📈📈 천지개벽
❤8🔥1

Channel
@leedogin2
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
15,219subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001725574634 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @leedogin2 |
| Description | #이도진 메타버스 Official 공지방 공지방 : https://t.me/leedogin2 채팅방 : https://t.me/chat_dogin 유튜브 : https://www.youtube.com/@leedogin DM : @leedogin2022 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/leedogin2 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 15,219 | +1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 15,218 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 15,220 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 15,222 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 15,224 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:36 | 15,219 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 15,217 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 15,226 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 15,226 | first reading |
144 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 144 (5 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 111,917 |
| Reactions total | 2,551 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,324 reactions across 125 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 923 | 39.7% | |
| 👍 | 600 | 25.8% | |
| 👏 | 486 | 20.9% | |
| 🔥 | 214 | 9.21% | |
| 🖕 | 31 | 1.33% | |
| 👎 | 26 | 1.12% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 1.08% | |
| 😢 | 10 | 0.43% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 0.129% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.129% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.086% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.043% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,551reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📈📈 천지개벽
❤8🔥1
개인적으로 정말 꼭 참고해보셨으면 좋겠습니다. 청춘님은 개인적으로도 정말 좋아하는 동생인데, 실제 만나면서 투자부터, 부업에 대한 이해도 의견등을 많이 들으면서 인사이트를 두루두루 얻었던 사람 중 하나입니다. 단편적으로 코인 투자를 잘해서 돈을 많이 벌어야지 라는 관점에서 국한 되지 않고, 그건 그거고 나는 별도의 내 갈길을 갈건데 남들이 시도하지 않는 길을 가면서 돈을 벌 거니까 한 번 해본다. 라는 마인드가 굉장히 강한 사람 중 하나입니다. 그동안은 그 경험을 혼자 알고 있었다면 이제는 공유하는 단계가 된거죠 저 역시 몇몇 사람들에게 영감을 받게 되면서 유튜브 자동화와 블로그 등 수익화를 위한 장치들을 개발하는 중이고 본 궤도에 들어가기 시작한 점인데, 그 시발점에 있던 사람 중 하나입니다. 개인적으로는, 성공을 좌우하는 행동강…
❤14👍5👎5🫡3
초보자분들이 접근하기 쉬운 부업 꿀팁 하나 가져가세요 예전에 제목 후킹하는거랑 같이 활용하셔서 한달 정도 노력하면 성과 나오실겁니다 https://x.com/dudrms606/status/2087786735036223901
👍10❤2👎1👏1
고수의 하반기 포트폴리오 https://n.news.naver.com/article/025/0003544082
👏9❤4
다른 방에서 데이터센터 관련 토론이 오가서 제가 아는 바를 정리해드리고자 합니다. 우선 한반도는 타고난 환경 상 데이터센터 산업을 하기에 매우 좋은 조건을 가지고 있습니다. 데이터센터의 이상적인 입지 조건은 다음과 같습니다. 1. 저렴한 건설 단가 2. 지질학적으로 안정적인 환경 3. 데이터 수요지와의 인접성 4. 해저케이블 등 외연 확장성 동아시아 4대 데이터센터 입후보지는 도쿄, 싱가폴, 홍콩, 서울이며 이 중 서울은 저 4개 조건을 안정적으로 충족하고 있습니다. 몇가지 아쉬운 것은 자체 모델이 취약하고 탈원전 정책 등으로 인해 예전만큼 전력 공급이 원활하지 않다는 것인데 이건 뭐 알아서 하겠지요. 데이터센터 산업만 본다면 그냥 입지를 임대해주는 것에 집중하면 될 것 같습니다. 업계 내에서도 몇 년 전부터 조심스레 힌트를 주고…
❤6🔥2
커뮤니티발 글 올라오며 빗썸 조리돌림 당하는중 그나저나 국내 2대장인데 이런 문제 발생은 없어야 할텐데..
