Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for GMB LABS

Channel

GMB LABS

@GMBLABS

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,149subscribers

-332 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001566624832
TypeChannel
Username@GMBLABS
DescriptionPegging the imbalance of information in Crypto World *본 채널은 투자 권유 및 투자 자문이 아닌 단순 정보 공유 채널입니다. 가상자산의 경우 큰 변동성으로 원금 일부 혹은 전부의 손실 가능성이 있습니다. Chat : @GMBLABSCHAT Contact: @GMB_McCoy Web: https://gmb.vc/
Created28 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GMBLABS

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@GMBLABS/13181 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 03:43 UTC@lnsanecoin/113252 Nov 2026, 03:56 UTC1.0013 minutes
@GMBLABS/13212 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC@lnsanecoin/1142510 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@lnsanecoin6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004 minutesthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 76 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

11,14911,48111,3156 August 202612 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -332. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,099–11,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 13:5911,149-12
10 Nov 2026, 08:3911,161-5
8 Nov 2026, 23:1811,166-3
7 Nov 2026, 14:1811,169-3
6 Nov 2026, 15:0711,172-3
5 Nov 2026, 12:5911,175-4
4 Nov 2026, 09:4911,179-1
3 Nov 2026, 13:0911,180-3
1 Nov 2026, 09:3511,183-4
31 Oct 2026, 11:1511,187-4
30 Oct 2026, 12:3611,191-3
29 Oct 2026, 08:5611,194-5
28 Oct 2026, 09:0611,199-8
27 Oct 2026, 06:4611,207-4
26 Oct 2026, 03:5511,211-4
25 Oct 2026, 01:0111,215-3
24 Oct 2026, 03:2611,218-6
23 Oct 2026, 01:3911,224-5
22 Oct 2026, 03:4711,229-5
21 Oct 2026, 00:4511,234first reading

Engagement

166 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 11,149 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,100
55 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 166 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 20 of 55 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held166 (29 July 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total115,759
Reactions total55
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 22:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,560
Videos
≈67
Links
≈5,520

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

252 reactions across 68 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19376.6%
🔥3011.9%
👏218.33%
🥰41.59%
🎉20.794%
😎10.397%
🤗10.397%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 166 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 267 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.602%
1 of 166 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
1,260
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,310
over 165 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 166 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 55 posts held from the last 30 days (9.09%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 14:22 UTC434 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

✅고팍스가 거래와 출금 중단한지 일주일도 넘었는데 아직도 재개가 안된상태 출금시도해보려니깐 과거 코인빗, 올스타빗 시절처럼 셀카찍어서 보내야함

Signed McCoy | GMB LABS

14 Nov 2026, 10:38 UTC≈3,510 viewsread 14 November 2026

https://www.oklink.com/ko/kava/address/0x37d732914f86cc6eb1e87419e3046a739f011042/cosmos-evm-tx 카바 해킹당해서 3M 정도 덤핑됐네요 KAVA > BSC로 레제로 브릿지 태워서 파는중 BUSD(카바) 관련 취약점인데 아직 잘 모르겠음

Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS

14 Nov 2026, 10:05 UTC≈4,410 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

젠슨 황 복직 요구 청원 75,000 명 돌파 주주 4만명에 전,현 직원 5천명 까지 젠슨의 CEO 복귀를 바라는 중 ㅋㅋ https://standwithjensen.com/

Signed Index l GMB LABS

13 Nov 2026, 13:32 UTC813 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Polymarket 대규모 인력 구조조정 한국에서 차단된 상태인 Polymarket 은 최근 구조조정을 감행했다고 하네요. 한때 예측 시장의 선두주자였으나 현재는 Kalshi 등 경쟁사에 밀려서 그런 게 원인으로 보이는듯합니다

Signed Index l GMB LABS

13 Nov 2026, 01:36 UTC≈1,140 views1 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

✅젠몬 X 삼성 AI안경 프리오더 받는중 (자세히보면 카메라가 보여서 이건 시험엔 못쓸듯..) https://www.gentlemonster.com/kr/ko/category/intelligent-eyewear/shop-all

👍1

Signed McCoy | GMB LABS

12 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC≈1,040 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

트럼프: 팀쿡이 엔비디아 맡아야한다. 근데 애플 AI로 한 거 있어요?

Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS

12 Nov 2026, 13:51 UTC998 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-ceo-transition

Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS

12 Nov 2026, 11:09 UTC926 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

현재 인젝티브 한국 X에서 라이브 스트리밍 중! 인젝티브 생태계에 어떤 일이 일어나고 있는지 최신 소식과 생태계에 대한 이야기를 팀에서 직접 해주신다고 하니 관심 있으신 분들은 한번 들어보시길 😋 https://x.com/i/broadcasts/2LPrXvoZgYvPzz

Signed Index l GMB LABS

12 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC907 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

https://governance.aave.com/t/arfc-dynamic-caps-oracle-rate-limiter/26219 에이브 거버넌스에 동적 캡 오라클을 적용하자는 프로포절이 올라왔네요. rsETH 사건처럼 유동성이 없어도 에이브에 예치하고 동결할 수 없는 자산을 빼가버리면 큰 피해가 발생하는데 바이낸스 사건 이후로 또 하나의 예방 조치를 하는 것 같습니다. 근데 Spark 같은 곳은 진작 대출 캡이 있었는데 이제서야... 어쨌든 모든 디파이 랜딩 댑이 가야할 방향은 맞다 봅니다. . 효과와 이용자 영향 기대 효과: 공격자의 대규모 차입을 지연시켜 긴급 대응 시간을 확보합니다. 공격 자체를 탐지·방지하는 기능은 아닙니다. 불편: 정상적인 대규모 차입도 나눠서 기다려야 할 수 있습니다. 대형 차입자 경로: 승인된 기관 등은…

Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS

12 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC829 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

올트먼 CEO는 삼성 사장단에 '전면 AI 대전환'을 통해 기업 경쟁력을 높일 적기로 "AI에 올인하고 베팅해야 한다"고 강도 높은 조언도 했다. 오픈AI와 같이 업무의 전 과정을 맡겨서 삼성의 경쟁 우위를 높이라는 것이다. https://www.fnnews.com/news/202611111812535017

Signed McCoy | GMB LABS

11 Nov 2026, 12:51 UTC797 viewsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🤗 맨틀 Mantle Voices 이벤트 진행 맨틀이 올해의 생태계 이야기를 주제로 콘텐츠 바운티 Mantle Voices 를 열었습니다. 올해 맨틀 공식 X에 올라온 게시물 하나를 골라, 인용하면서 내 생각이나 분석을 덧붙이면 되는 방식이네요. 기간: 11월 9일 ~ 12월 8일 보상: 총 $4,000 상당 MNT, 수상자 19명 (1등 $800) 방법: 2026년 @Mantle_Official 게시물 인용 후 구글폼 제출 형식: 스레드, 아티클, 리서치, 영상, 인포그래픽, 밈 등 자유 (한국어 가능) 여러 개 제출할 수 있지만 상은 1인당 하나만 받을 수 있고, 심사에서는 처음 보는 사람도 이해하기 쉬운지, 원문에 없는 맥락이나 관점을 더했는지를 가장 크게 본다고 합니다. 😃 공식 공지 #MANTLE #KOL

Signed Index l GMB LABS

11 Nov 2026, 12:12 UTC761 views0 reactionsread 14 November 2026

https://x.com/WuBlockchain/status/2120428465904361918 Anthropic 지분, FTX가 조기에 매각한 것이 현재 300억 달러 이상 가치

Signed Chuchu | GMB LABS

Showing the 12 most recent of 166 posts we hold for @GMBLABS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republished by 57 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.

