Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,909–31,335 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:38
30,958
-20
16 Sept 2026, 00:00
30,978
+4
14 Sept 2026, 06:20
30,974
-13
12 Sept 2026, 13:17
30,987
-16
10 Sept 2026, 12:40
31,003
-31
7 Sept 2026, 10:37
31,034
-35
4 Sept 2026, 11:38
31,069
-3
2 Sept 2026, 22:04
31,072
-19
1 Sept 2026, 19:03
31,091
+9
31 Aug 2026, 17:43
31,082
-9
30 Aug 2026, 18:58
31,091
-7
29 Aug 2026, 20:44
31,098
-8
28 Aug 2026, 20:53
31,106
-3
26 Aug 2026, 20:33
31,109
-8
25 Aug 2026, 21:46
31,117
-10
24 Aug 2026, 19:32
31,127
+4
23 Aug 2026, 05:37
31,123
+2
21 Aug 2026, 19:34
31,121
-5
20 Aug 2026, 17:37
31,126
-6
19 Aug 2026, 14:45
31,132
first reading
Engagement
1,302 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 79 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.01%
avg views ÷ 30,958 subscribers
Avg views / post
621
546 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.329%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
546
of 1,302 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 360 of 546 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
1,302 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
339,075
Reactions total
783
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 13:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈837
Links
≈222,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,463 reactions across 656 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
895
61.2%
👎
568
38.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 666 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,463 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 15 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
더 강력해진 코인니스, 신규 앱 '코인니스 라이브' 출시!
암호화폐 투자자를 위한 필수 파트너 코인니스가 한 단계 더 업그레이드되었습니다.
지금 신규 앱을 다운로드하고 시장을 선도하는 똑똑한 투자를 시작하세요!
✨ 주요 기능 ✨
📰 24시간 실시간 뉴스
글로벌 거시경제 소식이 실시간 뉴스에 추가됐습니다. 이제 코인니스는 암호화폐 시장을 넘어 주요 거시경제 소식까지 빠르게 전달합니다.
🤖 AI 뉴스 해석
복잡하고 방대한 뉴스 속 핵심 호재와 악재를 AI가 쉽고 명확하게 요약해드립니다.
💬 투자자 최적화 커뮤니티와 코인 라운지
국내 최대 암호화폐 커뮤니티에서 실시간 시장 반응과 관점을 공유하고 새로운 인사이트를 얻어보세요. 코인 라운지가 신설돼 특정 코인에 대한 커뮤니티 반응을 모아볼 수도 있습니다.
🎁 포인트로 쌓이는 활동 리워드
…
더 강력해진 코인니스, 신규 앱 '코인니스 라이브' 출시!
암호화폐 투자자를 위한 필수 파트너 코인니스가 한 단계 더 업그레이드되었습니다.
지금 신규 앱을 다운로드하고 시장을 선도하는 똑똑한 투자를 시작하세요!
✨ 주요 기능 ✨
📰 24시간 실시간 뉴스
글로벌 거시경제 소식이 실시간 뉴스에 추가됐습니다. 이제 코인니스는 암호화폐 시장을 넘어 주요 거시경제 소식까지 빠르게 전달합니다.
🤖 AI 뉴스 해석
복잡하고 방대한 뉴스 속 핵심 호재와 악재를 AI가 쉽고 명확하게 요약해드립니다.
💬 투자자 최적화 커뮤니티와 코인 라운지
국내 최대 암호화폐 커뮤니티에서 실시간 시장 반응과 관점을 공유하고 새로운 인사이트를 얻어보세요. 코인 라운지가 신설돼 특정 코인에 대한 커뮤니티 반응을 모아볼 수도 있습니다.
🎁 포인트로 쌓이는 활동 리워드
…
더 강력해진 코인니스, 신규 앱 '코인니스 라이브' 출시!
암호화폐 투자자를 위한 필수 파트너 코인니스가 한 단계 더 업그레이드되었습니다.
지금 신규 앱을 다운로드하고 시장을 선도하는 똑똑한 투자를 시작하세요!
✨ 주요 기능 ✨
📰 24시간 실시간 뉴스
글로벌 거시경제 소식이 실시간 뉴스에 추가됐습니다. 이제 코인니스는 암호화폐 시장을 넘어 주요 거시경제 소식까지 빠르게 전달합니다.
🤖 AI 뉴스 해석
복잡하고 방대한 뉴스 속 핵심 호재와 악재를 AI가 쉽고 명확하게 요약해드립니다.
💬 투자자 최적화 커뮤니티와 코인 라운지
국내 최대 암호화폐 커뮤니티에서 실시간 시장 반응과 관점을 공유하고 새로운 인사이트를 얻어보세요. 코인 라운지가 신설돼 특정 코인에 대한 커뮤니티 반응을 모아볼 수도 있습니다.
🎁 포인트로 쌓이는 활동 리워드
…
[비트코인 $8만 회복에 낙관론 확산… 투자자 39.2% 상승 전망]
코인니스와 크라토스가 공동 진행하고 있는 주간 국내 투자자 시장 동향 정기 설문조사에 따르면 응답자 39.2%(전주 23.7%)가 다음 주 비트코인이 상승 혹은 급등할 것으로 전망했다. 횡보를 예상한 응답자는 28.2%(전주 33.8%), 하락과 급락을 예상한 응답자는 32.6%(전주 42.5%)를 차지했다. 상승 전망이 뚜렷하게 늘고 하락 전망은 줄었다. 비트코인이 87,000 달러 부근까지 반등한 가운데, 이번 상승세가 어디까지 이어질지 묻는 질문에는 응답자 중 가장 많은 34.6%가 '90,000 달러 부근까지 상승 후 조정'이라고 내다봤다. 이어 30.5%는 '80,000~90,000 달러 박스권 형성', 18.4%는 '100,000 달러 이상까지 상승', 나머지 1…
더 강력해진 코인니스, 신규 앱 '코인니스 라이브' 출시!
