솔라나 자체적으로 Fomo같은거 만드는듯? 엄밀히 말하면, 솔라나랩스에서 인수한 Dialect 팀에서, Leap 이라는 모바일 트레이딩 앱을 개발해서 얼리억세스 모집중인듯. (사실 그게 솔라나에서 자체개발한거랑 같은거긴함) 토큰? 같은거 낼 확률은 많지는 않은거 같은데 거래수수료로 Sol 소각한다고함. 일단 라우터는 주피터쓰는듯 약간, 자체 거래터미널? 같은걸 보유해서 Sol 체인 단의 Rev를 만들 심산같긴함. 솔라나 생태계 친구중 하나인 주피터 모바일/포모 이런애들이랑 겹치는거 같기도하고.. 암튼 궁금하신 분들은 https://x.com/leapxyz/status/2118387868947394735?a=8sQxFC_rP8btAyhziEY&s=20

Channel
Buy High Sell Low
@billair1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,303subscribers
-169 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001847658483 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @billair1 |
| Created | 4 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/billair1 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:59 | 6,303 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 09:27 | 6,313 | -5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:38 | 6,318 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:27 | 6,327 | -11 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:07 | 6,338 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 17:58 | 6,343 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:31 | 6,353 | -11 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 13:46 | 6,364 | -1 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 6,365 | -18 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 14:46 | 6,383 | -5 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 14:20 | 6,388 | -10 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 6,398 | +1 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 6,397 | -2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:37 | 6,399 | +4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 6,395 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 6,407 | -11 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 18:23 | 6,418 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 6,427 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 6,433 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:59 | 6,436 | first reading |
Engagement
68 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.72%
- avg views ÷ 6,303 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 550
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.541%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 39
- of 68 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 68 (1 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 21,441 |
| Reactions total | 11 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 13:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 23s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
37 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👀 | 37 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 68 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 68 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 39 posts held from the last 30 days (2.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
러시아 중앙은행, 개인 투자자의 비트코인(BTC)·이더리움(ETH)·테더(USDT) 거래 허용 SOURCE
손가락 부셔버린다
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
돌격하라
하리는 앞자리 6보러갈거라고생각함
이거 얼마짜리 트윗이지
슬슬 올라오네: "모든게 거짓말이었다"
어렵게 얻어낸 2년 열심히 살아남아보아요
피어그룹을 이야기하니 또 생각이 드는 것이... 피어그룹이 참 중요하다. 피어그룹은 보통 내가 속한 집단을 뜻하는데... 이 안에서 내가 앞서나가고 있으면 일반적으로 만족하는 상태가 되고... 이 안에서 내가 뒤쳐지는 것 같으면 불만족 상태가 됨. 그래서 어떤 피어그룹에 속하고 있느냐에 따라 사람의 위치나 향상심이 많이 갈리기도 하는 것 같음. 피어그룹이 뛰어나다면... 나도 어느정도 뛰어난 위치로 끌어올려지게 되는 경우도 많지.... 그리고 투자가 재밌는게... 투자는 피어그룹 내에서 나의 위치가 너무 자주 / 쉽게 바뀜. 어떤 장세인지에 따라 내가 씹에이스였다가 씹퇴물이었다가 왔다갔다 함. 그래서 존나 스트레스 많이 받는듯.
유예 감사합니다
일단 당 이름부터 하나같이 다 존나 어지러움
Showing the 12 most recent of 68 posts we hold for @billair1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@minchoisfuture · 15,3914 posts변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,3263 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,1262 posts토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,0982 postsSteve’s Catallaxy
@catallactic · 5,2112 posts원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 16,9662 posts신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,3432 posts7JeY66CI64KY
@CI64KY · 631 postGMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,1491 post라오니()
@Raoni1 · 14,8701 post로우나의 투자방
@Rowna999 · 14,2101 post돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 6,2011 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4461 post코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋♂️
@coinboys · 15,4411 postCOINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,3891 post크립토마카세
@cryptomacase · 10,9081 postCryptoMouse's View
@cryptomouseview · 3,2961 post돈버는 작당모의
@cryptopangpang · 11,4071 post돈타쿠
@dontak00 · 14,7601 post먼슬리 오리(Monthly Ori)
@fake3lau · 1,6071 post대가리박기
@fuckmyheadomg · 2431 post행복을 찾아서
@iwontloseit · 2,7951 postZi존파워잼민
@jammin0720 · 5,6821 postDegen Guy
@justdegenguy · 10,3061 postManbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 16,3621 post킬베로스 ( Killberos ) 🐾
@killberosDAO · 14,8261 post온체인 레이더
@onchain_radar_korea · 1,3941 post힙한 펭미업의 1인칭 시점
@pengmeup · 9,1751 post해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 29,9991 post크새(크립토 새싹이라는 뜻)
@seoulgos · 6261 postCTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,4361 post1조 1교대
@vinil_11 · 5,7641 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@marshallog · 21,351
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,389
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@magonia_b · 26,164
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
@yobeullyANN · 22,207
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,703
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,311
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,904
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,511
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,134
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@mujammin123 · 25,742
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 29,999
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,840
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 15,339
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@airdrop_kor · 21,248
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,228
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@twitchoong · 79,159
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@BChoSN · 26,326
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@tlsrltnf · 22,343
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
@chavoonnam · 21,087
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
@blockmedia · 32,899
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@airdr0p_lab · 20,446
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@murphybus · 19,905
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,577
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Buy High Sell Low” (@billair1), 6,303 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/billair1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.