✅미국 7월 물가 전년비 3.4% 상승…예상치 동일 미국 7월 물가 전월비 0.1% 상승, 예상치와 동일 미국 7월 근월 물가 전년비 2.5% 상승, 전월비 0.2% 상승, 예상치와 동일
❤4🥰1

Channel
@cryptopandann
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16,594subscribers
+175 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001266542207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cryptopandann |
| Description | 안녕하세요 외노자 팬더입니다 대화방: @cryptopandachat Contact: @icoblog |
| Created | 10 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cryptopandann |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:33 | 16,594 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 16,599 | -21 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:31 | 16,620 | -9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:12 | 16,629 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:56 | 16,630 | -7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 16,637 | -14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:20 | 16,651 | +232 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 16,419 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (30 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,802 |
| Reactions total | 181 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
181 reactions across 32 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 145 | 80.1% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 3.87% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 3.31% | |
| 🤣 | 5 | 2.76% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 2.21% | |
| 🍌 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.66% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 181reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅미국 7월 물가 전년비 3.4% 상승…예상치 동일 미국 7월 물가 전월비 0.1% 상승, 예상치와 동일 미국 7월 근월 물가 전년비 2.5% 상승, 전월비 0.2% 상승, 예상치와 동일
❤4🥰1
본 콘텐츠는 KBW2026 티켓과 할인코드를 협찬받는 Community Program의 일환으로 작성됐습니다. ☑️ KBW2026, 개인적으로 주목하는 연사 5인 올해 KBW2026 연사 라인업이 계속 공개되고 있습니다. 개인적으로 이번 라인업에서 눈에 들어오는 5명을 뽑아보면👇 • Johann Kerbrat — 로빈후드 크립토부문 SVP & GM Robinhood의 크립토 사업 및 글로벌 확장을 이끄는 인물 • Keone Hon — 모나드 Co-Founder & GM 고성능 EVM 체인 Monad의 개발과 생태계 확장을 이끄는 공동창업자 • Guy Young — 에테나 Founder & CEO USDe를 비롯한 스테이블코인 기반 금융 인프라를 구축 중인 Ethena 창업자 • Monica Long — 리플 대표 Ripple의 디지털자산…
❤5😁2
🔠 엑스피어 — 스테이킹 에어드랍 이벤트 엑스피어가 새로운 XP 스테이킹 서비스 유니온 볼트를 런칭했습니다. XP를 스테이킹하고 간단한 미션을 수행하면 총 35만 XP 리워드 (총 800만원 상당)의 상금풀이 주어집니다. 이벤트 일정 - 총 보상 - 기간: 8/12 - 8/25 - 총 리워드: 350,000 XP (800만원 상당) - 최종 스냅샷: 8/25 24:00 - 선착순 및 랭킹에 따라 35만 XP 보상 보상 2종 - 얼리 스테이커: 5,000 XP 이상 스테이킹 → 선착순 200명 → 1 인당 500 XP (총 100,000 XP) -랭킹 보상: 최종 스냅샷 기준 스테이킹 수량 TOP 30 → 총 250,000 XP, 1위 최대 70,000 XP 참여 방법 (상세 가이드) - Xphere Union Vault …
❤3👏3
IPO 앞둔 빗썸 또 ‘출금 지연’…금감원도 살펴본다 - 알트코인 출금 13시간 소요…빗썸 “콜드월렛→핫월렛 시간 소요” - 업계 “출금 문제 반복되면 신뢰 훼손”…2028년 IPO에도 부담 https://www.dt.co.kr/article/12077813
❤3
코빗 운영사, 법인명 '디지털엑스'로 변경 완료 법인명만 변경, 거래소 서비스명 '코빗'은 추후 순차 변경 예정 앱·웹사이트 등 고객 접점 명칭·운영방식 기존과 동일 자산 보관 방식, 개인정보 처리 주체도 변동 없음 https://www.thefairnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=84768
❤5
StripChain x SBI Group
❤5
네이버·두나무 '합병 걸림돌' 해소 네이버와 두나무 합병의 걸림돌 중 하나로 꼽히던 가상자산사업자 대주주 적격성 심사에 예외 규정이 마련됐다. 네이버의 공정거래법 위반 전력이 두나무 대주주 적격성 심사에 미칠 불확실성은 상당 부분 해소됐다는 평가다.
⚡3❤2
구글, 이용자수 네이버 첫 추월 구글이 한국에 딜리버리 앱 내고 OTT내고 새벽배송하면 장악할듯
❤6
Open, 첫 번째 Monad Summit이 열립니다! 10월 6일 싱가포르에서 열리는 Token2049 바로 전에 만나요 🇸🇬 오실 분들은 여기서 신청하세요 자세한 내용은 여기에서 확인하세요: https://open.monad.xyz/
❤4🍌3
[온체인코리아 Night LIVE] 👉 Metaplex AMA Session 🔥 최근 한국 시장에 혜성처럼 등장한 Metaplex! 알고 보니 이전부터 엄청난 내공을 쌓아온 프로젝트였다? 자그마치 1,400만 유저, 10억 개의 온체인 자산을 만든 독보적 스케일. Metaplex Foundation U.S.A. President인 맥과 함께 지금의 Metaplex가 그리고 있는 솔라나 온체인 자산의 미래를 짚어봅니다. 📅 8월 13일(목) 오후 9시 📍 온체인코리아 X Space(링크는 아래) 🎙 게스트: 맥(Mackenzie Hom) - 메타플렉스 재단 미국 대표 🎤 호스트: 유리 × 메도 🎁 푸짐한 이벤트도 함께 진행됩니다. 💎 질문 선정자 보상 - 사전질문 선정자: 1,500 $MPLX × 6명 - 현장질문 선정자: 1,5…
❤6⚡3
[단독] 정성국, 가상자산 과세 유예 법안 발의...2030년 1월로 3년 유예 https://naver.me/50B9TipT
❤6
텔레그램 사칭광고 조심하세요. 제 채널말고도 많은분들 채널로도 나오는거 같은데.. 사칭입니다. 이 텔레채널 말고 하는거 아무것도 없습니다. 앞으로 할 계획 조차 없고요.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @cryptopandann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 177,654 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto 팬더 공지방🦅” (@cryptopandann), 16,594 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopandann.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.