Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 크립토다이어리

Channel

크립토다이어리

@c_ryptodiary

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,400subscribers

-397 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001738204270
TypeChannel
Username@c_ryptodiary
Description* 매일 크립토 공부를 위해 글 포스팅 * 투자 추천을 위한 글 아닙니다 * Web3 리서치 읽는거 짱 좋아함 * 좋은 글 있으면 추천해주세요 중요 연락: @Heykate0
Created22 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/c_ryptodiary

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,4007,7977,598.57 August 2026 — 7,797 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,797 subscribers8 August 2026 — 7,792 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,777 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,765 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,762 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,749 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,738 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,716 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,700 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,670 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,651 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,639 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,617 subscribers19 September 2026 — 7,601 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,557 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,532 subscribers13 October 2026 — 7,508 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,498 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,486 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,461 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,448 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,446 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,436 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,427 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,415 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,400 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 93 days, net -397. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,340–7,857 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 11:217,400-15
5 Nov 2026, 04:297,415-12
2 Nov 2026, 09:277,427-9
30 Oct 2026, 12:267,436-10
27 Oct 2026, 16:377,446-2
25 Oct 2026, 01:287,448-13
22 Oct 2026, 02:597,461-25
18 Oct 2026, 22:387,486-12
16 Oct 2026, 01:397,498-10
13 Oct 2026, 05:317,508-24
6 Oct 2026, 20:357,532-25
29 Sept 2026, 20:167,557-44
19 Sept 2026, 13:417,601-16
15 Sept 2026, 12:207,617-22
11 Sept 2026, 10:377,639-12
7 Sept 2026, 02:197,651-19
2 Sept 2026, 14:547,670-30
31 Aug 2026, 00:277,700-16
27 Aug 2026, 20:027,716-22
24 Aug 2026, 18:077,738first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.01%
avg views ÷ 7,400 subscribers
Avg views / post
371
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held60 (29 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total742
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:21 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,770
Videos
≈139
Links
≈3,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

23 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2087.0%
👀28.70%
👍14.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 2 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 07:07 UTC582 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

오오! 가상자산 과세 2년 유예 확정 https://www.khan.co.kr/article/202611051600001#ENT

25 Oct 2026, 04:46 UTC160 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @fireant_cryptoPhoto

🇰🇷 청와대 가상자산 과세 재유예 결론 기사에 대한 팩트 체크 담백하게 확인된 내용만 기술하겠습니다. [명확한 사실] 1. 과세유예 권한은 행정부(청와대) 가 아니라 입법부(국회) 에 있다. 확정할 수 있는 권한이 없다. 2. 해당 의견은 청와대 관계자의 "입장표명" 이다. 3. 하지만 "확정" 은 아니다. 확정은 세법 개정안이 국회에서 과반이상으로 "통과" 되어야 진짜 확정이다. [해석] 1. 여당의 최고 지휘권자 대통령의 측근에서 나온 이야기라 그냥 나간게 아니다. 2. 민주당대표, 대통령까지 코인과세유예에 동의했다는 것이다. 3. 대통령, 민주당, 국민의힘 모두 동의한거 맞다. [결론] 구두로는 여, 야, 행정부 모두 합의 완료. 이제 도장받는 절차만 남았음. * 한줄 평 : 끝날때까지 끝난게 아니다. 긴장 놓지말고 밀어 붙여!

9 Oct 2026, 08:07 UTC281 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @shrimp_notice

업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 카이아(KAIA) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2026-10-09 17:06:46

7 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC418 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @tlsrltnfPhoto

트잭을 분석하면 개인키를 알수있는 취약점 ㄷ

7 Oct 2026, 04:47 UTC348 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @cybertruck666

오늘 한솔라님의 친구분으로 알려진 분의 해킹 소식이 X에 시끌시끌한데요 저는 뭐 거창한 방법으로 보안을 신경쓰진 않고,,,, (저도 1년에 해킹 4번 당하고 전멸 당했던 적 있음) 간단하게 아래 방법만 준수합니다 1. 테더링은 항상 무제한 요금제를 써서 와이파이 죽어도 안쓰기 2. 주기적으로 백신 프로그램 돌리고 챗지피티에게 컴퓨터 전수조사 시키기 3. 주기적인 리보크 4. 귀찮아도 지갑 옮길때는 종이에 적어서 수기로 치기 정도만 하는데 요즘은 안전하더라구요 그리고 오피셜 웹사이트는 항상 x를 통해서 들어가고 계정도 훼이크 치는 애들 많으니 내 주변 사람이 많이 팔로우하는지까지 확인

👀1

7 Oct 2026, 01:28 UTC473 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

진짜 저번에 이어 진짜로 불나서 대피중;;

23 Sept 2026, 01:14 UTC564 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @dolchanchainPhoto

봉크 가이 진짜 놀 줄 아는 놈이네

21 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC383 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @WeCryptoTogether

에테나 AMA 시작 https://x.com/Edward__Park/status/2102004152918524086?s=20

21 Sept 2026, 11:02 UTC294 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @WeCryptoTogetherPhoto

⚾️ 마음이 심란할땐 AMA를 듣자: $ENA 선정이 딸이에요 - 일시: 오늘밤 9시 - 장소: 코인같이투자 트위터 - 손님: 에테나 마케팅 담당 Kate 오늘 X에서 가장 많이 보이는 토큰 중 하나를 꼽으라면 단연 에테나의 $ENA 가 아닐까 싶은데요. 그만큼 굵직한 업데이트가 많은 친구 중 하나가 Ethena가 아닐까 싶습니다. 한국어가 가능한 Kate님과 함께 에테나에 대해 낱낱이 핥아봅시다! 📂 AMA 현장이벤트 : 라이브 스트리밍 참여 : 에테나 코리아 팔로우 : 라이브 청취 인증샷 해당 방에 제출 : 네이버폼 작성 😡 보상: 5천원 상품권 20명, 스타벅스 커피 50잔, 메가커피 300잔 가보자고!! *이벤트 보상은 사비로 구성되었으며, 대신 에테나 바람막이 달라고 해서 받았습니다.

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @c_ryptodiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지)
@coinkcgchannel · 15,387
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“크립토다이어리” (@c_ryptodiary), 7,400 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_ryptodiary.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.