암호화폐 투자자를 위한 필수 파트너 코인니스가 한 단계 더 업그레이드되었습니다.
지금 신규 앱을 다운로드하고 시장을 선도하는 똑똑한 투자를 시작하세요!
✨ 주요 기능 ✨
📰 24시간 실시간 뉴스
글로벌 거시경제 소식이 실시간 뉴스에 추가됐습니다. 이제 코인니스는 암호화폐 시장을 넘어 주요 거시경제 소식까지 빠르게 전달합니다.
🤖 AI 뉴스 해석
복잡하고 방대한 뉴스 속 핵심 호재와 악재를 AI가 쉽고 명확하게 요약해드립니다.
💬 투자자 최적화 커뮤니티와 코인 라운지
국내 최대 암호화폐 커뮤니티에서 실시간 시장 반응과 관점을 공유하고 새로운 인사이트를 얻어보세요. 코인 라운지가 신설돼 특정 코인에 대한 커뮤니티 반응을 모아볼 수도 있습니다.
🎁 포인트로 쌓이는 활동 리워드
…
[코인니스 뉴스 제공 시간 안내]
코인니스 실시간 암호화폐 투자 정보는 월요일 아침 7시부터 일요일 0시까지 매일 24시간 제공됩니다. 일요일 0시부터 월요일 아침 7시 사이에는 중대 이슈가 발생할 경우에 한해 투자 정보가 제공됩니다.
※ 코인니스 라이브 앱과 코인니스 웹 서비스의 해외 경제 속보는 지속적으로 제공됩니다.
https://coinness.com/news/1169941
[미중 $300억 관세 인하 합의]
미국과 중국이 각각 300억 달러 규모 상품에 대한 관세를 인하하고, AI 관련 정례 회담을 시작하기로 합의했다고 코인텔레그래프가 전했다. 양국은 AI 관련 사고에 대응하기 위한 핫라인도 개설할 예정이다.
https://coinness.com/news/1169940
[크라켄 모회사 페이워드, 수십억달러 투입해 금융 인프라 기업으로 확장]
크라켄(Kraken) 모회사 페이워드(Payward)가 최근 2년간 수십억달러를 인수·투자에 투입하며 거래소를 넘어 거래·은행·자산운용·기관 서비스를 하나의 금융 인프라로 통합하는 전략을 추진하고 있다고 코인데스크가 전했다. 페이워드는 △크라켄 거래소 △은행 △자산운용 △B2B 인프라 사업 페이워드 서비스 등 4개 축으로 사업을 확대하고 있다. 미국 파생상품 시장 진출을 위해 닌자트레이더를 15억달러에 인수했고, 올해는 파생상품 거래소·청산소 등을 보유한 비트노미얼을 5억5000만달러에 인수했다. 유럽에서도 은행 인수를 추진 중이다. 토큰화 사업에서도 금융기관과 협력을 강화하고 있다. 나스닥은 페이워드에 1억달러를 투자하면서 주식 토큰과 시장감시 기술 협력을 확대했으며,…
[“이번 사이클, 급등 후 고점보다 ‘느린 상승’ 가능성”]
암호화폐 인플루언서이자 전 FTX 커뮤니티 파트너인 벤슨 선이 이번 비트코인 시장 사이클이 2013년과 2017년처럼 단기간 급등 후 뚜렷한 고점을 형성하기보다, 신고가를 점진적으로 경신하는 완만한 강세 흐름을 보일 수 있다고 전망했다. 그는 2021년 이후 비트코인의 주요 매수 주체가 개인에서 상장사·현물 ETF·기업 등 기관으로 이동했다며, 기관은 주로 현물을 매수하고 일부는 델타 뉴트럴 전략을 활용하는 만큼, 과거 대표 지표인 펀딩비와 MVRV Z-Score가 이번 사이클 고점에서도 극단적인 수준까지 상승하지 않을 가능성이 있다고 설명했다. 벤슨 선은 이번 사이클의 고점이 개인투자자 심리의 과열보다는 기관의 추가 자금 유입이 약해지는 시점에서 나타날 가능성이 있다고 봤다.
ht…
👎2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,302 posts we hold for @coinnesskr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@coinnesskr edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 September 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 102 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
블록미디어 @blockmedia · 33,507 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
차분남(차트분석하는남자) @chavoonnam · 21,312 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN @emperorcoin · 37,091 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
불개미 CRYPTO @fireant_crypto · 32,852 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
DeFi 농부 👨🏻🌾 조선생 @BSC_Farmer_KR · 20,670 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 26 September 2026
우리는 트윗충 @twitchoong · 74,854 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
크립토퀀트 알람 @cq_alert_kr · 21,994 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
Creta_official @Creta_world_official · 26,967 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH @BChoSN · 24,973 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방 @shrimp_notice · 28,748 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
마샬 공유방 2.0 @marshallog · 21,798 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
HS아카데미 대표 이효석 @HS_academy · 36,164 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓 @officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,979 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
코인 갤러리(Coin gallery) @dogeland01 · 21,207 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
잼민123🦅 @mujammin123 · 26,052 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
취미생활방📮 @enjoymyhobby · 49,893 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
신기술은 돈이 된다 공지방 @tlsrltnf · 22,804 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
New Listings Feed @NewListingsFeed · 59,209 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦅 @WeCryptoTogether · 48,959 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유 @seaotterbtc · 30,155 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
CryptoQuant @cryptoquant_official · 55,749 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COINNESS News Feed (코인니스)” (@coinnesskr), 30,958 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinnesskr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.