코인원(Coinone) 공지 개인정보 유출 사실 관련 안내 2026-11-15 08:00:00

Channel
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,266subscribers
-1,069 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001379897604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shrimp_notice |
| Description | 꼬마새우 공지방 - @shrimp_kkoma 새우잡이어선 트위터 - @shrimp_tweet @goldenbull @ddosok 📮새우잡이어선 썩은물 카톡방 https://open.kakao.com/o/gohwdDKh ✅카톡방 비번 : 9992 |
| Created | 28 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 65 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shrimp_notice |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 20:59 | 28,266 | -45 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 28,311 | -19 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:07 | 28,330 | -17 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 13:59 | 28,347 | -1 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:18 | 28,348 | -11 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:34 | 28,359 | -5 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:26 | 28,364 | -8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:19 | 28,372 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:10 | 28,386 | -13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:24 | 28,399 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:07 | 28,405 | -11 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:48 | 28,416 | -13 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 14:19 | 28,429 | -7 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 28,436 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 11:37 | 28,451 | +10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 11:56 | 28,441 | -20 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 12:38 | 28,461 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:06 | 28,466 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:45 | 28,473 | -21 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:14 | 28,494 | first reading |
Engagement
1,329 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.67%
- avg views ÷ 28,266 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,880
- 423 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 423
- of 1,329 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,329 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 796,978 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 02:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈366
- Videos
- ≈2
- Links
- ≈52,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 423 posts held from the last 30 days (1.18%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 카바(KAVA) 유의촉구 안내 2026-11-14 20:00:03
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 카바(KAVA) 유의 촉구 안내 2026-11-14 20:00:00
코인원(Coinone) 공지 유의촉구 안내: 카바(KAVA) 2026-11-14 20:00:01
코인원(Coinone) 공지 카바(KAVA) 보안 이슈로 인한 입출금 일시 중단 안내 (11/14 19:40~) 2026-11-14 19:38:39
업비트(Upbit) 공지 [입출금] 카바(KAVA) 입출금 일시 중단 안내 2026-11-14 19:36:55
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 카바(KAVA) 입출금 일시 중지 안내 2026-11-14 19:35:55
바이낸스(Binance) 공지 Recovery Update: Withdrawals Reopened for More Networks (2026-11-14) 2026-11-14 12:52:39
바이낸스(Binance) 공지 Notice on Share Count Basis of USDⓈ-Margined ANTHROPICUSDT Pre-IPO Perp 2026-11-13 20:30:13
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지변경 더 강력해진 VIP 매칭 프로그램! 빗썸으로 이동하시면, 국내 최고 VIP 혜택을 즉시 드립니다! (혜택 확대) 2026-11-13 18:00:04
빗썸(Bithumb) 공지 맵프로토콜(MAPO) 거래유의종목 지정 2026-11-13 18:00:04
코인원(Coinone) 공지 거래유의 종목 지정 안내: 맵 프로토콜(MAPO) 2026-11-13 18:00:01
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,329 posts we hold for @shrimp_notice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@shrimp_notice edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 30 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @shrimp_notice as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 1 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 13 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 103 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
@xvgwhitedog2 · 15,31749 posts취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,79931 posts코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,12625 posts불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,68423 posts마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,35114 posts졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,65114 posts코인맵핵 🎈
@centurywhale · 16,34613 posts부의길목에서 🦅
@stay_news · 7,63313 posts사랑방🍬(CRYPTO ALPHA)
@Sarangbang_Crypto · 8,47512 posts코인한나의 Honeybag
@coinhanna_honeybag · 6,58512 posts왕베이
@cryptowangbei · 7,04811 posts아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,80610 posts꿀프티 (세상 억까..) 공지방
@friedsquid26 · 12,0509 posts머니그리드
@moneygrid · 10,7429 posts크립토 스패니얼
@CryptoSpaniel · 10,6408 posts잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,7428 posts에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,7907 postsMBM Crypto Insider🦅
@MBMweb3 · 47,0417 posts코인광장(coinsquare)
@coinsquarelw · 1,1927 postsCrypto 팬더 공지방🦅
@cryptopandann · 16,3777 postsjenti_defi
@Jenti_DeFi · 16 posts에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,2486 posts해브로의 텔레그램
@havelaw · 6,1536 posts폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4465 posts크립토다이어리
@c_ryptodiary · 7,3855 posts🔥요블이 세상살이🔥
@yobeullyANN · 22,1755 posts코인왕 ( 공지방 ◇ 에어드랍 )
