7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5,344. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,207–40,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 13:25
34,014
-10
11 Aug 2026, 14:35
34,024
+9
10 Aug 2026, 13:03
34,015
+4
9 Aug 2026, 11:06
34,011
+2
8 Aug 2026, 10:01
34,009
-2
6 Aug 2026, 14:50
34,011
-5,347
6 Aug 2026, 02:04
39,358
first reading
Engagement
121 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.01%
avg views ÷ 34,014 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
120 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.356%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
121
of 121 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 94 of 120 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
121 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
163,592
Reactions total
436
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 21:06 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,600
Videos
≈315
Links
≈17,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
350 reactions across 76 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
220
62.9%
👍
34
9.71%
🔥
32
9.14%
🤔
20
5.71%
🌚
10
2.86%
☃
8
2.29%
🗿
5
1.43%
🤝
4
1.14%
🙊
3
0.857%
🫡
3
0.857%
🆒
2
0.571%
😇
2
0.571%
🤪
2
0.571%
🥰
2
0.571%
✍
1
0.286%
👏
1
0.286%
🙉
1
0.286%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
대안
1. 지금이라도 규제 열어서 업비트 빗썸이 RWA 시장이랑 선물거래를 지원하게 해준다.
2. 크립토의 특수성을 인정하여 상장 프로세스와 상장폐지 프로세스를 유연하게 한다.
3. 거래소별 쿼터제를 적용하여 일정 숫자 이상의 코인이 상장되지 않게한다. 상폐하라는 말임.
4. 상장에 대한 보증금을 받고 거래소들이 자산운용 역할을 할 수 있도록 하여 수수료에 목메지 않고 돈벌 수 있게한다.
5. 크립토 투자시장을 활성화시키고 상장과의 벽을 허문다.
6. 투자자피해에 대한 정의를 좀더 명확히 규정하고, 팔고 튀는 재단들은 4번의 상장보증금을 회수하지 못하도록 한다.
7. 한국에서 코인한다고 압수수색과 징벌적 세무조사와 징벌적 규제를 하지 않는다.
8. 코인과세를 추가유예하여 리테일과 기관 거래시장을 활성화시킨다. - 기관과 리테일은 분리된 시장…
솔직히 말해서 업비트랑 빗썸이 마지막 한국의 협상력이었음. 근데 업비트랑 빗썸이 할수있는게 한국에서는 너무 제한적임.
할수있는거? 하루에 한번씩 상장하면서 상장거래량 만드는거.... 그니까 미친듯이 상장하는데
역설적으로 모두에게 열린시장은 협상력을 잃게 됨.
한국의 코인시장은 어디로가야하는가? 업비트가 코인베이스처럼 큰형님의 역할을 해줘야 하는데.... 빗썸이 로빈후드처럼 자체 생태계 구축 시도를 할 수 있을까?
1. 우리나라는 이해충돌 어쩌고 법 때문에 투자한 코인을 상장 못함.
2. 투자시장에서 업비트나 두나무, 빗썸의 투자를 받으면 오히려 좋은 거래소에 상장을 못하는 오히려 투자를 받으면 장애물이 되어버림.
3. 그러다보니 생태계 투자 순환도 안됨.
4. 유저들 유동성 플레이말고 할 수 있는게 없음.
5. 근데 유저들 유동성플레이…
한국 코인시장의 힘이 글로벌에서 약화되고있음. 이번에 kbw 안오는 프로젝트와 관계자들이 엄청 많음.
한국사람들 더이상 코인도 안하고 곧 세금도 문다며? 그리고 거기서 행사하고 에드주거나 미팅해도 비즈니스 안되던데~~ ?
나는 싱가폴 토큰 2049만 갈래~ 싱가폴오면 연락줘~~
이런애들 개~~~ 많음
[현시간부로 에브리띵 한국 커뮤니티와 모든 권한, 관리주체는 재단 본사로 이관되었습니다.]
발행되지 않은 토큰보상을 제외하고 모든 보상을 지급 완료하였으며, 약속된 캠페인 토큰보상은 상장이 되면 지급을 요청하여 지급하겠습니다.
* 계약 이행 하겠죠....?
에브리띵 재단은 이제 저랑 관련이 없으니 저한테 물어보셔도 뭘 해드릴수가 없는 점 참고 부탁드립니다....!
📌 크라켄이 USDe 예치에 4.5% 이상의 이자를 지급하는 캠페인을 진행합니다.
지금 이더나를 예치하면 약 4% 상당의 이자를 주는데 크라켄에서 하면 최소 0.5% 이상을 더 줍니다.
