Channel
@coinnesskr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31,202subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001386345244 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coinnesskr |
| Created | 10 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coinnesskr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 31,202 | -6 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 31,208 | -16 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 31,224 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 31,240 | -13 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 31,253 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 31,271 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 31,283 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 31,286 | first reading |
226 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 144 of 226 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 226 (6 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 140,490 |
| Reactions total | 399 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
383 reactions across 133 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 203 | 53.0% | |
| 👎 | 180 | 47.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 144 of the 226 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 399reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 226 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
[시큐리타이즈 상장 후 첫 실적... $2170만 순손실] 토큰화 플랫폼 시큐리타이즈(SECZ)가 상장 후 첫 실적 보고서를 발표, 2분기 2170만 달러 순손실을 기록했다고 전했다. 같은 기간 매출은 1440만 달러로 전년 동기 대비 5% 감소했다. 이는 시장 예상치를 하회한 수치다. 실적 발표 후 SECZ 주가는 시간 외 거래에서 20% 넘게 급락, 사상 최저를 경신했다. https://coinness.com/news/1165421
[미 SEC, 프랭클린템플턴 온체인 정부 MMF 관련 비조치의견서 전달] 프랭클린 템플턴이 미국 증권거래위원회(SEC)로부터 온체인 정부 머니마켓펀드(MMF)와 관련해 비조치의견서(no action letter)를 전달 받았다고 블룸버그 ETF 애널리스트 제임스 세이파트가 전했다. 이는 특정 행위에 대해 법 위반 소지가 있더라도 제시된 조건을 충족하면 SEC가 집행 조치를 권고하지 않겠다고 밝히는 서한이다. 제임스 세이파트는 "프랭클린의 등록 펀드(뮤추얼펀드, ETF 등)가 1940년 증권거래위원회법에 따른 커스터디 규정을 기술적으로 충족하지 못하더라도 온체인 펀드를 보유할 수 있는 길이 열렸다"고 설명했다. https://coinness.com/news/1165420
[스트래티지 "BTC $2.1만까지 하락해도 부채 건전성 문제없어"] 스트래티지가 "비트코인 가격이 2.1만 달러까지 폭락하더라도 기업 발행 부채 및 우선주는 보유 비트코인으로 여전히 뒷받쳐진다"고 전했다. https://coinness.com/news/1165419
👎2👍1
[미 증시 3대 지수 혼조 마감] 미국 증시 3대 지수가 혼조 마감했다. S&P 500: +0.26% 나스닥: +0.54% 다우: -0.04% https://coinness.com/news/1165418
[럼블, 293.14 BTC 보유 중] 럼블(Rumble)이 보고서를 발표, 올해 2분기 비트코인 82.32개를 추가 매수했다고 발표했다. 현재 보유량은 293.14 BTC다. 해당 기업은 비트코인 보유 1년여 만에 처음 보유량을 늘렸다. https://coinness.com/news/1165417
👍2
