4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,940–8,986 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 01:28
8,945
-20
10 Aug 2026, 01:02
8,965
-12
7 Aug 2026, 02:22
8,977
-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:46
8,981
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.6%
avg views ÷ 8,945 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,040
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.416%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
26 (8 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
20,791
Reactions total
74
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,400
Videos
≈256
Links
≈10,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
107 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
99
92.5%
👍
4
3.74%
🤯
2
1.87%
🔥
1
0.935%
🥰
1
0.935%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😃Perp-Dex Day with ReboundX 루마페이지 오픈
감사하게도 많은 이스포츠 트레이딩의 오리지널격이 된 콘텐츠를 KBW에서 더욱 크게 구성하게되었습니다! 아직 공개 안 된 파트너들부터 자리잡은 "진짜" 1티어 프로젝트들과 더욱 거대하고 파격적으로 온오프라인 혜택도 준비해보았습니다!
Perpdex섹터는 RWA를 업고 더욱 커질거라고 생각 중
트레이더 라인업, 굿즈 라인업, 행사 이벤트 부스 소식은 일단 신청해두시고 확인하기!
참가 프로젝트 라인업
Variational, Lighter, Aster, Extended
??? / ??? / ??? / ??? 곧 공개
정보
일시: 2026년 9월 28일 월요일
위치: 서울 강남 · 상세 주소는 승인자에게 개별 공개
인원: 600명 (승인 전용)
Event Highlights
-스…
>>한국, 레버리지 규제 강화 이후 국내 개인투자자들이 미국 3배 레버리지 ETF로 몰려 (중국언론 인용)
•한국이 단일 종목 레버리지 ETF에 대한 규제를 강화한 이후, 한국 내 상장된 16개 단일 종목 레버리지 및 인버스 ETF의 거래 규모가 약 90% 급감
•동시에 7월 한국 투자자의 미국 주식 순매수 규모는 6억3천만 달러에서 46억4천만 달러로 급증, SOXL·TQQQ 등 3배 레버리지 상품이 새로운 인기 상품 부상
•실제 위험 노출 규모는 줄어들지 않고 오히려 증가했음. 한국 금융당국의 “풍선 효과”가 이미 나타나고 있으며, 학계에서는 해당 정책의 실효성에 의문을 제기
>韩国严管杠杆后，本土散户涌入美国3倍ETF https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3778878#from=ios
창펑이가 기글 아카데미 기부에 대한 해명아닌 해명을 하면서 글을 썼는데요
그 내용 중 세부항목으로 BNB 밈 전반을 지지하고 향후 몇 주 내로 테스트 삼아 거래 할 수 있는 새로운 방식에 대해 고려하겠다는 글이 올라왔습니다 !
📣 창펑이 트위터 링크
그러면, 근시일내에 지켜볼만한 BNB 체인 밈이나 기글 혹은 이전 밈도 같이 살펴보다 보면 하나쯤은 발견할 수 있지 않을까 ? 생각이 들었음
++ 전 이전에 말했던 Four.meme와 MAME가 파바박 하고 떠올랐음. 밑장 까는 거나 하려고 하는 방식이 이전에 말한 방식이랑 너무 겹쳐져 보임
오늘 반도체 이슈는 결국
엔비디아 순환금융 + 중국산 DUV 자체 생산 쇼크
엔비디아 순환금융
1. 엔비디아가 돈주고 엔비디아 칩을 사게하면, 이게 무슨 의미가 있느냐 인위적으로 펌핑한다 하면서 하락
2. 오픈AI의 신용도가 엔비디아의 신용을 까먹음 (엔비디아 CDS 프리미엄 증가 = 주가하락)
3. 오픈AI의 상황이 안좋다고 보여질 수도 있음
좋게 보면, 엔비디아가 나서서라도 오픈AI 망하지 않게하겠다 + 엔비디아의 지배력 강화로 볼 수도 있는데 일단 시장은 위의 1~3로 보고 있는듯
중국산 DUV 자체 생산 쇼크
1. CXMT가 상장한 자금으로, 자체 DUV 수급하면서 DRAM 생산 늘리는거 아니냐?
2. 1번으로 인해서 DRAM 수요 충족 되면서 DRAM 거품꺼지는거 아니냐?
3. ㅈ댔다
이렇게 보는건데, 현실적으로 26년 DU…
❤9
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @Bananamilkrich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 942,873 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“바밀이야 bamilirya” (@Bananamilkrich), 8,945 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bananamilkrich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
