👍2
[ 업비트 NCT(폴리스웜) 상장 ] NCT가 뭐야 대단한 분들이지
👍1
저 아니였으면 3년이라도 롤리랄을 못봤을겁니다 笑 그건 그렇고 모든 부자와 고수와 엘리트들이 한국을 떠나네..
🤡6👍2
언젠가 미국 비자를 받는 날이 오면 텔레그램 활동을 마무리하겠다는 생각으로 달려왔는데, 드디어 비자 발급이 완료되었습니다. 지난 3년 동안 치코 덕분에 텔레그램 채널을 운영해보고, 2년 동안 카카오톡방을 이끌어보고, 처음 시작할 때는 이렇게 오랫동안, 그리고 많은 분과 함께하게 될 거라고는 생각하지 못했습니다. 제가 드린 것보다 오히려 받은 것이 훨씬 많았고, 부족한 저에게 보내주신 관심과 믿음은 분에 넘치는 사랑이었다고 생각합니다. 이제는 제 인생에서 중요한 2막을 준비해야 하는 시기가 왔다보니. 새로운 출발에 온전히 집중하기 위해서는 투자 활동과 커뮤니티 운영을 계속 병행하기 어렵겠다는 판단을 내렸습니다. 어설프게 활동을 이어가며 책임을 다하지 못하는 것보다는, 지금 제대로 마무리하는 것이 맞다고 생각했습니다. 오랫동안 고민한 …
🤡6
[ 업비트 CAP 상장 ] 원상따리 계속 해보고있는데 원상따리하면 저점매수자들에게 털려서 돈 잃습니다 우리가 할 수 있는건 상장 예측으로 돈 버는게 최고같아요... 요즘 매일매일 상장하네 38커뮤니케이션 보는거같아
👍5🤡2
[ 업비트 빗썸 QUID 상장 ] 오랜만의 TGE 상장. TGE가 10시였는데 요새 기조로 보아 정규 상장시간인 11시에 상장은 못할 것 같음.
👍3
SK하이닉스 상한가 !
👍1
이유는 모르겠지만 SK하이닉스랑 달러랑 커플링되어있음 SK하이닉스 상승 = 달러 상승
👍3
아침 9시 3분, 하이닉스 레버리지 괴리율이 -20%까지 찍었습니다. 본주의 상승을 레버리지가 못따라간건데요. 이 때 줍기만해도 괴리율 사냥으로 돈을 벌 수 있었음
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @chikointhebox. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@chikointhebox edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“치코의 코인상자” (@chikointhebox), 14,872 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/chikointhebox.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.