[마감시황] 코스피, 외인 3조원 매도에 7000선 반납…삼전·하이닉스 5%↓ 코스피가 외국인의 3조원대 순매도와 반도체 대형주 급락에 2.7% 하락하며 6900선 아래로 밀렸다. 삼성전자와 SK하이닉스가 5% 넘게 내린 반면 코스닥은 HLB와… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144932?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social

Channel
블록미디어
@blockmedia
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
33,507subscribers
-520 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001363666182 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @blockmedia |
| Description | 블록미디어는 한국 최초로 전세계 디지털자산(가상자산)과 블록체인에 관한 콘텐츠를 전하는 미디어입니다. 시장정보와 더불어 규제 및 금융, 경제, 기술, 라이프 스타일 등 다양한 관점에서 독자여러분에게 한 발 앞선 통찰력을 제공하기 위해 노력합니다. 블록미디어는 미래를 창조하는 사람들의 길잡이가 될 것입니다. 독자여러분들이 다양한 정보를 접하고 통찰력을 얻는 길에 함께하겠습니다. [email protected] |
| Created | 2 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 37 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/blockmedia |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 17:57 | 33,507 | -58 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 15:19 | 33,565 | -22 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 02:20 | 33,587 | -27 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 33,614 | -5 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:56 | 33,619 | -28 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 33,647 | -19 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 33,666 | -37 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 20:01 | 33,703 | -12 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 33,715 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 09:53 | 33,730 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 33,745 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 33,747 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 33,757 | -15 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 33,772 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 33,784 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 33,797 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 33,801 | -12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 33,813 | -11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 33,824 | -22 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 33,846 | first reading |
Engagement
1,442 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.96%
- avg views ÷ 33,507 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,330
- 668 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.281%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 668
- of 1,442 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 621 of 668 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,442 (5 August 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 886,246 |
| Reactions total | 2,417 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Sept 2026, 07:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈26,500
- Videos
- ≈6
- Links
- ≈112,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,563 reactions across 928 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,944 | 54.6% | |
| 👍 | 992 | 27.8% | |
| 👎 | 429 | 12.0% | |
| 👏 | 83 | 2.33% | |
| 🔥 | 74 | 2.08% | |
| 🤔 | 32 | 0.898% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 0.112% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.056% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.056% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.028% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 931 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,563 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
지안카를로 “겐슬러도 디지털자산 못 죽였다…클래리티법 실패도 마찬가지” 크리스 지안카를로 전 미국 상품선물거래위원회(CFTC) 위원장이 디지털자산 시장구조법인 클래리티법(CLARITY Act)의 상원 표결 실패가 미국 디지털자산 산업의 성장을 막지는 못할 것이라고 주장했다.… #BTC #ETH 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144888?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
