추석 연휴 끝났네요 질서 있게 퇴장 해보겠습니다 _ _) 숏잡기엔 부담스럽고.. 눈치게임 시작
👍3❤1

Channel
@Bounty_ATM
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,216subscribers
+131 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001207079048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bounty_ATM |
| Description | DM : @bountyatm - 크립토 커뮤니티 - 무료 재테크 정보, 토큰세일 정보 공유 - 꾸준히 얻어갈수 있는 실물 이벤트 업로드 개설일 : 2019년 2월 3일 |
| Created | 3 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bounty_ATM |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 15:35 | 26,216 | +702 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 25,514 | -47 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:22 | 25,561 | -13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 25,574 | -34 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 25,608 | -22 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:21 | 25,630 | -26 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 25,656 | -3 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:59 | 25,659 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:04 | 25,674 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 25,685 | -26 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 25,711 | -23 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:42 | 25,734 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 25,749 | -13 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 25,762 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 25,765 | -11 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 25,776 | -15 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 25,791 | -26 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:44 | 25,817 | -57 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 25,874 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:48 | 25,877 | first reading |
311 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 311 (4 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 50,417 |
| Reactions total | 280 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 22:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,288 reactions across 308 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 598 | 46.4% | |
| 👍 | 595 | 46.2% | |
| 🙏 | 38 | 2.95% | |
| 🔥 | 27 | 2.10% | |
| 😁 | 27 | 2.10% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.233% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 308 of the 311 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,288 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 311 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Bounty_ATM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 311 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
추석 연휴 끝났네요 질서 있게 퇴장 해보겠습니다 _ _) 숏잡기엔 부담스럽고.. 눈치게임 시작
👍3❤1
생각하는 대로 AI하지 않으면, AI하는 대로 생각하게 된다. https://x.com/gorochi0315/status/2102891437608366359?s=20
