위로 한번 쓸어서 창펑자오 해킹으로 잃어버린 자금 좀 복구해야 하지 않을까요.. 🤐 진짜 갈 때 가더라도 부탁드립니다.. 🙏
👍9

Channel
@cryptomacase
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,909subscribers
-255 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001600146222 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptomacase |
| Created | 30 August 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptomacase |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:34 | 10,909 | +6 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:20 | 10,903 | -6 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 22:16 | 10,909 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 19:31 | 10,911 | -1 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:19 | 10,912 | -1 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 19:39 | 10,913 | -4 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 20:55 | 10,917 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:48 | 10,919 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:38 | 10,921 | -3 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 10,924 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:56 | 10,931 | -6 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:17 | 10,937 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 10,943 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 10,942 | +2 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:58 | 10,940 | -1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 21:27 | 10,941 | -4 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 10,945 | -9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 18:08 | 10,954 | -2 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:34 | 10,956 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 09:07 | 10,959 | first reading |
144 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 144 (3 August 2026 – 10 November 2026) |
| Views total | 73,768 |
| Reactions total | 580 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Nov 2026, 21:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,463 reactions across 134 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1,250 | 85.4% | |
| ❤ | 138 | 9.43% | |
| 🤔 | 23 | 1.57% | |
| 😱 | 20 | 1.37% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 0.752% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 0.547% | |
| 😈 | 4 | 0.273% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 0.273% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 0.205% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.068% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 0.068% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 144 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,569 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 144 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 51 posts held from the last 30 days (7.84%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
위로 한번 쓸어서 창펑자오 해킹으로 잃어버린 자금 좀 복구해야 하지 않을까요.. 🤐 진짜 갈 때 가더라도 부탁드립니다.. 🙏