우리가 보기에는 "에계 꼴랑 0.5%?" 라고 할지 몰라도 사실 이자액 총액을 기준으로 두면 약 12.5%의 이자가 더 나오는 셈입니다.
1000만원을 이자로 벌던 사람이 크라켄으로 옮기면 1250만원으로 증액되며 약 250만원의 추가수익을 올리는겁니다.
디파이 이율을 계산할때 이렇게 계산해보시면 상당히 도움이 됨.
공지링크
[속보] 미국 CPI: 전년 대비 +3.4% (예상치 +3.4%)
미국 근원 CPI: 전년 대비 +2.5% (예상치 +2.5%)
❓CPI: 소비자물가지수 (Consumer Price Index). 가계가 구매하는 상품·서비스 가격 변화 측정. 인플레이션 핵심 지표 — 연준 통화정책 결정 주요 입력
📰원문/번역 📅경제 캘린더 📲앱 다운로드
아무도 관심 없는 코인이야 가격 올리고 내리는건 진짜 상관 없는데, 에어드랍 신뢰를 말장난으로 배신해도 별 일이 일어나지 않는 지금은 피드백 루프가 완전히 고장났다고 생각함.
+ 최근에 로빈후드 NFT 시장이 다시 핫해지고있는데, 이전에 기존플젝 유기했던 애들이 다시 나와서 팔아도 제발 팔아달라고 매달리는 상황도 보고있기 힘든건 매한가지. 돈이랑 관심이 너무 밀접하게 연관된 시장이라서 악명도 명성이 되어버리는 현상은 어쩔 수 없는 것도 알겠지만 결국 다시 몇억 몇십억 빨아가는걸 모든 시장 참여자가 뜬눈으로 보고있어야 하는 것도 아이러니
중요) 클래리티 액트 통과가 계속 지연되자 SEC가 독자적으로 움직이기 시작
* 클래리티 액트(크립토 시장 구조법)
- 크립토를 어떤 기준으로 증권/상품으로 분류할지
- SEC(증권 감독)와 CFTC(상품 감독)가 어디까지 감독할지
- 토큰 발행사와 거래소가 어떤 규칙을 따라야 할지
= 미국 크립토 시장 전체 규칙을 의회가 법으로 만드는 것
* 이번에 발표한 SEC의 새로운 크립토 규칙 정식 초안
- 초기 프로젝트의 토큰발행 자금조달에 일정 기간 증권 등록 면제
- 큰 프로젝트들을 위한 별도의 자금조달 면제
- 투자계약 형태로 판매된 토큰이라도 일정 조건을 충족하면 증권 취급 X
= 현재 SEC 권한으로 정리할 수 있는 부분부터 명확히 하는 것
클래리티 액트가 계속 질질 밀리면서 사실상 올해 안에 통과될 가능성이 점점 낮아지고 있는데
…
📢 8월 맨틀 한국 라이브스트림 안내 — 맨틀 × Stable
맨틀과 스테이블 체인(Stable)이 함께하는 8월 한국 라이브스트림 일정을 리마인드립니다.
[라이브 안내]
🟢일시: 8월 14일(금) 오후 8시(KST)
🟢장소: 맨틀 한국 공식 X 계정(@0xMantleKR) 라이브 스트리밍
🟢리워드: 총 600달러 상당의 MNT 및 USDT
[출연]
🟢불개미 @fireant_korea
🟢브라이언 멜러 @mehler
🟢맨틀 한국 스쿼드 @Hope_web3_ @bcd_kyle
[다루는 내용]
🟢맨틀과 스테이블 체인의 최신 생태계 소식 및 주요 업데이트
🟢USDT0을 포함한 스테이블코인 생태계
🟢체인링크 CCIP를 포함한 브릿지 테크 세션
[리워드 안내]
🟢라이브 현장: 우수 참여자 10명에게 각 30달러 상당의 MNT
🟢라이브 후기: 베…
📌 좌카오페이가 원화스테이블코인 발행을 준비중
카카오페이는 "우리는 차세대 금융 인프라 핵심 축으로 KRW 스테이블코인 발행과 글로벌 생태계 구축을 준비하고 있다"고 말했다.
이어 "국내 주요 파트너 및 글로벌 기업, 해외 결제/송금 네트워크, 블록체인 인프라 파트너와 협업하며 국내 최초 및 최고 수준의 스테이블코인 기반 금융 서비스 모델을 구축하는 데 집중한다"고 설명했다.
* 카카오가 하는게 가장 말되긴 함.
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @fireant_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 8,216 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@fireant_crypto named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@vs2cf1z2rwe named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“불개미 CRYPTO” (@fireant_crypto), 34,014 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fireant_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
