Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 크립토 부엉이🦉

Channel

크립토 부엉이🦉

@CryptoOwlNotice

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,713subscribers

-217 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001646725578
TypeChannel
Username@CryptoOwlNotice
Description둥지 짓는 부엉이 코인에 대한 모든 정보를 다루는 채널입니다 공지방: https://t.me/CryptoOwlNotice 채팅방: https://t.me/CryptoOwlNest 트위터: https://x.com/crypto_owl77 카카오톡:https://open.kakao.com/o/g5QSMgNf Dm: @cryptoowl77
Created12 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/CryptoOwlNotice

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Bounty_ATM/1680731 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC@CryptoOwlNotice/12378 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 08:43 UTC1.0070 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Bounty_ATM5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0068 minutesthis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 202 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,7137,9307,821.56 August 2026 — 7,930 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,927 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,919 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,914 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,916 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,903 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,897 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,887 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,897 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,887 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,877 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,862 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,846 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,842 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,830 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,804 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,800 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,792 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,766 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,763 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,750 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,746 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,747 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,739 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,734 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,725 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,713 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net -217. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,680–7,963 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 07:197,713-12
6 Nov 2026, 00:197,725-9
3 Nov 2026, 01:297,734-5
31 Oct 2026, 01:297,739-8
27 Oct 2026, 19:417,747+1
24 Oct 2026, 16:447,746-4
21 Oct 2026, 13:597,750-13
18 Oct 2026, 12:577,763-3
15 Oct 2026, 05:577,766-26
12 Oct 2026, 01:197,792-8
5 Oct 2026, 17:397,800-4
28 Sept 2026, 11:427,804-26
18 Sept 2026, 10:567,830-12
14 Sept 2026, 02:217,842-4
10 Sept 2026, 14:017,846-16
5 Sept 2026, 15:577,862-15
2 Sept 2026, 02:447,877-10
30 Aug 2026, 11:457,887-10
27 Aug 2026, 19:237,897+10
25 Aug 2026, 03:447,887first reading

Engagement

274 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.39%
avg views ÷ 7,713 subscribers
Avg views / post
339
52 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
52
of 274 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 44 of 52 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held274 (5 August 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total17,619
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 01:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈8,990
Videos
≈409
Links
≈7,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

1,165 reactions across 221 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤78167.0%
👍23520.2%
🔥1079.18%
😈282.40%
🥰50.429%
👏30.258%
🆒20.172%
🐳20.172%
😁10.086%
🫡10.086%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 240 of the 274 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 274 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 52 posts held from the last 30 days (3.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 08:40 UTC63 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @GMBLABSPhoto

https://www.binance.com/en/support/announcement/detail/9ef6e347da924cdc90f53577ab483b1f MEXC 절대 입금, 출금 자제하시길 바랍니다. 멕씨 쪽에서는 뭐 미국 로펌 선임해서 연락한다고 공지 올렸지만 달라지지 않을 확률이 훨씬 높아요(HTX도 푼다더니 막혀있음) 일단 들어가면 나올 거래소가 없으니 들어가지 마시길..

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 07:32 UTC69 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @tlsrltnfPhoto

바낸에서 굿즈준다네요

❤1

10 Nov 2026, 04:53 UTC46 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @shrimp_notice

업비트(Upbit) 공지 [거래] 하이퍼리퀴드(HYPE) 신규 거래지원 안내 (KRW, BTC, USDT 마켓) 2026-11-10 13:50:00

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC232 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

아 ㅈ된거 같은데... 강 38에 털껄

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC240 views2 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

얼어죽지 않기 위해 꿀팁 전수 중

❤2

9 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC129 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @justicekingsmanPhoto

얼마전에 항해사로 근무하는 친구 만나서 커피먹는데 친구가 호르무즈 한번 건너면 월급이 1억을 준다고 해서 에이~ 개구라겠지 했는데 진짜로 1억이라고함 호르무즈 해협이 항로에 포함되어 있으면 기본 월급 10만달러 + 통과한번 할때마다 5만불 줌. 유조선이 대부분이라, 한번갔다오는데 한 4개월 걸린다고 치면 1번 갔다오면 대~강 40~50만불 버는셈. 한국에 장금상선이라는 곳은 호르무즈 몰래 통과 존내하다가 이란 혁명수비대한테 찍혀서 협박도 받았다고함 목숨딱 한번걸고 다녀오면 6억

9 Nov 2026, 08:02 UTC240 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

성수면 가까운데 혼내주러 가야하나.... 같이 갈 공주 찾습니다

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 07:30 UTC239 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

