Channel
@nftimagod
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
15,537subscribers
-545 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001798170670 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nftimagod |
| Created | 28 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nftimagod |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 15,537 | -29 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 15,566 | -59 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 15,625 | -64 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 15,689 | -353 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:21 | 16,042 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:50 | 16,061 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 16,070 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 16,082 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 16,082 | first reading |
70 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 70 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 70 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 86,962 |
| Reactions total | 131 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
95 reactions across 36 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 95 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 45 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 131reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
무료민트로 FP 2ETH까지 찍고 세컨드 컬렉션 치타 같은것도 또 내고 홀더들 돈만 다 빨아가고 1년도 안되서 러그때린 애들인데 Cole을 필두로 이런 애들이 기어나오면 안되는게 돈만 벌고 프로젝트 빌딩 자체를 제대로 안해도 되는구나 슬로우러그, 러그 하고 다시 해쳐먹어도 되는구나 라고 생각하고 돌아오는듯 크립토판이 생겨나고부터 끊임없이 반복되는 이 쓰레기같은 짓들이 근절되야 더 성숙한 시장이 될거라고 생각함 크립토유저들은 스캠에 너무 익숙해져있는게 문제인듯 크립토의 역사를 한 문장으로 표현하면 "나만 아니면 돼"
👍1
Signed 1Minute
솔직히 말해서 업비트랑 빗썸이 마지막 한국의 협상력이었음. 근데 업비트랑 빗썸이 할수있는게 한국에서는 너무 제한적임. 할수있는거? 하루에 한번씩 상장하면서 상장거래량 만드는거.... 그니까 미친듯이 상장하는데 역설적으로 모두에게 열린시장은 협상력을 잃게 됨. 한국의 코인시장은 어디로가야하는가? 업비트가 코인베이스처럼 큰형님의 역할을 해줘야 하는데.... 빗썸이 로빈후드처럼 자체 생태계 구축 시도를 할 수 있을까? 1. 우리나라는 이해충돌 어쩌고 법 때문에 투자한 코인을 상장 못함. 2. 투자시장에서 업비트나 두나무, 빗썸의 투자를 받으면 오히려 좋은 거래소에 상장을 못하는 오히려 투자를 받으면 장애물이 되어버림. 3. 그러다보니 생태계 투자 순환도 안됨. 4. 유저들 유동성 플레이말고 할 수 있는게 없음. 5. 근데 유저들 유동성플레이…
Signed 1Minute
Max Bidding 사우디가 돌아왔네요. 로빈후드에서 새로운 5,555개의 NFT를 발행한다고 합니다. 그 소식으로 기존 컬렉션들도 많이 올랐네요. 거의 유기했다가 한탕할려고 밖에 안느껴져서 모르겠습니다.... https://x.com/i/status/2087527536158744796
Signed 1Minute
내 발로 회사 나가도 100만원 정부가 35세 미만 청년이 자진퇴사해도 생애 한 번 구직급여를 받을 수 있도록 제도 개편을 추진 중 현재 35세 미만 자진퇴사자의 66.5%가 입사 1년을 채우지 못했고, 3년 미만 퇴사자는 91%에 달함 청년들이 생계 걱정 없이 더 나은 직장을 찾도록 돕겠다는 취지지만, 오히려 단기 퇴사와 잦은 이직을 부추길 수 있다는 우려도 나오는 중 고용보험 재정도 이미 적자인 만큼, 실제 도입된다면 근속기간과 지급조건을 얼마나 빡빡하게 잡느냐가 핵심이 될 전망 원문
