Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

로우나의 투자방

@Rowna999

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13,842subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001363465802
TypeChannel
Username@Rowna999
Created19 May 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Rowna999

Growth

13,83713,87813,857.56 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,876 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,868 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,858 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,853 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,848 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,839 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,837 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,842 subscribers13,8426 August 202614 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 8 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,831–13,884 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:2713,842+5
13 Aug 2026, 01:2513,837-2
12 Aug 2026, 04:4213,839-9
11 Aug 2026, 04:5213,848-5
10 Aug 2026, 03:5113,853-5
8 Aug 2026, 08:4013,858-10
7 Aug 2026, 08:3213,868-8
6 Aug 2026, 06:5113,876-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:3013,878no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:0313,878first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.73%
avg views ÷ 13,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
932
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 39 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held39 (2 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total36,355
Reactions total169
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
30s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

150 reactions across 28 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13288.0%
👍1812.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 169reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
877
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
896
over 38 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 13 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 11:17 UTC287 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔸 KiiChain 바낸 알파 상장 예정 및 매경 인터뷰 며칠전 토큰 세일을 진행했던 KiiChain이 내일 TGE 예정인가 봅니다. 방금 바이빗 현물 상장 공지도 업로드 되었네요 1️⃣ 바이낸스 알파 소식 - $KII 토큰 바이낸스 알파 감지 완료 - 컨트랙트는 0xeec6574eabba52bac3f0277f2cd5ac7e67197886 - 내일 오후 10시 거래가 시작될 것으로 예상 2️⃣ 키체인 CEO 다니엘 아레나스의 매경 인터뷰 - 다니엘 에레나스 키체인 CEO는 매일경제와의 인터뷰를 진행 - 트론이 달러 스테이블코인 테더(USDT)의 핵심 인프라로 거듭난 것처럼 키체인은 달러가 아닌 스테이블코인을 위한 대표 인프라가 될 것이라고 발언 - 키체인을 통해 중남미 외환과 낙후된 금융 체질 개선 예정 토큰 세일에 맞춰서 TGE도

3👍2

13 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC93 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @WeCryptoTogetherVideo

📱 [AMA] Acurast , 핸드폰을 통한 분산 컴퓨팅 네트워크. 이거 가능해? - 일시: 8월 13일 목요일 오후 9시 - 장소: 코인같이투자 트위터 스트리밍 - 손님: Acurast Acurast는 핸드폰을 통한 분산형 네트워크로 현재 279,700 의 핸드폰 구동, 9.19억개 온체인 트랜잭션. 60만 컨트랙트 배포를 통해 영역을 넓히고 있는 DePIN 네트워크입니다. 📨 AMA 기념 이벤트 : Acurast 한국 커뮤니티 ㅣ 대화방 입장 : AMA 공지 게시물 Like RT : AMA 참여 및 인증샷 해당그룹 제출 : 네이버폼 제출 🗳 리워드: 치킨 기프티콘 10명, 만원 기프티콘 50명, 커피 300명 📆 기한: 8월 13일 오후 11시 59분까지 현재 갖춰진 네트워크를 기반으로 peaq와 OKX AI등에 인프라를 제

1

13 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC764 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

☠️ 개노답 김치 게임 코인을 저주한다 이건 제 빗썸 잔고 사진인데요 MBX, XPLA 레전드 손실 보이시나요? 대부분 국내 게이밍 코인들은 사실상 비즈니스를 접었고 그나마 남은 팀물량도 언락에 팔기만 하는 디지털 쓰레기에 불과합니다. 저는 제대로 손절을 못하고 언젠가는 한번 올라가주겠지 하며 홀딩하고 있다가 당했지만 여러분들은 당하지마세요 그냥 한국인이 찍어내는 코인은 0에 수렴한다 생각하고 매도만 하시는게 정신건강에 이롭습니다. 빗썸 정리하다가 손실보고 짜증나서 적어봐요

6

13 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC711 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🍿 Entropy market 찍먹할 예정 어제 오늘 하루종일 Entropy 글이 올라오는데요 애네 파운더랑 팀원들 이력이 상당하고 3달만에 500K $HYPE이랑 14M 규모 투자를 받았기 때문에 핫한 것 같습니다. Tradexyz처럼 하리 위에서 온체인 RWA Perp를 구축할 예정이고 미국 시간 기준으로 8월 19일 정식 런칭 한다네요 초기 유저들 시원하게 챙겨준다고는 하는데 개인적으로는 수수료 녹이면서 토큰만을 위한 파밍보다는 펀비, 갭 양방을 선호하기 때문에 각자 취향에 맞게 접근하시면 좋을 것 같습니다. 무슨 PerpDEX든 첫주에 하는건 대부분 이득이었으니까 적당히 녹여봐도 괜찮을듯하여 개별적으로 코드를 받아왔는데 사용해주시면 감사하겠습니다. 👉 https://entropy.io/?r=rowna

5👍2

13 Aug 2026, 01:03 UTC818 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👋 하닉 불장 모닝 일어나서 하이닉스 가격을 확인해보니 7%나 올랐네요 미장 메모리 주식들도 반등이 쌔던데 하닉도 시동걸고 있는 모습입니다 아주 기분 좋은 아침이네요 GM

