급하게 로그인에 캡챠 넣은건가 아님 원래 있는데 발동된건가? 뭔가 공격을 당하는 건가 싶기도 함
Signed Pagu Info

Channel
@pgyinfo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,340subscribers
-285 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001301520513 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pgyinfo |
| Description | DeFi, NFT and Crypto Info Channel #AD = paid AD / #KOL = requested post TeleChat: t.me/PaguInfo_Chat Blog: pgyinfo.tistory.com Twitter: twitter.com/NewPaguInfo DM: t.me/PaguInfo |
| Created | 31 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pgyinfo |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Nov 2026, 22:17 | 8,340 | -15 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:08 | 8,355 | -7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:59 | 8,362 | -9 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:38 | 8,371 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:27 | 8,387 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:40 | 8,385 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 8,386 | -3 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:38 | 8,389 | -5 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 14:37 | 8,394 | -8 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 12:57 | 8,402 | -2 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 19:59 | 8,404 | -31 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 12:22 | 8,435 | -23 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 8,458 | -25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 8,483 | -20 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 8,503 | -22 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:15 | 8,525 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 8,535 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 8,543 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 8,551 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:21 | 8,569 | first reading |
222 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 90 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 222 (5 August 2026 – 13 November 2026) |
| Views total | 36,518 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
62 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 67.7% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 4.84% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.61% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.61% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 51 of the 222 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 222 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 90 posts held from the last 30 days (5.56%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
급하게 로그인에 캡챠 넣은건가 아님 원래 있는데 발동된건가? 뭔가 공격을 당하는 건가 싶기도 함
Signed Pagu Info
Claude authenticating issue 계속 로그인 풀림... 짱나네 https://status.claude.com/
Signed Pagu Info
아니 다 좋은데 머리숱은 왜 따지는데? 벌시?!
Signed Pagu Info
Metric 포인트 프로그램 공식 런칭 이제 봇 제대로 체크해서 돌려야겠다 https://x.com/metricxyz/status/2120974101892522079?a=OmydqzqaNmgFOBubNOg&s=19
Signed Pagu Info
Nado 가 포인트 프로그램 증지함 그런데... Kraken 이 IPO 할것 같지도 않고 INK 가 갑자기 나오는 것도, 이런 장에..., Kraken IPO 전에?, 에반데... 장황하게 이담에 뭐니 어쩌구 늘어놓은거 보면.. ㅜ https://x.com/nadoHQ/status/2121048483474145437?a=G6AsnSKf7HWsCEM-LAo&s=19
Signed Pagu Info
📊 11월 13일 Perp DEX 데이터 Vol Hyperliquid가 24시간 거래량 $12.02B로 1위이며, 2위 Lighter($2.27B)의 약 5.29배 Hyperliquid의 OI는 $6.62B(+0.07%), Vol/OI는 1.81, TVL은 $6.13B 거래량은 Variational($1.93B)과 Aster($1.80B)가 Lighter 뒤를 이음 OI 14곳 중 11곳의 OI가 감소, Paradex가 -7.17%로 낙폭 가장 큼 Backpack(-5.72%), ApeX(-3.97%), Aster(-3.19%)도 OI가 줄어듦 Hyperliquid(+0.07%), Variational(+0.27%), EVEDEX(+0.38%), Nado(-0.44%)는 OI 변동이 작음 Vol/OI Vol/OI는 Pacifica 14.…
Signed Pagu Info
DeFi News Summary 2026-11-13 09:00 KST [DeFi] - Pendle: Pendle RWA Insights 4화: NYLIM 인터뷰 링크 - Ondo: Spout Finance, 솔라나에서 Ondo Stocks 담보 지원 예정 링크 - Metric: Metric 포인트 프로그램 시작 링크 [PerpDEX] - RiseX: RISEx 레퍼럴 V2 도입 링크 - Ondo Perps: Anthropic 프리IPO 무기한선물(ANT) 출시 링크 - RiseX: RISEx, $1000PEPE 마켓 상장 링크 - Ondo Perps: Ondo Perps, 샤오미·텐센트·기가디바이스 무기한선물 상장 링크 [Chain] - GIWA: GIWA 테스트넷 Upgrade 20 적용 링크 - GIWA: GIWA node v0.7.…
Signed Pagu Info
[DeFi] Metric Metric 공식 계정이 포인트 프로그램 시작을 발표했으며, 거래·유동성 공급·Metric 기반 빌드 참여자에게 매주 1,000,000 포인트가 분배됩니다. 포인트는 10월 15일부터 적립되어 왔고, 분배는 매주 목요일에 이뤄지며 별도 클레임 없이 자동 적립됩니다. Metric을 사용했거나 온체인 거래를 했다면 앱에서 획득 포인트를 확인할 수 있으며, 포인트·추천 관련 내용은 문서에 안내되어 있습니다. 출처 · ☆ 8/10
Signed Pagu Info
살려주세요...
Signed Pagu Info
했제... (물림ㅠ)
Signed Pagu Info
🫰 DOKDO × RISEx 거래 대회 최종 보상 지급 완료 DOKDO × RISEx 거래 대회 상금이 지급완료되었습니다! 함께해 주신 모든 분들께 진심으로 감사드립니다! 앞으로도 RISEx 많은 관심 부탁드립니다! '상금은 ETH체인 USDC로 지급되었습니다 ' 🎁 최종 총 보상 • 총상금: $83,250 USDC • 총 RISEx 포인트: 9,100P • 당첨자 : 70명 🏆 최종 당첨자 및 보상 안내 순위 | 상금 (USDC) | RISEx 포인트 🥇 1위 | $18,250 | 850P 🥈 2위 | $5,700 | 560P 🥉 3위 | $5,600 | 450P 4위 | $5,300 | 430P 5위 | $5,200 | 410P 6위 | $3,900 | 390P 7위 | $3,800 | 370P 8위 | $3,700 | 355P 9…
Signed Pagu Info
0G x MAGIC x Humbleman AMA - 일시 : 11월 12일(목) 저녁 9시 (KST) - 장소 : MAGIC 트위터 스페이스 - 게스트 : Michael (CEO) - 코호스트 : MAGIC, Humbleman AMA 참여방법 - AMA 공지글 좋아요, 리트윗 - AMA 공지글에 댓글로 사전 질문 남기기 - 이벤트리 미리 가입하기 AMA 보상 - 사전 질문 10명 : 치킨 - 현장 인증 200명 : 커피 이번 AMA는 KBW 시즌에 맞춰 iAI를 런칭하고 Layer for AI로 여러가지 활동을 진행중인 0G의 CEO Michael님을 모셨습니다 개인적으로 AI + 크립토가 가져올 미래에 많은 기대를 하고 있는데, 이번 AMA에서 0G의 현재 구조와 향후 계획 등을 가감없이 알아보겠습니다. 많관부!
Signed Pagu Info
Showing the 12 most recent of 222 posts we hold for @pgyinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pgyinfo named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PaguInfo 파구정보 (DeFi Info)” (@pgyinfo), 8,340 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pgyinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.