[콜드카드 해킹 발생 후 장기보유 월렛서 23.3만 BTC 이동] 콜드카드 펌웨어 취약점 공격으로 약 1.3억 달러 규모의 피해가 발생한 가운데, 해킹 발생 이후 23.3만 BTC가 장기보유자(Long-Term Holder) 월렛에서 이동한 것으로 나타났다. 이는 콜드카드 탈취금의 100배가 넘는 규모다. 디크립트는 "해커가 콜드카드를 공격하는 동안, 약 150억 달러 규모의 비트코인이 안전한 곳을 찾아 조용히 이동했다"며 "일부는 골드카드 이용자들이 멀티시그 월렛으로 자금을 이전한 것이었고, 일부는 해킹 사건으로 경각심을 갖게 된 레저(Ledger) 및 트레저(Trezor) 사용자로부터 발생한 것이었다"고 설명했다. https://coinness.com/news/1165416
👎1
[WLFI, 전 코인베이스 임원 영입] 트럼프 일가 디파이 프로젝트 월드리버티파이낸셜(WLFI)이 전 코인베이스 임원 라이언 발란타인(Ryan Ballantyne)을 최고사업책임자(CBO)로 영입했다. 더블록에 따르면 그는 최근까지 코인베이스 인스티튜셔널의 기업 고객 전략 부분을 이끌었으며 향후 WLFI의 글로벌 사업 전략 및 파트너십을 총괄할 예정이다. https://coinness.com/news/1165415
👍1
[나스닥 상장사 트론, 자산 90% 이상 저스트렌드 예치] 나스닥 상장사 트론(TRON)이 자산 90% 이상을 트론 디파이 프로토콜 저스트렌드(JustLend)에 예치해 의존도가 너무 크다고 크립토슬레이트가 지적했다. 2분기 공시 기준 총 자산의 91%(2억3380만 달러)가 TRX, sTRX 형태이고 이중 대부분이 저스트렌드에 예치돼 있다. 저스트렌드 해킹 발생 시 자산 손실 위험이 크다는 지적이다. https://coinness.com/news/1165414
[샘슨 모우 "BIP-110 분란, 비트코인 코어 개발진 반성해야"] 샘슨 모우(Samson Mow) JAN3 CEO는 최근 비트코인 생태계에서 큰 논란을 일으킨 BIP-110에 대해 비트코인 코어 개발진 스스로 불러온 결과라고 비판했다. 유투데이에 따르면 그는 개발진이 스스로 BIP-110 운동을 촉발한 책임을 인정하지 않는다면 이러한 분란은 계속 반복될 것이라며 비트코인 코어 측이 OP_RETURN 기본 정책을 건드리지 않고 1~2년 정도 유예했더라면 이 사태를 충분히 피할 수 있었다고 지적했다. BIP-110은 비트코인 블록체인에 비금융 데이터(오디널스·NFT 등)를 대량 저장하는 행위를 제한하기 위한 제안이다. https://coinness.com/news/1165413
[캐나다 몬트리올은행, XRP ETF 보유 공시] 캐나다 몬트리올은행이 미 증권거래위원회(SEC)에 제출한 최신 13F 분기 보고서를 통해 XRP ETF를 포트폴리오에 보유 중이라고 공시했다고 유투데이가 보도했다. 렉스 오스프리 XRP ETF 323주, 프로쉐어스 XRP ETF 20주를 보유 중이다. https://coinness.com/news/1165412
👍1
[골드만삭스, 비트코인 수익형 ETF 확보...네오스 인수] 골드만삭스가 옵션 기반 ETF 운용사인 네오스(Neos) 인수를 추진하면서 약 10억 달러 규모의 비트코인 수익형 ETF BTCI(NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF)를 확보하게 된다고 블룸버그 ETF 분석가 에릭 발추나스(Eric Balchunas)가 전했다. 발추나스는 "골드만삭스가 몇 달 전 신청했던 비트코인 커버드콜 상품을 왜 출시하지 않았는지 이제야 이해가 된다"고 덧붙였다. 비트코인 하이 인컴 ETF, 부스티드 비트코인 하이 인컴 ETF, 이더리움 하이 인컴 ETF가 골드만삭스에 편입될 예정이다. 인수는 2027년 1분기 완료될 것으로 예상된다. https://coinness.com/news/1165411
👍2
[스케일, AI 트레이딩 샌드박스 '에이전트 핏' 출시] 스케일 랩스(SKALE Labs)가 폴리마켓 구조를 그대로 복제하여 AI 에이전트의 트레이딩 전략을 가상 환경에서 훈련 및 검증할 수 있는 모의 예측시장 '에이전트 핏(Agent Pit)'을 출시했다고 더블록이 보도했다. 폴리마켓의 오더북, 시장 정산 메커니즘, 실시간 이벤트 데이터 피드 등을 미러링하여 서비스를 제공한다. https://coinness.com/news/1165410
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 226 posts we hold for @coinnesskr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 7,897 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COINNESS News Feed (코인니스)” (@coinnesskr), 31,202 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinnesskr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.