Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

리암의 코인공방

@liambitcoin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,606subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001449725025
TypeChannel
Username@liambitcoin
Created26 June 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/liambitcoin

Growth

4,6064,6174,611.56 August 2026 — 4,616 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,616 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,617 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,614 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,606 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,604–4,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:544,606-8
9 Aug 2026, 21:524,614-3
6 Aug 2026, 17:204,617+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:354,616no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:514,616first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.13%
avg views ÷ 4,606 subscribers
Avg views / post
328
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.337%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held24 (29 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total7,881
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC122 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @moneybottlePhoto

🚀키옥시아 일주일만에 자사주 매입 완료 총 8000억엔, 시총의 2.96%

1

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

9 Aug 2026, 22:12 UTC175 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @BTCpentagonPhoto

⚡️⚡️⚡️ 트럼프, 이란 핵합의 없이도 전쟁 끝낼 의향…“호르무즈 완전 개방이 조건” 도널드 트럼프 미국 대통령이 이란이 호르무즈 해협을 완전히 재개방한다면 핵합의를 체결하지 않고도 이란과의 전쟁을 끝낼 수 있다는 방안을 고위 참모들에게 비공개로 제시한 것으로 전해졌음. 월스트리트저널(WSJ)에 따르면 트럼프는 최근 핵 문제 해결보다 호르무즈 해협의 정상적인 선박 통행 복구에 우선순위를 두는 방향으로 움직였으며, 해협이 열릴 경우 이를 성과로 내세우며 전쟁을 끝내는 방안을 검토했음. 이는 기존에 핵 문제 해결까지 요구했던 미국의 종전 조건에서 상당히 후퇴할 수 있음을 의미함.

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

9 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC257 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @waitstudyPhoto

왼쪽 : 2025 10.10 오른쪽 : 2026 8.8 크립토 볼륨은 토토토토토막남

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

9 Aug 2026, 10:38 UTC241 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @seaotterbtcPhoto

버크셔 해서웨이가 드디어 현금을 사용하기 시작 14분기 연속 주식 순매도를 이어가면서 막대한 현금을 쌓아오던 버크셔 해서웨이가 2022년 이후 처음 현금을 사용하기 시작 이번 현금 사용에 매수된 종목은 - 알파벳 : 100억 달러 - 테일러 모리슨 홈(미국 상위권 주택 건설사) : 68억 달러(인수) - 자사주 매입 : 78억 달러 쌓아둔 현금에 비해 사용한 비중이 많지는 않지만.. 현재 시장에서 버크셔 해서웨이의 현금 사용에 대한 평가가 극과 극으로 나뉘는 중 1) 버크셔 해서웨이가 드디어 AI판에 뛰어들었으니 불장 시작이다 - 2022년 1분기 에너지 기업 매수 후 에너지 섹터 상승 2) 버크셔 해서웨이는 전형적인 기회 포착형 투자자로 현금 사용기는 오히려 하락장 시작에 가까웠다 - 버크셔 주가는 장기적으로 S&P500의 퍼포먼

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

9 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC191 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @HANAchina

>>SK하이닉스, 710억달러 규모 주주환원안 추진…40%는 자사주 매입 (중국언론 인용) •한국 매체, SK하이닉스가 총 100조원(약 710억달러) 규모의 사상 최대 주주환원 계획을 추진할 예정임. 이 가운데 자사주 매입에 약 40조원을 투입. 이는 전체 발행주식의 약 2%에 해당하는 규모로 미국에서 ADR을 발행하기 위해 신주를 추가 발행하는 규모와 거의 맞먹음. •회사는 동시에 3분기에 추가 주주환원 방안을 발표할 예정임. 강력한 HBM 수요와 실적 전망이 대규모 자사주 매입을 뒷받침하고 있음 >韩媒:SK海力士拟推710亿美元股东回报方案,40%用于回购股票,相当于美股发行规模 https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3778998#from=ios

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

6 Aug 2026, 02:59 UTC404 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @lululalaInsightsPhoto

경기도 사실상 부도상태 https://www.news1.kr/local/gyeonggi/6249637

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

5 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC345 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @stockhubkr