신한은행 연 4% 예금 재출시 신한은행이 지난달 완판된 최고 연 4% 예금을 5,000억원 한도로 다시 팝니다 - 판매 기간: 11월 9일~12월 31일, 한도 소진 시 조기 마감 - 가입 금액: 50만원부터 1인당 2,000만원 - 6개월 기본 연 3.3%, 12개월 기본 연 3.6% - 앱 신규 접속과 급여이체 조건을 채우면 12개월 최고 연 4% 원금 손해 안 보는 예금으로 대동단결! ➡️원문

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 04:34 UTC≈1,440 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

납치 30분 만에 코인 210만달러 탈취 영국 옥스퍼드에서 납치 피해를 본 투자자가 얼굴인증으로 거래소 계정이 털린 과정을 공개함 - 복면 남성 5명이 차량에 침입해 폭행 - 휴대폰 Face ID를 풀어 바이낸스에서 150만달러를 이체 - 게이트 계정의 ETH 약 60만달러도 빼감 - 바이낸스·MEXC 도움으로 약 100만달러를 동결·회수 와 이젠 아예 납치해서 인증으로 풀어버리네 ㄷ ㄷ ➡️원문

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 03:50 UTC249 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

그만 내려가라..... Kda.. 붐은 온다...

❤1

9 Nov 2026, 02:16 UTC236 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026

음.. Ai 반도체를 잘하려면 불륜을 잘 해야하나..

❤1

Showing the 12 most recent of 274 posts we hold for @CryptoOwlNotice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋‍♂️
@coinboys · 15,455
6 posts
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,511
6 posts
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,000
6 posts
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,104
5 posts
나의 문어 선생님 (AI & 마케팅)
@nimdaltg · 557
3 posts
돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 6,201
2 posts
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,455
2 posts
돌비콩의 투자정복
@dolbikong · 9,601
2 posts
Web3 & TCG & AI 막돈방
@lastmoneyalpha · 23,025
2 posts
이도진 메타버스 공지사항 🦅
@leedogin2 · 15,361
2 posts
기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,189
2 posts
㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,408
2 posts
CTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,436
2 posts
윤로그 공지방
@yunlog_official · 10,726
2 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,326
1 post
GMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,161
1 post
하나 중국/신흥국 전략 김경환
@HANAchina · 35,273
1 post
개인적인 DYOR🦅
@LEEHEESANGDYOR · 9,494
1 post
로우나의 투자방
@Rowna999 · 14,222
1 post
조선미래연구소
@cryptobyrdemarty · 452
1 post
💎다이아광산특급열차
@diatrain · 6,115
1 post
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery)
@dogeland01 · 20,918
1 post
도리의 코인메모
@doriworld · 2,166
1 post
⚡️일론머스크 (Elon Musk) x 🇰🇷 Korea | 글로벌 트렌드 분석
@elonmusk_korea · 144
1 post
피린이
@forevernft · 12,088
1 post
코인씨커의 일기장
@honey_box_main · 5,391
1 post
Degen Guy
@justdegenguy · 10,395
1 post
Manbull (구, AI 버블이 온다) 공지방
@justicekingsman · 16,372
1 post
KK Kontemporaries
@kkkontemp · 21,169
1 post
자낳괴 리리의 수금일기
@kuromia_riri · 4,056
1 post
인생코인
@lnsanecoin · 7,940
1 post
마샬 공유방 2.0
@marshallog · 21,370
1 post
Midnight Network 한국 공지 채널
@midnight_kor · 3,286
1 post
머니보틀
@moneybottle · 15,737
1 post
요약하는 고잉
@one_going · 48,209
1 post
새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,330
1 post
StockHub (스톡허브) 뉴스
@stockhubkr · 3,152
1 post
성연이의 바이브
@sy_vibe · 1,609
1 post
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방
@tlsrltnf · 22,355
1 post
업비트 Upbit 공식 텔레그램
@upbit_news · 44,232
1 post
T.A Crypto
@yul_papa · 7,517
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NUMINE official
@numineverse · 23,049
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 13 September 2026
에어드랍ATM
@Bounty_ATM · 25,805
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Units.Network Announcements
@unitsnews · 658,491
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 August 2026
에어드랍코리아 (Airdropkorea)
@airdrop_kor · 21,269
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“크립토 부엉이🦉” (@CryptoOwlNotice), 7,713 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CryptoOwlNotice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.