지캐시, 5000만달러 규모 ‘개발 보조금’ 회수하나… 커뮤니티·보유자들 투표 프라이버시 디지털자산 지캐시(ZEC)의 개발 보조금 기금에서 약 5000만달러(약 668억원) 상당의 ZEC 5만개를 회수하는 방안이 투표에 부쳐진다. ZEC 가격 급등으로 기금 규모가… #ZEC 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164942?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social

Channel
블록미디어
@blockmedia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
32,899subscribers
-1,128 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001363666182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockmedia |
| Created | 2 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 67 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockmedia |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 09:16 | 32,899 | -30 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 07:47 | 32,929 | -12 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 16:49 | 32,941 | -21 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:00 | 32,962 | -21 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 12:45 | 32,983 | -15 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 15:05 | 32,998 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:26 | 33,008 | -22 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:35 | 33,030 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:39 | 33,040 | -10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 12:50 | 33,050 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 16:04 | 33,060 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 13:16 | 33,069 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 11:46 | 33,077 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:16 | 33,084 | -2 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 33,086 | -11 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 10:29 | 33,097 | -26 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 33,123 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 33,131 | -24 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 33,155 | -14 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:29 | 33,169 | first reading |
Engagement
3,037 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 176 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.34%
- avg views ÷ 32,899 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,100
- 1,037 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.219%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 1,037
- of 3,037 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 854 of 1,037 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 3,037 (5 August 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,140,060 |
| Reactions total | 2,301 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 07:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,252 reactions across 826 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,553 | 69.0% | |
| 👍 | 302 | 13.4% | |
| 👎 | 219 | 9.72% | |
| 👏 | 64 | 2.84% | |
| 🔥 | 52 | 2.31% | |
| 🤔 | 30 | 1.33% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 0.888% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 0.355% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 0.178% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 831 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,252 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 14 October 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 1,037 posts held from the last 30 days (0.868%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
[마감시황] 코스피, 기관 매도세에 5340선 후퇴…코스닥은 700선 붕괴 코스피가 기관의 매도세에 밀려 하락 전환하며 5340선에서 거래를 마쳤다. 코스닥지수도 바이오·이차전지주 중심의 차익 실현 매물이 나오며 1% 넘게 떨어져 700선 아래로… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164941?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
비트코인 5주 연속 하락…10년간 세 번째, 과거엔 반등·폭락 엇갈려 비트코인이 5주 연속 주간 하락세를 기록했다. 최근 10년간 세 번째로 나타난 드문 현상이지만 과거 사례를 보면 연속 하락이 끝났다고 해서 곧바로… #BTC #비트코인 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164853?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
