Channel
@WeCryptoTogether
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49,809subscribers
-159 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001396820120 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @WeCryptoTogether |
| Description | 중요하다고 생각하는 코인 소식과 공부한 자료 필터없이 나누는 채널! ✔️대화방: 스캐머가 많이 비공개로 전환 ✔️협력문의 @We_Crypto_Together |
| Created | 15 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/WeCryptoTogether |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:17 | 49,809 | -36 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 49,845 | -32 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 49,877 | -33 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 49,910 | -20 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 49,930 | -24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 49,954 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 49,968 | first reading |
104 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 74 of 104 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 104 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 290,994 |
| Reactions total | 642 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
529 reactions across 56 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 246 | 46.5% | |
| 👏 | 123 | 23.3% | |
| 👍 | 113 | 21.4% | |
| 🔥 | 47 | 8.88% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 74 of the 104 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 642reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 104 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✖️ 버추얼 로봇 연구소(East Worlds) 열어서 돈 버는중 버추얼이 유니트리한테 중국외 지역에서 휴머노이드 데이터 제공자 중 1위라고 합니다. 당연히 아시겠지만 이런 데이터 제공 역시 모두 돈받고 파는 것이기 떄문에, 버추얼이 현재 새로운 자금 파이프라인을 로보틱스 분야에서 굴착해낸 것으로 볼 수 있겠네요. 그것도 아주 건전한 측면에서. 사람 데이터 수집도 돈주고 하는데, 휴머노이드 데이터 수집은 더 구하기 어렵고, 퀄리티도 중요할거라 아예 휴머노이드 유격훈련장인 이스트 월드의 자료 수요가 꽤 많을듯. 이런식으로 자생적으로 돈벌어서 러닝타임 늘려가고 팀 내실 늘려가는건 보기 힘든 사례이기도 하고 당연 좋은 사례일듯.
10명 차서 끝. 나중에 티어 변경되는거 확인되면 그거로 셀퍼럴 하셔요. 꼬리물기 혜택 이런거 저한테 없는거로 알고 있으면 제가 걍 다 환원할게요. 나중에 티어 바꾸는거 보고 쓰셔도 무관함
❤2👍1
하이퍼리퀴드쪽 엔트로피 핫한데 본인지갑 상위티어 바뀌는 코드 필요하신 분은 얘기주세요. 상위티어 리베이트 최대로 되는 등급일거라 그거로 셀퍼럴 하시면 제일 상위 계정일듯? 최고티어 만들어주는 수량(Spot? 암튼)이 한도가 있어서 댓글로 의사 표시해주신 분들에게만 10명에게 DM으로 보내드릴게요. 팀이 어쩌고 저는 잘 모르겠고, 기억에 남았던 좋은 점은 질질 끌지 않겠다는 포부가 있어서 저도 셀프로 등록하고 실거래만 해놓으려구요. = 끝난글
객관적으로 여기서 비트가 단기간에 급 좋아질 그림이 잘 보이지 않는듯.. 다른자산 다 반등에 홀로 역행하고, 따로 이유도 없음. 무엇보다 지금 오를거라고 하는 사람은 따로 근원적인 이야기보단 니들이 바라는 저점을 줄 것 같냐 이런 얘기밖에 없는거 같은데.. 세일러가 $STRC 를 빠르게 $100 으로 원귀시키고 스팀팩을 꽂아봤자 $65K 를 재탈환하는게 맥스지 않을까.. 8월 전략으로 얘기했던 비트 헷징은 계속 안풀고 유지할 것 같고, 세일같은거나 따리 바이낸스 알파 트레이딩이나 하면서 먹고살 것 같습니다.
👏3
📱 [AMA] Acurast , 핸드폰을 통한 분산 컴퓨팅 네트워크. 이거 가능해? - 일시: 8월 13일 목요일 오후 9시 - 장소: 코인같이투자 트위터 스트리밍 - 손님: Acurast Acurast는 핸드폰을 통한 분산형 네트워크로 현재 279,700 의 핸드폰 구동, 9.19억개 온체인 트랜잭션. 60만 컨트랙트 배포를 통해 영역을 넓히고 있는 DePIN 네트워크입니다. 📨 AMA 기념 이벤트 : Acurast 한국 커뮤니티 ㅣ 대화방 입장 : AMA 공지 게시물 Like RT : AMA 참여 및 인증샷 해당그룹 제출 : 네이버폼 제출 🗳 리워드: 치킨 기프티콘 10명, 만원 기프티콘 50명, 커피 300명 📆 기한: 8월 13일 오후 11시 59분까지 현재 갖춰진 네트워크를 기반으로 peaq와 OKX AI등에 인프라를 제…
👍7❤5
진즉 $70K 가야할 힘을 뻘짓으로 에너지 다 소진하는 느낌. ☔
🟢 $64,000 @bitcoin_price
📈 빗썸 비틱공지 개선 하루가 뭐다하고 신저가 알림이 너무 많이 오니 하루에 네번만 부고문자 보내는걸로 개선.
❤2
📂 Kii 체인은 세일 1.6배 초과청약으로 마무리 한국인은 거의 부적격이 떠서 참여 못했는데 그럼에도 불구하고 돈이 꽤 모인듯? Legion만 봐도 세일 파워는 역시 한국인이 강한데 핸디캡 딛고도 초과청약한듯.
❤4👏4
또 다른 장수생 근황 얼라인 얘네들도 NFT 뿌리고 뭐 밑밥깐거 많은데 뭐 안하나? 아스펙타 프리마켓 나오고 해서 진짜 뭐 하려나 했는데, 다시 쌉쏘리 모드로 돌아간듯.
맥여줬으니 꺼드럭 인정
👍3
🟢 DappOS 가 TGE까지 걸어온 여정 - DappOS 4년 활동 리캡 📆 DAPPOS 로드맵 이행 이력 2022 — START 🚩 Binance Labs Incubation Season 5 선정. DAPPOS 시작 2023 — BUILD 🧱 Binance Labs Pre-Seed 투자유치 * IDG Capital, Sequoia China 등이 참여한 Seed Round 투자유치 완료. Unified Account와 Intent Execution Network를 중심으로 DAPPOS의 기반 마련 2024 — GROWTH 📈 Polychain 주도 $15.3M Series A 투자유치. 당시 $300M Valuation으로 유치 완료. Intent Assets와 IntentEX 제품을 공개하며 기술에서 실제 제품으로 영역 확장 2…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 104 posts we hold for @WeCryptoTogether. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,123 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 64 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅” (@WeCryptoTogether), 49,809 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/WeCryptoTogether.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.