Channel
@minchoisfuture
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
14,912subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001621568519 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @minchoisfuture |
| Description | 본인의 개인적인 취향을 큐레이팅하는 채널. 꼭 필요한 연락 : @flarrs |
| Created | 17 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/minchoisfuture |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 14,912 | -5 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 14,917 | +7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 14,910 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:11 | 14,912 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:21 | 14,920 | -5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 14,925 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 14,933 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 14,925 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 14,922 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 14,922 | first reading |
204 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 78 of 204 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 204 (5 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 158,774 |
| Reactions total | 122 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
114 reactions across 63 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 114 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 204 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 204 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟢 Claude에 추가되는 워터마크 -Anthropic은 8월 2일 이후 출시되는 신규 모델들이 작성한 텍스트에 '워터마크' 추가 계획 -이는 EU의 AI Act법 준수를 위한 것으로 다른 주요 AI 개발사들도 Code of Practice에 서명하여 워터마크가 도입될 것으로 보임 -워터마크는 Claude의 답변 품질이나 내용에 영향을 주지않으며 사람 눈에는 보이지 않지만 AI가 단어를 고르는 패턴에 특정 흔적을 남기는 방식 -전용 탐지기를 통해서 볼 시 Claude가 작성했다라는 가능성 통계패턴을 남기는 방향
제인스트릿, 7월 150억달러 손실 출처 레오폴드 관련 AI 투자한게 폭락했다고 함 TMI. 지난 분기 역대급 수익 기록 160억달러 창립 2016년 후 10년간 무손실 행진에 종지부
저스틴 선 "바이낸스와 소통했습니다." 원문 바이낸스에서 HTX 금지 조치는 영국 및 EU 사용자와 관련 된 것만 해당 영향 받은 사람 있으면 후오비 고객센터로
❤1
광복모우닝...😊
❤1
$ALIGN added to Coinbase roadmap
[속보] 최태원, '노소영에 9440억원 지급' 불복…다시 대법으로 https://n.news.naver.com/article/119/0003122052?type=breakingnews
❤1
이거 지캐시 유통량의 94%까지는 확인되어서 이제 검증되지 않은 옛날 익명성 풀의 ZEC 개수는 1M 아래라 함 ($1M 이 아님에 유의) https://x.com/cipherscan_app/status/2087902659684470979
올해 하반기에 나오는 FTX 소재 드라마 <The Altruists> 이거 찾아보니 배우들 싱크는 일단 제법 괜찮아보이네... 캐롤라인... 샘뱅크먼... 보인다 보여 <이미테이션 게임> 각본을 썼던 그레이엄 무어가 각본을 썼고 편당 60분, 총 8편짜리 드라마라고 함
❤1
가끔씩 간지나는 포스팅을 하는 스타링크형님 스페인 마드리드에 산불이 크게 나자 무료로 스타링크 서비스를 긴급 제공하였다고 함. 이럴때마다 엘론머스크 형님 뽕차긴 해... https://x.com/Starlink/status/2081382502560850198
❤2
바이낸스 8월 23일부터 HTX를 포함한 11곳 거래소와의 입출금 금지 - HTX → 바이낸스 입금 / 바이낸스 → HTX 출금 금지 - 개인지갑을 중간에 끼워 우회하는 간접 전송도 하지 말라고 명시함. - 시도하면 거래가 보류되고 컴플라이언스 심사, 관련 지갑·바이낸스 계정 제한까지 걸릴 수 있음. - 바이낸스는 이유를 “최근 규제 변화”라고만 밝혔고, 구체적인 국가·제재 근거는 공개하지 않음. https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/af2be67dc03c4673b4f56c42db948253
속보) 호랑이형님 복귀 업무에 참고바랍니다
[넷플릭스, FTX 드라마 11/19 공개] FTX 창업자 샘 뱅크먼-프리드(SBF)의 흥망을 모티브로 한 넷플릭스 드라마 ‘디 알트루이스트(The Altruists, 이타주의자들)’가 11월 19일 공개된다고 버라이어티가 전했다. 총 8부작으로 제작됐다. FTX 공동 설립자 게리 왕과 SBF 여자친구이자 전 알라메다 CEO 캐롤라인 엘리슨(Caroline Ellison) 등 주변 인물들도 극중 등장한다. 작품은 뉴욕매거진 기사들을 바탕으로 제작됐으며 버락 오바마 전 미 대통령 내외도 총괄 프로듀서로 참여했다. https://coinness.com/news/1165620
Showing the 12 most recent of 204 posts we hold for @minchoisfuture. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 3,277 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@minchoisfuture named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드” (@minchoisfuture), 14,912 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/minchoisfuture.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.