4

12 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC855 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔥 KiiChain 퍼블릭 세일 1.6배 초과청약으로 끝 KiiChain이 Sonar를 통해 토큰 세일을 진행했었는데요 모두 완판되었고 1.6배 초과청약으로 마무리 되었다고 합니다. 참여하신분들은 할당 기다리는 중이라네요 한국인들은 참여가 케바케라 안되는 사람 반, 되는 사람 반으로 갈렸는데 저는 안되길래 참여는 못했습니다. 세일 벨류 175M인데 나름 괜찮은 세일 결과를 보여준거보면 잘될 것 같기도 합니다. #Kiichain #KOL

3👍2

12 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC893 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😏 코스피 매수 사이드카 하이닉스와 삼성전자가 8프로 이상 오르면서 매수 사이드카가 발동되었습니다. 본절 근처길래 정리할까 고민하다가 놔뒀는데 올라가서 다행이네요 덕분에 뭔가 점심맛도 더 잘느껴지는거보면 역시 수익이 답이다

7

12 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC979 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

👍 최대이자 8.15% NH농심천심적금 NH농협은행은 8월 15일 창립기념일을 앞두고 8월 11일 NH농심천심예금과 NH농심천심적금을 출시 가입기간 1년, 월 납입한도 최대 30만원, 선착순 1만명까지 가능 기본금리는 연 2.3%, 최고금리는 연 8.15%, 즉 우대금리 최대 5.85%를 적용했을때 8.15%를 받을 수 있음 우대 조건은 다음과 같음 1. 농심천심국민참여단 가입 2. NH올원뱅크에서 농심천심 응원 메시지 작성 3. NH농협카드로 NH싱씽몰 결제 4. 농심천심 특화상품인 올바른이음카드 이용 이런 조건들을 모두 충족하면 최대 5.85%의 우대금리가 더해져 최고 연 8.15%가 적용 물론 이자가 8.15%라고 해서 넣은 돈 전체에 8.15%가 붙는 것은 아님, 적금은 매월 돈을 나눠 넣기 때문에 예금과 이자 계

4

11 Aug 2026, 11:24 UTC896 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

😭 Sonar 오류 때문에 저만 세일 참여 못하나요? multipli 애네도 Sonar 통해서 토큰 세일 한다길래 예전에 파밍했던 지갑들 연결해보니까 모두 부적격으로 뜨네요 보니까 kiichain, multipli 둘다 Sonar 계정이 부적격으로 뜬거보면 뭔가 공통적인 오류가 있나봅니다. 저 같은 경우 메가이더 참여까지는 문제 없었는데 갑자기 이러는거보면 코비 욕을 너무 해서 막은건가 싶기도 하네요 이렇게 Sonar 계정 kyc도 정상인데 오류 생기신분들이 꽤 많은 것 같은데 언제 해결해줄지 모르겠습니다. 아오 일좀해라십새들아

5

11 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC829 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🙈 모든걸 다주는 탈루스 오늘은 탈루스의 $US 토큰 야핑 물량 언락일이었습니다. 저는 3일전부터 받을 물량 헷징숏을 쳐놨는데 결과적으로 성공했네요 보니까 언락 직전 위아래 움직임이 되게 심해서 살짝 걱정을 했는데 언락에 풀리는 물량이 많아서 그런가 급히 올리진 않더라고요 상장 이후 우상향하는 퍼포먼스 보여주는 몇안되는 고마운 프로젝트입니다. 토큰 가격으로 증명하는 탈루스...수이 생태계의 희망으로 인정하겠습니다. 굳

2👍1

10 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC840 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🐱 KiiChain 토큰 세일은 저만 참여 불가 KiiChain 토큰 세일 벨류에이션이 나쁘지 않아보여서 참여해 볼 생각으로 Sonar 계정을 연동해봤는데요 한국은 규제 대상 지역이라 참여 안되는줄 알았더니 저를 포함한 일부만 안되는거라네요 이러면 뭔가 잘될 것 같은 느낌적인 느낌이 드는데 코비 욕해서 그런가 내부적으로 오류가 있는듯 합니다. 그냥 한국 커뮤니티에서 진행하는 이벤트나 계속 참여해봐야겠네요 현재 초대 이벤트와 X 포스팅 이벤트 진행중이니 다들 쌀먹 도전해보시죠!

👍32

10 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC779 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

✅ Konnex 토크노믹스 발표 꽤 오랫동안 테스트넷을 진행중인 Konnex에서 $KNX 토크노믹스를 발표했습니다. 1️⃣ Konnex란? - Konnex는 로봇이 실제 물리적 작업을 수행하고 그 결과를 온체인에서 검증받아 스테이블코인으로 즉시 정산받는 퍼미션리스 Physical AI 마켓플레이스 - 로봇이 신뢰 없이 계약을 체결하고 작업을 경쟁 수주할 수 있으며 AI 기능도 온디맨드로 라이선싱 가능한 구조 - 작업 결과는 Proof-of-Physical-Work(PoPW) 방식으로 검증되는데 GPS 로그, 컴퓨터 비전, IoT 센서 데이터 등을 활용 - 서로 다른 종류의 로봇과 AI도 UTL(Universal Task Language) 기반으로 사람 개입 없이 협업 가능 - 정산은 USDC로 이뤄져 작업 수행부터 검증, 보상까지 온체인

3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @Rowna999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 40,052 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“로우나의 투자방” (@Rowna999), 13,842 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Rowna999.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.