@Coin_Airdrop_King · 40,4684 posts디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지)
@coinkcgchannel · 14,5744 posts도랏맨 - 젠지이즈굿
@doratman18 · 9,4124 posts피린이
@forevernft · 12,0544 posts이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,3194 postsMADANG 크립토
@madang_club · 1874 posts말하는 토끼
@malto0115 · 5,5214 posts풀소유멤버십_오피셜
@FullSoU_official · 813 posts로로의 공사다망 | 웹3 · AI · TCG
@ROBLOCK_INFO · 4,3723 posts크립토 번역공장
@coinsaywhat · 9,3433 posts外賣派單了
@iamhandsomebo · 6273 posts언더그라운드 크립토
@underground_cctt · 6803 posts메타부 스토리
@x2emeta · 3,5383 postsXbyus_News
@xbyus_news · 1,6733 posts크립토 탈옥 채널 iOS 4.0
@Crypto_jailbreak_Korea · 5,8562 postsDynasty
@Dynastylabs · 6,3432 posts리무의 일기장
@MBMDiary · 4,1742 postsCRYPTO Sea
@crypt0_sea · 15,5982 posts희단이의 Web3 꿀정보 공지방
@heedan22 · 8,0282 posts나는 무직이다
@iammujik · 1,9172 postsWeb3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 22,9712 posts㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,3912 posts
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@enjoymyhobby · 48,799#1
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,126#2
@murphybus · 19,883#3
@BChoSN · 26,320#4
@gensencoin · 14,744#5
@kookookoob · 16,478#6
@emperorcoin · 35,440#7
@magonia_b · 26,164#8
@fireant_crypto · 32,684#9
@xangle_official_kr · 12,514#10
@mujammin123 · 25,742#11
@moneygrid · 10,742#12
@GMBLABS · 11,149#13
@yobeullyANN · 22,175#14
@inlyeog · 10,455#15
@theddari_wallet · 3,050#16
@waitstudy · 19,364#17
@chikointhebox · 14,517#18
@twitchoong · 79,159#19
@kkeongsmemo · 10,533#20
@Bananamilkrich · 8,627#21
@billair1 · 6,290#22
@seaotterbtc · 29,986#23
@lnsanecoin · 7,868#24
@LEEHEESANGDYOR · 9,494#25
@gmrvillage · 6,190#26
@theddari_notice · 2,036#27
@dolbikong · 9,599#28
@cryptomacase · 10,908#29
@eastsouthwind · 4,651#30
@CryptoStreetSignal · 10,458#31
@EnjoyMyAirdrop · 8,145#32
@killberosDAO · 14,826#33
@cryptopangpang · 11,389#34
@churin0329 · 9,079#35
@Info_Arbitrage · 5,349#36
@dolgommagic · 12,098#37
@liambitcoin · 4,508#38
@xvgwhitedog2 · 15,317#39
@money0stack9Notice · 7,856#40
@forevernft · 12,054#41
@PASACREW · 5,916#42
@cryptoflow_notice · 746#43
@ricebeen · 4,814#44
@shrimp_kkoma · 1,159#45
@BQTelegram · 9,321#46
@airdrop_kor · 21,248#47
@jibegagosian · 4,112#48
@coinkokr · 1,569#49
@BithumbExchange · 11,776#50
@coinboys · 15,441#51
@dopaminemaxi · 3,013#52
@crypt0_sea · 15,598#53
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,045#54
@KOREAalphaDEGEN · 8,618#55
@Rowna999 · 14,210#56
@Hikicha0_0 · 5,582#57
@dogeland01 · 20,884#58
@icoroots · 5,389#59
@Raoni1 · 14,861#60
@coinnesskr · 30,357#61
@dontak00 · 14,760#62
@tlsrltnf · 22,343#63
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,651#64
@airdr0p_lab · 20,446#65
@moneybottle · 15,772#66
@mongtanodance · 4,348#67
@rolypopa · 10,603#68
@juhyukb · 6,552#69
@koreapigdiary · 4,139#70
@pgyinfo · 8,325#71
@marshallog · 21,351#72
@jutrobedzielepsze · 8,859#73
@anancoin · 5,299#74
@Jenti_DeFi · 1#75
@realtime_breaking · 15,140#76
@allkindchallenge · 4,441#77
@speculation_dairy · 2,853#78
@BMTube · 13,418#79
@web3subin · 9,722#80
@bokjisaideashare · 3,925#81
@leedogin2 · 15,319#82
@centurywhale · 16,346#83
@serpie_log · 2,179#84
@blockmedia · 32,899#85
@crypt0made · 6,724#86
@vallettaidea · 3,478#87
@minebuu_cryptoball · 10,700#88
@theddari_kimp · 4,049#89
@cobling · 6,045#90
@honey_box_main · 5,394#91
@SnowCrypto1 · 3,985#92
@minchoisfuture · 15,391#93
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@twitchoong · 79,159
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@layergg · 19,277
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
@cq_alert_kr · 21,577
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,134
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@BChoSN · 26,320
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,799
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@toncoin_kr · 22,926
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
@godmulzoo · 22,670
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,357
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,684
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@locusofficial · 17,978
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 4 October 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 14,574
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@chavoonnam · 21,087
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,884
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,440
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@seaotterbtc · 29,986
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@blockmedia · 32,899
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,126
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,228
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@airdrop_kor · 21,248
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026
@yobeullyANN · 22,175
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
@murphybus · 19,883
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
@BWEnews · 72,455
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
@mujammin123 · 25,742
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“새우잡이어선 공지방” (@shrimp_notice), 28,266 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shrimp_notice.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.