😢8❤3
📱 [AMA] Acurast , 핸드폰을 통한 분산 컴퓨팅 네트워크. 이거 가능해? - 일시: 8월 13일 목요일 오후 9시 - 장소: 코인같이투자 트위터 스트리밍 - 손님: Acurast Acurast는 핸드폰을 통한 분산형 네트워크로 현재 279,700 의 핸드폰 구동, 9.19억개 온체인 트랜잭션. 60만 컨트랙트 배포를 통해 영역을 넓히고 있는 DePIN 네트워크입니다. 📨 AMA 기념 이벤트 : Acurast 한국 커뮤니티 ㅣ 대화방 입장 : AMA 공지 게시물 Like RT : AMA 참여 및 인증샷 해당그룹 제출 : 네이버폼 제출 🗳 리워드: 치킨 기프티콘 10명, 만원 기프티콘 50명, 커피 300명 📆 기한: 8월 13일 오후 11시 59분까지 현재 갖춰진 네트워크를 기반으로 peaq와 OKX AI등에 인프라를 제…
👍11❤3
부디, 부탁드립니다
👏25👍2
솔직히 말해서 업비트랑 빗썸이 마지막 한국의 협상력이었음. 근데 업비트랑 빗썸이 할수있는게 한국에서는 너무 제한적임. 할수있는거? 하루에 한번씩 상장하면서 상장거래량 만드는거.... 그니까 미친듯이 상장하는데 역설적으로 모두에게 열린시장은 협상력을 잃게 됨. 한국의 코인시장은 어디로가야하는가? 업비트가 코인베이스처럼 큰형님의 역할을 해줘야 하는데.... 빗썸이 로빈후드처럼 자체 생태계 구축 시도를 할 수 있을까? 1. 우리나라는 이해충돌 어쩌고 법 때문에 투자한 코인을 상장 못함. 2. 투자시장에서 업비트나 두나무, 빗썸의 투자를 받으면 오히려 좋은 거래소에 상장을 못하는 오히려 투자를 받으면 장애물이 되어버림. 3. 그러다보니 생태계 투자 순환도 안됨. 4. 유저들 유동성 플레이말고 할 수 있는게 없음. 5. 근데 유저들 유동성플레이…
❤9👏3😢2
장당 12만원권이라, 받게 되면 꽤 메리트 있지 않나 싶어요 특히, 목동 아이스링크 뮤지컬이라 특장점도 있고, 후기도 엄청 괜찮아서 관심있는 분들은 꼭 챙겨보세요
👏10❤2
1분참여, 역대급 이벤트 준비했으니 필참해보세요 이도진 x Minara AI (나 혼자만 레벨업 on ICE) 뮤지컬 이벤트 그동안 비싸서 선뜻 문화생활 하기 어려웠던 분들이 많으셨을텐데요. Minara AI 와 함께 뮤지컬 티켓 에어드랍 이벤트를 준비했습니다. 간단하게 참여 가능하므로 필참해보세요 - 기간 : 8/13 - 8/14 09:00 KST - 당첨자 1인당 1매 제공(R석, 개인당 12만원) 총 5매 - 관람 일자 : 8월 15일 오후7시, 8월 16일 오후 7시 - 관림 일자는 무작위 배정 » 배정 후 선택 및 변경 불가 📱 이벤트 참여 방법 - 미나라 가입하기(링크) - 기존 가입자는 본 링크로 신규 가입 - 네이버폼 작성(링크) - 트위터 포스팅 좋아요, 리트윗, 댓글 (링크)
👍12❤3
아니근데 빌더피 찾아보고있는데, 포켓유니버스가 올라오고있는거 보니까 또 어디서 몰래 돈빼먹고있는듯. 그냥 크롬에 포켓유니버스 깔려있으면 반드시 삭제할것. rabby, OKX 등 지갑이 옛날 메타마스크시절과 다르게 발전하면서 이제 더이상 필요없는앱이 됨. 돈빼먹는놈들 삭제하세요
👍10❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @leedogin2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@leedogin2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 167,120 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅” (@leedogin2), 15,219 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/leedogin2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.