Channel
@justdegenguy
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
8,588subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002373735487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justdegenguy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justdegenguy |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 8,588 | +3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 8,585 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 8,574 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 8,572 | -6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 8,578 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 8,578 | first reading |
80 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 80 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 91,640 |
| Reactions total | 48 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
33 reactions across 14 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5357579953497983889 | 33 | 100.0% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Entropy Market CPO와 텍스트로 몇 가지 질문을 주고받았습니다. 전체 팀은 10명 안팎. 창업진과 팀원들은 Jump Trading, Polymarket, Kalshi, Ribbit Capital, Jane Street, HRT 등에서 트레이딩·market structure·consumer growth를 경험했다고 합니다. 또한, 리빗캐피탈 리드의 시드 투자가 진행되었다는 이야기를 들었습니다. 이들이 만들려는 건 Pre-IPO, 글로벌 주식·지수, Federal Funds 같은 시장을 온체인에서 24시간 거래할 수 있게 만드는 것. 기존 RWA perp의 문제를 단순히 “유동성이 부족하다”가 아니라 oracle·mark price·funding·시장 설계가 약하다는 쪽으로 보고 있었습니다. 초기 유저와 실제 트레이더에 대한 …
https://m.blog.naver.com/changstockman/224376447351
또 수금타임이야?
추정 실력 탁월한데?
아무도 관심 없는 코인이야 가격 올리고 내리는건 진짜 상관 없는데, 에어드랍 신뢰를 말장난으로 배신해도 별 일이 일어나지 않는 지금은 피드백 루프가 완전히 고장났다고 생각함. + 최근에 로빈후드 NFT 시장이 다시 핫해지고있는데, 이전에 기존플젝 유기했던 애들이 다시 나와서 팔아도 제발 팔아달라고 매달리는 상황도 보고있기 힘든건 매한가지. 돈이랑 관심이 너무 밀접하게 연관된 시장이라서 악명도 명성이 되어버리는 현상은 어쩔 수 없는 것도 알겠지만 결국 다시 몇억 몇십억 빨아가는걸 모든 시장 참여자가 뜬눈으로 보고있어야 하는 것도 아이러니
custom 53575799534979838891
수익 기준 상위 30개 암호화폐 앱 중 85%의 암호화폐 수익이 OFFCHAIN(지분 주주에게)으로 귀속됩니다. 뭐어어어어엇
익숙해진 크라임이라는 단어가 크립토 시장에서 약속과 신뢰라는 개념을 덮어버리기 너무 편리하게 만들어버렸다고 생각됨 통수친 플젝에 징벌이나 피드백 대신 크라임이라는 이름을 씌워버리면 다음 그 다음 통수는 더 쉬워지는 악순환
최근 트위터에서 얘기되는 주제들 > 포모 vs 펌펀 > 밈은 사기이며, 이를 장려하는 솔라나 팀도 문제다 (“어차피 모든 게 투기고, 밈도 그중 하나일 뿐”이라는 솔라나 팀원의 트윗을 비판하며 이어진 논쟁 / smac 트윗) 이 주제들이 한꺼번에 다뤄졌고 → 이제는 밈/덱스 트레이딩 자체의 불합리한 구조(번들, PVP, 내부자 등)를 언급하면서 밈 자체를 두고 싸우는 단계로 옴 이런 와중에 프랭크(디갓)가 가져온 엑시인피니티 관련 사진 "그래도 관찰도 제대로 못하고 당하던 VC/CEX 시대보다는, 온체인 데이터라도 보면서 당하는 지금이 낫지 않냐"는 뉘앙스
화들짝 놀라서 해지. 알려주신 형님들 정말 감사합니다
: : [데이터/코멘트] 죽어가는 업비트 상장빔 작성자: 포뇨 6월 15일 이후 신규 상장된 14개 종목의 첫날 상승률 중앙값은 10%로 떨어졌으며 거래대금 중앙값도 540억 원으로 줄어들었습니다. HOME 조차 90% 상승에 그쳤으며, 14개 중 8개는 첫날 종가가 시가보다 낮았습니다. 🌎 코멘트 전문 (X / 웹사이트) FP Website | Telegram (EN / KR) | X (EN / KR)
반드시 엄마를 AI 네이티브 사이보그 아줌마로 만들어버려
custom 53575799534979838893
월 3 ~ 6만원 절약은 아주 소중해 가족들 각자 계정으로 등록해주면 가족 단위로는 아끼는 돈이 더 커질듯
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @justdegenguy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 8,493 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Degen Guy” (@justdegenguy), 8,588 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justdegenguy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.