인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 7,868
11 posts
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,126
5 posts
쿠쿠쿱 koob 6.0
@kookookoob · 16,478
4 posts
이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,319
4 posts
아크의 프리미엄 코인정보방 🍀
@Board_the_Ark · 11,806
3 posts
꿀찾는 양말이 Super N 크립토 일기장 ⚡️
@Honeyofwhitesocks_2 · 11,045
3 posts
사랑방🍬(CRYPTO ALPHA)
@Sarangbang_Crypto · 8,475
3 posts
쉬러감청소년
@Iwanttogohome09 · 6,105
2 posts
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,446
2 posts
코백남 공지방
@cobacknamannounce · 16,976
2 posts
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,799
2 posts
실전 크립토 연구소 by 레온 [오피셜]
@lla_KOR · 1,873
2 posts
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,164
2 posts
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,351
2 posts
㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,391
2 posts
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,742
2 posts
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,343
2 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,320
1 post
BRILLER
@BRILLER_Research · 17,961
1 post
바밀이야 bamilirya
@Bananamilkrich · 8,627
1 post
부업연구소 🦅
@CRYPTOSCH00L · 12,534
1 post
조선코인
@ChosunCrypto1 · 3,957
1 post
크립토 부엉이🦉
@CryptoOwlNotice · 7,686
1 post
Base & Farcaster diving
@Farcasterkor · 2,928
1 post
젬하 크립토(GemHive)🦄 경제적 자유 이루기
@GemHive · 20,914
1 post
킹반인들을 위한 킹반친구
@Kingbanfriend · 71
1 post
MBM Crypto Insider🦅
@MBMweb3 · 47,041
1 post
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,248
1 post
에어드랍가즈아 (AirdropGazua)
@airdropgazua · 3,112
1 post
Buy High Sell Low
@billair1 · 6,290
1 post
흑우냠냠의 일기장
@c0wfarm · 13,473
1 post
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,111
1 post
Crypto 팬더 공지방🦅
@cryptopandann · 16,377
1 post
큐브의 유기농 크립토 쌀농장 🦅
@cubestudy1557 · 9,342
1 post
싸이버트럭
@cybertruck666 · 10,997
1 post
디지털 장난감 유치원 - 다계반
@ddcave · 227
1 post
디젠의 트레이딩 일지
@degen2468 · 13,037
1 post
돌곰배와 매직 코인일기
@dolgommagic · 12,098
1 post
D&C Ventures↗️ 공지 (旧 D's Room)
@dsroomjewel · 570
1 post
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,684
1 post
이1기정
@gizyon1 · 627
1 post
코인짬빱 10년차 brian의 꿀통 큐레이팅
@honeycurator · 3
1 post
암호화폐 연구소
@ishowcrypto7 · 64
1 post
JerrY Alpha
@jerryalpha · 4,396
1 post
킬베로스 ( Killberos ) 🐾
@killberosDAO · 14,826
1 post
크립토 원정대
@legoleecm777 · 7,004
1 post
리암의 코인공방
@liambitcoin · 4,508
1 post
Crypto Crunch 공지방
@makecryptoeasyy · 1,546
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

COINNESS News Feed (코인니스)
@coinnesskr · 30,357
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,266
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 29,999
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,684
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery)
@dogeland01 · 20,884
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
Layergg exchange & project alert
@layergg · 19,277
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,440
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
30대에 은퇴번복한 머피
@murphybus · 19,883
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
DeFi 농부 👨🏻‍🌾 조선생
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,228
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,164
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,320
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
Gram 🇰🇷
@toncoin_kr · 22,926
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
잼민123🦅
@mujammin123 · 25,742
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
블록미디어
@blockmedia · 32,899
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지)
@coinkcgchannel · 14,574
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,446
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“GMB LABS” (@GMBLABS), 11,149 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GMBLABS.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.