👍1
Signed 1Minute
크레이지 아케이지 내일 서비스 종료 2013년 이후 최고 동접자 기록을 13년만에 어제밤에 갱신함 한때 국민 게임답게 추억을 즐기러온 사람들과 함께 마지막 불꽃을 화려하게 태우며 작별중 친구랑 삼보컴퓨터 앞에 앉아서 2P로 키보드 나눠서하던 크아도 이제 추억속으로 😭
Signed 1Minute
MACHI BIG BROTHER 또 다시 청산 Machi Big Brother가 ETH 롱 포지션을 유지하던 중 다시 청산당했음 몇 시간 전 Machi의 포지션이 총 250만 달러 규모로 두 번 청산 현재 증거금으로 약 18만 달러 밖에 남지 않았고 어디서 돈을 또 구해왔는지 포지션을 다시 매수하기 시작했으며 현재 $4.6M 규모의 ETH 롱 포지션을 보유 중 부자는 망해도 부자인게 돈이 계속 나오긴 하네요
Signed 1Minute
안녕하세요 전신마비 환자입니다 원문 안녕하세요!! 병원 침대에서 하루를 보내고 있는 전신마비 환자 입니다. 멀쩡하게 걷고, 내 손으로 밥을 먹고, 일을하고, 일상적인 것들이 얼마나 큰 기적이었는지 이 좁은 침대에 눕고 나서야 뼈저리게 깨달았습니다. 당장이라도 밖으로 뛰어나가고 싶은 마음이 굴뚝같습니다. 비록 전신마비라는 무거운 짐을 지고 있지만 정신만큼은 또렷하니 이것 또한 감사하며 하루하루 버티고 있습니다. 회원님들의 유쾌한 유머글 보며 웃기도 하고 세상 돌아가는 이야기에 같이 분노도 하면서 살아있음을 느낍니다. 다들 사는 게 팍팍하고 힘들 때가 많으시겠지만 병실에 누워 손가락 하나 움직이지 못하는 놈도 이렇게 살아가려고 아둥바둥 노력하고 있습니다. 그러니 회원님들도 오늘 하루 힘든 일 있으시다면 훌훌 털어버리시고 힘내셨으면 …
👍6
Signed 1Minute
주식시장에서 중국을 불신하게된 사건 중국 주식들 가끔씩 유행할때가 있는데 거의 대부분 엔딩은 전손 위 원문글과 별개로 저는 예전에 Ehang $EH 에 관심을 가진적이 있는데 한창 테슬라가 뜨던시기 하늘을 나는 드론 택시를 만든다고 유명해진 주식이 있었음 최고 주가 130달러 까지 올라갔었는데 지금은 5.6달러 그때 당시 상용화 얼마 안남았다라고 하면서 한창 호재로 주가를 띄웠었음 그러다 유명 헷지펀드에서 Ehang에 숏을치고 리서치를 발표했는데 생산공장에 잠입해서 몰래 촬영한 사진들이였음 사람 한명 없고 페인트통 몇개만 놓여진 깡통 공장이였음 이게 진짜다 가짜다 하면서 폭등과 폭락을 반복하다 결국 진짜로 밝혀져서 개판남 그뒤에 공장부지만 사놓고 기술개발은 다른곳에서 한다고 해명했지만 주가는 20토막 상용화가 불가능했음 저…
👍2
Signed 1Minute
바로 오늘 새벽에도 히야님 덕분에 협업한 스크립트 키디스 0.001ETH ➡️ 0.12 까지 올라갔었음 지금도 0.04 유지중 소소하게 간간히 좀 의미있게 수익이 나오고 있는 중이라 늪장도 챙겨보세요
Signed 1Minute
미쳐따
Signed 1Minute
지금 로빈후드 NFT 엄청 수익 잘나오고 있습니다. 시장이 돌아온거같음 44444개 0.0091ETH 로 완판 ㄷㄷ 확실히 전 펏지펭귄 팀이라 하잎을 만들 줄 아는듯 18억을 벌어버리네 저는 펏지펭귄 들고 있었는데도 몰라서 민트못함 ㅠㅠ https://discord.gg/1minute NFT 디스코드 활동 하실분들은 위 디코 가입 고고
Signed 1Minute
🟢 Spritehood Wisps 로빈후드 NFT 개수 : 44,444 가격 : 0.0091 ETH ($17) - 데스나이트 특성은 $100 더 비쌌음 📌 https://opensea.io/collection/spritehood-wisps 현재 완판해서 $1.28M 만든이는 번상태 만든이 😄 https://x.com/ColeThereum 논란이 예전에도 있었고 개수 많고, 민팅가 비싸다보니 cash grab 이라는 말이 많았음 챗방에서 @koreakda 님이 말씀해주셔서.. 민팅 많이 했네요 현재 약 FP 3배 일반 민팅은 좋은거 뽑을수 있는 확률이 없던거같고, 아주키 펭구 릴펭구 BAYC 등등 해당 트윗에 있는 블루칩 홀더들이 첫 민팅할때 현재 FP 0.38 ETH Enhanced 특성 뽑게 해줬네요 얼마만에 og 늪 챙겨준건지…
Signed 1Minute
Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @nftimagod. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 38,984 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제” (@nftimagod), 15,537 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nftimagod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.