카난, 7월 46 BTC 채굴... 보유량 1,917 BTC https://www.coinreaders.com/253140

Channel
케이씨지 블록체인/디지털자산/AI/경제 뉴스
@coinkcgchannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,724subscribers
-2,195 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001162271405 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinkcgchannel |
| Description | 텔레그램 그룹(채팅방) @coinkcg https://kcgkorea.com 카톡 익명방(비밀번호 880506) https://open.kakao.com/o/p02MKZHi 문의 @arnold33 #암호화폐 #가상화폐 #디지털자산 #코인 #비트코인 #bitcoin #btc #블록체인 #인공지능 #AI #경제 |
| Created | 15 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinkcgchannel |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 21,724 | -111 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:04 | 21,835 | -90 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 21,925 | -614 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 22,539 | -154 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 22,693 | -213 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 22,906 | -659 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:41 | 23,565 | -123 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 23,688 | -35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:06 | 23,723 | -24 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 23,747 | -172 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 23,919 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 23,919 | first reading |
Engagement
290 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.496%
- avg views ÷ 21,724 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 108
- 290 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 290
- of 290 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 290 (6 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,245 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 15:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈8,700
- Videos
- ≈28
- Links
- ≈71,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Harmony는 공격자가 ONE 토큰을 위조한 사건 이후 블록체인을 8월 11일 시점으로 되돌릴 계획입니다. 한 지갑에서 2분도 채 안 되는 시간에 거의 2조 4천억 개의 ONE 토큰이 이동되었습니다. Harmony 팀은 위조된 자금의 거의 전부를 추적한 결과, 고정된 시점으로 되돌리는 것이 "가장 공정하고 안전한" 선택이라고 밝혔지만, 위조된 자금을 안전하게 격리하거나 소각할 수는 없다고 덧붙였습니다. https://x.com/i/status/2089347728232837366
[단독]이름만 바꿔단 '바라크'...계속되는 코인 사기 https://www.tbc.co.kr/news/view?pno=20260812163808AE03846&id=209852
비트마인은 지난주 9,926 ETH를 매입하여 총 보유량이 5,815,164 ETH(이더리움 총 공급량의 약 4.8%)에 달했다고 밝혔습니다. 회사는 보유량의 약 87%에 해당하는 5,067,309 ETH를 스테이킹했으며, 연간 스테이킹 수익은 약 2억 5천만 달러로 예상됩니다. BitMine은 또한 지난주 170만 주를 자사주 매입하여 7월 이후 누적 매입량이 2,080만 주를 넘어섰습니다. 8월 16일 기준 BitMine의 암호화폐, 현금, 시장성 유가증권 및 기타 투자 자산 총액은 114억 달러입니다. https://x.com/i/status/2089330661282779266
스트래티지, 비트코인 매입 중단 및 MSTR 매각으로 3억 3,400만 달러 조달 스트래티지는 8월 10일부터 8월 16일까지 비트코인 매입 및 매도를 하지 않아 보유량을 840,447 BTC로 유지했다고 밝혔습니다. 이는 평균 매입가 75,385 BTC, 총 매입가 633억 6천만 달러에 해당합니다. 회사는 해당 기간 동안 MSTR 주식 346만 주를 매각하여 3억 3,370만 달러를 조달했습니다. 이 중 1억 3,220만 달러는 MSTR 주식 139만 주를 자사주 매입에, 5,240만 달러는 MSTR 배당금 지급에, 나머지 1억 4,910만 달러는 미 달러 보유고 확충에 사용했습니다. 8월 16일 기준 MSTR의 미 달러 보유고는 48억 달러입니다. https://x.com/i/status/2089323144859246874
녹아내리는 코인 가격… 침체 늪 빠진 가상자산 시장 https://naver.me/xHErb51J
로이터 통신에 따르면 바이낸스는 2023년에 러시아에서 철수했음에도 불구하고 우크라이나 기부금과 관련하여 러시아 IT 전문가에게 요금을 부과하는 데 사용된 고객 데이터를 모스크바에 넘겼습니다. https://x.com/i/status/2089251063362715719
조각투자 넘어 RWA로… 금투업계, 토큰증권 경쟁 본격화 https://it.chosun.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=2023092168245
"수익률 270%, 5억 먹고 은퇴합니다"…정체불명 인증글, 조급증 불질러 https://m.news.nate.com/view/20260817n01224?issue_sq=11391
'글로벌 큰손' 노르웨이 국부펀드, 비트코인 간접투자 '사상최대' https://www.edaily.co.kr/News/Read?newsId=01571126645548304&mediaCodeNo=257&OutLnkChk=Y
유니스왑 V4가 24시간 수수료 기준으로 리도를 앞질렀습니다. 120만 달러 대 120만 달러의 수수료를 기록 https://x.com/MSBIntel/status/2089179088304959990?s=20
"외국인 관광객, 국내서 해외 디지털자산 지갑 그대로 사용" https://www.newsis.com/view/NISX20260815_0003750696
Showing the 12 most recent of 290 posts we hold for @coinkcgchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 885,512 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“케이씨지 블록체인/디지털자산/AI/경제 뉴스” (@coinkcgchannel), 21,724 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinkcgchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.