7. 마치며 - 특히 솔버, 거래소, 마켓 메이커, 브릿지 서비스 등 다양한 유동성 제공자들이 자산을 더 효율적으로 활용가능 - 현재 에버클리어는 EVM 호환 체인을 지원하고 있지만, 향후 SVM과 MoveVM 등 다양한 체인 환경을 지원할 계획

Channel
ConnextKorea_Announcement
@ConnextKorea_Announcement
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
86subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001417383177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ConnextKorea_Announcement |
| Created | 28 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ConnextKorea_Announcement |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 86 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 87 | -1 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:26 | 88 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 89 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 90 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 91 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 91 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
요약)) 1. 들어가며 1) 실제 디파이라마(DeFiLlama) 내 등록된 체인의 수만 300여개 이상 = 멀티체인 생태계 2) 멀티체인 생태계 문제점 (1) 생태계 복잡성 (2) 유동성 파편화 - 레이어에 금융(Financial) 레이어를 결합한 산업이기에 유동성이 핵심 요소로 작용 2. 크로스 체인 기술, 체인 추상화를 통한 스펙업 1) Everclear는 23년 체인추상화 기술 제안 3. 하지만 체인 추상화는 마법이 아니다. 1) 체인추상화 기술은 CAKE 프레임워크 + 3가지 레이어로 구성 2) 그 중, Solver레이어 역할히 특히 중요하다. - 사용자가 요청한 트랜잭션을 바탕으로 최적의 경로(가스비, 시간 등)를 찾고 실행하는 역할 - 실제로 사용자의 의도를 기반…
Photo, posted without a caption
타이거 리서치 리포트에서 나온 Everclear(前 connext)에 대한 내용을 공유합니다. *타이거리서치는 "아시아 전역의 Web3 시장에 전문성을 가진 리서치 및 비즈니스 자문 회사"입니다. 한국어 전문 바로보기
https://x.com/EverclearOrg/status/1844068995542229156
https://x.com/EverclearOrg/status/1842246612036587600?t=W3_h07Rn9aPIzom951gpzQ&s=19
https://x.com/EverclearOrg/status/1838156406664650761
📌 싱가폴에서 만난 프로젝트 - 에버클리어 에버클리어 블로그 링크 싱가포르에서 만난 프로젝트입니다. 얘네는 정말 토큰 유틸리티에 진심인 것 같았습니다. 에버클리어는 Clearing Layer의 메인넷 베타를 출시했습니다. ✔️ 에버클리어 중점 내용 1. 체인 추상화 : 사용자가 어떤 체인을 사용하는지 신경 쓸 필요 없이 편안~ 하게 쓸 수 있게 하는 기술 2. Clearing Layer : 분산된 시스템을 통해 유동성 재균형 과정을 자동화하고, 서로 다른 체인 간의 유동성 흐름을 최적화합니다. - 대충 슬리피지 최소화 어쩌구 3. vbNEXT 모델 : DAO에서 승인된 새로운 토큰 모델로, 스테이킹을 통해 수수료를 얻고, 유동성을 필요한 곳으로 안내하는 기능 4. 인텐트 처리 : 사용자는 자금을 제공하고 `newIntent`를 호출하여…
https://x.com/EverclearOrg/status/1836273441626034362
https://x.com/EverclearOrg/status/1835627046908944861
24.09.13. 소식 1. Vending Machine에서는 @EverclearOrg DAO와 협력하여 복잡한 시스템 모델을 사용하여 다양한 시장 조건에서 강력한 경제적 성과를 보장하는 고급 시뮬레이션을 사용하여 토큰 설계를 검증했습니다. 2. 문제는 초기 성장 인센티브와 장기적인 지속 가능성의 균형을 맞추는 것이었습니다. 저희는 상세한 시뮬레이션을 통해 시스템 성능을 모델링하여 이 문제를 해결했습니다. 3. 저희는 에버클리어의 디지털 트윈을 만들어 수백만 개의 시나리오를 시뮬레이션하여 다양한 경제 조건에서 프로토콜이 어떻게 작동하는지 파악할 수 있었습니다. 4. 몬테카를로 시뮬레이션을 통해 시나리오 전반의 주요 지표를 추정했습니다. 무작위성을 도입함으로써 다양한 잠재적 결과에 대한 인사이트를 얻을 수 있었습니다. 5. 시뮬레이션은…
https://x.com/EverclearOrg/status/1833143751042322527?t=cdhjXrLD8LpAxQI_xY21zQ&s=19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ConnextKorea_Announcement. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ConnextKorea_Announcement named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ConnextKorea_Announcement” (@ConnextKorea_Announcement), 86 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ConnextKorea_Announcement.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.