Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 97 days, net -609. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,813–21,604 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 21:39
20,904
-14
10 Nov 2026, 01:07
20,918
-9
8 Nov 2026, 15:08
20,927
-7
7 Nov 2026, 06:51
20,934
-12
6 Nov 2026, 08:01
20,946
-12
5 Nov 2026, 07:50
20,958
+1
4 Nov 2026, 08:07
20,957
-7
3 Nov 2026, 04:49
20,964
-7
2 Nov 2026, 05:27
20,971
-2
1 Nov 2026, 06:28
20,973
-13
31 Oct 2026, 06:36
20,986
-12
30 Oct 2026, 10:06
20,998
-9
29 Oct 2026, 07:56
21,007
-9
28 Oct 2026, 04:01
21,016
-9
27 Oct 2026, 06:46
21,025
-11
26 Oct 2026, 04:36
21,036
-2
25 Oct 2026, 03:56
21,038
-2
24 Oct 2026, 02:37
21,040
-4
23 Oct 2026, 01:19
21,044
-18
21 Oct 2026, 22:41
21,062
first reading
Engagement
233 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.48%
avg views ÷ 20,904 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
72 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.167%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
73
of 233 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 72 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
233 (2 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
127,560
Reactions total
185
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 15:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈6,990
Videos
≈161
Links
≈2,730
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
612 reactions across 167 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
296
48.4%
👍
155
25.3%
🔥
46
7.52%
🤯
37
6.05%
👏
31
5.07%
😁
21
3.43%
🐳
9
1.47%
🙏
7
1.14%
💯
6
0.98%
🎉
3
0.49%
🤩
1
0.163%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 233 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 612 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 233 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 73 posts held from the last 30 days (6.85%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
비트코인 공포·탐욕 지수, 다시 공포 구간 진입
✅강세장 초입에서 나타나는 공포는 오히려 기회가 될 수 있다는 분석
🗂비트코인 공포·탐욕 지수 현황
⚫최근 공포·탐욕 지수 25~30 수준까지 하락
⚫2026년 9~10월 탐욕 구간에서 빠르게 공포 구간으로 전환
⚫2025년 강세장에서도 공포와 탐욕 구간이 반복적으로 나타난 모습
⚫2023~2024년 상승 초기에도 단기적인 공포 심리가 발생했으나 이후 비트코인 가격 상승세 지속
⚫현재 비트코인 가격은 약 7만 달러 초반대로, 투자심리 위축이 두드러지는 상황
수익 프로토콜 16곳 경쟁력 지수, 펌프닷펀 76점 1위 하이퍼리퀴드는 FDV 80배에 발목
펌프닷펀(Pump.fun)이 수익을 내는 온체인 프로토콜 16곳을 사업 성과와 토큰 구조로 나눠 평가한 경쟁력 지수에서 76점으로 1위에 올랐다. 연환산 수익은 6억 6,400만 달러, 시가총액은 17억 달러다. 시가총액을 수익으로 나눈 배수는 2.5배로 16개 프로토콜 중 가장 낮았다.
https://www.coinddak.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=9465
Lbank 공식 입장문
X에서 계속 공방하고 싶진 않았지만, 우리 커뮤니티에 실제로 무슨 일이 있었는지 명확히 알려드릴 필요가 있다고 생각했습니다.💛
간단히 말씀드리면:
해당 유저가 이 건에 대해 글을 올리기 전에, 이미 입금한 금액 100%를 출금할 수 있도록 조치했습니다.
많은 분들이 이 유저를 “초보”라고 부르셨는데,
저희 검토 과정에서 확인된 내용 중 하나만 말씀드리면, 같은 계정으로 거의 50대에 가까운 기기에서 거래를 진행한 것으로 확인됐습니다. 더 많은 내용이 있지만 여기서 다 나열하진 않겠습니다.
다른 분들께도 한 말씀 드리면… 대부분 휴대폰 50대씩은 안 가지고 계실 거라 생각합니다.
DOKDO 대회 종료, RISEx 신규 $50,000 트레이딩 대회 개최!
✅총상금 $50,000 USDC + 미스터리 보상이 걸린 새로운 트레이딩 대회 시작!
🗂 RISEx 신규 트레이딩 대회 안내
⚫대회 기간 : 11월 10일 23:00 ~ 12월 8일 23:00 (KST)
⚫총상금 : 50,000 USDC 고정
⚫추가 보상 : Perpkin Pie 미스터리 상금
⚫대회 기간 : 약 4주간 진행
🗂 대회 참여 조건 및 상금 분배
⚫최소 거래량 : $100,000 이상
⚫레버리지 활용 시 약 $10,000 수준의 거래 자본으로도 조건 충족 가능
⚫1위 독식이 아닌 점수 비례 상금 분배 방식
⚫참가 자격을 충족한 트레이더들이 획득 점수에 따라 상금 분배
🔄 RISEx 바로가기
🗄 Comment
최근 Dokdo 대회가 끝난지 얼마…
Showing the 12 most recent of 233 posts we hold for @dogeland01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
갓물주 (코인정보, 돈되는거) @godmulzoo · 22,634 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
크립토퀀트 알람 @cq_alert_kr · 21,587 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
차분남(차트분석하는남자) @chavoonnam · 21,087 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 September 2026
블록미디어 @blockmedia · 32,899 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지) @coinkcgchannel · 15,339 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
우리는 트윗충 @twitchoong · 79,274 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH @BChoSN · 26,326 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 September 2026
해달의 투자 정보 공유 @seaotterbtc · 29,999 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
불개미 CRYPTO @fireant_crypto · 32,703 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
졸업준비위원회🎓 @officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN @emperorcoin · 35,511 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
취미생활방📮 @enjoymyhobby · 48,840 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
COINNESS News Feed (코인니스) @coinnesskr · 30,389 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
새우잡이어선 공지방 @shrimp_notice · 28,311 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Gram 🇰🇷 @toncoin_kr · 22,926 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 September 2026
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“코인 갤러리(Coin gallery)” (@dogeland01), 20,904 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dogeland01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.