Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

머니스택 공지방 - Season 1

@money0stack9Notice

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,046subscribers

-22 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001323179502
TypeChannel
Username@money0stack9Notice
Description머니스택 채팅방 : https://t.me/money0stack9chat 머니스택 공지방 : https://t.me/money0stack9Notice 코인웃짤 시즌2 : https://t.me/coinsmileV2 아직 정체성이 없는 채널입니다 언제 소리소문 없이 사라질지 모르겠지만, 가급적 그럴일 없게 열심히 운영해보겠습니다!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/money0stack9Notice

Growth

8,0468,0688,0576 August 2026 — 8,068 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,068 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,067 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,060 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,046 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,043–8,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:028,046-14
9 Aug 2026, 12:318,060-7
6 Aug 2026, 04:208,067-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:048,068no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:038,068first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 8,046 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,200
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.516%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held18 (8 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total30,821
Reactions total154
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,090
Videos
153
Links
1,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

163 reactions across 17 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12375.5%
👍3320.2%
😱42.45%
🤬31.84%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 163reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 05:46 UTC≈4,670 views103 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

안녕하세요, 머니스택입니다. 다름이 아니라 오랜 고민 끝에, 지난주를 끝으로 4년 1개월간 함께 했던 디스프레드를 떠나 새로운 시작을 하기로 결정했습니다. 이유를 풀자면 괜히 길어만 지니 짧게 말하자면, 이쯤이면 한번 스스로 새롭게 달려나갈 목표를 다시 세워야 할 때라고 생각했습니다. 함께 해왔던 지난 4년이 누군가는 짧다고 할 수도 있겠지만, 제게는 막상 초등학교를 제외하면 가장 오래 몸담았던 조직일 만큼 긴 시간이었더라구요 ㅎㅎ 업계 첫 커리어를 이곳에서 시작했는데, 지금 돌아봐도 정말 좋은 결정이었고 배운 것만 가득 안고 나옵니다. 덕분에 좋은 분들도 정말 많이 만날 수 있었습니다. 함께해 주신 수많은 동료들, 응원해주시는 여러분들께 감사한 마음뿐입니다. 저도 정말 가득 애정을 담아 함께 해왔던 소중한 시간이었습니다. 지금은 교토

89👍14

24 Jul 2026, 03:30 UTC≈3,640 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://x.com/MoneyStack9/status/2080495240331596164

👍112

24 Jul 2026, 03:07 UTC≈2,540 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Level of public communication 대중과의 소통 수준 Material or unjustified increases in token supply or changes to tokenomics 토큰 공급량의 부당한 증가나, 토큰 경제 모델의 변경 하인리히의 법칙(Heinrich's Law)은 어떤 대형 사고나 참사가 발생하기 전에 반드시 그와 관련된 경미한 사고와 사소한 징후들이 여러 번 나타난다는 통계적 법칙입니다. '1:29:300의 법칙'이라고도 불립니다. 1:29:300의 의미 미국의 보험회사 감독관이었던 허버트 윌리엄 하인리히(Herbert W. Heinrich)가 7만 5천 건의 산업재해 사례를 분석하여 1931년 저서 《산업재해예방》에서 발표했습니다. 1 (중대재해): 사망자나 중상자가 발생하는 1번의 대형 사

👍6

24 Jul 2026, 03:02 UTC985 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @killberosDAO

Binance , $ACX $LSK $STX 유의 지정 ✅

21 Jul 2026, 14:19 UTC≈1,100 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

상반기 USD1 리캡, 공급량 $5.3B 상반기 공급량 $5.3B을 뚫어내며 $DAI와 영혼의 맞다이를 벌이며, 단기적 수치가 아닌 꾸준히 높은 발행량을 가진 스테이블 코인으로써 거듭나고 있는 USD1입니다. 상반기 성과를 살펴보면 1. UFC 백악관 대회 상금 USD1으로 지급하며 마케팅 2. WLFI 마켓 활성화를 통한 자체 생태계 구축 3. OCC 연방 은행 면허 신청 4. 솔라나 체인 발행량 10억달러 돌파 정도를 예로 들 수 있습니다. 그래도 USD1이 트럼프빨을 가장 많이 받는 코인이라는 가정 아래, 그 권력으로 뭐를 이뤘냐? 라고 물어본다면 저는 1,3번이라고 생각해요. 백악관 UFC 매치는 진짜 트럼프니까 할 수 있는.. 심지어 데이나 화이트가 '이 이벤트 2번은 못한다 돈이 너무 많이 든다' 라고 이례적 인터뷰를 했을만

