이게 진짜라면 아서헤이즈 오늘 코에 공기주입하다 뇌가 살짝 돌아간거라고 보면될듯요
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx

Channel
@justicekingsman
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,019subscribers
+41 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001645632215 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @justicekingsman |
| Description | Contact : @jonnabutija |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/justicekingsman |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 16,019 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 16,031 | +6 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 16,025 | -8 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:18 | 16,033 | +20 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 16,013 | -8 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 16,021 | +14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:46 | 16,007 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 15,995 | +11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 15,984 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 15,982 | +4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 15,978 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 15,978 | first reading |
84 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 84 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 84 (5 August 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
| Views total | 151,380 |
| Reactions total | 88 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
72 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 25 | 34.7% | |
| 😱 | 25 | 34.7% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 9.72% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 8.33% | |
| ⚡ | 5 | 6.94% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 2.78% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 2.78% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 18 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
이게 진짜라면 아서헤이즈 오늘 코에 공기주입하다 뇌가 살짝 돌아간거라고 보면될듯요
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
?? 아서헤이즈 뭐지요 근데 그냥 해킹일듯 절대 상호 노노해 일단
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
바낸 알파를 간 소가온다 코인은 기존 홀더들이 알파소식에 익절하면서 손바뀜이 생기는거 같네요 특히 qwerty가 열심히 팔긴하는중 결국 다음알파도 rwa meme에서 나온터라 바낸은 확실히 rwa meme을 밀고싶어하는거 같기는 해요 사실 따지고보면 마스코인도 밀어주려다 대참사난 케이스라.. (저 소코인의 상장으로 마스코인은 엄청난 조정을..)
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
로빈후드 크립토의 프로덕트 헤드가 뭔가 뉴스가 나올거 같이 예고했네요 저기 피자 이모지는 별뜻은 아니고 걍 이사람 진짜 피자에 ㅈㄴ 진심이라 피자이모지 쓰는듯 (피드 80프로가 피자이야기)
🥰1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
Marscoin 넘었네요
🔥1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 늙크크 귀엽긴해
😱1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
진짜 실수인가보네..
🥰1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
쩝 결국 이젠 서로 PVP가 되는 시총언저리까진 오긴했네요. 뭐 실수던 고의던 전혀 중요하지 않은 상황까지 온거 같긴합니다. (이걸 아직도 논하기엔 이제 의미가 전혀없음) 이젠 뭐 창펑 넥스트 스텝이 뭔지만 보면 될거같아요 개인적으로 스톡밈페어인 마스(알파에 올린)를 홀딩하고 있던터라 그냥 이 상황이 썩 유쾌하진 않네요.
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
대략 홈페이지가 이런느낌인데.. 이게 그냥 플랫폼? 느낌이고 공개되어 있어서 그런지 이미 자잘한 토큰들을 런칭한 중국형들이 있어보이네요. 비문이랑 마찬가지로 아무거나 사면 어차피 다 0원갈거라 그냥 저 파운더가 만든 애들 사는게 맞긴한거같음. 대강 구조가 -> bnb로 채굴 -> 2차시장에서 거래 인데, 파운더가 만든건 제가 보니까 다 이미 채굴누가 해놔서.. 2차거래에 누가 팔아주길 기다려야하긴해요. *물론 비문은 BTC에서 온체인활동 하는거라 좀 특이한 매력도가 있긴했는데 이건 비문만큼 잘나갈지는 솔직히 잘모르겠어요
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
어제 채팅방에서 븐브에서 어떤 개발자형이 재밌는거 만들어서 공유했는데... 창펑이 팔로우박고 댓글까지 남겼네요. 일단 이게 약간 비문?메타 같은 느낌인데... 이게 진짜 뭐 어케 토큰 사는건지도 모르겠고.. 뭐 어케하는건지 진짜 모르겠어서 멀뚱멀뚱 구경중.. 일단 공식적으로 거래???마켓같은거도있음 근데, 이게 약간 예전에 sats 거래하듯이.. 주문넣고 누가 팔아줘야지 거래가 가능함 https://tapeout.net/#market
🥰1
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
추가로 저는 이게 그냥 헤프닝이라고 생각했던건 마스코인이 잘나가게 된건 스톡밈페어라서인데 저거는 스톡밈페어가 아니라 그냥 BNB페어임. 하지만...단타로는 충분히... 접근가능했을거같은데 아쉽네 까비
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
진짜 멈춰주세요 아 근데 이거 12밀이긴한데 창펑 지갑에 70% 보내둔 마스코인이라.. 실제론 한 3.6밀이긴함
Signed Manbull | IQ0 .xx
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @justicekingsman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 12,533 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방” (@justicekingsman), 16,019 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/justicekingsman.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.