“월가의 자산 토큰화는 립서비스”…블록체인 기반 대출 기업의 지적 월가 대형 금융기관들이 실물연계자산(RWA) 토큰화 사업에 잇따라 진출하고 있지만, 상당수 프로젝트가 실질적인 금융 혁신보다는 형식적인 참여에 그치고 있다는 지적이 나왔다. 미국… #ONDO #USDT 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164891?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
“비트코인 반등해도 추가 하락 가능”… 렉트캐피털, 7만2800달러 주목 비트코인이 수주간 이어진 매도 압력에서 벗어나 단기 반등에 나설 수 있지만 본격적인 추세 전환까지는 추가 하락이 필요하다는 분석이 나왔다. 최근 17%에… #BTC #비트코인 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164846?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
👎2
제타체인, 솔라나 체인 이전 확정…AI 플랫폼 제타랩스 예고 제타체인(ZetaChain·ZETA)이 자체 블록체인 운영을 종료하고 솔라나(Solana·SOL)에서 프라이빗 인공지능(AI) 플랫폼 제타랩스(ZetaLabs)를 출시한다. ZETA도 기존 네트워크의 가스비와 스테이킹 중심 역할에서 벗어난다. 앞으로는 AI… #ZETA 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164865?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤1
美, 중국의 해외 AI 반도체 원격 이용 차단 추진…엔비디아 수출 규제 강화 미국 정부가 중국 인공지능(AI) 기업들이 해외 데이터센터를 통해 첨단 반도체를 이용하는 것을 차단하기 위한 새로운 수출통제 규정을 추진하고 있다. 반도체의 중국… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164838?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
👍1
비트마인, 연간 63억달러 순손실…ETH 평가손실 62억달러 직격타 이더리움 재무전략(DAT) 기업 비트마인 이머전 테크놀로지가 이더리움 가격 하락 여파로 연간 63억달러(약 8조3809억원)가 넘는 순손실을 기록했다. 12일 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC)에 제출된 비트마인의… #ETH 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164841?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤3👍1👏1
젠슨 황 해임설에 AMD 주식 연동 선물 10% 급등 젠슨 황 엔비디아 최고경영자(CEO)의 해임설이 확산하면서 경쟁사 AMD의 주식 가격을 추종하는 무기한 선물이 10% 넘게 급등했다. 엔비디아의 경영 불확실성이 커지자 경쟁사… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164860?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤2
“젠슨 황 내일 해임 확률 72%”…폴리마켓, 추가 불륜 의혹에 급등 젠슨 황 엔비디아 최고경영자(CEO)의 사임 또는 해임 가능성이 예측시장에서 70%를 넘어섰다. 황 CEO가 엔비디아 여성 임원과 부적절한 관계를 맺었다는 추가 의혹이… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164857?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤1
트럼프 일가 ‘USD1’ 홍보하던 UAE 예측시장, 실제론 USDC 사용 트럼프 일가의 스테이블코인 USD1을 사용한다고 홍보했던 아랍에미리트(UAE) 관련 예측시장 플랫폼이 실제로는 경쟁 스테이블코인인 USDC를 사용한 것으로 드러났다. 특히 미국 중간선거에서 승리한… #USD1 #WLFI 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164830?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤3
그레이스케일 “지캐시 개발자 2년 새 두 배…ZEC 가치 상승 기대” 디지털자산 업계 전반에서 개발자 이탈이 이어지는 가운데 프라이버시 코인 지캐시(ZEC)의 개발자 수는 최근 2년간 두 배 가까이 증가한 것으로 나타났다. 디지털자산… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1164769?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 3,037 posts we hold for @blockmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@SincoinNews · 66410 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,8057 posts크립토 서울(crypto Seoul)
@crypto_Maximalist_info · 3767 posts코인광장(coinsquare)
@coinsquarelw · 1,1925 posts타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,9783 posts아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,8152 postsYeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,4502 posts토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,0982 postsBitKR 블록체인 공식채널
@bitkr_official · 642 posts차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,0872 posts코오해 😴 뉴스
@coinhae_news · 122 posts🎒Alpha School🎒
@AlphaSchool77 · 5,9341 postDynasty
@Dynastylabs · 6,3431 post달달한초코btc코인정보/btc/차트분석/자유우파
@FllowYourDreamForsight · 2,5951 post풀소유멤버십_오피셜
@FullSoU_official · 811 post코챌스&코봉이의 뉴스 채널
@Kobongi · 1281 postAbstract Korea 🇰🇷
@abstractkorea · 3091 postBrevis Korea 한국 공식 커뮤니티
@brevis_korea · 1,2441 post가치투자클럽
@corevalue · 67,1261 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 13,0251 post똥마려
@dongmaryeo · 9201 postWaymaker
@dots999 · 2021 post이더파이 Korean Fan Page
@ehterfi_KR · 841 post불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,7031 post호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,4551 post메이의 일기
@mai_crypto_news · 831 post마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,3701 post㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,3911 post머니그리드
@moneygrid · 10,7421 postComa의 코인투자
@need_crypto · 11 post졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,6571 post오브스(Orbs) 한국 공지 채널🌐
