매매를 쉬고 있더라도 중요한 것은 항상 시장에 남아서 생각을 나열하고 시나리오를 구상하기 기회는 그냥 오지 않는다
👀4

Channel
@billair1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,456subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001847658483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @billair1 |
| Created | 4 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/billair1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 6,456 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 6,464 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:36 | 6,471 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:45 | 6,472 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 6,472 | first reading |
29 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 29 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 18,442 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 03:07 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
26 reactions across 7 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 26 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
매매를 쉬고 있더라도 중요한 것은 항상 시장에 남아서 생각을 나열하고 시나리오를 구상하기 기회는 그냥 오지 않는다
👀4
방금 속보를 낸 이데일리에 저도 힘을 보태기 위해서 기고문을 냈습니다. 내용은 제가 지난번 삼프로 티비때 이야기 했던 것과 그 궤를 같이합니다. 이재명 대통령은 지난 대선에서 "대한민국을 디지털자산의 허브로 만들어야 한다"는 공약을 내세웠지만, 지금 정부와 규제당국의 방향성을 보면 한국이 허브가 될 가능성은 매우 낮아보입니다. 기고문에는 짤렸지만, 사실 금투세를 폐지하자고 했던 2024년 당시 최상목 부총리의 근거가, 지금 디지털자산 과세를 폐지해야하는 근거와 같습니다. 당시에 최상목 부총리는 안그래도 힘든 주식시장에 세금까지 부과하면 투자심리를 위축시키고, 유예를 하더라도 불확실성을 주기 때문에 폐지를 주장했고, 그 당시 야당의 대표인 이재명 대통령도 이에 동의하여 금투세를 폐지했습니다. 디지털자산 과세도 똑같습니다. 안그래도 지금…
주담대뜻이 주인담보대출이었구나
👀2
10/10 폭락 당시와 현재 거래량 비교 출처
https://youtu.be/t93Ln5IVyUs?si=qEs-1QpEhDgAFPW8 이거 지금봤는데 지리네요
✅ ISA는 논란이 커지자 전면 재검토에 들어갔는데, 왜 가상자산 과세는 재검토하지 않느냐는 이야기가 나옵니다. 그런데 지난달 15일 올라온 가상자산 과세 유예 청원은 아직 동의자가 1만 명을 조금 넘는 수준입니다.. 물론 청원에 대한 동의 숫자만으로 정책을 결정할 수는 없겠지만, 만명이라는 숫자는.. 외부에서 봤을땐 관심도가 매우 떨어져있는 것으로 보입니다.. 지금이라도 동의해주세요.. https://petitions.assembly.go.kr/proceed/onGoingAll/562B57D0D2076F1DE064ECE7A7064E8B
한국 하락을 예측했던 대만의 경제 전문가 ❤️ 하필 주식시장이 역대급으로 활활 불타오르고 있을 때 단일종목 2배 레버리지를 만드는건 불난 집에 기름통 집어 던지는 것과 같은거라고 ❤️ 이거 보면 저점에서 수수료 무료 이벤트 했던 창펑자오는 천사같기도 하네요
ㅋㅋㅅㅂ
👀4
패닉셀에 대해 깨달은 주갤러 현명셀 하버드셀 신조어 제조함
👀7
게이트 ㄴㄴ 업이트
zz
🇰🇷 조세형평성을 상실한 징벌적 가상자산 과세 유예 및 재검토 요청에 관한 청원 동의하러 가기 소귀에 경을 읽으면 소가 열반에 들 수도 있어.
👀5
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @billair1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Buy High Sell Low” (@billair1), 6,456 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/billair1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.