👍2
불개미의 과세유예 글이 조회수 100만회에 가까워지고 있습니다. 저도 제돈 써가면서 매일 부스트 걸어줘 한국인에 대한 노출을 높여가고 있습니다. 실제로 위 움직임 이후 가상자산 관련 활동을 하는 국회의원실과 교류가 있고, "실제 투자자"가 있는 곳을 만나 교류하시기로 했습니다. 바로 내일 9:30분 조선 팰리스 서울에 민병덕 의원이 방문합니다. 따뜻한 맞이와 함께 우리가 유권자이며 목소리를 내고 있음을 보여주세요. 과세유예 할 수 있습니다.
👍2
🪙 업토버 - 지금까지 비트코인 싸이클상 가장 상승을 많이했던 월. 10월 다만 대부분 7, 8, 9월 조정 -> 10월 상승이었는데 이번에는 7, 8, 9 월이 상승이었음.
👍3❤1
업토버 이즈 커밍 비트코인 $85000 뚫
👍3
LLM 시대에도 프로그래밍을 계속 즐기는 법 - 코딩은 사람이 맡고, LLM에는 계획 정리, 조사, 검토 등 주변 작업을 맡기는 방식으로 프로그래밍의 즐거움과 적당한 생산성 향상을 함께 추구할 수 있음 - 코드베이스에 대한 이해와 주도권을 유지하려면 직접 코드를 계속 작성해야 함. 모든 구현을 에이전트에 넘기면 코딩 실력이 약해지고, 생성된 코드에서 문제를 찾기도 어려워짐 - LLM과 함께 계획하되 중요한 결정은 직접 내리고, 조사도 병행해야 함. 에이전트에는 판단 대신 다음 작업과 수정할 위치, 주의점, 관련 자료를 준비하게 함 - 생성된 코드뿐 아니라 계획… https://news.hada.io/topic?id=34336
👍1
💡AI가 싸질수록, 병목은 비싸진다 source AI 가격 하락 → 사용량 상승 → 더 많은 업무에 침투 → inference volume 상승 → 전력, 메모리, 네트워크, 데이터센터 병목 심화 1. AI는 역사상 어떤 다른 혁신적 기술보다도 더 빠르게 저렴해지고 있음 2. 주어진 성능 수준에서, 비용은 2023년 이후 분기당 47% 하락함 3. 이는 DNA 시퀀싱보다 4배, 컴퓨팅보다 6배, 리튬 배터리보다 18배, 전기보다 54배 빠름 4. 실제로 GPT-6 Astra 출시 3주도 안 돼서 Claude Opus 5.5가 등장하기도 함 ✍️AI는 역사상 가장 빠르게 디플레되는 상품. 역설적으로 그 때문에 AI 총수요와 물리적 인프라 투자는 더 커지고 있음
❤2👍1
제가 굉장히 오래전부터 해온 생각인데, 운이 나한테 왔을 때 그걸 잡는 것도 결국 평소에 준비했던 사람만 가능하다는 것임. 밈코인을 한 번도 안 사본 사람은 트럼프급 밈코인이 다시 나와도 어차피 못 먹습니다. 따리를 안 해본 사람은 루나 따리 같은 졸업 기회가 다시 와도 막상 실행을 못 해요. USDe 가격을 계속 모니터링하던 사람만 디페깅을 먹을 수 있고, 평소에 아무도 관심 없는 개잡체인까지 돌아다니던 사람들이 돈복사 이벤트가 터졌을 때 바로 움직일 수 있음. 경험치 = 돈 남들이 레전드 이벤트로 돈복사하는 걸 보면서 배 아파하고 망하길 기도하는 것보다, 왜 저 사람은 저걸 먹을 수 있었는지 공부해보면 좋겠어요. 캐시캣으로 몇 M씩 번 사람들도 그전에 수십 개의 신생체인을 돌아다니며 러그를 당했던 사람들입니다. 결과만 보면 운이…
👍6❤1
추석 이벤트 안한사람 손 아이패드,에어팟,한우 등 받으면 눈물 와락 흘릴만한 이벤트가 진행중이에요 입장하고 폼제출만 하면 되니 잊지말고 꼭 하셔요 뻥아니고 진짜 선물 나갑니다 원문 https://t.me/Bounty_ATM/16402 atm 비공개 대화방 입장 원하는분은 dm 주세요. @bountyatm
👍6❤2
XRP 고래 매집 뒤에 있는 진짜 그림 XRP 고래들이 최근 5일간 4억7000만개 넘게 매집함. 금액으로는 7억2400만달러 규모(크립토포테이토 집계). 근데 같은 시점에 나온 리플-시큐리타이즈 발표가 더 눈에 띔. 시큐리타이즈가 블랙록 BUIDL, 반에크 VBILL 같은 토큰화 단기 국채펀드 투자자들이 보유 지분을 리플 스테이블코인 RLUSD로 즉시 교환할 수 있는 스마트 컨트랙트를 공개했음. 흐름 정리하면 — 고래 매집(수요 신호) → RLUSD가 토큰화 국채펀드의 환전 창구로 편입 → 블랙록·반에크 같은 전통 자산운용사 인프라 안쪽까지 스테이블코인이 파고드는 구조로 이어짐. 여기에 시큐리타이즈가 XRP렛저(XRPL)와도 통합을 확대할 계획이라고 밝혀서, 이번 RLUSD 교환 기능이 XRPL 활용 사례를 늘리는 다음 단계의 발판이…
❤3👍1
알트 도미넌스 57개월짜리 추세선 돌파 #알트코인
👍2❤1
잠들어 있는 휴면예금 찾기 https://www.kinfa.or.kr/cyber/pymntReqst/indvdlinfo.do (간단 인증 필요 / 30초컷) 할 거 없으신 분들은 혹시모르니 이거 한번 해보시길. 어떤 사람 오래 사용하지 않은 계좌에서 32만원 찾았다고 함.
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 311 posts we hold for @Bounty_ATM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Republishes 90 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones this channel has forwarded most; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“에어드랍ATM” (@Bounty_ATM), 26,216 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bounty_ATM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.