@orbskrannouncement · 5,7081 post시드 삭제 연구소 [Seed Deletion Research Institute (SDRI)]
@ottikim · 2901 post🇰🇷 펏지펭귄 공식 공지방
@pudgypenguinskr · 1,8821 post호시탐탐 크립토
@tamtamcrypto · 3,8001 postTARI VIBE
@tariworld · 1141 post안녕하세요불지옥탈출기를담습니다잘부탁드립니다
@whoskoriel · 5521 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@coinnesskr · 30,389#1
@BChoSN · 26,326#2
@emperorcoin · 35,511#3
@kkeongsmemo · 10,552#4
@moneybottle · 15,777#5
@cryptomacase · 10,909#6
@xangle_official_kr · 12,533#7
@seaotterbtc · 29,999#8
@xvgwhitedog2 · 15,336#9
@chavoonnam · 21,087#10
@lovejudylee · 17,954 (as read 4 September 2026)#11
@dolbikong · 9,601#12
@juhyukb · 6,565#13
@MAC_DDDD · 4,703#14
@TeamYonseiDent · 8,491#15
@Jobless_investor · 5,866#16
@Signal_Quant · 4,600#17
@magonia_b · 26,164#18
@digitalassetnewsroom · 2,016#19
@dogeland01 · 20,904#20
@coincodekr · 10,187#21
@tokenpost_kr · 5,936#22
@cryptoquant_kr · 10,164#23
@dancoininvestor · 4,337#24
@moon252423 · 4,374#25
@ApexFlowpros · 13,937#26
@vibetaku · 1,979#27
@dkc_notice · 1,656#28
@colufarmers · 4,356#29
@teamctrine · 8,436#30
@AISPERSONS · 3,842#31
@cq_alert_kr · 21,587#32
@BithumbExchange · 11,795#33
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,228#34
@DOGGODIE_TRADER · 3,424#35
@bloomingbit_io · 933#36
@enjoymyhobby · 48,840#37
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,170#38
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657#39
@dontak00 · 14,773#40
@realtime_breaking · 15,150#41
@fireant_crypto · 32,703#42
@murphybus · 19,905#43
@gensencoin · 14,744#44
@allkindchallenge · 4,441#45
@marshallog · 21,370#46
@mujammin123 · 25,742#47
@waitstudy · 19,387#48
@shrimp_notice · 28,311#49
@BQTelegram · 9,321#50
@airdr0p_lab · 20,455#51
@kookookoob · 16,501#52
@web3subin · 9,722#53
@SnowCrypto1 · 3,998#54
@moneygrid · 10,742#55
@tlsrltnf · 22,355#56
@inlyeog · 10,467#57
@Bananamilkrich · 8,627#58
@liambitcoin · 4,517#59
@GMBLABS · 11,149#60
@chikointhebox · 14,542#61
@coinboys · 15,455#62
@billair1 · 6,303#63
@eastsouthwind · 4,651#64
@cogall1st · 4,011#65
@ricebeen · 4,827#66
@yobeullyANN · 22,207#67
@money0stack9Notice · 7,856#68
@TraderHyun · 6,422#69
@easychartgo · 6,052#70
@CryptoStreetSignal · 10,428#71
@yieldnspread · 22,083#72
@LEEHEESANGDYOR · 9,494#73
@killberosDAO · 14,849#74
@jutrobedzielepsze · 8,859#75
@TheDisPater · 2,072#76
@anancoin · 5,307#77
@leedogin2 · 15,336#78
@sealcryptocvd · 11,150#79
@EnjoyMyAirdrop · 8,167#80
@BMTube · 13,428#81
@coin_1st · 5,475#82
@whalealertkorean · 6,556#83
@lnsanecoin · 7,940#84
@GDSTofficial · 2,490#85
@vc_21m · 5,446#86
@hedgehara · 19,603#87
@minchoisfuture · 15,391#88
@Raoni1 · 14,870#89
@Jenti_DeFi · 1#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@coinnesskr · 30,389
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 15,339
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@cheonjiilbo · 19,687
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 30 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,587
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@TelegramTipsKo · 97,426
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 30 September 2026
@BChoSN · 26,326
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@chavoonnam · 21,087
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,904
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@godmulzoo · 22,634
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@BabyDogeAnnKO · 74,089
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,511
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@seaotterbtc · 29,999
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,228
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@twitchoong · 79,274
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@toncoin_kr · 22,926
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,311
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,840
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“블록미디어” (@blockmedia), 32,899 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.