2

20 Jul 2026, 16:57 UTC≈1,050 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

약스포) 야밤에 나홀로 호프 후기 (줄거리 스포는 없는데, 감상에 큰 방해가 되는 내용) 이거를 스토리로 이해할려고 하면 이딴 괴작이 있다고?? 싶지만 그냥 와 이걸 이렇게 비트네 ㅋㅋ 와 이걸 내가 생각한 그대로 가네 ㅋㅋ 이런 눈으로 보면 그냥 이만한 영화가 없음 내 기준 1분에 한번씩 '와 스토리가 이렇게 흘러간다고..? 와 여기서 이딴 대사를 친다고?' 하는걸 심어주는데 이러는 와중에도 스토리에 몰입하려고 노력하면 도저히 편하게 볼 수 없고, 그냥 아 이런 영화구나 하고 받아들이면 이만한 재미가 없는 작품.. 뭐랄까 영화를 서술의 유기성으로 보는 게 아니라, 그냥 별 이야기를 다하는 하나의 플랫폼으로써 봤던 사람이라면 너무 재밌어 할거 같고, 그거보다는 개연성을 중요하게 보면 재미 없게 볼 것 같다. 거미집이라는 영화 볼때도

6

20 Jul 2026, 02:14 UTC≈1,070 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☠️ 1세대 브릿지 올브릿지 코어 해킹 서클이 통합되기 전, 스택스 생태계 메인 브릿지였던 올브릿지가 해킹당했습니다. 약 1.65M 규모이고, 아직 공식적인 원인 발표는 없는 상황입니다. 만약 서클 통합 안했다면 나도 피해입을 뻔 했던건데..... 하 진짜 크립토 아직도 좋기는 한데 이럴때마다 밉고싫고짜증나고증오하고혐오하고힐난하고비난하고서운하고화가나고열이받고맘이식고그러네... 아!!!!!!!! https://x.com/Allbridge_io/status/2078932561036722319

👍21

18 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,350 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

3/ $100불치 온도 기반 주식을 사면 $10불 준다! 쏘 심플 태스크! 마이이더월렛 웹에 접속(기존 지갑 그대로 사용 가능, 추가 설치 필요 없음)해, 100불 이상의 온도 기반 주식을 사고 14일동안 홀딩하면 $10 USDC를 지급합니다! (일단 지금으로써는 다계도 안막혀있는거 같음..) 직접 해본 결과, 지갑에 돈만 있으면 참여까지 10초 컷이에요. 이외에도 1. 매 시각 정각마다 선착순으로 250불 이상을 스왑한 15명에게 $5 USDC를 주는 이벤트 2. 0.15 ETH 이상을 주식 토큰으로 스왑하고 30일 이상 보유하면 $25를 주는 레이어3 이벤트도 함께 진행중이에요. (현재 1000명중 118명 참여 완료, 아마 하면 무조건 될듯?) 💡 요약 MEW 포트폴리오 접속 후, 0.15 ETH 이상을 정각에 스왑 후 한달 이

3

18 Jul 2026, 07:30 UTC735 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

2/ MEW에서 누가도라와아앗게~ 그랬던 MEW가 돌아왔습니다! MEW는 무려 2015년에 시작한 최초의 이더리움 월렛인만큼, 그 레거시가 확실했고 이대로 역사 속으로 사라지기는 너무 아쉬웠단 말이죠. 그래서 이번에 대대적 개편 + 대규모 리워드 이벤트를 진행합니다. 규모도 꽤나 크고, 참여 조건도 합리적이에요! (다계도 가능한듯 👀) 굳이 지갑을 다시 민다기보다, 내 포지션을 쉽게 볼 수 있는 대시보드처럼 만들어놨어요. 군더더기 없는 느낌? https://app.myetherwallet.com

1

18 Jul 2026, 07:13 UTC726 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1/ 💀 틀주의) 이 UI/UX 아는 사람..? 요즘이야 뭐 OKX니 래비니 편한 월렛이 정말 많이 나왔지만, 옛날옛적 라떼에는 마이이더월렛이라는 지갑이 있었더랍니다. 지갑계의 MC메타 포지션으로, 만들면 JSON 파일도 주고 요즘은 당연히 브라우저 확장자로 지갑이랑 상호작용 할 수 있지만, 나때는 그런것도 없었다~ 이말이야 주로 ICO에 참여할 때 요 지갑을 사용했더랬죠.. 같은 요양원 동지들 있나..

3

17 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC705 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

스타테일도 크립토 카드 출시? 바야흐로 대 크립토 카드의 시대, 소니움 개발사인 스타테일도 카드 출시를 예고했습니다. 요즘 스타테일이 제일 열심히 하는 건 소니움 외에도 JPYSC라고 해서, 렌딩하면서 돈을 벌어오는 엔화 스테이블을 빌딩하고 있습니다. 스테이블 사업하려면 사실 카드만한게 없긴 해서 어쩌면 이쪽 진출은 당연했을지도? 뭐 그건 그거고, 우리 입장에서는 혜택 좋은 카드가 짱이긴해.. 어쨌든 스타테일이 일본 커넥션은 꽉잡고 있으니까, 캐시백 1타까지는 어렵다면 일본 내에서 압도적 혜택 가진 카드로 자리잡으면.. 해볼만한 승부일지도 🤔? 웨이트리스트 받고 있으니, 평소에 일본 좀 가시는 분들은 참고해보세요 🇯🇵 https://app.startale.com/cards

6

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @money0stack9Notice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 176,195 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“머니스택 공지방 - Season 1” (@money0stack9Notice), 8,046 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/money0stack9Notice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.