Channel
@kkeongsmemo
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,533subscribers
-636 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001490762856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kkeongsmemo |
| Description | 코인/경제/이슈/속보 등을 다룹니다. 채팅방 : https://t.me/kkeongchat 카톡방(비번 : qqqq) : https://open.kakao.com/o/gN5A39nd 프로모션 및 기타 문의사항 : @cryptocin 채널에 모든 내용은 매수매도 추천이 아니며 개인의 의견입니다. 실제 매수 매도는 본인의 판단하에 하시기 바랍니다. |
| Created | 7 October 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 63 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kkeongsmemo |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 03:20 | 10,533 | -19 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:46 | 10,552 | -19 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 01:36 | 10,571 | -8 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 14:47 | 10,579 | -5 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:17 | 10,584 | -9 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 12:29 | 10,593 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:06 | 10,595 | -3 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 14:36 | 10,598 | -3 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 10,601 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 13:26 | 10,604 | -9 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 10,613 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 12:35 | 10,619 | -10 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 10:28 | 10,629 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 10,636 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:29 | 10,642 | -8 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:36 | 10,650 | -10 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 10,660 | -5 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 10,665 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 08:05 | 10,672 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 07:30 | 10,673 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 15 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
227 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🙏 | 74 | 32.6% | |
| 👍 | 67 | 29.5% | |
| custom 5195346931215244163 | 19 | 8.37% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 7.49% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 4.85% | |
| 👎 | 9 | 3.96% | |
| 🤣 | 8 | 3.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 2.20% | |
| 🍌 | 4 | 1.76% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 1.32% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.881% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.441% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.441% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 227 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 15 September 2025 to 23 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kkeongsmemo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 September 2025 to 23 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
오래간만에 인사를 드립니다. 저의 최근의 근황을 전해드리자면 현재 저는 매매는 계속 쉬고있는 상태입니다. 채널 활동도 본업과 개인 공부의 부담으로 거의 손을 못대고 있는 상태네요. 여러 이야기를 하며 매매하던 시장이 그립습니다. 현재는 본업에 집중하며 활발한 매매를 할수 있는 장이 오기를 기다리고 있습니다. 때가 되면 다시 돌아와 여러분과 함께 정보를 나누며 활동해 보도록 하겠습니다. 언젠간 때가 오겟지요 ㅎㅎ
🙏74👍29🔥15❤🔥5🍌4👎4😭3🐳2
금융위 “가상자산거래소 상장, 자율→공적규제로 전환” 금융위는 우선 가상자산 거래소 상장 업무 규제와 관련 △상장·폐지 기준 △거래 정지·해제 △공시사항 등을 포함한 상장규정 마련 의무를 부과할 계획이다. 이는 상장심사 부실 문제를 해결하기 위한 조치다. 앞서 금융위는 지난 5월 신규 거래지원(상장) 후 가격 급변동(상장빔) 현상 등을 방지하기 위해 ‘거래지원 모범사례 개정안’을 발표한 바 있다. 상장빔을 막기 위해 매매 개시 전 최소 유통량 확보 의무를 부과하고, 매매 개시 후에는 일정 시간 시장가 주문을 제한하는 내용이 핵심이다. 거래지원 모범사례 개정안 내용이 2단계 법안에 반영될 가능성이 높다. 원문 급한 이유가 있었구나
👍3
[속보]카카오 "카카오톡 '친구' 탭, 원상태로 되돌린다"
custom 519534693121524416318🤣8👍7
#업비트 & 케이뱅크, 10월 이후에도 '실명계좌 제휴' 이어간다 “오늘(26일) 금융권에 따르면 가상자산거래소 업비트 운영사 두나무㈜는 최근 금융위원회 금융정보분석원(FIU)에 케이뱅크와의 실명계좌 제휴 기간 연장을 위한 심사 신청 서류를 제출” #UPBIT https://n.news.naver.com/article/374/0000465909?sid=101 ※“우리는 트윗충의 모든 게시글은 매수, 매도 등 권유를 구성하지 아니하며 내용의 그 어느 부분도 투자 결정을 위한 기초 또는 근거가 될 수 없습니다.”
