차가운 자본주의 음악 개추 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w1X5r5hkSdk

Channel
박주혁
@juhyukb
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,552subscribers
-105 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001797237914 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @juhyukb |
| Created | 29 January 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/juhyukb |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Nov 2026, 13:06 | 6,552 | -13 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 23:20 | 6,565 | +1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 6,564 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:46 | 6,568 | -4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:09 | 6,572 | +1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 6,571 | +8 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 6,563 | +9 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 21:55 | 6,554 | +18 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 03:36 | 6,536 | -4 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 07:45 | 6,540 | -15 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 12:29 | 6,555 | -4 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 21:14 | 6,559 | -16 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 15:17 | 6,575 | +15 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 00:01 | 6,560 | -8 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 6,568 | -16 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 6,584 | -10 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:08 | 6,594 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:08 | 6,604 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:03 | 6,605 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 13:23 | 6,607 | first reading |
Engagement
117 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 17.6%
- avg views ÷ 6,552 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,160
- 61 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 61
- of 117 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 117 (2 August 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 70,542 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 30s
- Average length
- 15s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 61 posts held from the last 30 days (3.28%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
옛날 팟캐스트에서 중국한테 GPU 팔면 위험하지 않냐는 질문에 젠슨이 존나 화났던게 자기 여자친구 보호하는 거라서 그랬구나… https://x.com/sjgadler/status/2044552788307529982?a=5UG45LzI77QVBkWFv8E&s=46
: : 마스터링 지캐시 한글 번역본 번역: 캘빈 본 글은 막심 데살(Maxime Desalle)이 작성한 마스터링 지캐시(Mastering Zcash)의 한글 번역본입니다. 비트코인의 프라이버시 문제에서 출발해, 영지식 증명으로 거래 내용을 숨기는 지캐시의 작동 원리, 프로토콜 단계에서의 발전, 양자 저항성과 같은 향후 과제를 차례로 짚으며 지캐시 전반에 대해 다룹니다. 🌎 번역본 (웹사이트) FP Website | Telegram (EN / KR) | X (EN / KR)
오늘의 곡이다 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siO6dkqidc4
나도 스미스 좋아해 when the double decker bus kills the both of us to die by your side is such a heavenly way to die
지금 파라과이 우에노 뱅크?가 좆망해서 존나 폭동 일어나고 난리났짢아요 그래서 이제 검사? 같은 사람들이 대통령 자택까지 털엇나봐요 근데 그 안에서 이스라엘 보안 회사의 생체 데이터랑 홍채 스캐너?가 있었다네요 https://x.com/RT_com/status/2119616128477446150
젠슨황 불륜 = 호르무즈 해협 유조선 타격
사실 대형 호재였떤 것이다
우리 젠슨 황 입장도 생각해봅시다
??: 젠슨 황이 바람 폈대 ??: 비트코인 다 팔아
Video, posted without a caption
중간선거 이후에 보여준 비트코인 멘헤라 움직임에 정신을 잃고야 말았습니다. 지캐시는 매출 따위에 벨류에이션을 의존하지 않기 때문에 상방이 무제한입니다. 우리는 이제부터 민주당 지지자입니다. 유튜브에서 시청하세요
Showing the 12 most recent of 117 posts we hold for @juhyukb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@catallactic · 5,2112 posts직장인투자자A🥇
@jiktooofficial · 1,1352 posts기분좋은 마곤
@magonia_b · 26,1642 posts원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 16,9662 postsTo The Mars🚀
@tothemarsssss · 162 posts슬기로운 HODL생활
@SOLful_hodl_life · 1,7541 post토큰투칸
@TokenTucan · 4291 post토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,0981 post아치 네트워크
@archkorea · 3011 post차분남(차트분석하는남자)
@chavoonnam · 21,0871 post크립토 번역공장
@coinsaywhat · 9,3431 post슈빛랜드-베모닝단
@coinsohard · 7381 postZ's Reading Dump
@cryptoarchive_by_z · 281 post크공집 (크립토로 공덕역에 집사기)
@cryptonyong · 2141 postDaniel Social Club
@danielsocialclub · 4,5211 post돌찬 공지방
@dolchanchain · 5,6431 post도랏맨 - 젠지이즈굿
@doratman18 · 9,4121 post민서 생각
@followminseo · 51 postHybiscus Original 🌺
@hybiscusxyz · 4641 post㈜ 청년열정마라두바이쫀득민트초코손맛푸드
@minchoisfuture · 15,3911 post오렌지 연합 🟧
@orange_alliance · 1,5521 post사카밤바스피스 낙서장
@otakurypto · 5981 post메모장
@qoodong · 31 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@face_east · 3406 postsSteve’s Catallaxy
@catallactic · 5,2114 posts알렉스의 모자이크 🧩
@mosaicalex · 3442 postsFour Pillars Research (KR)
@FourPillarsFP · 3,1161 post폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,4461 postFirst Squawk
@firstsquaw · 3,8461 postCTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,4361 posttradfi
@trad_fin · 11,1341 post빚쟁이는 여의도로
@yeouidobi · 2,0081 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,228
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@blockmedia · 32,899
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@coinkcgchannel · 14,574
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
@murphybus · 19,905
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026
@HS_academy · 36,206
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@seaotterbtc · 29,999
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@toncoin_kr · 22,926
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
@enjoymyhobby · 48,799
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
@emperorcoin · 35,440
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
@dogeland01 · 20,904
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
@coinnesskr · 30,357
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@NewListingsFeed · 59,134
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@twitchoong · 79,159
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
@fireant_crypto · 32,684
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@airdr0p_lab · 20,446
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
@shrimp_notice · 28,311
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
@layergg · 19,277
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 October 2026
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,126
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“박주혁” (@juhyukb), 6,552 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/juhyukb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.