Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 148 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 9 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net -292. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,977–22,876 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
9 Nov 2026, 11:54
22,236
-17
8 Nov 2026, 02:58
22,253
-21
7 Nov 2026, 01:38
22,274
-20
5 Nov 2026, 22:38
22,294
-12
5 Nov 2026, 01:45
22,306
-7
4 Nov 2026, 04:56
22,313
-8
3 Nov 2026, 06:49
22,321
-5
2 Nov 2026, 04:08
22,326
-8
1 Nov 2026, 06:19
22,334
-10
31 Oct 2026, 05:49
22,344
-12
30 Oct 2026, 09:00
22,356
-6
29 Oct 2026, 06:28
22,362
-15
28 Oct 2026, 01:26
22,377
-11
27 Oct 2026, 02:37
22,388
-10
26 Oct 2026, 05:56
22,398
-4
25 Oct 2026, 06:25
22,402
-7
24 Oct 2026, 08:39
22,409
-14
23 Oct 2026, 09:40
22,423
-23
22 Oct 2026, 08:05
22,446
-11
20 Oct 2026, 22:48
22,457
first reading
Engagement
333 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.97%
avg views ÷ 22,236 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,110
67 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.165%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
67
of 333 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 67 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held
333 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total
74,103
Reactions total
68
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 03:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,000
Videos
≈389
Links
≈11,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 37s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
362 reactions across 171 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🫡
362
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 184 of the 333 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 382 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 333 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 333 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yobeullyANN. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 333 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.50%
5 of 333 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,140
over 5 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,240
over 328 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 333 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 67 posts held from the last 30 days (8.96%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Elysium x Opensea
기념 NFT 8,888개 발행
https://opensea.io/collection/enter-elysium/overview
대상 조건
- Hypurr NFT 보유자
- HYPE 제네시스 할당 수령자
- 스냅샷 시점 기준, HyperCore와 HyperEVM 합산 KNTQ 10,000개 이상 보유자 (sKNTQ는 온체인 환율로 환산)
- 과거 kPoints 보유자
- 일부 OpenSea 모바일 사용자
- OpenSea에서 KNTQ를 매수한 사용자
- Markets.xyz를 통한 거래량 10만 달러 이상 기록자
- HyperCore와 HyperEVM 합산 kHYPE 1개 이상 보유자
😆Elysium_KR
공지방 | 채팅방
⚙️ Ondo Perps
주간 보상 250,000 USDC로 확대
(기존 220,000 -> 현재 250,000)
- Liquidity Pool : 112,500 USDC
- Volume Pool : 112,500 USDC
Activity Pool (OI) : 25,000 USDC
종료후 48 이내에 USDC로 보상 지급 예정
📌 https://app.ondoperps.xyz/referrals
OPENAI 가격 이벤트 진행중
(트윗을 통해 참여 가능)
😄 관련 트윗
🟢거래 마켓 및 캠페인 업데이트
PEARL 무기한 선물 상장 &
금(XAU) 선물 누적 거래량은 50억 달러 돌파
😄 https://x.com/OndoPerps
#OndoPerps #AD
Elysium mainnet is now live
elysium.kinetiq.xyz
https://x.com/Enter_Elysium/status/2119777337952841977?a=bNkZZ7pkdARQC79qoII&s=20
😆Elysium_KR
공지방 | 채팅방
🫰 DOKDO × RISEx 거래 대회 시즌 2 종료 및 최종 보상 지급 안내
DOKDO × RISEx 거래 대회 시즌 2 , 성공적으로 마무리됐습니다!
약 3주간 진행된 RISEx 거래 대회가 종료되었습니다. 함께해 주신 모든 분들께 진심으로 감사드립니다!
💯최종 성과
• 최종 누적 거래량: $830,871,341
• 81번째 마일스톤 달성 ($830M 돌파!)
🎁 최종 총 보상
• 총상금: $83,250 USDC
• 총 RISEx 포인트: 9,100P
• 당첨자 : 70명
🏆 최종 당첨자 및 보상 안내
순위 | 상금 (USDC) | RISEx 포인트
🥇 1위 | $18,250 | 850P
🥈 2위 | $5,700 | 560P
🥉 3위 | $5,600 | 450P
4위 | $5,300 | 430P
5위 | $5,200 | 410P
…
Elysium 메인넷 밈코는 어제
체급이 큰 Montra 런치패드가 나오면서
😄 https://x.com/MontraXYZ
다른 런치패드 토큰은 많이 내려갔네요
Boxa , Kleos , Agora 등등
현재 Elysium 메인넷 넘어간 HYPE 개수는
오늘부로 HYPE 10만개를 돌파했네요
현재 약 108,166 HYPE개
📌 hyperevmscan
메인넷 정식 오픈까지 약 3일 남음
🫡2
Signed 요블이
Showing the 12 most recent of 333 posts we hold for @yobeullyANN. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 80 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@yobeullyANN named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@riftboundkr named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026 · confirmed gone 12 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea) @airdrop_kor · 21,269 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
폐지줍기 연구소 @airdr0p_lab · 20,455 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방 @tlsrltnf · 22,355 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
30대에 은퇴번복한 머피 @murphybus · 19,909 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓 @officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,675 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방 @shrimp_notice · 28,330 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN @emperorcoin · 35,511 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
갓물주 (코인정보, 돈되는거) @godmulzoo · 22,609 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0 @marshallog · 21,370 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery) @dogeland01 · 20,918 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
Gram 🇰🇷 @toncoin_kr · 22,951 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
Layergg exchange & project alert @layergg · 19,298 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
Units.Network Announcements @unitsnews · 658,491 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스) @coinnesskr · 30,389 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO @fireant_crypto · 32,703 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
JackToken Announcements @jacktokencom · 381,368 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
크립토퀀트 알람 @cq_alert_kr · 21,587 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
블록미디어 @blockmedia · 32,929 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
차분남(차트분석하는남자) @chavoonnam · 21,088 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
DeFi 농부 👨🏻🌾 조선생 @BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,255 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유 @seaotterbtc · 30,000 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🔥요블이 세상살이🔥” (@yobeullyANN), 22,236 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yobeullyANN.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
