너무 잘 해주고 그러면 안된다
😁30

Channel
@dontak00
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14,195subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001749096540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dontak00 |
| Description | DM : @dontakoo Email : dontakoo55@gmail.com BLOG : https://blog.naver.com/dontakoo X : https://x.com/odajubb |
| Created | 14 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dontak00 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 14,195 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 14,206 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 14,214 | -5 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:52 | 14,219 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 14,218 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:20 | 14,219 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 14,216 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 14,216 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (29 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 171,930 |
| Reactions total | 1,255 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,255 reactions across 23 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,010 | 80.5% | |
| 😱 | 67 | 5.34% | |
| 😁 | 61 | 4.86% | |
| 👏 | 57 | 4.54% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 2.47% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 2.23% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,255reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
너무 잘 해주고 그러면 안된다
😁30
내 와이프는 배가 불러서 가방을 사 준대도 싫다네....
❤15😁6
Photo, posted without a caption
🔥15😁5
배당소득세 분리과세랑 상속세 손 보는 것을 사명으로 삼는 대통령 어디 안 나오나
❤48
오늘 오건영 선생님께 강의를 들으며 가장 인상 깊었던 말이 고점과 저점에서 느낀 감정들을 반드시 기록으로 남겨두라는 것이었다. 버블의 꼭대기와.. 바닥에서 내가 느끼는 감정 상태는 어떤 교재나 명강의로도 얻을 수 없는 소중한 자산이고 이를 기록해 둔다면 다시 볼 때 그때의 감정을 떠올리기 좋다는 이야기 였다. 굉장히 공감이 가는 이야기이고... 실제로 내 투자의 알파가 그런 부분에서 나오는 것들이 상당하다고 느끼는 면이 있었는데.. 내가 기록을 하거나 기록을 다시 꺼내 보는 일을 원체 하지 않는 사람이라... 지금부터라도 반드시 시장 상태의 변곡점마다는 기록을 남겨야 겠다는 다짐을 했다.
❤117👍5
지금 내가 느끼는 상황은... 사람들은 아직도 삼전/닉스에 대한 믿음이 꺽이지 않았음. 꺽인 건 그들의 잔고임. 더 이상 적극적으로 매수 할 돈이 없음. 이런 상황에서 재밌는 것이... 매수여력이 있는 것은 외국인인데... 외국인이 지수를 올리면 똥받이가 된다는 것임. 국민연금도 팔아야하고... 물린 개인들도 본전탈출하고 싶음. 그럼 지금 지수를 올려주는 주체는 똥받이 역할을 해야 되는데... 그걸 누가 해주나?? 하는 생각이 좀 든다.. 시간이 많이 필요하려나
❤114😁7👍2
https://youtu.be/OutXhDAMIaI?si=QwHXHWghZRJKSbGB
근데 진짜 뭔일이 나긴한듯... 와이프한테 엊그제 어제 오늘 3일간 돈 빌려달라는 류의 연락이 3명한테 옴. 다 다른 이유를 대고 있지만... 시기적으로 주식 때문 아닐까 생각되넹
😱54❤19🔥1
하닉 형님들 애초에 돈으로 받는게 존나 이상한거에요!!! 주식으로 받으세요!!! 같이 좀 살자 100% 주식으로 받겠다고 먼저 이야기해
❤73
세상을 배후에서 조종하는 큰형님들이... 자기들이 차린 밥상에 계속 숟가락을 올리는 레버리지충들을 보고 분노해서 회초리한번 들고 손등 존나 쎄게 때린 다음에 다시 식사 시작하시는걸까
👏57❤9
감사합니다 감사합ㄴ디ㅏ 감사합니다 착하게살겠습니다.
❤49🔥2🥰1
갑자기 50%만 더 오르면 삼성전자 신고가네? 와이 낫? 이런 생각 드는데 빨리 익절해야되는 시그널인가요
❤46🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @dontak00. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 69,436 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“돈타쿠” (@dontak00), 14,195 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dontak00.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.