Channel
@c_ryptodiary
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,777subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001738204270 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @c_ryptodiary |
| Description | * 매일 크립토 공부를 위해 글 포스팅 * 투자 추천을 위한 글 아닙니다 * Web3 리서치 읽는거 짱 좋아함 * 좋은 글 있으면 추천해주세요 중요 연락: @Heykate0 |
| Created | 22 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/c_ryptodiary |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 7,777 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:04 | 7,792 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:15 | 7,797 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 7,797 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 21 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (29 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,982 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
8 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 87.5% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
방금 속보를 낸 이데일리에 저도 힘을 보태기 위해서 기고문을 냈습니다. 내용은 제가 지난번 삼프로 티비때 이야기 했던 것과 그 궤를 같이합니다. 이재명 대통령은 지난 대선에서 "대한민국을 디지털자산의 허브로 만들어야 한다"는 공약을 내세웠지만, 지금 정부와 규제당국의 방향성을 보면 한국이 허브가 될 가능성은 매우 낮아보입니다. 기고문에는 짤렸지만, 사실 금투세를 폐지하자고 했던 2024년 당시 최상목 부총리의 근거가, 지금 디지털자산 과세를 폐지해야하는 근거와 같습니다. 당시에 최상목 부총리는 안그래도 힘든 주식시장에 세금까지 부과하면 투자심리를 위축시키고, 유예를 하더라도 불확실성을 주기 때문에 폐지를 주장했고, 그 당시 야당의 대표인 이재명 대통령도 이에 동의하여 금투세를 폐지했습니다. 디지털자산 과세도 똑같습니다. 안그래도 지금…
업비트(Upbit) 공지 BTC, USDT 마켓 신규 거래지원 안내 (CYS, ICNT, XAN, EDEN, AIOZ, ALLO) 2026-08-10 11:05:59
🇰🇷 가상자산 과세, 2030년까지 3년 유예 법안 발의 Source 국민의힘 정성국 의원이 가상자산 과세 시행일을 기존 2027년 1월 1일에서 2030년 1월 1일로 미루는 소득세법 개정안을 발의한다고 함. • 현행 과세 시작: 2027년 1월 1일 • 유예안: 2030년 1월 1일로 3년 연기 • 현재 기준 연 250만 원 초과 수익에 22% 과세 예정 • 과세 대상은 비트코인·이더리움 등 가상자산 양도·대여 소득 • 국민의힘은 별도로 가상자산 과세 자체를 폐지하는 법안도 추진 중 정 의원은 투자자 보호와 공정한 과세 기반이 충분히 마련된 뒤 시행해야 한다는 입장. 다만 아직 ‘발의’ 단계라 실제 유예 확정 여부는 국회 논의를 더 지켜봐야 함!
최근 국내 거래소 근황 업비트 전년 동기 대비 -75% 빗썸 전년 동기 대비 -95% 코빗 운영자금을 위해 갖고 있던 암호화폐를 판매 (약 120억) 출처
온도파이낸스 창업자 사망 후 경영권 분쟁 소송 온도파이낸스 창업자 네이먼 올먼 사망 후, CEO가 된 드 보드에 대해 경영권 분쟁이 일어나고있네요. 출처
정말 도움을 요청드리고 싶어 이렇게 올립니다. 정말 무거운 마음으로 이 글을 올리게됩니다. 저희 아버지는 대형회사에서 IT담당 임원으로 계십니다. 메모리가격 인상에 따라 계약을 재체결하는 과정에서 높은가격으로 재 계약을 진행하는 과정에서 제대로 이전 계약 마무리가 제대로 되지 못하고 진행이됨과 함께 최종 결재자가 되시면서 감사에서 계속해서 회사에 수백억에 가까운 손해를 입혔다고 압박을 받으시는것 같습니다. 결론이 나지 않았지만 수백억을 추징을 당할 수 있다는 압박감에… 좋지못한 선택을 시도하셨습니다. 혹시 이와관련하여 상담을 할 수 있거나 관련 전문가를 알고 계신분이 있다면 지나치치지마시고 한번만이라도 조언을 주시면 너무나도 감사하겠습니다. 제가 지금 당장 못하더라도 꼭 평생에 걸쳐서라도 보은하겠습니다
가상자산 과세 유예 청원 링크
❤2
[아서 헤이즈, $98.5만 ENA 추가 매수] 비트멕스 공동 설립자 아서 헤이즈(Arthur Hayes)가 방금 1090만 ENA(98.5만 달러)를 추가 매수했다고 룩온체인이 전했다. 그는 지난 5일 간 총 2264만 ENA(200만 달러)를 매수했다. https://coinness.com/news/1164875
업비트(Upbit) 공지 그래비티토큰(GRVT) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2026-08-05 13:42:37
🚨 2027년부터 코인 수익에 세금 22% ① 매매·대여 수익 과세 - 2027년 1월 1일 이후 발생한 가상자산 수익부터 적용 - 연간 순이익에서 250만원 공제 - 초과분에 22% 과세 (소득세 20%＋지방소득세 2%) - 첫 신고는 2028년 5월 ② 코인끼리 교환해도 과세 - BTC→ETH, USDT→알트코인 같은 교환도 매도로 간주 - 원화로 출금하지 않아도 교환 시점의 원화가치로 수익 계산 ③ 기존 보유자는 2026년 말 가격이 중요 - 2027년 이전부터 보유한 코인의 취득가격은 실제 매수가와 2026년 12월 31일 시가 중 높은 금액 적용 - 따라서 2026년 말까지 오른 가격은 상당 부분 과세 대상에서 제외되는 구조 예시: 2027년 순이익 1,000만원이면 1,000만원－250만원에 22% 적용 → 세금 16…
🆘 이거 조심해야할 듯 ㄷㄷㄷ - 불법주차 경고장 차에 부착하는 놈들 있음 - 여기에 나와있는 QR코드 찍으면 악성사이트나 앱으로 들어가짐 - 소위 QR코드 + 피싱 = Q싱 이라고 불리는 신종 사기 유형 - 개인정보 입력 유도 or 휴대전화 해킹하여 금융 정보 빼내는 수법 참고로 식품 포장지에 있는 QR코드도 조심해야 한다고 함. 아무쪼록 일상 여기저기 스캐머들의 흔적들이 있을 수 있으니 항시 주의 필요! (공공장소에서 와이파이도 앵간하면 잡지않는 것 추천 / 우리는 투자자이기도 해서 더욱이 주의가 필요)
👀1
비트도 30% 상한가좀 보여줬으면...
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @c_ryptodiary. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 467,063 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“크립토다이어리” (@c_ryptodiary), 7,777 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/c_ryptodiary.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.