👍9
이더리움 가격이 2700달러에서 2000달러까지 하락하는 동안 비트파이넥스 이더리움 롱 물량은 10만 ETH => 39만 ETH로 약 3.9배 증가했는데 엇그제부터 손절? 튀기 시작한듯 😱 보통 이거 가격 올라야 꺾였는데..🥲 중요한 건 비트파이넥스 비트코인 고래들은 약세장 초반부터 상승장이 시작될 때까지 버티는 경우가 많았고 매번 결국 이기긴 했다는 것 🥳이 아닐까요 😢😢😢😢
👍9
지금 현재 무서운 점은 가격 하락하면서 oi는 엄청 쌓이고 있다는 점 어딘가 한 방향으로 크게 터져야 해소될 것 같은데 진짜 인간적으로 지금 스탑로스걸고 롱치는 롱충이들만 계~속 죽이는데 갈 때 가더라도 반전 한번 나오는 게 맞는 거 아닌가 ;;😡😡 비트코인 혁명수비대 돌아오세요.. 🙏
👍10
개인투자자들은 반도체 급락에 레버리지 베팅 중 🤔 1. 미국 반도체 3배 레버리지 ETF인 SOXL에 지난주 51억 달러 유입됨 이는 역대 두 번째로 큰 주간 유입 기록 2. SOXL이 같은 기간 -40% 급락했음에도 대규모 매수세가 들어온 것 => 최근 4주 누적 유입액은 134억 달러 3. 이후 월요일에 SOXL 가격이 +22% 급등하긴 함 4. 나스닥100 ETF인 $QQQ에도 최근 2주간 94억 달러 유입되며 8월 이후 최대 수준을 기록함 5. 개인투자자들이 기술주와 반도체 하락을 저가 매수 기회로 판단하고 있으며 특히 고위험 레버리지 상품을 통한 공격적인 매수세가 두드러진다는 게 특징 🤔 과연.. 이 하락이 어떻게 마무리될지 🤔
👍8❤1
와 진지하게 남은 현금 usdt.d 7.2%오면 다 쓰려고 했었는데 뭔가 장 분위기가 손이 안가네요 사람들 무슨 74도 롱 73도 롱 72도롱 68 안깨지면 롱 이러고 있어서❤️ 알트들 진짜 잘 버티는데 이더리움.. 진짜 제일 많이 떨어지는게 말도안되네.. 🤐
👍8❤2
미국 CPI 발표 전 체크 포인트 금일 오후 6시 경 연준의 그림자 의장(케빈이 소통 잘 안해서)이라 불리는 윌러 이사가 - 인플레이션이 너무 높다. 9월 데이터는 나빴고 희망적인 부분이 없었다 - 10월 CPI가 개선되더라도 12월 FOMC에서 최소 25bp 인상을 지지하겠다 - 만약 근원 CPI 상승률이 전월 대비 0.3% 이상 상승하면 더 강력한 조치가 필요하다 - 현재 정책은 충분히 긴축적이지 않으며 실질 금리를 더 올려야 한다 라고 발언하면서 위험자산 시장들이 조정받고 있는데.. 사실 이제 위험자산들에게 더 나빠질 환경이 조성될 수 있나...? 라는 생각이 들기 시작 페드워치나 폴리마켓 기준으로 보면 어차피 12월 금리인상은 이미 시장 투자자들이 예상하지 못하던 이슈는 아니고 (원래 인상할 것이라 예상) 그렇다면 윌러 말대로 …
👍9❤2
김은숙 작가도 2026년에 이렇게 각본 쓰면 욕먹을 것 같은데 ;; 생각보다 일이 커질수도 있는 엔비디아 사태 AI 칩 5만 개 누락 + 미 정부 수사 개입 ㄷㄷ 원문 1. 미 상무부 산업안보국(BIS)은 싱가포르 데이터센터 기업 메가스피드가 엔비디아 AI 칩을 중국으로 몰래 빼돌렸다는 의혹을 조사하고 있었음 2. 그런데 메가스피드의 핵심 임원이었던 앨리스 황이 싱가포르 당국에 억류되면서 상황이 급변하기 시작함 3. 앨리스 황이 억류되자 엔비디아 최고법률책임자가 미 상무부 고위 관계자에게 직접 연락함 => 메가스피드에 대한 수사가 어디까지 진행됐는지, 미국 정부가 앨리스 황의 억류에 관여했는지 등을 문의한 것 4. 그런데 이 연락 이후 미 상무부 내부에서 이례적인 지침이 내려짐 조사관들은 엔비디아 관련 문의에 고위층 승인을 받아야 했고…
👍12❤3
카이트 2026년 11월 풀릴 물량 락업 연장했는데 베스팅은 안미뤄져서 2027년 11월에 물량 폭탄으로 돌아올 예정 ❤️ 원문 1. 기존에는 2026년 11월 팀·투자자 물량 8억 개를 해제하고, 이후 매월 약 6,667만 개씩 추가 해제할 예정이었음 2. 그러나 재단이 락업을 1년 연장하면서 해제 시점이 2027년 11월로 변경됨 3. 문제는 2027년 11월에 연기된 8억 개뿐 아니라, 기존 일정상 1년간 분할 해제될 예정이었던 8억 개까지 합쳐 총 16억 개가 한꺼번에 해제되는 구조로 바뀜 4. 여기에 다른 유통 물량 약 1.09억 개까지 더해져 2027년 11월에 약 17.09억 개가 추가로 풀릴 예정 락업을 1년 연장했지만 기존엔 반절만 일시적으로 풀리고 나머지 선형적으로 풀릴 예정이었는데 락업을 연장하면서 언락 물량이 두…
👍8❤1
점점 커지는듯한 느낌의 젠슨황 내연녀 근황 미국 뉴욕포스트에서 직접 문의하며 조사해본 결과 • CCTV 기자 근무 (거짓) • 후난TV 기자 근무 (거짓) • HSBC 근무 (거짓) • 상하이 허시 인베스트먼트 이사 근무 (거짓) • 중신그룹(CITIC) 부사장 근무 (거짓) • 중신증권 근무 (거짓) 다 가짜였다고 ㄷㄷ 그런데 과연.. 그런데 과연 젠슨황이나 되는 사람이 사랑에 눈이 멀어서 뒷조사 한번도 안해보고 만났다고? 가 더 이상한듯 오히려 젠슨황이미국 제재 피해서 중국에 납품하려고 세워둔 거라고 보는 게 합리적인 거 아닌지.. 🤔
👍12❤2
백종원한테 고소당한 주주 근황 무. 혐. 의 이게 옳게 된 세상이지..
👍8
이더리움 파운데이션 1000ETH 추가 매도 이제 톰 리도 39000ETH 추가로 더 사면 이더리움 공급량 5% 다 차고 캡 끝나는데 그만팔아라..
👍8❤1
트뷰 오류 뭐지요... usdt.d btc.d 다이러네 아니 ㅋㅋ total3는 4T 가있네요
👍10❤1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 144 posts we hold for @cryptomacase. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토마카세” (@cryptomacase), 10,909 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomacase.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.