[거래] 봉크(BONK) 거래지원 종료 안내 (9/7 15:00) 🔗 공지사항 확인하기

Channel
에어드랍 정보 공유 (워렌존버핏)
@jonbuffit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
576subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001876131687 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jonbuffit |
| Description | 에어드랍, 코인 정보공유 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jonbuffit |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:30 | 576 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 576 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 4.13%
- avg views ÷ 576 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 23.8
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.33%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 476 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 03:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,480
- Videos
- ≈159
- Links
- ≈8,040
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 34s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
[거래] 블록스트리트(BSB) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 🔗 공지사항 확인하기
[거래] 카미노파이낸스(KMNO) KRW 마켓 디지털 자산 추가 🔗 공지사항 확인하기
가상자산(디지털자산) 시장 포괄 법안 클래리티법안(CLARITY Act) 처리 절차가 당초 예상됐던 금요일을 넘어 주말까지 이어질 가능성이 제기됐다. 5일(현지시각) 미국 공화당의 신시아 루미스(Cynthia Lummis) 상원의원은 폭스비즈니스(Fox Business)에 출연해 "이번 주 금요일에 끝나지는 않을 것"이라며 "8월 휴회에 들어가기 전에 클래리티법안을 비롯해 표결해야 할 법안들이 남아 있어 주말까지 일정이 이어질 것으로 본다"고 말했다. 그는 이어 "매일 민주당과 여러 쟁점을 놓고 협의하고 있다"며 "전날 밤에도 상품선물거래위원회(CFTC) 관련 조항을 논의했고, 현재까지도 법 집행 관련 조항을 계속 조율하고 있다"고 말했다. 최대 쟁점인 윤리 조항과 관련해서는 도널드 트럼프 대통령이 이미 상당한 양보를 했다고 주장했다. 그는…
실제로 벌어졌습니다. 로빈후드 캐시캣 상장.. ROBINHOOD: New Listing: CASHCAT
🍀 GRVT 현장 AMA 당첨자 발표 보러가기 오늘밤 12시까지 어뷰징 신고 및 개선 요청을 받겠습니다. 본인의 트위터와 텔레그램 계정이 일치하지 않을 경우 제보해주세요! 수고하셨습니다!!
🌴 [AMA] Kii 체인과 함께 온라인에서 애프터파티 -일시: 8월 6일 오후 11시 -장소: 코인같이투자 트위터 원문공지 오늘 한국 밋업이 있는 온체인 스테이블 코인 & RWA 결제 레이어 Kii 체인과의 AMA를 진행합니다. Kii 체인 관련 정보 정리글 보러가기 1️⃣ 사전이벤트 : 트위터 게시글 Like + RT (필수) : 사전질문 제출 (선택) : Kii 한국 공지방 ㅣ 대화방 입장 : 네이버폼 제출 🧵 리워드: 사전질문 당첨자 5명 100 $KII , 랜덤 100명 40 $KII 2️⃣ 현장이벤트 : 라이브 스트리밍 참여 및 Like RT : 인증샷 방에서 인증샷 제출 : Kii 한국 공지방 ㅣ 대화방 입장 : 네이버폼 제출 🧵 리워드 : 랜덤 300명 80 $KII 랜덤 10명 150 $KII 이번주 AMA 열…
오만과 이란, 호르무즈 해협 통과 항로 관련 공동 성명 조만간 발표 그만좀해 제발
🍀 [AMA] 왔냐...우리 얘기좀 하자 GRVT 야 여기 앉아봐라 - 일시: 8월 6일 오후 8시 - 장소: 코인같이투자 트위터 - 손님: GRVT 코파운더 & COO Matthew Quek 한차례 폭풍이 지나간 후 잊혀질 권리따위 주지 않기 위해 GRVT와의 AMA를 목요일날 진행합니다. 왜 베스팅 검? 왜 아봉함? 이런 질문도 다 받아볼 수 있도록 하겠습니다. 우리 허심탄회하게 이야기하자. 일단 이리 와서 앉아봐라. 1️⃣ 사전이벤트 : 트위터 게시글 Like + RT (필수) : 사전질문 제출 (선택) : 네이버폼 제출 🍀 리워드: 사전질문 당첨자 5명 200 $GRVT , 랜덤 100명 40 $GRVT 2️⃣ 현장이벤트 : 라이브 스트리밍 참여 및 Like RT : 인증샷 방에서 인증샷 제출 : 네이버폼 제출 🍀 리워드 …
🎤 Savior Of Health X 코인소년 AMA ✅ Savior Of Health가 코인소년 크립토 채널에서 프로젝트의 진행방향 등에 대해 AMA를 진행합니다. 🗓 날짜 : 8월 6일(목) 오후 9시 📍 장소 : 코인소년 트윗 스페이스 👤 참석자 : Felix Chan (CMO) 🎁 AMA 참여자 보상 🟢치킨 기프티콘 (3명) 🟢편의점 상품권 1만원 권 (5명) 🟢편의점 상품권 5천원 권 (10명) 🟢커피 기프티콘 (30명) ✍ 오늘 밤 9시에 AMA가 진행됩니다. 기프티콘도 제공되며 파밍이 가능한 프로젝트라 파밍에 대한 이야기도 나올 것 같네요. AMA 참여시 구글폼 작성을 하셔야 보상받으실 수 있으니 꼭 작성하셔서 AMA도 들어보시고 상품도 챙기시면 좋겠네요. AMA 트위터 | AMA 참가자 구글폼 #SaviorofHea
ZKcandy 이 녀석들도 토큰을 내네요. 작년에 Kroma 인수합병 했던 애들인데 오늘 트위터 보다가 8월 7일 런칭을 우연히 발견... 근데 정작 Mexc 트윗에만 공지 올라와있고 본인들 소셜에는 TGE 공지도 없음ㅋㅋ 보통 이런 경우는 그냥 조용히 토큰내고 프로젝트 접는 케이스
📕 골드만삭스, 코스피 12000견해 유지 ✅ 세계 유명 금융사인 골드만삭스는 연초부터 계속해서 만스피를 외치는데, 이번에는 한 번 더 상향조정해 12000피를 간다고 말하고 있네요. 🚀골드만 삭스의 견해 🟢메모리 상승 사이클은 지속될 것이다. 🟢현재의 급락은 급등한 것에 대한 조정일 뿐. 🟢하이퍼 스케일러의 CaPeX 가 하락의 타당한 이유지만, 그것이 이번 반도체 사이클을 훼손시킬 정도는 아니다. 🟢과거 PER 의 고점은 8배 수준인데, 현재는 5.1배 수준으로 충분하다. 🟩 자기들 물리면 좋은 소리, 밑에서 사려고 하면 나쁜소리 하는 대표 주자 중 한명인 골드만삭스입니다. 다만, 4000피 5000피일때도 계속 같은 견해를 유지하고 있네요. 물론 말은 계속 바뀌는 것이 믿음직 스럽진 않네요. #국내 #코스피
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jonbuffit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@WeCryptoTogether · 49,7875 posts업비트 Upbit 공식 텔레그램
@upbit_news · 68,3724 posts취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 50,5943 posts기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 27,3122 posts폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,3661 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,5071 postMBM Crypto Insider🦅
@MBMweb3 · 68,5601 post코국놈 정보방
@realKoreanguy · 3,6421 postordinary subinium
@web3subin · 10,0041 post윤로그 공지방🦅
@yunlog_official · 10,2671 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“에어드랍 정보 공유 (워렌존버핏)” (@jonbuffit), 576 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jonbuffit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.