👏1
금감원 “RWA 시장 키우려면 결제·시스템 안전장치 갖춰야” 실물연계자산(RWA) 시장이 본격적인 온체인 자본시장으로 성장하려면 결제 지연과 블록체인 네트워크 간 파편화 등 구조적 문제를 해결해야 한다는 금융감독원의 입장이 나왔다. 금융사들이… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144919?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
부캉이 밈코인도 화제, 시총 100만달러 넘어 부산 북항 친수공원 ‘인기 스타’ 부캉이가 밈코인으로 만들어졌다. 28일 펌프펀 플랫폼에 따르면 ‘bukangi’ 이름을 단 밈코인이 등장해 거래되고 있다. 부캉이… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144895?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤2👎2
퀀트, 24시간 만에 52% 폭등… 주간 상승률 300% 돌파 디지털자산 퀀트(QNT)가 거래량 폭증과 대규모 청산 물량에 힘입어 하루 만에 50% 넘게 폭등했다. 최근 일주일간 상승률은 300%를 넘어서는 등 강한 오버슈팅… #QNT 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144898?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤2
업비트, ‘캐시캣’ 원화·BTC·USDT 마켓 신규 상장…28일 오후 5시 거래 예정 국내 디지털자산(가상자산) 거래소 업비트가 캐시캣(CASHCAT)을 원화(KRW), 비트코인(BTC), 테더(USDT) 마켓에 신규 상장한다고 28일 공지했다. #CASHCAT 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144889
❤2👎2
세일러, AI 시대 자본조달 혁신 제안…”토큰으로 1000만개 기업에 자금 공급” 마이클 세일러 스트래티지 회장이 디지털 토큰을 활용해 최대 1000만개의 신규 기업이 보다 쉽게 자금을 조달할 수 있는 환경을 만들어야 한다고 주장했다.… #BTC #ETH 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144877?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤3
日 2년물 국채금리 2% 육박… BOJ 연속 금리인상론에 31년 만에 최고치 일본의 통화정책 전망에 가장 민감하게 반응하는 2년 만기 국채 금리가 심리적 저항선인 2% 턱밑까지 치솟았다. 일본은행(BOJ)이 기준금리를 추가로 올릴 것이라는 시장의… 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144878?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤1
빗썸, ‘쿼크에이아이’·‘페이팔유에스디’ 원화 마켓 신규 상장…28일 오후 3시 거래 개시 국내 디지털자산 거래소 빗썸이 쿼크에이아이(Q)와 페이팔유에스디(PYUSD)를 원화 마켓에 추가한다고 공지했다. #Q #PYUSD 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144875
❤1
‘시총 10위 진입’ 하이퍼리퀴드 ETF에 기관 자금 쏠림… 한 주간 120억 원 뭉칫돈 탈중앙화 금융(DeFi) 기반 레이어1 블록체인 하이퍼리퀴드(HYPE) 현물 상장지수펀드(ETF)에 한 주 동안 900만달러가 넘는 기관 자금이 몰렸다. 비트코인과 이더리움을 넘어 알트코인 현물… #HYPE 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144835?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤1
10년 전 26억원에 산 비트코인, 5100억원 됐다… 수익률 ‘5000% 대박’ 10년 전 약 189만달러(약 26억원)에 매입된 초기 비트코인(BTC) 4500개가 최근 이동하면서 약 3억7700만달러(약 5100억원) 규모의 막대한 평가이익을 거둔 것으로 나타났다. 오랜… #BTC 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144836?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
❤1
미국 SEC 린드먼 “클래리티법 없어도 규제 정비…기존 권한으로 가능” 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC)가 가상자산 시장구조 법안인 클래리티법(CLARITY Act) 없이도 상당수 디지털자산(가상자산) 정책을 추진할 수 있다는 입장을 밝혔다. 의회 입법이 규제 정비에 속도를… #BTC #USDT 기사 보기 👉 https://www.blockmedia.co.kr/archives/1144846?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social
👏5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,442 posts we hold for @blockmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@SincoinNews · 67810 posts크립토 서울(crypto Seoul)
@crypto_Maximalist_info · 3717 posts코인광장(coinsquare)
@coinsquarelw · 1,1925 posts타점 읽어주는 여자(타자)
@tazastock · 40,3203 postsYeouido Lab_여의도 톺아보기
@Yeouido_Lab · 43,3092 posts토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,1462 postsBitKR 블록체인 공식채널
@bitkr_official · 642 posts코오해 😴 뉴스
@coinhae_news · 132 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 26,2161 post달달한초코btc코인정보/btc/차트분석/자유우파
@FllowYourDreamForsight · 2,6671 post풀소유멤버십_오피셜
@FullSoU_official · 791 post코챌스&코봉이의 뉴스 채널
@Kobongi · 1571 postAbstract Korea 🇰🇷
@abstractkorea · 3371 postBrevis Korea 한국 공식 커뮤니티
@brevis_korea · 1,3071 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,3121 post디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 12,1311 post똥마려
@dongmaryeo · 9101 postWaymaker
@dots999 · 2121 post이더파이 Korean Fan Page
@ehterfi_KR · 821 post호그니엘
@hogniel · 15,3151 post메이의 일기
@mai_crypto_news · 831 post㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,1191 post머니그리드
@moneygrid · 11,0281 postComa의 코인투자
@need_crypto · 11 post오브스(Orbs) 한국 공지 채널🌐
