Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Crypto 팬더 공지방🦅

Channel

Crypto 팬더 공지방🦅

@cryptopandann

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,407subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001266542207
TypeChannel
Username@cryptopandann
Description안녕하세요 외노자 팬더입니다 대화방: @cryptopandachat Contact: @icoblog
Created10 August 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held63
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/cryptopandann

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,58216,65115,116.516,4076 August 20269 November 2026
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,122–17,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 23:1516,407-9
8 Nov 2026, 17:5116,416-9
7 Nov 2026, 11:4716,425-2
6 Nov 2026, 10:2116,427-16
5 Nov 2026, 07:0016,443+982
4 Nov 2026, 03:3615,461-100
3 Nov 2026, 02:4115,561+581
2 Nov 2026, 04:4114,980+1,398
1 Nov 2026, 02:4613,582-191
31 Oct 2026, 05:0013,773-711
30 Oct 2026, 08:0614,484-1,577
29 Oct 2026, 07:1616,061+577
28 Oct 2026, 08:2615,484-537
27 Oct 2026, 05:4016,021+465
26 Oct 2026, 04:2115,556+751
25 Oct 2026, 03:0614,805-417
24 Oct 2026, 03:2815,222-141
23 Oct 2026, 02:5815,363-626
22 Oct 2026, 00:2915,989-85
20 Oct 2026, 17:4016,074first reading

Engagement

94 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.73%
avg views ÷ 16,407 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.452%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 94 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held94 (30 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total34,252
Reactions total152
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 06:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈14,500
Videos
≈877
Links
≈14,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

473 reactions across 92 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤39683.7%
⚡122.54%
🌚91.90%
👍81.69%
👏81.69%
🔥61.27%
🍓51.06%
😁51.06%
🤣51.06%
❤‍🔥40.846%
🤡40.846%
🥰40.846%
🍌30.634%
👎30.634%
💯10.211%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 94 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 473 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 94 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (6.45%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 12:38 UTC592 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

바이낸스, iOS 취약점 경고…시드문구·개인키 유출 위험 바이낸스(Binance)는 iOS 26.7.1·27.0.1·27.2에 영향을 미치는 취약점 worse_query로 악성 앱이 다른 앱의 로컬 파일을 읽을 수 있어 시드문구, 개인키, 로그인 인증정보가 위험에 노출될 수 있다고 경고했다. 이는 바이낸스에만 국한되지 않는 iOS 차원의 문제라고 설명했다. 사이드로딩하거나 수동 서명한 IPA 등 신뢰할 수 없는 출처에서 설치한 앱을 삭제하고, iOS와 모든 앱을 최신 공식 버전으로 업데이트할 것을 권고했다.

❤3🔥2

10 Nov 2026, 11:06 UTC583 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @ZetaChainKRANNVideo

30일 후, 프라이빗 AI가 😈 솔라나에 찾아옵니다! 12월 9일, 🔥 ZetaLabs가 정식 출시됩니다. 하나의 채팅창에서 실시간 시장 데이터를 확인하고 주요 AI 모델을 이용할 수 있으며, 이 모든 경험은 ZETA를 기반으로 제공됩니다. 지금 대기자 명단에 등록하세요: labs.zetachain.com

❤3

9 Nov 2026, 06:17 UTC626 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @teamctrineVideo

데이터센터 소음 버지니아주의 경우 데이터센터의 3분의 1이 주거지 바로 옆에다...

❤5

6 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC748 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026

[美 노동부, 퇴직 연금 내 가상자산·사모펀드 편입 완화 최종안 백악관 제출] 미국 퇴직연금(401k)에 비트코인 등 가상자산과 사모펀드(PE), 부동산을 투자 옵션으로 편입할 수 있도록 길을 열어주는 미 노동부(DOL)의 최종 규칙이 백악관 검토 단계에 진입했다.

❤7

6 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC≈2,780 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📕 바이낸스 해킹 후폭풍…고팍스도 해킹 협박에 출금 중단 ✅ 국내 가상자산 거래소 고팍스가 해킹 협박 메일을 받고 긴급 보안 조치에 착수했습니다. 현재까지 실제 자산 피해는 확인되지 않았으며, 이용자 보호를 위해 출금을 일시 중단했습니다. 📂 주요 내용 - 고팍스, 11월 6일 해킹 협박 메일 수신 - 오후 2시 55분부터 가상자산 출금 중단 - 해킹 위험에 대비해 핫월렛 자산 대부분을 콜드월렛으로 이전 - 현재까지 실제 이용자 자산 피해는 없는 것으로 파악 - 고팍스는 바이낸스가 지분 67%를 보유한 국내 거래소 - 지난달 바이낸스 대규모 해킹 이후 계열 거래소 보안 우려 확대

❤3🔥3

5 Nov 2026, 07:10 UTC651 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @GMBLABSPhoto

✅유예도 유예인데, 손실 이월공제 3년 허용도 되게 좋네요 정부는 추가 유예기간 동안 가상자산 투자 손실을 이후 3년간 발생한 이익에서 공제하는 손실 이월공제 도입도 추진할 방침이다. 그간 가상자산 과세제도에서 손실 이월 공제제도는 담겨 있지 않았다. https://n.news.naver.com/mnews/article/032/0003480888?sid=101

