4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,824–4,842 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 19:37
4,826
-4
10 Aug 2026, 00:01
4,830
-6
7 Aug 2026, 01:20
4,836
-4
6 Aug 2026, 07:21
4,840
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 4,826 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.324%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held
18 (15 July 2026 – 9 August 2026)
Views total
29,357
Reactions total
95
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
95 reactions across 18 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
73
76.8%
👍
22
23.2%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚩 이번주 주요 일정
📈 8월 10일 (월)
*실적: 샤프링크 2분기 실적
※ CLARITY Act 상원 표결 9월로 연기
📈 8월 11일 (화)
*휴장: 일본 산의 날
📈 8월 12일 (수)
21:30 미국 7월 CPI★
*이벤트: MSCI 8월 지수 리뷰 발표
*이벤트: Made by Google 2026
📈 8월 13일 (목)
21:30 미국 7월 PPI★
*이벤트: 한국 옵션만기일
*실적: 시스코
📈 8월 14일 (금)
05:30 미국 연준의 대차대조표
05:30 미국 연방준비은행 지급준비금 잔액
*이벤트: 미국 기관투자자 13F 보고서 제출 마감★
🚩 주요일정
08.20 미국 7월 FOMC 의사록 공개
08.27 05:20 엔비디아 실적발표★
08.27 한국 금융통화위원회
08.27 연준 잭슨홀 미팅 개막(~29)
※ Cir…
✅ 서클($CRCL) 급락
모건스탠리가 서클 실적발표(8.5) 이틀전 투자의견을 '보유 → 비충축소' 로 하향하고 목표주가를 '106달러 → 38달러' 로 대폭 낮춤
- USDC 유통량 성장 전망 하향(2027년 -33%, 2028년 -44%)
- 준비금 이자수익 둔화 우려
- 토큰화 MMF·예금 등 경쟁 심화
- 스테이블코인의 실제 결제 활용은 아직 제한적
- AI 결제·OpenUSD 등 신사업은 아직 실적 기여도가 낮다고 평가
기술적으로 $58.7 은 주요 매물가격. 버티면 반등, 이탈시 급락.
🚩 이번주 주요 일정
📈 8월 3일 (월)
23:00 미국 7월 ISM 제조업 PMI
📈 8월 4일 (화)
08:00 한국 7월 소비자물가지수
23:00 미국 6월 JOLTS 구인건수★
*이벤트: Ai4·FMS 2026 개막(~6)
*실적: 팔란티어·캐터필러·화이자·머크
📈 8월 5일 (수)
06:00 AMD 실적발표★
21:00 Circle 2분기 실적발표★
21:15 미국 7월 ADP 민간고용
23:00 미국 7월 ISM 서비스업 PMI★
*실적: 디즈니·우버·일라이릴리
📈 8월 6일 (목)
08:00 한국 6월 경상수지
21:30 미국 신규 실업수당 청구건수★
📈 8월 7일 (금)
05:30 미국 연준의 대차대조표
05:30 미국 연방준비은행 지급준비금 잔액
21:30 미국 7월 비농업고용·실업률★
*이벤트: 삼성 갤럭시 Z8 시…
✅ 서클($CRCL) 주가 저평가 영역
- 주가 고점 대비 약 80% 조정으로 밸류에이션 부담 완화
- Forward PER 48배로 상장 초기 대비 밸류에이션 부담 완화.
- PSR 5배 수준으로 고성장 금융 인프라 기업 대비 저평가 구간.
- USDC 성장 + 규제 수혜 + 고금리가 향후 실적 성장을 뒷받침.
- 현재 주가 64달러, 적정가 120~140달러 판단.
✅ KOSPI 고점 대비 하락률 역사적 구간 도달
최고점 대비 현재 하락률은 약 -41%.
1980년 코스피 출범 이후 이런 수준의 하락은 손에 꼽을 정도로 드문 구간입니다.
추가 하락 가능성은 있지만, 현재 시스템 리스크가 발생한 상황은 아니라는 점을 고려하면 충분히 매력적인 구간이라고 생각합니다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @MAC_DDDD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 531,100 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“맥디” (@MAC_DDDD), 4,826 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MAC_DDDD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.