[로이터] 삼성전자·SK하이닉스, 주주 환원 강화 예정 • 삼성전자가 지속 가능한 방식으로 주주 환원을 강화하는 방안을 모색 중이며, 조만간 세부 내용을 공유할 예정임. • SK하이닉스는 올해 말까지 구체적인 주주 환원 계획을 준비 중이며, 주주 환원을 유의미하게 확대할 것으로 기대하고 있음. • SK하이닉스는 역대 최고 수준의 현금 창출 능력을 바탕으로 투자와 재무 건전성을 유지하면서 주주 환원을 확대할 수 있다고 믿고 있음. • 양사는 최근 인공지능(AI) 기반 메모리 칩 수요 급증에 힘입어 역대 최고 수준의 분기 실적을 발표한 바 있음. 🔗자세히 보기 📅실적 캘린더 📲앱 다운로드 #삼성전자 #SK하이닉스

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

5 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTC323 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @seaotterbtcPhoto

흑형 풀매수 선언 아서 헤이즈 새로운 에세이 요약 : 내꺼인듯 내꺼아닌 내꺼같은 너(썸) [크립토, 주식 관련 내용] - 현재 AI 캐펙스는 기술 투자가 아닌 부동산 투자임 - 데이터센터는 감가상각되는 칩을 넣어두는 부동산일 뿐임 - 이번 AI 버블은 2000년 닷컴처럼 실적 스토리가 아니라 2008년 서브프라임처럼 신용 스토리일 것 - 칩은 시간이 갈수록 전력당 성능이 기하급수적으로 좋아짐. 즉, 지금 지어놓은 물리적 인프라는 몇 년 뒤 구식이 됨 - 데이터센터 부동산은 포화돼도 AI 토큰 소비는 계속 늘 수 있음. 둘 다 참일 수 있는 얘기임 - 하이퍼스케일러가 AI 캐펙스 자금 대려고 발행한 부채는 전부 부외(장부 밖)에 숨어 있음 - 신용 스토리이기 때문에 정부는 반드시 구제금융에 나설것 - 그 잘못 배분된 자본이 결국 크립토로 흘

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

4 Aug 2026, 22:57 UTC254 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @therealdyor

스페이스 x 컨콜 메모리 언급 "현재의 제약 요인은 메모리입니다. 메모리 생산량은 연간 20% 정도씩 늘고 있습니다. 보통이라면 이 정도는 성숙 단계에 접어든 대형 산업치고는 엄청나게 빠르고 놀라운 속도죠. 그런데 스스로에게 물어보십시오. 수요도 연 20%씩 늘고 있습니까? 아닙니다. 수요는 연 200%, 어쩌면 그 이상으로 늘고 있습니다. 공급보다 수요가 훨씬 빠르게 증가한다면, 경제학 기초가 말하는 결론은 가격이 오른다는 것입니다. 내리는 게 아니라요."

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

3 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC263 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @TreeNewsFeed

STRATEGY: STRATEGY SOLD 1,637 BTC REDUCING HOLDINGS TO 842,138 BTC

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

3 Aug 2026, 11:54 UTC272 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @slav_insightPhoto

와 ISA도 개악하네요 레전드 ㅋㅋ 1. 연간한도 이월불가 (무조건 연 2000만원) 2. 무한연장 불가 (최대 5년) #ISA

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

3 Aug 2026, 09:42 UTC194 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @leo_autotrading

🚨 2027년부터 코인 수익에 세금 22% ① 매매·대여 수익 과세 - 2027년 1월 1일 이후 발생한 가상자산 수익부터 적용 - 연간 순이익에서 250만원 공제 - 초과분에 22% 과세 (소득세 20%+지방소득세 2%) - 첫 신고는 2028년 5월 ② 코인끼리 교환해도 과세 - BTC→ETH, USDT→알트코인 같은 교환도 매도로 간주 - 원화로 출금하지 않아도 교환 시점의 원화가치로 수익 계산 ③ 기존 보유자는 2026년 말 가격이 중요 - 2027년 이전부터 보유한 코인의 취득가격은 실제 매수가와 2026년 12월 31일 시가 중 높은 금액 적용 - 따라서 2026년 말까지 오른 가격은 상당 부분 과세 대상에서 제외되는 구조 예시: 2027년 순이익 1,000만원이면 1,000만원-250만원에 22% 적용 → 세금 16

Signed ₗᵢₐₘ ᴸᴵᴬᴹ

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @liambitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 877,720 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“리암의 코인공방” (@liambitcoin), 4,606 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liambitcoin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.