@orbskrannouncement · 5,7561 post시드 삭제 연구소 [Seed Deletion Research Institute (SDRI)]
@ottikim · 2981 post🇰🇷 펏지펭귄 공식 공지방
@pudgypenguinskr · 1,9351 post호시탐탐 크립토
@tamtamcrypto · 3,8101 postTARI VIBE
@tariworld · 1191 post안녕하세요불지옥탈출기를담습니다잘부탁드립니다
@whoskoriel · 5751 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@coinnesskr · 30,958#1
@BChoSN · 24,973#2
@emperorcoin · 37,091#3
@kkeongsmemo · 10,875#4
@moneybottle · 15,628#5
@cryptomacase · 11,038#6
@xangle_official_kr · 12,856#7
@seaotterbtc · 30,155#8
@xvgwhitedog2 · 15,656#9
@chavoonnam · 21,312#10
@lovejudylee · 17,954 (as read 4 September 2026)#11
@dolbikong · 9,600#12
@juhyukb · 6,560#13
@MAC_DDDD · 4,801#14
@TeamYonseiDent · 8,547#15
@Jobless_investor · 6,051#16
@Signal_Quant · 4,694#17
@magonia_b · 26,896#18
@digitalassetnewsroom · 1,992#19
@dogeland01 · 21,207#20
@coincodekr · 10,468#21
@tokenpost_kr · 6,175#22
@cryptoquant_kr · 10,299#23
@dancoininvestor · 4,398#24
@moon252423 · 4,486#25
@ApexFlowpros · 14,574#26
@vibetaku · 2,045#27
@dkc_notice · 1,698#28
@colufarmers · 4,437#29
@teamctrine · 7,739#30
@AISPERSONS · 3,922#31
@cq_alert_kr · 21,994#32
@BithumbExchange · 14,731#33
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,670#34
@DOGGODIE_TRADER · 3,500#35
@bloomingbit_io · 941#36
@enjoymyhobby · 49,691#37
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,959#38
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,979#39
@dontak00 · 14,271#40
@realtime_breaking · 15,220#41
@fireant_crypto · 32,852#42
@murphybus · 20,099#43
@gensencoin · 15,000#44
@allkindchallenge · 4,455#45
@marshallog · 21,798#46
@mujammin123 · 26,052#47
@waitstudy · 19,734#48
@shrimp_notice · 28,748#49
@BQTelegram · 9,810#50
@airdr0p_lab · 20,589#51
@kookookoob · 16,787#52
@web3subin · 9,877#53
@SnowCrypto1 · 4,000#54
@moneygrid · 11,028#55
@tlsrltnf · 22,804#56
@inlyeog · 10,749#57
@Bananamilkrich · 8,769#58
@liambitcoin · 4,599#59
@GMBLABS · 11,309#60
@chikointhebox · 14,872#61
@coinboys · 15,482#62
@billair1 · 6,398#63
@eastsouthwind · 4,759#64
@cogall1st · 4,136#65
@ricebeen · 5,027#66
@yobeullyANN · 22,081#67
@money0stack9Notice · 7,943#68
@TraderHyun · 6,563#69
@easychartgo · 5,826#70
@CryptoStreetSignal · 10,220#71
@yieldnspread · 22,018#72
@LEEHEESANGDYOR · 9,484#73
@killberosDAO · 15,102#74
@jutrobedzielepsze · 9,004#75
@TheDisPater · 2,066#76
@anancoin · 5,324#77
@leedogin2 · 15,469#78
@sealcryptocvd · 11,349#79
@EnjoyMyAirdrop · 8,518#80
@BMTube · 13,489#81
@coin_1st · 5,600#82
@whalealertkorean · 6,677#83
@lnsanecoin · 7,647#84
@GDSTofficial · 2,548#85
@vc_21m · 5,577#86
@hedgehara · 19,022#87
@minchoisfuture · 15,119#88
@Raoni1 · 14,980#89
@Jenti_DeFi · 14,455#90
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 4 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@coinnesskr · 30,958
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,994
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@BChoSN · 24,973
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@chavoonnam · 21,312
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 21,207
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@godmulzoo · 22,764
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@BabyDogeAnnKO · 81,816
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 37,091
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@seaotterbtc · 30,155
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,670
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,979
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
@twitchoong · 74,854
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,748
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 49,691
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“블록미디어” (@blockmedia), 33,507 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blockmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.