Channel
@c_ryptodiary
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,601subscribers
-196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001738204270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c_ryptodiary |
| Created | 22 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c_ryptodiary |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:41 | 7,601 | -16 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 7,617 | -22 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 7,639 | -12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 7,651 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:54 | 7,670 | -30 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:27 | 7,700 | -16 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 7,716 | -22 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 7,738 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 7,749 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 7,762 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 7,765 | -12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 7,777 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,792 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 7,797 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 7,797 | first reading |
39 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 39 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
21 reactions across 9 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 95.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 20 | 95.2% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🇰🇷 달러 환차익은 비과세인데 스테이블코인 차익은 과세? Source 2027년 가상자산 과세 시행을 앞두고 스테이블코인 과세 형평성 문제가 제기되는 중. - 개인의 일반적인 달러 환차익은 비과세 - USDT·USDC 등은 현행법상 ‘디지털자산’으로 분류 - 환율 상승으로 생긴 스테이블코인 차익도 과세 가능 - 기본공제 250만원 / 세율 최대 22% - 결제수단·대외지급수단으로 별도 정의할지 입법 논의 필요 같은 달러 가치에 연동돼도 ‘달러냐 스테이블코인이냐’에 따라 세금이 달라질 수 있는 상황. 이런 거 보면 과세를 준비되지 않은 상황에서 억지로 그냥 밀어붙일 문제는 절대 아니라 생각함...
❤1
$ENA 현시점 가장 옳게된 코인 진짜 머 자대고 그린거 같네
참고로 ENA의 DAT 회사도 있다는거 아시나요? 나스닥 티커 USDE를 사용하는 스테이블코인X인데 약 30억개 이상의 ENA를 사모았어요. 이번 상승에 ENA가 크게 올라주면서 스테이블코인X도 바닥가 대비 약 4배 상승 중
📈ENA 상승률 1등 흑인은 ENA 여기서 5배 간다고 실링중ㅋㅋ 흑인은 이더, 이더나, 이더파이 맛있게 먹는즁이고 불장에 맞춰 플젝 론칭까지 ㄹㅈㄷ잘하네... https://x.com/cryptohayes/status/2090558888215191669?s=46&t=qOnvDqeaAu-hDp7imiVLNQ
🟢 $72,000 @bitcoin_price
정부 "개인지갑 보관 가상자산도 과세 대상" https://www.digitalasset.works/news/articleView.html?idxno=42551
크립토 백악관 회동 주요 발언
방미심위, '사행성 논란' 폴리마켓 접속차단 의결
시드구문은 집에만 꽁쳐놓기.. https://x.com/pritipatelfgoo/status/2089227487587013004?s=20
코인과세는 1400만명의 표심을 잃고, 세수는 오히려 줄이는 과세정책입니다. 국민동의청원 링크는 여기로
CCT가 11분만 투자하면 좋을 전신 운동 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-Jd4kI6rdM
지난 5년간 크립토 VS 미국 주요 주식 성과
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @c_ryptodiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토다이어리” (@c_ryptodiary), 7,601 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_ryptodiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.