Crypto & trading โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโs forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts โ open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 13 of the 15 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
โPublished firstโ means first in this corpus. We hold 368 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detectorโs own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Recorded under the keys clone_copy ยท clone_mutual ยท clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
65 measurements spanning 98 days, net -819. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 25,619โ26,684 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 09:47
25,742
-14
10 Nov 2026, 06:11
25,756
-16
8 Nov 2026, 20:50
25,772
-18
7 Nov 2026, 11:57
25,790
-21
6 Nov 2026, 14:27
25,811
-16
5 Nov 2026, 11:26
25,827
-1
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
25,828
-4
3 Nov 2026, 14:08
25,832
-1
2 Nov 2026, 17:25
25,833
-4
1 Nov 2026, 15:05
25,837
-2
31 Oct 2026, 11:30
25,839
-14
30 Oct 2026, 08:08
25,853
-16
29 Oct 2026, 04:40
25,869
-9
28 Oct 2026, 04:27
25,878
-10
27 Oct 2026, 03:39
25,888
-10
26 Oct 2026, 06:55
25,898
-3
25 Oct 2026, 06:55
25,901
-5
24 Oct 2026, 03:20
25,906
-18
22 Oct 2026, 23:59
25,924
-18
22 Oct 2026, 00:30
25,942
first reading
Engagement
957 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 152 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
5.46%
avg views รท 25,742 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,410
348 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.23%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
348
of 957 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 229 of 348 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held
957 (5 August 2026 โ 14 November 2026)
Views total
489,502
Reactions total
767
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ24,900
Videos
โ447
Links
โ15,300
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 14 November 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 34s
Average length
32s
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
2,174 reactions across 615 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
1,839
84.6%
๐
159
7.31%
โคโ๐ฅ
29
1.33%
๐ฑ
29
1.33%
๐ฅ
22
1.01%
๐ค
16
0.736%
๐
15
0.69%
๐คฃ
13
0.598%
๐
9
0.414%
๐
9
0.414%
๐
7
0.322%
๐ญ
6
0.276%
๐ฏ
6
0.276%
๐ข
5
0.23%
โก
3
0.138%
๐
3
0.138%
๐
3
0.138%
๐คก
1
0.046%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 658 of the 957 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 2,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 957 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 956 we hold a reading for ยท 1%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @mujammin123. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 957 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.04%
10 of 957 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none โ marked by hashtag only
Median views ยท ads
1,500
over 10 measured posts
Median views ยท rest
1,380
over 946 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #ัะตะบะปะฐะผะฐ / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides โ nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means โthe share of posts that declared themselvesโ, never โthe share of posts that were paid forโ. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched โ for topic, for length, for hour of day โ so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 957 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegramโs own โeditedโ marker: 29 of 348 posts held from the last 30 days (8.33%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Showing the 12 most recent of 957 posts we hold for @mujammin123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@mujammin123 edited 5 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 3 posts on @mujammin123 as deleted โ posts this register held that were missing from the channelโs public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channelโs public page, and when โ not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
20 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 957 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channelโs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@mujammin123 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
@cucumber__52c named in 3 posts, 10 October 2026 โ 12 October 2026
@encryptkor named in 3 posts, 10 October 2026 โ 12 October 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
์์ด๋๋์ฝ๋ฆฌ์ (Airdropkorea) @airdrop_kor ยท 21,248 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 24 September 2026
๐ฅ์๋ธ์ด ์ธ์์ด์ด๐ฅ @yobeullyANN ยท 22,175 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 21 September 2026
์์ด๋๋ATM @Bounty_ATM ยท 25,790 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here โ alongside 78 others โ read 14 September 2026
์ฝ์ธ๊ฐ์ดํฌ์ ์ ๋ณด ์์ด๋๋๐ฆ @WeCryptoTogether ยท 48,126 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 25 August 2026
30๋์ ์ํด๋ฒ๋ณตํ ๋จธํผ @murphybus ยท 19,905 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 28 September 2026
ํ์ง์ค๊ธฐ ์ฐ๊ตฌ์ @airdr0p_lab ยท 20,446 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 26 September 2026
์ ๊ธฐ์ ์ ๋์ด ๋๋ค ๊ณต์ง๋ฐฉ @tlsrltnf ยท 22,343 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 20 September 2026
๊ธฐ๋ถ์ข์ ๋ง๊ณค @magonia_b ยท 26,164 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 11 September 2026
COINNESS News Feed (์ฝ์ธ๋์ค) @coinnesskr ยท 30,357 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 6 September 2026
์ทจ๋ฏธ์ํ๋ฐฉ๐ฎ @enjoymyhobby ยท 48,799 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here โ alongside 91 others โ read 25 August 2026
๋ถ๊ฐ๋ฏธ CRYPTO @fireant_crypto ยท 32,684 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here โ alongside 91 others โ read 4 September 2026
์กธ์ ์ค๋น์์ํ๐ @officialunivercityofcrypto ยท 22,651 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 19 September 2026
ZAP Tech News @zaponblast ยท 62,882 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 21 August 2026
์์ฐ์ก์ด์ด์ ๊ณต์ง๋ฐฉ @shrimp_notice ยท 28,311 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 93 here โ alongside 92 others โ read 9 September 2026
๋ง์ฌ ๊ณต์ ๋ฐฉ 2.0 @marshallog ยท 21,351 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 22 September 2026
ํ ๋ ๊ทธ๋จ ์ฝ์ธ ๋ฐฉ,์ฑ๋ - CEN @emperorcoin ยท 35,440 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 19 August 2026
Gram ๐ฐ๐ท @toncoin_kr ยท 22,926 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 30 September 2026
ํด๋ฌ์ ํฌ์ ์ ๋ณด ๊ณต์ @seaotterbtc ยท 29,999 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here โ alongside 93 others โ read 7 September 2026
์ฐ๋ฆฌ๋ ํธ์์ถฉ @twitchoong ยท 79,159 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 25 August 2026
์ฝ์ธ ๊ฐค๋ฌ๋ฆฌ(Coin gallery) @dogeland01 ยท 20,904 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 24 September 2026
Layergg exchange & project alert @layergg ยท 19,277 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 91 here โ alongside 90 others โ read 1 October 2026
๋ณ์ฐฝํธ ์ฝ์ธ์ฌ๊ดํ๊ต BCH @BChoSN ยท 26,320 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 15 September 2026
๋ธ๋ก๋ฏธ๋์ด @blockmedia ยท 32,899 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 90 here โ alongside 89 others โ read 4 September 2026
Units.Network Announcements @unitsnews ยท 652,470 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ์ผ๋ฏผ123๐ฆ โ (@mujammin123), 25,742 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mujammin123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
