Channel
@SnowCrypto1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,954subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001444234106 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SnowCrypto1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SnowCrypto1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 3,954 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 3,958 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 3,958 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (1 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,594 |
| Reactions total | 34 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
34 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 47.1% | |
| ☃ | 11 | 32.4% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 20.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
밈에 대해 캐시캣 상장했으니 커뮤니티와 레거시를 존중하며 로빈후드는 밈에 대한 성의를 충분히 보였다. 커뮤니티가 어쨌거나 서열정리하기 위해 본인들이 베팅한 경주마들을 외치며 폰즈 등등 트렌딩하고 있지만 다음 먹거리는 에이전트다. 확실히 베이스의 파이를 싹 가져갈 것 같단 느낌 여기는 버추얼이 가져갈까? 아니면 뱅커가 활약할까? 또 누군가 등장하나? https://x.com/robinhoodapp/status/2085841862720360782?s=46&t=ARbhzQskfoLqxClTtB1S8A
비트가 많이 하락해서 주봉으로 보면 상승전환추세에 놓여져 있는데 문제는 트리거가 없음 코베프리미엄양수도 아니고 CVD보면 수급도 갈고가 빠져있고 클래리티법안도 지금 올해 빠그라졌고 트리거가 없는 이상태에서 잡코만 날뛰는중 그냥 잡코로 소액매매하던가 밈코매매하던가 도박장놀이터마냥 놀고있다가 비트가 방향이 나오면 그때 비트매매하면 될듯 솔직히 지금 당장은 장기추세가 바뀐다라는 건 아니라서 이러한 횡보 몇달 더할듯 뉴스도 없고 관심도 없고 이때가 인간지표로 보묜 저점느낌이긴하네요 차트는 시기상조
☃2❤1
일주일 전부터 상장 찌라시 돌던 것도 그렇고 직원들 입이 너무 가벼운 게 아닌지??
물론 말했던 전망들은 유지! 하지만. 당장 뭐 할게 없다는 사실 또 심지어 세금문제로 코인으로 벌어서 인생역전해보겠쒀하는 사람들도 의지가 꺽임
❤3☃1
주인장이 조용한 이유 뭐.. 뷰가 없음 ㅜ 주식, 반도체쪽은 공부를 전혀 안해서 뭐 아는것도 없고 코인쪽은 크라임만 쳐하다 뒈지는 곳이니..
❤2😱2☃1
["USDT 시총 지속 감소 추세... 암호화폐 시장 유동성 위축 신호"] 세계 최대 스테이블코인 테더(USDT)의 시가총액이 지속 감소 추세를 나타내고 있으며, 이는 암호화폐 시장 유동성이 말라가고 있다는 신호라고 온체인 애널리스트 모레노(Moreno)가 분석했다. 그는 "USDT 시총 60일 변동폭이 약 -40억 달러까지 하락하면서, 역사상 가장 큰 시총 감소폭을 나타내고 있다. 실제로 최근 11일 동안 약 8.7억 USDT가 공급량에서 제거되며, 시총 감소세는 가속화되고 있다. USDT는 암호화폐 시장에서 가장 즉각적으로 활용 가능한 유동성의 원천이다. 따라서 이는 시장 내 유동성이 빠르게 고갈되고 있음을 의미한다"고 설명했다. 이어 "USDT 공급량 감소와 비트코인 가격 하락은 직접적인 인과관계가 성립하지 않는다. 과거 데이터 상 U…
무슨 국장은 맨날 사이드카임
❤1
8월동안 70k 위에 올라가지 못하면 60k 아래를 보게 될 것
😱5❤1
내가 진짜 초보인 지인에게 투자하라고 조언을 하고싶다고 한다면 그냥 나라 망했다 세상망했다 할 때까지 총알 모으고 있으라고 하고 싶음 솔직히 여기서 뭐하려고 하면 되는게 없다고 봄. 🥹 다들 각자 가진 방망이 깍으면서 생존중인데. 지금 여기서 초보가 방망이 깍으면 수업비가 너무 빡셀듯
❤1
받) 살아남는게 항상 중요하구나 이번 주식장에 무너진 사람들 사례. 실화소니 1. 취준생 빚 4,100만 원으로 주식 투자. 해외주식 -47%, 총 손실 1,000만 원 이상. 낮에는 국비교육, 밤에는 배달하며 대출 상환 중. 2. 화물차기사 주식에 빚까지 내 총 1억 원 투자. 현재 거래정지로 원금 대부분 증발. 화물차 할부와 투자 빚으로 매달 400만 원 이상 상환. 3. 민박집 사장 노후자금과 대출 6~7천만 원을 2차전지 테마주에 투자. 투자금 대부분을 잃고 “죽고 싶다는 생각까지 했다”고 고백. 4. 공시생 코인으로 3천만 원 빚. 현재 막노동을 하며 번 돈 대부분을 빚 갚는 데 사용. 5. 배달기사 코인으로 4천만 원 손실. 손실을 복구하려 스포츠 도박까지 손댔다가 결국 채무조정 신청. 6. 학부모 아들 대학 등록금을 위…
❤3
불갬믿어요ㅕ!
코인과세 유예 시위는 때를 기다릴 것
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @SnowCrypto1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 902,171 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“스노우맨 공부방🇰🇷” (@SnowCrypto1), 3,954 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SnowCrypto1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.