❤5

5 Nov 2026, 01:34 UTC619 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

받으라슈) 재정경제부, 가상자산 소득과세 시행 2년 유예 공식 확정

❤5

4 Nov 2026, 17:23 UTC706 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🔥 제타 마이그레이션 12월 9일

👏4❤2

4 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC614 views7 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @coinboysPhoto

KAST CEO, 이메일로 해명문 발송함 KAST CEO가 최근 KPU 전환을 둘러싼 혼란에 대해 직접 설명함. 1. KAST 포인트 → KPU 전환 - 6,250 KAST Points = 1 KPU - 예시: 100,000 Points → 16 KPU - 기존에 예고했던 TGE 대신 KPU 보상 프로그램 운영 2. KPU는 어떤 구조? - KAST 본사가 스톡옵션 120,000개를 별도 법인(SPV)에 배정 - SPV가 해당 옵션을 보유하고 KPU 프로그램을 지원 - KPU 보유자는 KAST 주식이나 옵션을 직접 소유하는 것은 아님 3. 향후 현금 보상 가능성 - 옵션 바이백 등 특정 조건이 충족되면 KPU 보유자에게 지급이 이뤄질 수 있음 - 다만 지급, 환매, 유동성 확보는 보장되지 않음 - KPU의 평가상 가치는 상승하거나 하락…

❤7

4 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTC693 views3 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @insidertrackingPhoto

외신 텔레에서 도는짤. 이란 정권 교체보다 미국 STATE 정권 교체

❤3

3 Nov 2026, 21:53 UTC828 views5 reactionsread 11 November 2026

🇺🇲미국 중간선거 실시간 링크 https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2026-us-election-results 한국 시간 오전 8시부터 개표 시작

❤4⚡1

3 Nov 2026, 00:17 UTC791 views6 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

📕 바이낸스 이어 브라질 최대 거래소도 해킹 의혹…입출금 전면 중단 ✅ 브라질 최대 가상자산 거래소 메르카도 비트코인(Mercado Bitcoin)이 보안 사고로 입출금을 전면 중단했습니다. 의심 거래 규모는 4,000만달러 이상으로 추정되며, 테더도 관련 자금 동결에 나섰습니다. #가상자산거래소 #보안

❤3🌚3

Showing the 12 most recent of 94 posts we hold for @cryptopandann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @cryptopandann as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

새우잡이어선 공지방
@shrimp_notice · 28,330
7 posts
불개미 CRYPTO
@fireant_crypto · 32,703
3 posts
변창호 코인사관학교 BCH
@BChoSN · 26,326
2 posts
돈포하 I Dont focus on hype
@Web3LearningWithInger · 6,201
2 posts
ZetaChain Korean Announcement
@ZetaChainKRANN · 1,346
2 posts
폐지줍기 연구소
@airdr0p_lab · 20,455
2 posts
코백남 공지방
@cobacknamannounce · 17,020
2 posts
업비트 Upbit 공식 텔레그램
@upbit_news · 44,232
2 posts
GMB LABS
@GMBLABS · 11,161
1 post
이니셜 영투한
@Initial02Han · 8,520
1 post
쉬러감청소년
@Iwanttogohome09 · 6,105
1 post
MBM Crypto Insider🦅
@MBMweb3 · 47,101
1 post
AI 피봇 중(강복순)
@VVOON12 · 3,258
1 post
코인같이투자 정보 에어드랍🦋
@WeCryptoTogether · 48,170
1 post
토니의 아무거나 리서치
@amgnresearch · 3,098
1 post
루팡
@bornlupin · 49,242
1 post
흑우냠냠의 냠냠
@c0wfarm · 13,457
1 post
Steve’s Catallaxy
@catallactic · 5,211
1 post
Coinary - 실시간 코인 호재/악재
@coinaryai · 877
1 post
코인소년의 크립토 이야기 🙋‍♂️
@coinboys · 15,455
1 post
크립토메이지
@cryptocurrencymage · 10,104
1 post
도파민 연구소
@dopamineonchain · 5,329
1 post
텔레그램 코인 방,채널 - CEN
@emperorcoin · 35,511
1 post
취미생활방📮
@enjoymyhobby · 48,840
1 post
미국 주식 인사이더 🇺🇸 (US Stocks Insider)
@insidertracking · 74,015
1 post
KDP
@kdp_dao · 5,399
1 post
AI 구독료 벌어야하는 레오
@leo_autotrading · 1,238
1 post
100B
@lfg100b · 882
1 post
🌸Crypto Judy🐰🌸
@lovejudylee · 37,063
1 post
원미닛 크립토 - 코인, 주식, 경제
@nftimagod · 17,003
1 post
머리나빠도 돈버는법
@nojobnoplan · 5,434
1 post
졸업준비위원회🎓
@officialunivercityofcrypto · 22,657
1 post
해달의 투자 정보 공유
@seaotterbtc · 30,000
1 post
CTRINE
@teamctrine · 8,436
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

디지털자산/AI/경제(케이씨지)
@coinkcgchannel · 15,339
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 5 October 2026
Creta_official
@Creta_world_official · 19,323
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Crypto 팬더 공지방🦅” (@cryptopandann), 16,407 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptopandann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.