👍8
업비트 ‘두나무’, 네이버 계열사 편입… 네이버파이낸셜과 포괄적 주식교환 추진 #마일벌스 움직일지는 각자판단 https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/020/0003663677?sid=101 ※“우리는 트윗충의 모든 게시글은 매수, 매도 등 권유를 구성하지 아니하며 내용의 그 어느 부분도 투자 결정을 위한 기초 또는 근거가 될 수 없습니다.”
👍4custom 51953469312152441631
[단독] 금융당국, 해외 거래소와 ‘오더북 공유’ 빗썸 이재원 대표 소환 기사보러가기 #BITHUMB
💩8👍2
[거래] 제로지(0G) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) (거래지원 개시 시점 및 매도 최저가 기준 가격 안내) 🔗 업데이트 내용 확인하기
📌업비트 공지 라그랑주(LA) KRW 마켓 디지털 자산 추가 @theddari_notice
👍2
📌업비트 공지 롬바드(BARD) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) @theddari_notice
연준의 비공식 대변인 닉 형이 요새 계속 무서운 말을 하네요 연준이 명백한 경기침체 국면에 접어들지 않은 상황에서 금리인하를 시작한 것은 이번이 역사상 3번째 끈적한 인플레이션과 정치적 압박을 모두를 고려해도 현재는 2019년, 2024년과는 판도가 다르다 목표는 1995~1996년 소프트랜딩 시나리오겠지만 리스크는 1967년(대 인플레 시대 개막 후 스태그), 1990년(석유파동), 2001년(닷컴버블), 2007년(금융위기)에 가깝다 소프트랜딩에 성공한 1995년을 제외하고 나머지 4번의 사례는 모두 해당 연도가 역사상 고점이 되었고 경기침체 발생 (미국 주식 15~20년 박스권 개막…) 올해 잘 마무리 해보는걸로 출처 #경제
👍3😁1😱1
⭐️코인의 신 워뇨띠 AMA 요약본 ■ aoa(워뇨띠) AMA 1차 정리 ■ Q. 세금은 어떻게 내고있나요?, 자산 10억일때와 1000억일때 비교하면요? A. 세무사 통해서 처리하고 있습니다. 혼자서 다 정하기엔 신경쓸 부분이 너무 많더라구요 Q. aoa님 비트맥스 거래량이 많이죽은시점인 지금은 자산분배를 어떻게 하고계신지 궁금합니다 비맥(관망=현물풀매수) :바이낸스: 현물 비율을 어떻게 리스크 관리 하고 계신지 ,포지션을 잡으실때 주로 어떻게 자산대비 레버리지 관리를 하고계신지 알고싶습니다 A. 거래량이 상대적으로 적은 거래소에서는 장기포지션을 주로, 거래량이 많은 거래소에서는 단기포지션을 주로 잡습니다. 자산대비 레버리지는 최근들어서 총 자산대비 1배를 넘어가지는 않는 것 같습니다. 자산이 너무 커져서 시장에서 받기엔 평단손실이…
👍5🔥2
#연준 나팔수 닉 티미라오스, 갑작스레 08년도 9월 당시 FOMC 내용을 공유 - 당시 연준은 AIG 파산 우려 속 부의장이 불참할 정도로 급박한 상황이었으며, 시장의 AIG/페니 메이/프레디 맥/크레딧 스프레드/자금경색 및 MMF 크랙 등 여러 우려를 알고 있었음에도 불구하고 금리 인하를 거부 - 해당 트윗에 한 유저가 "그래서 뭘 시사하려 하는 건데?"라고 묻자, 닉 티미라오스는 "그냥 역사적 사실을 언급한 것일 뿐"이라며 말을 흐려 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 그냥 역사적 사실이라? 어떤 방향으로 결론이 나든, 이번 FOMC는 꽤 흥미로운 변곡점이 될 것 같네요.
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @kkeongsmemo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📉껑껑이의 메모장📈” (@kkeongsmemo), 10,533 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kkeongsmemo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.