Channel
@cryptogoldcow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,199subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002005044751 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptogoldcow |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptogoldcow |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 2,199 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 2,203 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 2,204 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 2,204 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (12 July 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 2,840 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
왜냐면 이 시장을 경험할수록 특정 종목이나 특정 자산군들에 대한 믿음이 얼마나 무참히 박살나는지 보게 된다. 반대로 특정 종목이나 자산군을 믿고 큰 부를 얻게 된 사람도 있다. 그런데 이런 구조가 오래 가냐는 말이다. 다들 내가 하이퍼리퀴드를 알아보고 초기부터 참여해서 안목이 있다는 느낌으로 알고 있는데 전혀 사실이 아니다. 첨부터 하이퍼리퀴드가 잘 될지 안 될지 어떻게 아노 그냥 나는 5년간 계속 반복하다가 어쩌다 하나 터진게 하이퍼리퀴드 였을뿐. 물론 하이퍼리퀴드에 좀 더 공을 들인건 사실이다. 하지만 그것은 비중의 문제 였을뿐. 나는 그때도 다른 프로젝트를 여전히 하고 있었다. 무너지지 않는 구조를 만들자. 나에겐 하나에만 몰두 하는게 아닌 여러 프로젝트에 씨를 뿌려두는게 무너지지 않는 형태였다. 그리고 더 나아가 현금 주식…
쎄예스님 앱스 Ethereal 티어 달성 ㄷㄷ 지난주 기준으로 Ethereal 티어는 전세계 4명 (0.0006%) 브론즈 -> 실버 -> 골드 -> 플래티넘 -> 다이아 -> 옵시디언 -> 이더리얼 📌 https://abslysis.xyz/user
한 6개월전에 리스팅한 야피바라 팔림.. 참고로 전 정품이더 1이더 정도 주고 샀던거 같아요.. 흑
🟢 캄브리아 던전 뱃지 얻는 법 🟠 [미션] 열쇠 10개 이상으로 던전 플레이하기 ㅡ 이미지 보고 따라하시믄 댑니다 캄브리아 앱스로 로그인하고 게임 접속 1. 처음 시작하면 이 위치! 화살표 방향(좌측위)으로 ㄱㄱ 2. 가다보면 왼쪽에 미궁과 함께 빨간원이 보임 3. 상단에 열쇠를 눌러서 키 10개(=1USDC)를 구매 4. 빨간원으로 던전 입장 🟠무기가 고민이 된다면 리더보드(던전 바로 북쪽에 위치)에서 어떤걸 많이 썼는지 확인해보세용 🟠캄브리아 던전이 재밌어졌다면, 성수님 채널에 가서 꿀팁들 보고 따라하시면 됩니당
❤2
조금씩 오르는 Abstract XP + 87,963XP 똑같은 것만 하는데 대략 10,000XP 더 올랐으니 너무 좋은데요? 아.. 톨란 뱃지받는다고 깔짝하긴 했어요. Abstract vote 25days Mog 1000개 Tollan Badge
못맞춰서 100% 캐시백 받음.. 돈 아꼈따..
💳 KAST 8x 캐시백 부스트 진행 중 Matchday 결승, 스페인 승리를 맞췄을 경우 기존 멤버십 월 캐시백 한도 • Standard: 최대 $30 캐시백 ($2,000의 1.5%) • Premium: 최대 $200 ($10,000의 2%) • Private: 최대 $1,200 ($40,000의 3%) 8x 적용 시 월 최대 한도 • Standard: 최대 $240 캐시백 ($2,000의 12%) • Premium: 최대 $1,600 캐시백 ($10,000의 16%) • Private: 최대 $9,600 캐시백 ($40,000의 24%) 💡캐시백 예시 (프리미엄 멤버십) • 기존 월 한도: $200 • 8x 적용 기간 기간 월 한도: $1,600 • 이벤트 시작 전 이미 수령한 캐시백이 $100일 경우 • 이벤트 기간 동안 추가로…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnDQYsdSnjc
2026 월드컵 결승전 티켓 가격 현재 $8200 = 약 1200만원
현재까지 도파민 터지는 아르헨티나 토너먼트 결과 32강 아르헨티나 3 : 2 카보베르데 → 연장후반 115분 결승 골 16강 아르헨티나 3 : 2 이집트 (역전 승) → 후반 79분 골 → 후반 83분 동점 골 → 후반 92분 (추가시간) 결승 골 8강 아르헨티나 3 : 1 스위스 → 연장후반 112분, 121분 골 4강 아르헨티나 2 : 1 잉글랜드 (역전 승) → 후반 85분 동점 골 → 후반 94분 결승 골 (추가시간)
❤1
아니 이번월드컵 아르헨티나 진짜 말 안된다.. 모든 토너먼트가 역전 승, 추가시간 골이 진짜 많음..
아직 종목은 많이 없지만.. (현물만 있음) 포인트제도 이제 막 시작해서.. 초기에 바짝 좀 캐볼까 합니다.
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cryptogoldcow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 980,148 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“골드카우 Crypto” (@cryptogoldcow), 2,199 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptogoldcow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.